logo
ADB Acting On US Concerns Over China, Bank Chief Tells AFP

ADB Acting On US Concerns Over China, Bank Chief Tells AFP

The Asian Development Bank was trying "very hard" to accommodate US concerns over lending to China, the bank's president told AFP, including by slashing loans to the world's second-largest economy.
Global development institutions are in Spain this week for a UN summit on financial aid for the world's poorest overshadowed by Washington's gutting of poverty and climate change programs.
The United States is a major donor to multilateral banks like the ABD, but Washington's future commitment to development lenders has been in doubt since the election of President Donald Trump.
In April, US Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent urged ADB President Masato Kanda "to take concrete steps" to end loans to rival China.
Kanda said lending to Beijing was "radically decreasing" and had already halved from $2 billion in 2020 to $1 billion in 2024.
"We are already on... a declining trajectory," the Japanese head of the Manila-based lender told AFP in an interview in Paris on Friday.
"Probably -- I can't promise -- but probably this declining trajectory will be continued, and someday may be zero," he added, stressing that such a decision would ultimately be decided by the bank's shareholders and board of directors.
Kanda said US demands that ADB curtail financing for China were hardly new and probably "one of the very few agendas across the aisle in the US Congress".
"Even under the Biden administration, it was the same request," Kanda said, referring to the last administration under President Joe Biden.
The United States and Japan are the largest shareholders of ADB, which helps bankroll projects in the Asia-Pacific region that lift living standards and promote economic growth.
China, India and Australia are also significant members.
Kanda said ADB's efforts to raise lending without asking more of taxpayers in donor countries "was very much appreciated by the United States and others".
"I try very hard to accommodate the issues of the United States," he said.
Kanda is among thousands this week attending the International Conference on Financing for Development in Seville, the biggest event in a decade on the crisis-hit aid sector.
The United States in snubbing the UN-sponsored conference, underlining the erosion of global cooperation on combating hunger, disease and climate change.
Trump's cuts have come under particular scrutiny but Germany, Britain and France have also slashed foreign aid while boosting spending in areas such as defence.
With budgets in doubt, multilateral development banks have come under particular pressure to step up financing for projects that tackle global warming and prepare poorer countries for climate disaster.
Last year, rich countries committed $300 billion annually by 2035 for climate finance in the developing world -- well short of the $1.3 trillion that experts say is needed.
Last year, the ADB committed to channelling half its annual lending to climate-related projects by 2030 and Kanda said it was likely this would grow in time.
The bank was navigating a level of global uncertainty not seen in many decades but it was critical to consider the most vulnerable on the rocky road ahead, he added.
"This is not just a short-term phenomenon of one country, but it is rather universal," he said.
"This is a really difficult situation. And as long as we don't improve the root cause of this situation -- for instance, a more fair society -- it will not be so easy."

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Pakistan takes on presidency of UN Security Council – DW – 07/01/2025
Pakistan takes on presidency of UN Security Council – DW – 07/01/2025

DW

time32 minutes ago

  • DW

Pakistan takes on presidency of UN Security Council – DW – 07/01/2025

Pakistan has assumed the presidency of the Security Council for the month of July. New Delhi has a strategy in place to counter Islamabad's narrative, said Indian media. Pakistan assumed the presidency of the United Nations Security Council on Tuesday. Pakistan began its two-year term as a non-permanent member of the 15-member body in January this year. The council's presidency rotates on a monthly basis. This is Pakistan's first presidency since 2013, and the eighth time the country has served on the Security Council. Although the rotating presidency is largely a symbolic role with no executive authority, it comes at a time of heightened geopolitical tensions. Pakistan's Permanent Rep­resentative to the UN, Ambassador Asim Iftikhar Ahmad, emphasized Islamabad's commitment to peaceful conflict resolution. To view this video please enable JavaScript, and consider upgrading to a web browser that supports HTML5 video "We will closely work with other Cou­ncil members in a spirit of cooperation for collective and timely action… in line with the UN Charter and corresponding to the exp­ectations of the international community," he said in comments to Pakistan's daily. He stressed that Pakistan's presidency came at a time of increasing threats to international peace and security. "Pakistan is going to assume the presidency of the United Nations Security Council at a time of global tumult marked by growing instability, escalating conflicts, complex geopolitical and geostrategic landscape, and serious threats to international peace and security," the ambassador said. To view this video please enable JavaScript, and consider upgrading to a web browser that supports HTML5 video Pakistan is expected to raise the issue of its recent conflict with India over the disputed territory of Kashmir sparked by a deadly attack on tourists near the town of Pahalgam. Indian business daily reported that India was preparing a strategy to counter Islamabad's presidency. New Delhi's focus will be on its economic strength and dedication to the UN's Sustainable Development Goals. India will also draw attention to cross-border terrorism. India's government has accused Pakistan of supporting militants behind the Pahalgam attack, a charge Islamabad denies. India also suspended its participation in a crucial water sharing treaty and downgraded its ties with Islamabad over the attack. Some 26 people, mostly Hindu men, were killed in the Pahalgam attack in Indian-administered Kashmir. The attack was followed by four days of intense hostilities between the two South Asian nations which ended in a ceasefire on May 10.

Canada axes digital tax to ease Trump trade tensions – DW – 06/30/2025
Canada axes digital tax to ease Trump trade tensions – DW – 06/30/2025

DW

timean hour ago

  • DW

Canada axes digital tax to ease Trump trade tensions – DW – 06/30/2025

Canada has withdrawn a tax that could have reaped billions in revenue to bring Donald Trump back to the table. It raises the possibility that other taxes targeting big tech could be in the US president's sights next. Canada has canceled its digital services tax (DST) to entice the United States to return to the negotiating table for a long-awaited trade and defense deal. The tax, which was due to take effect on Monday, would have applied a 3% levy on revenues earned within Canada by companies — from any country — whose services are digitally based and earn more than 20 million Canadian dollars ($14.7 million, €12.4 million) per year. But the DST was the target on Friday of a now familiar missive from US President Donald Trump on his Truth Social platform. There, he labeled the tax as a "direct and blatant attack" on the US and set the clock ticking on new tariffs for his northern neighbor as he put trade negotiations on ice. While DSTs from Canada and other nations avoid naming specific companies among their targets, there is an inescapable reality that such instruments catch a swathe of American companies in their nets — among them digital behemoths like Meta, Google, Amazon, Airbnb and Uber. The tax's impact was compounded by its retroactive nature, capturing all revenues back to 2022, a boon that would have yielded more than $2 billion to Canada's finances. Binning the tax on the day it came into effect has potentially prevented Canada from feeling the brunt of harsher Trump tariffs and the loss of a trade deal with a significant trading partner. At the very least, it's brought the US president back to the negotiating table. Last year, Canada bought nearly $350 billion in US products and exported more than $412 billion to the US. "Obviously, the revenue from digital services taxes will be much lower than any costs from potential trade conflicts," said Bertin Martens, a senior fellow at the Brussels-based economic think tank Bruegel. "This is the right road to take at this moment for Canada, at least." To view this video please enable JavaScript, and consider upgrading to a web browser that supports HTML5 video Big tech companies make billions in revenue globally and there are few places that haven't been touched by the presence of the dominant US players in e-commerce, digital advertising and social media. But taxation of these businesses largely falls to the country where they are headquartered. For the majors, it's usually in the US, or even low-taxing countries like Ireland or Luxembourg. It's why other countries are turning to DSTs to recoup revenue for operating within their borders. While Canada's DST has been shelved, other countries across the Atlantic have been reaping revenues for years. France, Italy, Spain and the UK have revenue taxes for digital services providers, with criteria requiring a company to meet a minimum level of global revenue, a fraction of which is made within their borders. France, Italy and Spain apply a tax of 3% on those revenues, the UK 2%. France is even looking to increase its rate to 5%. "Big US tech companies that operate in Europe and elsewhere in the world pay very little, if any, taxes in the countries where they operate and collect substantial revenue and profits," Martens told DW. "But nothing of that can be taxed in the country itself, and so, in the absence of an OECD agreement on how to do this, countries have taken this in their own hands." The US has historically taken a dim view towards foreign digital services taxes under the last three administrations, Democrat and Republican, with a view that they amount to import tariffs on services. "It's not just Preisdent Trump, it was President Biden too, it is members of the US Congress in both parties, Republican and Democrat, that agree that DSTs are not appropriate for other countries to adopt," said James Hines, a professor of law and economics at the University of Michigan, US. "A tax that really is designed just to hit hard the American tech companies, which is what DSTs are," Hines said. "I'm sure the Trump administration is very serious about being upset about DSTs, and being willing to retaliate." That leaves open the question of whether other countries will be pressured to drop theirs. "I think the EU could also be persuaded to withdraw these taxes, but the problem is that the EU Commission, as a trade negotiator, has no leverage on member states' taxation policies," said Martens. "It can try to pass the message to member states, but whether they will accept it or not is a different matter." To view this video please enable JavaScript, and consider upgrading to a web browser that supports HTML5 video The Biden administration opposed DSTs but worked to broker a global trade deal via the OECD. That agreement was scuttled by Trump upon his return to the White House, leaving the prospect of unilateral DSTs back on the table. Despite American opposition to these agreements, Allison Christians, a tax law professor at McGill University in Canada, said the idea that major tech corporations should only be taxed in their home country is "antiquated." "They're headquartered in the US, yes, but they're capitalized all over the world, and they're collecting data all over the world, and they're making profit all over the world," Christians said. That, she said, makes it harder for local companies to compete with their "highly digitalized" US rivals. Martens agrees that DSTs are a response to the desire for other nations to have a level playing field. "There is this distorted playing field between local companies and foreign — in this case US — companies, in online markets," Martens said. "Local companies obviously pay local taxes in the country where they are established, and US companies can avoid that or circumvent that through preferential tax deals with tax havens like Ireland or Luxembourg, or even through repatriation of lots of their profits to the US. Martens said a global agreement like those brokered by the OECD would be a better way to proceed. But without US support, national-level taxes are likely to remain, at least until they appear again as a trade negotiation tool. "[DSTs] have become tangled up in this Trump administration trade policy debates, and that makes a debate even more complicated," Martens said.

CBEX Crypto Scam: AI-hyped Ponzi Scheme Defrauds African Investors
CBEX Crypto Scam: AI-hyped Ponzi Scheme Defrauds African Investors

Int'l Business Times

time4 hours ago

  • Int'l Business Times

CBEX Crypto Scam: AI-hyped Ponzi Scheme Defrauds African Investors

Embarrassed and in debt, Edwin was left reeling after losing $16,000 to CryptoBridge Exchange (CBEX), one of the crypto-trading platforms preying on investors in Africa. Edwin, a Kenyan government worker who only gave his first name out of shame, first encountered CBEX on Telegram, a messaging app. He was lured with promises of guaranteed monthly returns made possible by AI-powered trading systems, with lucrative referral bonuses -- classic hallmarks of Ponzi schemes. "I had very big plans. But I was conned both by the platform and an agent who lied he could help recover my money," Edwin told AFP. When he began investing last August, there were initial returns, leading him to invest more despite lacking prior cryptocurrency trading experience. In total, he believes he lost roughly 2.1 million shillings ($16,000), mostly from a bank loan he is now worried about needing to repay. Blockchain analysis firm Chainalysis says some $9.9 billion was lost to crypto scams globally last year. Such scams are not new in Africa, but their scale and sophistication has grown as cryptocurrency spreads. CBEX collapsed in April, leaving scores of investors like Edwin ruined, mainly in Kenya and Nigeria, according to media reports. But AFP has confirmed from accessing messages on CBEX's private Telegram groups that it has since rebooted its operations despite ongoing investigations and warnings by authorities. Abby, another Kenyan investor, carries the guilt of introducing 25 family and friends to CBEX. "(They) invested so much, and it all disappeared," he told AFP. "I would really love to help them recover but I'm broke." In Nigeria, news of CBEX's collapse led to attacks on CBEX-affiliated offices, which have since closed. Adeoye, a Nigerian victim, lost N700,000 (about $450). "The offer was juicy," he said. "I knew it was a risk, but I thought I would be lucky to cash out before anything happened." CBEX used the "brandjacking" tactic, adopting an acronym similar to the China Beijing Equity Exchange to give it legitimacy. The platform claimed to be licensed in the US and said ST Technologies International was responsible for the AI trading signals, allowing it to operate in Nigeria under the corporate identity of ST Technologies International Ltd (Smart Treasure/Super Technology). It even obtained an anti-money laundering certificate from Nigeria's Economic and Financial Crimes Commission (EFCC) this January, though the EFCC has clarified that this was only for "consultancy services", not for currency exchanges. To add further legitimacy, CBEX claimed it was established a decade ago and the ST team eight years ago. In reality, it began operations in Nigeria last July, according to local media, before spreading to Kenya. "If you check CBEX wallet addresses on-chain, they were only operating for about a year before the collapse," Kenyan cryptocurrency investigator Wycklife Sewe told AFP. While pretending to actively trade, CBEX actually moved funds out of investors' wallets via TRON (a decentralised blockchain network), said Sewe. The assets then underwent complex routing through multiple wallets and cryptocurrency conversions to obscure the audit trail. "They have designed their system using code to fool you that your money is still there and you can see it growing. But your money is moved immediately after you deposit," Sewe said, adding that CBEX was also running other scams. CBEX has changed its website domain several times to avoid attracting attention. AFP found at least four registered by it. In April 2024, the Hong Kong Securities and Futures Commission, an independent market regulator, issued a public alert against "CBEX Group". A recent investigation by crypto analyst Specter linked CBEX's withdrawal wallets to darknet marketplace Huione Guarantee, a Cambodia-based platform known for providing illicit tools to facilitate crypto crime. The US Treasury's Financial Crimes Enforcement Network (FinCEN) designated Huione Group a "primary money-laundering concern" in May, saying that it had facilitated more than $4 billion in illegal transactions between August 2021 and January 2025. Following CBEX's collapse, Kenya's Capital Markets Authority issued an "Investor Alert" about unregulated platforms, and parliament is discussing a bill to regulate virtual assets. Nigeria's EFCC says it has arrested two people and put out warrants for eight others in Nigeria and Kenya. A new Investments and Securities Act expressly prohibits and criminalises Ponzi schemes. But investigations are lengthy and expensive. In May, the EFCC said a "reasonable sum" of lost funds had been recovered, without stating the amount, highlighting the complexity of converting cryptocurrencies back to national currency. A Telegram spokesman told AFP that "scam content is removed when discovered and offending users banned". AFP found some CBEX Telegram groups were now labelled as scams on the platform. On June 10, CBEX, which had previously blamed hackers for the missing funds, claimed on its Telegram channels to have "compensated" the lost money. But it asked affected users to complete "verification" by paying a fee -- a common re-scamming tactic. For victims like Abby, the way forward is easy. "Never, ever again! I am done," he said.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store