logo
'You Generally Get A Lower Return With A Guaranteed Investment Certificate In Comparison To A Bond' – Suze Orman Shares Her Preference

'You Generally Get A Lower Return With A Guaranteed Investment Certificate In Comparison To A Bond' – Suze Orman Shares Her Preference

Yahoo23-06-2025
When it comes to investing for income in retirement, many people are looking for safety. That often leads them to consider low-risk options like bonds or Guaranteed Investment Certificates — GICs. But according to Suze Orman, personal finance expert and host of the "Women & Money" podcast, not all fixed-income investments offer the same benefits.
In a recent episode, Orman shared why she prefers bonds over GICs — and what investors, especially those approaching or in retirement, should understand before choosing between the two.
Don't Miss:
Maker of the $60,000 foldable home has 3 factory buildings, 600+ houses built, and big plans to solve housing —
Peter Thiel turned $1,700 into $5 billion—now accredited investors are eyeing this software company with similar breakout potential. Learn how you can
A GIC is a savings product commonly offered by Canadian banks and financial institutions, which are available in the U.S as well. When you invest in a GIC, you're lending the bank your money for a set period — often one to five years. In return, you're promised a guaranteed interest rate and the full return of your original investment when the term ends.
"You're essentially lending a bank or a financial institution money for a fixed period of time," Orman explained. The appeal is the safety. GICs are low-risk, and in Canada, they're generally insured up to $100,000.
But that safety comes at a cost.
Orman didn't mince words about the downside. "You generally get a lower return in comparison to a bond," she said. While the return is guaranteed, it's often less than what you could earn with other fixed-income investments.
Trending: Maximize saving for your retirement and cut down on taxes: .
Another limitation is liquidity. Most GICs lock in your funds until the end of the term. If you need to access your money early, you may face penalties or restrictions.
"You usually don't get your interest rate until it matures," Orman said. "It's not like a bond that if interest rates go down, the value of the bond goes up, that you can easily cash out of."
Orman prefers bonds for one key reason: flexibility. "You can buy and sell them any time you want," she said. Bonds may also offer higher interest rates than GICs, depending on market conditions and the type of bond.
And there's potential for added value. If the value of the bond increases, investors could potentially sell the bond at a profit before maturity.
However, it's worth noting that bonds do carry some risk. Their value can fluctuate with interest rate changes, and unlike GICs, they're not insured.Ultimately, Orman acknowledged that the right choice depends on your goals. "If you like that your principal is protected, you like the guaranteed return... then just stick with your GICs," she said.
For investors who prioritize security over growth, GICs might still be a solid choice. But for those looking for more flexibility and potentially higher returns, bonds could be worth a closer look.
As always, it's a good idea to speak with a financial advisor before making changes to your portfolio — especially when planning for retirement income.
Read Next:
Image: Shutterstock
UNLOCKED: 5 NEW TRADES EVERY WEEK. Click now to get top trade ideas daily, plus unlimited access to cutting-edge tools and strategies to gain an edge in the markets.
Get the latest stock analysis from Benzinga?
APPLE (AAPL): Free Stock Analysis Report
TESLA (TSLA): Free Stock Analysis Report
This article 'You Generally Get A Lower Return With A Guaranteed Investment Certificate In Comparison To A Bond' – Suze Orman Shares Her Preference originally appeared on Benzinga.com
© 2025 Benzinga.com. Benzinga does not provide investment advice. All rights reserved.
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

These 2 Indicators Suggest Bitcoin Could Soon Double
These 2 Indicators Suggest Bitcoin Could Soon Double

Yahoo

time2 hours ago

  • Yahoo

These 2 Indicators Suggest Bitcoin Could Soon Double

Key Points Bitcoin's price doesn't move in a vacuum. The global money supply is a key driver of its growth or lack thereof. The strength of the U.S. dollar is also a very important factor to consider. 10 stocks we like better than Bitcoin › Markets are full of complicated gauges, but sometimes the simplest ones deliver the cleanest signal. Right now, the U.S. Dollar Index (DXY) is sliding while the global M2 money supply is swelling, and those two shifts have historically been rocket fuel for crypto assets, particularly Bitcoin (CRYPTO: BTC). At roughly $118,000 per coin, up about 29% so far this year, Bitcoin sits at an inflection point where fresh liquidity and a softer dollar could converge into a powerful updraft, doubling it from here. Understanding these two indicators is key to predicting what might happen next. As the dollar sags, Bitcoin runs Across Bitcoin's 16-year history, pronounced dollar weakness has usually coincided with strong upside for the coin. As fate would have it, the DXY -- which measures the value of the U.S. dollar against a basket of foreign currencies -- recently printed its deepest dive below its 200-day moving average in 21 years, precisely as Bitcoin is climbing to touch its all-time highs. In every major crypto bull cycle, like 2013, 2017, and 2021, a falling value of DXY preceded or paralleled Bitcoin's advance. The mechanism is straightforward. As the greenback loses purchasing power, investors hunt for scarce, nonsovereign assets that can hold value across borders, like gold (which is at a high-water mark as well) and like Bitcoin. Dollar softness may not be transitory this time around. There could be a couple of interest rate cuts by the Federal Reserve before the end of 2025, signaling easier monetary policy ahead. A cheaper dollar, combined with a shrinking pool of newly minted Bitcoin courtesy of its halving in 2024, will tighten the supply-and-demand vise in favor of Bitcoin holders even further. Still, correlation is not destiny. During prior pivots to risk-off periods, both Bitcoin and the dollar have fallen together. However, short-term dislocations aside, a persistently weaker DXY tilts the long-term odds toward higher Bitcoin prices. The global money supply is expanding again While the dollar stumbles, the total pool of money sloshing around the world just hit an all-time high. The global M2 money supply indicator, which counts cash plus liquid deposits across the 21 largest central banks, climbed to $55.5 trillion in July, reclaiming the growth trend that paused in 2023. That matters because Bitcoin historically tracks M2 growth with a loose but meaningful correlation. When liquidity accelerates, investors have more capital to deploy into scarce assets, and Bitcoin's hard cap of 21 million coins makes it an obvious candidate on that front. Central banks are also greasing the wheels here. India's Reserve Bank has already slashed its repo rate and cut its reserve requirements to inject cash into markets. China's central bank has committed to a fairly loose stance, preparing further liquidity injections to shore up demand domestically. Those moves echo shifts at other major central banks and point to a broad, synchronized easing cycle which will send the money supply even higher. Assuming Bitcoin simply maintains its historical elasticity to rising liquidity, a 1% jump in global M2 growth has often translated into 65% or higher returns for the coin within the following 12 to 18 months. Starting from today's $118,000 price tag, even a conservative reading of that relationship suggests a doubling toward $240,000 is thus feasible on the basis of the M2's recent expansion, though not guaranteed. What investors should consider The past can't predict the future, and while I'm optimistic about these money moves pushing Bitcoin drastically higher, investors should remember that more money supply can stoke inflation, prompt surprise rate hikes, or flow into entirely different asset classes. Still, with the dollar on the back foot and central banks printing money again, Bitcoin looks unusually well positioned, and it could well double from here. Should you invest $1,000 in Bitcoin right now? Before you buy stock in Bitcoin, consider this: The Motley Fool Stock Advisor analyst team just identified what they believe are the for investors to buy now… and Bitcoin wasn't one of them. The 10 stocks that made the cut could produce monster returns in the coming years. Consider when Netflix made this list on December 17, 2004... if you invested $1,000 at the time of our recommendation, you'd have $624,823!* Or when Nvidia made this list on April 15, 2005... if you invested $1,000 at the time of our recommendation, you'd have $1,064,820!* Now, it's worth noting Stock Advisor's total average return is 1,019% — a market-crushing outperformance compared to 178% for the S&P 500. Don't miss out on the latest top 10 list, available when you join Stock Advisor. See the 10 stocks » *Stock Advisor returns as of July 29, 2025 Alex Carchidi has positions in Bitcoin. The Motley Fool has positions in and recommends Bitcoin. The Motley Fool has a disclosure policy. These 2 Indicators Suggest Bitcoin Could Soon Double was originally published by The Motley Fool

Donald Trump's next target could be deal that shields most Canadian imports from tariffs, experts warn
Donald Trump's next target could be deal that shields most Canadian imports from tariffs, experts warn

Hamilton Spectator

time2 hours ago

  • Hamilton Spectator

Donald Trump's next target could be deal that shields most Canadian imports from tariffs, experts warn

Canada's biggest shield against U.S. tariffs is still intact after Donald Trump's latest trade deadline, but that could change by next year, experts warn, as Prime Minister Mark Carney prepares for a new round of talks with the mercurial American president. While Trump raised the tariff on Canadian goods to 35 per cent in an executive order Thursday night, an exemption for goods which comply with the Canada-U.S.-Mexico Agreement (CUSMA) was maintained. The order was signed after Ottawa and Washington failed to reach an economic and security deal. That means, most economists agree, that roughly 90 per cent of Canadian exports will still enter the U.S. tariff-free. But, warned BMO chief economist Douglas Porter, that agreement is up for renegotiation in 2026. 'Even though we're in a relatively good spot right now, I don't think that should give us much confidence in the longer term,' Porter said Friday. With CUSMA-compliant goods facing no tariffs, and sector-specific tariffs of 50 per cent on steel and aluminum, Canadian goods currently face an average tariff in the low single digits. But that could easily change when the agreement is renegotiated, Porter added. The fact that Canadian negotiators weren't able to get any agreement lowering the 35 per cent tariff — or cutting sector-specific tariffs — ahead of Trump's Aug. 1 deadline isn't exactly reassuring either, Porter said. 'It really does raise some questions over how smoothly the renegotiation of (CUSMA) is going to go,' said Porter. 'We're going to come into it with the U.S. holding this 35 per cent over our head.' Shortly after midnight on Thursday, just after the hike came into effect, Carney said he was 'disappointed' by Trump's decision, after Canadian officials spent several days this week hunkered down in Washington meeting with U.S. Commerce Secretary Howard Lutnick and representatives of Senate Republicans. 'We remain committed to CUSMA, which is the world's second-largest free trade agreement by trading volume,' Carney's statement read. 'Other sectors of our economy — including lumber, steel, aluminum, and automobiles — are, however, heavily impacted by U.S. duties and tariffs. For such sectors, the Canadian government will act to protect Canadian jobs, invest in our industrial competitiveness, buy Canadian and diversify our export markets.' Dominic LeBlanc, Carney's point-person on Canada-U.S. trade, told Radio-Canada's 'Midi info' that Canadian officials have always maintained that they 'wouldn't accept just any agreement.' 'We'd accept an agreement that was in the interests of workers, of the Canadian economy, and at the end of the day yesterday that agreement wasn't in sight,' LeBlanc said Friday, as he was set to leave Washington after meeting with Lutnick on Thursday. The head of the association representing small businesses said Canada avoided the worst-case scenario this week by keeping CUSMA-compliant goods tariff-free, but said the country is not out of the woods yet. In next year's renegotiation, the U.S. could give preferential status to goods which comply with CUSMA — but that doesn't mean they'd still be duty free, warned Dan Kelly, CEO of the Canadian Federation of Independent Business. 'That's absolutely one of the prospects I fear,' said Kelly of the idea that U.S. negotiators would try to put tariffs on CUSMA-compliant goods. 'There's also nothing stopping him from pulling out of CUSMA altogether. That would be the nuclear scenario.' A senior official with the Canadian Chamber of Commerce also said Canadian businesses need to be wary of the CUSMA revamp, and any lingering uncertainty until it's completed. 'The review could start Monday,' said Matthew Holmes, the chamber's head of public policy. 'But we're going to be talking about CUSMA until 2026, and that's the third act of this play.' At the moment, Holmes estimated, Canadian exports to the U.S. face an average tariff of anywhere from 2.9 to five per cent, which still gives this country the best treatment of any American trading partner. Still, Holmes isn't under any illusion that that low rate will continue — even if Canada's access remains better than most. 'I think it's reasonable to expect they come to the table with a baseline tariff,' Holmes said of U.S. negotiators. 'If they establish a floor of 15 per cent on the world and we come in at 10, we're in relatively good shape, but it's still not great for our businesses.' For sectors like steel and aluminum which still face targeted tariffs, the continuation of the CUSMA exemption didn't provide much comfort at all, said Catherine Cobden, CEO of the Canadian Steel Producers Association. 'What we see is some of our largest trading allies, both with us and the United States, accepting and normalizing 50 per cent tariffs,' said Cobden. 'That cannot happen in the case of Canada.' 'We don't have months to wait for a USMCA process. We are in the thick of it now,' she said. Dan Ujczo, an Ohio-based international trade lawyer, said in spite of sectoral pressures, Canada needs to get a clearer sense of the deals the White House has struck with the European Union, Japan and South Korea. 'Canada and Mexico started these negotiations with the best access to the United States in the world. They don't want to put themselves in a position now to accept a deal where that's going to get them less access to the United States than any other trading partner, so I think we still need to see what those other parties have agreed to,' said Ujczo, who has also worked for both Canadian and U.S. governments. Ujczo also said it's time for Carney and other Canadian political leaders to dial down the partisan rhetoric. On Friday, the Conservatives and the NDP accused Carney of failing to improve circumstances for Canadian workers. 'This is a negotiation,' Ujzco said. 'The political campaigns are over now.'

Protecting Your Privacy With Offshore Identities
Protecting Your Privacy With Offshore Identities

Time Business News

time2 hours ago

  • Time Business News

Protecting Your Privacy With Offshore Identities

**VANCOUVER, British Columbia —**As privacy erodes under the weight of mass surveillance, biometric data collection, and digital profiling, more individuals are exploring a solution that is not only legal—but practical: offshore identities. These identities, when established through lawful means such as legal name changes, second citizenships, and international residency, offer a powerful buffer between individuals and the institutions or actors that track, monitor, or exploit personal data. Contrary to the stereotype of offshore identities being tools for deception, they are increasingly viewed as mechanisms for self-preservation, used by professionals, activists, entrepreneurs, and families to reclaim control over their personal lives. Through careful structuring, these offshore identities enable people to reduce their visibility to prying systems while fully complying with international law. Amicus International Consulting, a leader in discreet legal identity solutions, explores in this report how privacy-conscious individuals are using offshore identities to build safer, more autonomous lives. The Erosion of Privacy in the 2020s From financial institutions and government agencies to social media companies and data brokers, the ecosystem of surveillance has never been more intrusive. Artificial intelligence, facial recognition, behavioral algorithms, and smartphone tracking have created a world where privacy is no longer the default—but a privilege earned through strategy. In 2025, the average person has more than 2,000 data points stored across global systems—from banking histories and location data to biometric identifiers. For those facing reputational risk, targeted harassment, political instability, or even simple overexposure, this creates significant vulnerabilities. Case Study: Data Breach Victim Opts for Privacy Shield A Canadian e-commerce entrepreneur suffered a massive privacy breach in 2023 when hackers accessed her professional accounts and exposed financial records. She endured public shaming, extortion attempts, and threats to her safety. In response, she used Amicus International Consulting to initiate a legal name change, establish a second residency in Portugal, and create a new corporate structure in Cyprus. Her new identity, layered through offshore residency and reissued credentials, now serves as a privacy firewall. She runs her new business anonymously and legally. Offshore Identity: Defined and Demystified An offshore identity is a legally established personal or corporate identity created through mechanisms in jurisdictions other than one's home country. These identities are fully supported by national and international law and may include: Legal name changes through recognized court or administrative processes Dual or second citizenship obtained via Investment, descent, or residency Residency permits and tax identification numbers in privacy-respecting nations Offshore companies, trusts, and foundations with nominee structures ID cards, passports, and legal instruments issued by foreign governments Unlike false identities, these structures rely on transparency, lawful issuance, and mutual recognition under treaties such as the Hague Apostille Convention and Vienna Consular Agreements. Legal Protections Embedded in International Frameworks Several legal doctrines support offshore identities: Sovereign Right to Nationality: Each state determines who its nationals are and what identity documentation it issues. Right to Privacy: Articles in the Universal Declaration of Human Rights and the International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights protect individuals from arbitrary interference. Freedom of Movement: Includes the right to leave any country and to choose a country of residence. Mutual Recognition of Civil Status: Allows lawful identity documents from one country to be validly used in others. These principles create a framework within which a legally issued offshore identity becomes an effective and protected tool for personal privacy. Case Study: Political Activist Escapes Biometric Tagging A South Asian activist advocating for minority rights was placed on a biometric watchlist by his home country. Facing detention and permanent tracking, he reached out to Amicus International. He secured Dominican citizenship via Investment and a legal name change in Central America. His biometric data—collected under his original identity—could no longer match his new profile. International law protected his status, and he relocated to a non-extradition country, continuing his work in safety. How Offshore Identities Protect Privacy in Real Terms The protections provided by offshore identities are not theoretical—they are practical. They can shield you in the following ways: Banking Under a New Identity : Open international accounts disconnected from your prior credit reports or KYC trails. : Open international accounts disconnected from your prior credit reports or KYC trails. Avoiding Data Brokers : By using new identities, your data no longer feeds into existing surveillance networks. : By using new identities, your data no longer feeds into existing surveillance networks. Social Media Freedom : Disconnect your digital life from legacy profiles through name changes and IP geolocation from new jurisdictions. : Disconnect your digital life from legacy profiles through name changes and IP geolocation from new jurisdictions. Reputation Management : Rebuild your online footprint using legally obtained credentials and domain registrations. : Rebuild your online footprint using legally obtained credentials and domain registrations. Travel Anonymity: Use new passports and residency cards to travel without triggering biometric alerts linked to former documentation. Case Study: Reputation Reboot for a Tech Executive A tech executive in the U.S. was falsely accused of misconduct, resulting in public backlash and career sabotage. Though cleared legally, the Internet preserved the accusations indefinitely. Working with Amicus, he secured a second passport through Antigua, relocated to Asia under a new identity, and started a new consulting firm using a Singapore-based corporate structure. Today, he manages million-dollar contracts under a new name, all legally documented and tax-compliant. Offshore Structures and Corporate Identity Shielding Beyond personal use, offshore identities also serve in corporate contexts. High-net-worth individuals and businesses use layered legal entities to separate control from visibility. Examples include: Belize Trusts and Panama Foundations : Remove personal names from public registries while maintaining legal control. : Remove personal names from public registries while maintaining legal control. Nevis LLCs with Nominee Directors : Allow business operations under third-party names with private agreements ensuring actual governance. : Allow business operations under third-party names with private agreements ensuring actual governance. Malta and Cyprus Holding Companies: Permit re-registration of intellectual property and digital assets under new ownership while maintaining operational secrecy. These structures are recognized under international business law and protected by jurisdictional sovereignty. Case Study: Crypto Founder Uses Offshore Layers for Safety A blockchain entrepreneur faced extortion threats after a crypto token he launched spiked in value. To protect himself, he moved operations offshore. Amicus helped him form a Seychelles IBC owned by a Liechtenstein foundation, with banking in Mauritius. His data was removed from all registries, and only the offshore entity was visible to the public. This legal setup allowed him to continue development safely. Digital Footprint Erasure and Rebuilding Once a new offshore identity is established, clients often pursue a structured digital erasure campaign. Key steps include: Closing accounts linked to prior identities Deleting old social media and website content Replacing domain registrations under new corporate names Requesting de-indexing under international privacy rights (e.g., GDPR 'right to be forgotten') Using VPNs and offshore servers for any remaining public activity Combined with a second passport or legal name change, these steps form the backbone of a truly private modern life. Navigating Legal and Ethical Lines At Amicus International, privacy strategies are implemented with strict adherence to legality. No false documents, no tax fraud, and no concealment of criminal activity are permitted. Every offshore identity plan undergoes due diligence and AML compliance. In 2025, legal identity transformation is less about secrecy and more about discretion. With proper planning, anyone facing political risk, reputational threats, or digital overexposure can step into a life of safety without breaking the law. Case Study: Whistleblower Relocates With Legal Identity Change An EU government contractor blew the whistle on illegal data-sharing between agencies and private firms. Fearing retaliation, she contacted Amicus and was guided through acquiring a legal identity in the South Pacific, complete with new credentials, banking access, and secure residency. She now lives off-grid, consults internationally, and maintains her integrity—all without jeopardizing her security. Conclusion: Offshore Identity Is the Future of Personal Privacy As traditional privacy collapses, offshore identities provide one of the last fully legal, fully effective ways to protect oneself. Whether used to escape harassment, avoid data tracking, or rebuild a life after reputational damage, these tools are not loopholes—they are lifelines. The key is not just to create a new identity, but to do so with clarity, strategy, and legality. Amicus International Consulting leads clients through every stage of this process, ensuring full compliance with international law while building a structure that offers genuine peace of mind. Contact InformationPhone: +1 (604) 200-5402Email: info@ Website:

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store