Warning issued for UK renters who've used deposit scheme
The Guardian reports just four per cent have used the formal dispute resolution process to try to reclaim the money.
One of the reasons why I live in the north of the UK is because of living costs.
Its far much cheaper & comfortable up here than in London.
Its also easier to afford a 15 year mortgage where you pay less than £500 instead £1050 for rent. pic.twitter.com/V9XqVdJO8e — Zimbo_Factual (@fracta70911) July 16, 2025
Dan Wilson Craw of Generation Rent said the system was 'failing renters who are put off from challenging unfair deductions by unclear rules, and threats and delaying tactics from landlords'.
He added: 'Ultimately, that puts millions more in unscrupulous landlords' pockets. The uncertain timescales and unclear rules of the deposit system, as well as obstructiveness and threats from some landlords, mean that accepting unfair deductions to get some cash back quickly can feel like the better option.'
Your landlord must put your deposit in a government-approved tenancy deposit scheme (TDP) if you rent your home on an assured shorthold tenancy that started after 6 April 2007.
'Because challenging deposit deductions is usually worth it, renters put off from doing so are losing hundreds of pounds of their own money,' said Wilson Craw. 'The government's review of deposit protection is an opportunity to build trust in the system so tenants have the confidence to challenge unfair landlord claims.'
Recommended reading:
A Ministry for Housing, Communities and Local Government spokesperson said: 'It is completely unacceptable to unfairly withhold a tenancy deposit, and this government is cracking down on rogue landlords who make tenants' lives a misery.
'Our renters' rights Bill will give councils stronger investigatory powers, for example making it easier to get financial information from landlords suspected of abuses.'
If you do not rent your home on an assured shorthold tenancy, your landlord can accept valuable items (for example a car or watch) as a deposit instead of money.
The items will not be protected by a scheme.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Telegraph
27-07-2025
- Telegraph
The Left has a long history of catastrophic financial errors – Reeves is about to follow suit
Is being Left-wing bad for your finances? Does distrusting markets lead to bad investment decisions? And if so, is this the common thread that brings together the cataclysmic choices of The Guardian, Unite the union, Gordon Brown and Rachel Reeves? The Guardian is owned by the Scott Trust, an endowment now valued at around £1.3bn, whose purpose is to keep the paper going in perpetuity. Much of this money originates from the sale of what started off as a car listings magazine, and then became an online marketplace, Autotrader. The Guardian Media Group sold 49.9pc of Autotrader's parent, Trader Media Group, to private equity firm, Apax, for £675m in 2007 – and the remaining 50.1pc to it for around £700m in 2014. This may at first sound like a brilliant deal. The Guardian's initial decision to invest in Autotrader certainly was a wise one. But the deal looks rather less great if you take a look at Autotrader's current valuation. Apax floated the Auto Trader Group on the London Stock Exchange in 2015 with an initial market capitalisation of around £2bn. It now stands at nearly £7.3bn, and many commentators, including The Telegraph's own Questor column, think the company is still undervalued. It is rather delicious that The Guardian's net zero zealots owe the paper's survival to a site flogging cars – it certainly isn't down to the paper's own profitability. The paper lost nearly £25m in the year to March 2025, and £37m the year before. But just think how much more greenery and tax hiking the paper could push if its endowment was not £1.3bn, but over £7bn. Unite, one of Britain's largest unions with around 1.2 million members and a Labour Party affiliate, has done rather worse with its own assets, as an interim internal report revealed last week. Under its previous general secretary, Len McCluskey – a staunch socialist and champion of Jeremy Corbyn – the union spent over £110m on a hotel and conference centre, the Aloft Birmingham Eastside – but the building is only valued at £35m. The report states that the cost of drilling holes in blockwork walls was estimated at £91,000, but was charged at £1.3m. The union has not submitted a full annual return to the Certification Officer, a legal requirement, since 2020. Unite would perhaps have been better off if it had shunned capitalist enterprise in practice, as well as in theory, and avoided going into business altogether. On a national scale, Gordon Brown's decision as chancellor to reduce the nation's gold holdings was a truly appalling commercial choice. Between 1999 and 2002, the Treasury sold 401 tons of gold, reducing the UK's strategic reserve from 715 tons in 1999 to around 314 tons in 2003. The sale price averaged at $275 per ounce and brought in a total of around $3.5bn (£2.7bn). The gold price, generally quoted in US dollars, now stands at over $3,300 per ounce. The holdings sold by Brown would now be worth over $42bn, or over £31bn – tenfold what Brown brought in.
Daily Mirror
24-07-2025
- Daily Mirror
Renters' deposit scheme 'scandal' exposed as tenants 'lose out on millions'
Private renters in England and Wales are losing out on the potential benefits of £169million in interest on their money protected as deposits, research has found Private renters in England and Wales are losing out on the potential benefits of £169million in interest on their money protected as deposits, research has found. Generation Rent said £5.37billion of renters' deposit money is protected by three government-accredited schemes in England and Wales. The campaign group said millions of pounds worth of interest on renters ' money is not finding its way back to them. It called for deposit money to be pooled and invested, with any returns on it going into a funding pot for tenants. Renters could then access the cash for legal challenges against their landlord, or to help reduce the upfront costs of moving house, such as through deposit guarantee schemes for tenants in financial hardship and facing homelessness. People moving into rental housing often have difficulty raising a deposit in the first place. Polling commissioned by Generation Rent shows 16% had to borrow money to cover the costs of their last move, and 29% had to use savings. Landlords are required to protect deposits in a government-accredited scheme. In England and Wales, the schemes offer landlords two options. Either they can hold onto a tenancy deposit and pay to insure the cash, or place the deposit with a scheme free of charge. In the insurance option, which accounts for £2.9billion of deposits, landlords can keep the interest that builds up on tenants' money, Generation Rent said. The group recommends that insurance-backed deposit protection schemes be discontinued. It is calling for all deposit funds, minus a small portion to pay out successful landlord claims, to be invested in assets. The campaign group's study, which analysed returns in line with the current Bank of England base rate of 4.25%, found that millions could be generated in annual returns. The research took into account that some of the deposit funds would not be able to be invested to ensure cash is available to return deposits back to renters at the end of their tenancy. Dan Wilson-Craw, deputy chief executive at Generation Rent, said: 'Renters face many disadvantages in the housing system. Around half lack savings, making moving home a more painful process than it should be. Limited access to legal support means it is hard to take action if your landlord is failing to keep your home safe. 'So it is a scandal that the billions of pounds of renters' money tied up in deposit schemes is not being used to improve the experience of renting, and in many cases sees landlords and letting agents collecting the interest. With deposit schemes' contracts up for renewal, the government has a golden opportunity to get renters' money working for renters.' An Ministry of Housing, Communities and Local Government spokesman said: 'Our landmark Renters' Rights Bill will level the playing field and give tenants greater security in their homes by banning s21 no fault evictions, empowering tenants to challenge unreasonable rent hikes, and banning unfair bidding wars. "We are currently reviewing the deposit system to ensure it works effectively and identify how we can improve outcomes for tenants.' ::: Opinion surveyed 2,000 UK private renters for Generation Rent between March 31 and April 9.
Glasgow Times
24-07-2025
- Glasgow Times
Warning issued for UK renters who've used deposit scheme
The scheme has allegedly put "millions" into the pockets of landlords. Almost a quarter of tenants have had money withheld unfairly, with 46 per cent of renters said they did not know they could challenge deposit deductions they deemed to be unfair. The Guardian reports just four per cent have used the formal dispute resolution process to try to reclaim the money. One of the reasons why I live in the north of the UK is because of living costs. Its far much cheaper & comfortable up here than in London. Its also easier to afford a 15 year mortgage where you pay less than £500 instead £1050 for rent. — Zimbo_Factual (@fracta70911) July 16, 2025 Dan Wilson Craw of Generation Rent said the system was 'failing renters who are put off from challenging unfair deductions by unclear rules, and threats and delaying tactics from landlords'. He added: 'Ultimately, that puts millions more in unscrupulous landlords' pockets. The uncertain timescales and unclear rules of the deposit system, as well as obstructiveness and threats from some landlords, mean that accepting unfair deductions to get some cash back quickly can feel like the better option.' Your landlord must put your deposit in a government-approved tenancy deposit scheme (TDP) if you rent your home on an assured shorthold tenancy that started after 6 April 2007. 'Because challenging deposit deductions is usually worth it, renters put off from doing so are losing hundreds of pounds of their own money,' said Wilson Craw. 'The government's review of deposit protection is an opportunity to build trust in the system so tenants have the confidence to challenge unfair landlord claims.' Recommended reading: A Ministry for Housing, Communities and Local Government spokesperson said: 'It is completely unacceptable to unfairly withhold a tenancy deposit, and this government is cracking down on rogue landlords who make tenants' lives a misery. 'Our renters' rights Bill will give councils stronger investigatory powers, for example making it easier to get financial information from landlords suspected of abuses.' If you do not rent your home on an assured shorthold tenancy, your landlord can accept valuable items (for example a car or watch) as a deposit instead of money. The items will not be protected by a scheme.
