Secret deportation: 82-year old lost after ICE office visit to replace green card; family was told he died, later found alive in Guatemala
Leon had been living in Allentown for decades after being granted political asylum in the US in 1987, following torture under Chilean dictator Augusto Pinochet's regime.
He had lost his wallet containing the physical card that confirmed his legal residency, according to The Morning Call report cited by the Guardian. Therefore, Leonus and his wife had booked an appointment at an immigration office for 20 June to have the card replaced.
However, upon arrival, Leon was suddenly handcuffed by two Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) officers and led away without explanation, his wife said.
She was allegedly held inside the building for 10 hours before relatives came to collect her. The family said they then heard nothing about Leon's whereabouts, despite numerous attempts to contact authorities.
Days later, they received a phone call from a woman claiming to be an immigration lawyer who said she could assist, but she did not explain how she knew about the case or where Leon was being held. On 9 July, the same woman contacted the family again and told them Leon had died.
by Taboola
by Taboola
Sponsored Links
Sponsored Links
Promoted Links
Promoted Links
You May Like
When the Camera Clicked at the Worst Possible Time
Lintmit.com
Read More
Undo
However, in a shocking twist, the family learned a week later through a relative in Chile that Leon was, in fact, alive, but hospitalised in Guatemala, a country with which he has no known connection. The relative said Leon had initially been detained in an immigration facility in Minnesota before being deported, although his name did not appear on any public ICE deportation lists.
His family remains in the dark about how and why he was removed to Guatemala.
A recent US Supreme Court ruling had allowed the Trump-era policy permitting deportations to third countries, not just countries of origin, to stand.
Leon, who had spent nearly four decades in the US working at a leather manufacturing plant and raising a family, had since retired. His medical condition remains unclear, but relatives say that he suffers from diabetes, high blood pressure and a heart condition. They now planning to travel to Guatemala to be by his side.
The case is currently under investigation.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Time of India
2 minutes ago
- Time of India
Epstein–Melania BOMBSHELL? Trump Wife Breaks Silence as Rumours EXPLODE Over Sex Offender Ties
Jeffrey Epstein, a true "movie villain," intertwined with high-profile figures like Donald and Melania Trump. A long-standing friendship between Trump and Epstein included parties and private jet travel. After Epstein's conviction and death, a resurfaced rumor claims Epstein introduced Trump to Melania. Melania recently refuted this by sharing a book chapter detailing her 1998 meeting with Trump at Fashion Week, amidst renewed scandal and her rare public defense of her husband. Read More
Time of India
19 minutes ago
- Time of India
US walks out on UNESCO 2 years after rejoining — what prompted the exit and what the fallout could look like
The US is leaving UNESCO again, just two years after it joined again. As part of the Trump administration 's latest effort to sever ties with foreign organizations, the United States announced on Tuesday that it would withdraw from UNESCO, U.N.'s educational, scientific, and cultural agency. Critics say the move shows that there are more and more ideological differences between the US and international organizations. The choice is likely to affect both funding and cultural cooperation around the world, as per a report by The Guardian. Explore courses from Top Institutes in Please select course: Select a Course Category Cybersecurity Design Thinking PGDM Management Project Management MCA Artificial Intelligence Healthcare Product Management MBA Data Analytics Leadership Data Science Public Policy Operations Management CXO others Digital Marketing Others Data Science healthcare Technology Degree Finance Skills you'll gain: Duration: 10 Months MIT xPRO CERT-MIT xPRO PGC in Cybersecurity Starts on undefined Get Details This is the third time Washington has left the Paris-based group, which is now under pressure from Trump's "America First" policy. Why did Donald Trump target UNESCO again? The action will be implemented at the end of next year, according to the State Department. It is a reflection of President Trump's strong dislike and mistrust of international organizations, particularly those associated with the United Nations, and multilateralism. Live Events State Department spokeswoman Tammy Bruce said in a statement that "Continued involvement in UNESCO is not in the national interest of the United States." 'Unesco works to advance divisive social and cultural causes and maintains an outsized focus on the UN's sustainable development goals, a globalist, ideological agenda for international development at odds with our America First foreign policy,' Tammy Bruce said in a statement, as per a report by The NY Times. Just two years after rejoining, the United States announced Tuesday that it will once more withdraw from the U.N.'s educational, scientific, and cultural agency due to what Washington perceives as its anti-Israel bias . White House deputy spokesperson Anna Kelly told the New York Post, "President Trump has decided to withdraw the United States from UNESCO, which supports woke, divisive cultural and social causes that are totally out of step with the commonsense policies that Americans voted for in November." According to a statement released by the White House in February, the international organization had "shown failure to reform itself, has continually demonstrated anti-Israel sentiment over the past decade, and has failed to address concerns over mounting arrears." The White House also announced a 90-day review of the US membership in Unesco. When will the United States officially leave UNESCO? In December 2026, the US plans to exit UNESCO, citing the agency's "woke" and anti-Israel bias. The decision will not surprise UNESCO officials, who anticipated this action after the review mandated by the Trump administration earlier this year. They anticipated that Trump would withdraw once more, as the US's re-engagement in 2023 had been advocated by a political adversary, former President Joe Biden. A global organization based in Paris that was established following World War II to advance peace via international collaboration in science, education, and culture has been hit hard by the move. This action is a component of Trump's initiative for a second term aimed at extricating the United States from many international organizations, including the World Health Organization (WHO), ceasing financial support to the Palestinian aid agency UNRWA, and disengaging from the UN Human Rights Council. What's at stake for global culture and education? Officials at UNESCO's headquarters in Paris had anticipated a possible US withdrawal during Trump's second term. The United States contributes approximately 8% of the overall budget, resulting in a less pronounced financial influence compared to other entities, such as the WHO, where the US is the predominant financial supporter. Now that the decision is final, people are still wondering what will happen next. Critics say it's another step away from working together on a global scale. For those who want to leave, it's a necessary rejection of too much power from other countries. No matter what, the US and UNESCO's relationship is still rocky, and the world is watching. How has the U.S. relationship with UNESCO evolved? The United States is leaving UNESCO, which is headquartered in Paris, for the third time, and the second time under the Trump administration. After the Biden administration applied to rejoin the group, the United States rejoined after a five-year hiatus, and President Donald Trump had already withdrawn during his first term. The United States will be leaving Unesco for the third time, having first joined in 1945. Under Ronald Reagan, the US initially left in 1983, but under George W. Bush, it returned in 2003. As a result of "mounting arrears, the need for fundamental reform in the organization, and continuing anti-Israel bias," Trump withdrew the United States from Unesco in 2017, during his first term as president. Despite Unesco's 2011 vote to admit Palestine, the Barack Obama White House reduced Unesco's funding, leaving the US with millions of dollars in unpaid debt, as per a report by NBC News. FAQs Why is the United States leaving UNESCO again? The United States claims that UNESCO promotes "divisive" and "anti-Israel" agendas that contradict America First principles. When will the United States officially leave UNESCO? The US withdrawal is set to take effect in December 2026.
Time of India
19 minutes ago
- Time of India
Primary responsibility of states: Govt on implementing passive euthanasia in healthcare system
Health being a state subject, it is the primary responsibility of the states and Union territories to implement passive euthanasia and living wills in the healthcare system by incorporating these into hospital protocols to ensure that medical professionals are trained to respect patients' end-of-life preferences , the government told Parliament on Tuesday. In a written response to a question in the Rajya Sabha, Union Health Minister J P Nadda said it is also the responsibility of the states to establish ethical safeguards , such as a mandatory review by a medical board in accordance with a Supreme Court judgment . Explore courses from Top Institutes in Please select course: Select a Course Category healthcare Finance Artificial Intelligence Product Management Cybersecurity MCA Design Thinking Digital Marketing Leadership Data Science Data Analytics Public Policy Technology others Data Science Management CXO MBA Project Management Degree Operations Management Others Healthcare PGDM Skills you'll gain: Duration: 11 Months IIM Lucknow CERT-IIML Healthcare Management India Starts on undefined Get Details Nadda's response came with respect to a question on the specific measures taken to implement and promote passive euthanasia and living wills in the healthcare system in light of the 2018 judgment of the apex court. by Taboola by Taboola Sponsored Links Sponsored Links Promoted Links Promoted Links You May Like Play War Thunder now for free War Thunder Play Now Undo He said in the judgment in Common Cause Vs Union of India , the Supreme Court laid down specific guidelines for executing advance directives and implementing passive euthanasia. The court, in Miscellaneous Application No. 1699 of 2019 in Common Cause Vs Union of India, relaxed these guidelines by simplifying the procedure for executing the same. Live Events These modifications aimed at making the process more accessible for terminally-ill patients to exercise their right to die with dignity by refusing life-prolonging treatment, the minister said. "Health" being a state subject, it is the primary responsibility of the states and Union territories to implement passive euthanasia and living wills in the healthcare system by incorporating these into hospital protocols to ensure that medical professionals are trained to respect patients' end-of-life preferences," Nadda said in his written response.
