logo
Serious crime involving children increases in London, report finds

Serious crime involving children increases in London, report finds

BBC News18-06-2025
An increasing proportion of children aged between 10 and 14 years old are suspected of committing violent crime in London, in comparison to other young people, a report has found.According to Met Police figures, 7,512 children aged between 10 and 14 were suspected of violent crime, including knife offences, in 2023, a rise of 38% from 2020.While this is below the 2019 figure, the report highlighted that those aged 10-14 made up a higher percentage of serious offences involving young people in 2023, compared to 2019.Lib Peck, director of London's Violence Reduction Unit (VRU), which commissioned the study, described the findings as "disturbing".
The VRU was set up by London mayor Sadiq Khan in 2019 to try to tackle the underlying causes of violence.The study, put together by crime and justice specialists Crest Advisory, analysed data between 2019 and 2023 to examine the impact and background of crime in London, and provide recommendations on how to respond to it. The figures show that serious offences affecting under 25-year-olds initially fell during the pandemic, but increased in the years after.In 2019, there were 56,734 serious offences involving those aged 24 and under, falling to 37,616 in 2021 and rising to 41,147 by 2023.While in 2019, children aged 10-14 were involved in 15.9% of those offences, this had risen to 18.3% in 2023.In comparison, for those aged 15-18 the proportion fell from 47.8% in 2019 to 43.5% in 2023, and for 19-25s it rose from 36.3% to 38.3% in the same time period.
Ms Peck said the report highlighted the importance of the VRU's work aimed at tackling school absences and exclusions, which were found to be key risk factors in children becoming involved in violence.The study said the number of permanent exclusions in inner London had fallen over five years, while increasing nationally, but the number of suspensions had increased across both inner and outer London. It also said that young people with special educational needs were disproportionately represented in the youth justice system.In 2023, the VRU launched a three year, £3m project involving 70 primary schools across seven boroughs, offering targeted support to improve children's language and communication skills. "It really directly helps support young people to address things like conflict by using words not fists," Ms Peck said.
Manda George, head teacher of Torridon primary in Catford, south-east London, said her school had used the funding to expand its support for children with speech language and communication needs through oracy lessons, as well as teaching children about relationships and conflict resolution. She said teachers were still seeing the impact of the pandemic, which has left an increasing number of young children struggling with language skills."We can see straight away in nursery if a child needs something extra in terms of language and communication, and similarly a child with being able to talk about their emotions, or how they're feeling, as opposed to hitting out or lashing out."Now in the second year of the programme, Ms George said the school had seen a huge improvement in behaviour. "If children are able to resolve that conflict before they get angry, before they get upset, then it doesn't escalate to a point where we are having to intervene with things like suspensions and exclusions."
Sai Satyadeva, Torridon primary school's inclusion leader, said it was easy for children to become "lost or labelled" in secondary school and then disengage. She said since the expansion of the oracy programme pupils were "better able to advocate for themselves" and were showing improvements in their behaviour and forming better relationships with their peers.
When we visited the school, some of the older children were discussing a book they'd been reading, using a technique called Rally Robin, which Ms Satyadeva explained encouraged them to take turns, without one person dominating the conversation.The children picked up from each other using phrases such as "I would like to build on" or "I would like to challenge" the ideas put forward by their classmates. Ten-year-old Ashton said it gave them the ability to disagree with each other "but not in a rude way. We don't say, you're not correct, or shout out". He told me his friends now used a similar technique in the playground to decide which games to play."If one person says how they feel, then the other person says how they feel, then you can figure out a way to resolve the argument," added his classmate, Madison, aged 10. Eleven-year-old Isla said she liked this as it helped her to "see the other people's point of view"."If you're in a large disagreement, we don't want it to get really physical" explained 10-year-old Ethan. "We talk about our feelings."
Ms Peck insisted the results within the schools the VRU had been working with had been "remarkable". "Ninety-six percent of young people who have got involved in these type of lessons narrowed the gap between their peers, and 81% narrowed it by more then 50%," she said.But it will be some time before it's possible to evaluate whether such a programme can help lower the number of young people being stabbed on London's streets. The report points out that, as the VRU was only created five years ago, it is difficult to measure how successful its public health approach has been, while the impact of the Covid-19 pandemic had made it "difficult to see key trends in crime data".
"I think we do have to acknowledge that last year, for the first time, we had the lowest level of murders for under 25 [year olds] for 23 years," Ms Peck said, when asked about the figures in the report.However, she added that it "doesn't breed any complacency."It's something Londoners are concerned about, absolutely rightly so, and we see far too may young people get caught up in violence." The report also recommended that the VRU should commission research into the exposure of children to online harm, including social media, as well as harmful relationships with peers and adults.It follows the release of hit Netflix series Adolescence earlier this year which sparked a national conversation about the impact of social media on young people."It's important that we understand what is going on the virtual space and how that relates to physical violence," said Ms Peck.
The Metropolitan Police commissioner has repeatedly warned that knife crime could rise in London without more funding from the government, although following last week's Spending Review, the chancellor said she was confident that pledges on cutting crime and increasing police numbers can be kept."Everybody wants to feel safer," Ms Peck said, when asked if she was concerned about Sir Mark Rowley's comments. "What we need to be doing is really investing in that prevention that stops young people getting engaged [in crime] and being exploited in the first place."
But won't some people be sceptical about the link between funding oracy programmes for young children and preventing a young teenager from picking up a knife? "I can appreciate that," said Ms Peck, "but it's entirely logical. We know the safest place for children is in school."One of the key factors of a young person being excluded, or being suspended, is very often because they're unable to articulate themselves very well, and that turns into bad behaviour."
Head teacher Manda George told me she can "absolutely" see the link between supporting speech and language skills for very young children and preventing older ones becoming involved in violence. "The earlier we can support children the better. By the time they're in secondary school it's too late."
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Driver who crashed into primary school killing two eight-year-old girls could face criminal charges two years on - after new witnesses come forward
Driver who crashed into primary school killing two eight-year-old girls could face criminal charges two years on - after new witnesses come forward

Daily Mail​

time29 minutes ago

  • Daily Mail​

Driver who crashed into primary school killing two eight-year-old girls could face criminal charges two years on - after new witnesses come forward

A woman driver who crashed into a school killing two eight-year-old girls could face criminal charges, two years on – as significant new witnesses have come forward. Police are preparing a file of evidence for prosecutors to consider charges against Claire Freemantle, 48, who had avoided prosecution after saying she had suffered her first ever epileptic seizure at the wheel. The development comes on the second anniversary of Nuria Sajjad and Selena Lau dying after the Land Rover Defender veered off the road and smashed through a fence into The Study Prep School in Wimbledon, south-west London, as children and staff were enjoying an end-of-term tea party. Nine children and three adults were also seriously injured in the crash on the morning of July 6, 2023. Today, the grieving families and community are holding a memorial event to commemorate the girls. In a poignant reminder, Nuria and Selena's classmates marked the end of their time at the prep school on Friday before moving on to secondary education. Ms Freemantle was arrested at the scene and investigated by police. But prosecutors decided not to bring any criminal charges in June 2024 after Ms Freemantle said she had suffered an epileptic seizure. In October, the Mail revealed Met Police had decided to reopen the probe after a serious case review uncovered significant flaws in the way officers conducted the initial inquiry, including consideration of medical evidence which led to the case being dropped. One of the key issues in the original investigation was the diagnosis of epilepsy, which is notoriously difficult to detect without brain scans shortly after a seizure, and a detailed consideration of a patient's medical history. The review is also understood to have been critical of missed opportunities by the original investigation team in the Road Traffic Collisions Unit who failed to interview key witnesses at the scene about the driver's behaviour in the immediate aftermath. The case was subsequently reopened and handed to a top detective superintendent from Specialist Crime Command. Police then made a successful appeal for people who witnessed the crash to come forward to help officers understand whether the driver's behaviour was consistent with her diagnosis. In January, Ms Freemantle was rearrested on suspicion of causing death by dangerous driving. She remains on bail. The bereaved families welcomed the case being reopened 'into the death of our beautiful girls and the harm caused to those injured and who witnessed the tragedy'. Ms Freemantle has said she had no recollection of what happened after losing consciousness. She said last year: 'Since I became aware of the terrible event that took place on July 6, the devastating consequences for all those affected have not left my thoughts and will be with me for the rest of my life. 'I have since been diagnosed as having suffered an epileptic seizure with loss of consciousness. 'This was not a pre-existing condition,' she added. 'As a result of losing consciousness, I have no recollection of what took place.' Met Police said: 'Our thoughts are with Nuria and Selena's loved ones at this time.

Will the French keep slashing boats of people smugglers? Non! Starmer left ‘humiliated' after continental cops revealed that they will not routinely use tactic to stop people smugglers
Will the French keep slashing boats of people smugglers? Non! Starmer left ‘humiliated' after continental cops revealed that they will not routinely use tactic to stop people smugglers

Daily Mail​

time41 minutes ago

  • Daily Mail​

Will the French keep slashing boats of people smugglers? Non! Starmer left ‘humiliated' after continental cops revealed that they will not routinely use tactic to stop people smugglers

SIr Keir Starmer was left 'humiliated' after French police revealed that they will not routinely slash the boats of people smugglers as they set off to cross Channel. Only two days ago, No 10 hailed footage showing French officers ripping open a dinghy in shallow waters as a 'significant moment' in the bid to smash the people-smuggling gangs. But last night a senior source working for the Gendarme unit responsible – the Compagnie de Marche – made clear it would 'by no means' be a regular tactic. The source told The Mail on Sunday: 'The slashing of boats will not become routine.' He added: 'It was a pragmatic move ultimately aimed at saving lives. We saw the boat was dangerously overcrowded and liable to sink, and so took the decision to rescue everybody on board. 'This is exactly what happened – nobody was hurt, and the very dangerous boat was confiscated. 'This was by no means a change in tactics.' Embarrassingly for the Prime Minister, it comes just days before French president Emmanuel Macron arrives in the UK for a state visit. Cops were shown slashing the dinghy with knives in their latest attempt to foil migrants and refugees from making the perilous crossing Only yesterday the PM spoke to Mr Macron and raised hopes of making 'good progress' on migration and other priorities. Last night the Tories seized on what they saw as Downing Street's discomfort. Shadow Home Secretary Chris Philp said: 'Only two days ago, No 10 was claiming this as a huge victory. But now they have been humiliated as the new tactic turned out to be a one-off.' He added: 'The French appear to have no intention of routinely stopping these boats despite being paid nearly half a billion pounds of British taxpayers' money. 'Illegal migration continues to flood into the UK, but Labour has lost control of our borders and has no answers.' On Friday, No 10 welcomed video footage showing a French 'gendarme' destroying an inflatable dinghy off a beach south of Boulogne-sur-Mer. The flimsy craft was packed with migrants, who were forced to abandon their crossing as it collapsed into the water. Downing Street said that it was a 'significant moment' that could have 'a major impact on shutting down the tactics these gangs use'. However, unlike regular police in France, gendarmes are military personnel known for more robust tactics than their counterparts in other law and order units. And a National Police spokesman said that regular officers would 'continue to follow strict rules that bar them from going into the sea' in case they put lives at risk. It follows police trade unionists arguing that interfering with UK-bound migrants in the English Channel could 'lead to more deaths.' A senior source at Alliance – the largest police union in the country – said: 'If there are 80 people on an overcrowded boat, including women and children, then it is extremely dangerous to try to stop them. 'People can fall in the water, while others resist arrest – the potential for disaster, including further deaths, is immense. 'Turning us into sea police in this manner is not the way forward.' It comes as more than 500 people arrived in the UK after crossing the Channel on Friday. Some 517 people came on eight boats, taking the annual total to 21,117, according to news agency PA. There have been 17 deaths in 2025 alone on the cross-Channel migration route, mainly because of flimsy dinghies overturning or deflating, often very close to the shore. Procedural changes now being considered in France will instead focus on the use of patrol boats at sea to intercept so-called 'taxi-boats'. These are the people-smuggling boats that enter the sea empty from inland waterways and attempt to pick up migrants from the beach. A French interior ministry source told The MoS: 'Preventing a taxi boat with one or two people smugglers on board from picking up scores of migrants will be much safer than approaching a boat that is already overcrowded.' Last night a Home Office source said: 'We obviously welcome any action French counterparts are able to do. We want to see an end to these dangerous channel crossing. 'These criminal gangs packing more people into boats are a total disgrace.'

Wife of crime boss ‘Hotdog' to ‘live in tent' when illegal scrap yard is shut down as she's kicked out of 8-bed home
Wife of crime boss ‘Hotdog' to ‘live in tent' when illegal scrap yard is shut down as she's kicked out of 8-bed home

The Sun

timean hour ago

  • The Sun

Wife of crime boss ‘Hotdog' to ‘live in tent' when illegal scrap yard is shut down as she's kicked out of 8-bed home

THE wife of a crime boss has claimed she may have to live in a tent when she is evicted by authorities next week. Mary Smith, 48, and her husband Tommy 'Hotdog' Smith will be imminently booted from their eight bedroom detached house in Great Harwood, Lancashire. 2 2 The couple's site is also stacked with static caravans and stables for dozens of horses. Those occupying the land will be evicted after a court order was issued by Judge Guy Mathieson following a spate of criminality, including illegal waste collection and fires. In May, firefighters spent several days putting out raging fires outside the illegal scrapyard after illegal waste was dumped in the area. And following reports of a disturbance at the site on Bonfire Night in November, cops were attacked with fireworks as they attempted to defuse the issue. Mrs Smith's lawyers accepted the justification for the order, but argued the welfare of the couple's children and animal should be highlighted and argued for partial closure. This was swiftly rejected by Judge Mathieson. Mrs Smith alleged that tenants she had previously evicted were responsible for the fires and that she had no affiliation with them after Mr Smith was jailed seven years ago. Mrs Smith replied: "Me and my daughter Indiana have bought a tent, a two man tent. That is all." The judge asked: "You have a £1.4 million turnover and you are going to live in a tent?" Mrs Smith replied: "I don't know what you are talking about. I don't own any business. Sir, I think you have got it wrong. "My husband has been in jail for the past seven years, I haven't had any business for at least six years. "At the moment sir, I have had to sign on benefits." Mark Chester, representing Lancashire Constabulary, said there was a 'staggering' list of previous enforcement action going back 'years' to tackle issues on the site. He said: "None of these measures have had the necessary effect and what is very clear is that as soon as these orders lapse, the lucrative business of waste management continues. "This has been years of misery being heaped on local residents." He added that neighbours were unable to open their windows due to "putrid smells" coming from the site, with some suffering breathing difficulties. Judge Mathieson granted a full closure order meaning more than 100 officials from the police, council, RSPCA and Environment Agency will move in to secure the site and prevent occupants from access. He said: "The fact is, the occupants of this site have done nothing to address the reasons behind the closure order. They have, either directly or indirectly by letting their tenants, continue to commit nuisance and continue to operate a highly profitable business. "The only way to ensure the cessation of this is to grant a full closure order."

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store