&w=3840&q=100)
Govt must go beyond RDI, fund bluesky research at the university level
premium
Business Standard Editorial Comment Mumbai
Listen to This Article
The Research Development and Innovation (RDI) Scheme, approved by the Union Cabinet this week, is an acknowledgement that policymakers must find ways to spark innovation and support it with funding. However, while the scheme is a step in the right direction, a lot will need to be done and, given the way the scheme is designed, it may not address some key concerns that hinder India's research & development (R&D). India spends less than 1 per cent of its gross domestic product (GDP) on R&D, while for China and South Korea, for example, it is over 2.5 per cent. Thus,
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
&w=3840&q=100)
Business Standard
37 minutes ago
- Business Standard
Realty firm Signature Global purchases two land parcels in Gurugram
Signature Global's subsidiary firm has executed two sale deeds to purchase the lands admeasuring approximately 9.96 acres situated at Tehsil Sohna, District Gurugram, Haryana Press Trust of India New Delhi Realty firm Signature Global has acquired two land parcels in Gurugram totalling 10 acres to build housing projects. Signature Global's subsidiary firm has executed two sale deeds to purchase the lands admeasuring approximately 9.96 acres situated at Tehsil Sohna, District Gurugram, Haryana. These lands have an overall potential sales area of approximately 0.53 million (5.3 lakh) square feet, according to a recent regulatory filing. Last month, Signature Global chairman Pradeep Kumar Aggarwal said the company would invest around ₹1,200-1,500 crore to acquire land parcels as part of its expansion plan. Signature Global had invested ₹1,070 crore last fiscal year to purchase 48 acres of land in Gurugram, Haryana. "Land is an important raw material for real estate developers. We will be investing around ₹1,200-1,500 crore on the acquisition of land parcels this fiscal," he had said. Signature Global emerged as the fifth largest listed real estate developer last fiscal in terms of sales bookings by achieving record pre-sales of ₹10,290 crore. The Gurugram-based company has given a guidance of posting ₹12,500 crore worth pre-sales in the current fiscal. Signature Global is also ramping up construction activities across its ongoing projects. The company will invest ₹2,500 crore in 2025-26 fiscal on construction activities as against Rs 1,900 crore in the preceding fiscal. Recently, Signature Global announced plans to raise ₹875 crore through issue of non-convertible debentures to refinance debt and expand business. Signature Global started its business to develop affordable housing projects but shifted its focus on mid-income, premium and luxury segments because of high land cost in Gurugram. During the last fiscal year, the company posted a net profit of ₹101.2 crore, a sharp jump from ₹16.32 crore in the preceding year. Its total income grew to ₹2,637.99 crore in the last fiscal from ₹1,324.55 crore in 2023-24. Since inception, Signature Global has delivered 13.5 million sq ft of housing projects and has a strong pipeline of about 21.6 million sq ft of saleable area in upcoming projects, along with 46.38 million sq ft of ongoing projects, targeted for completion within the next 2-3 years. (Only the headline and picture of this report may have been reworked by the Business Standard staff; the rest of the content is auto-generated from a syndicated feed.)
Indian Express
4 hours ago
- Indian Express
‘The RBI has done its job… availability of capital not an issue for industry': CII President
The Reserve Bank of India (RBI) has done its job very proactively and the availability of capital for Indian industry is not an issue, according to Confederation of Indian Industry (CII) President Rajiv Memani. Memani, who took over as the head of the industry body from ITC Ltd's Sanjiv Puri last month, also said the Indian central bank is working to simplify its circulars. In a wide-ranging interview with Aggam Walia and Siddharth Upasani, Memani – Chairman and Chief Executive Officer of EY India – also discussed the pace of private investment, the adoption and impact of Artificial Intelligence (AI) on jobs, how Indian companies are gearing up to meet the challenges that will come from the Free Trade Agreements (FTAs) being signed by the government, and China's grip on rare earth magnets. Edited excerpts: By and large, Indian companies are in favour of entering into FTAs. No one wants to be left behind, because it's very clear that countries which enter into FTAs with each other, the quality of relationship will get better. Second, there has been quite a high level of engagement the government has had with Indian industry and the government has spent a lot of time trying to understand every sector, sub-sector, and what is the implication of that (FTA) on them. Most of it, as it stands today, relates to manufacturing. The new set of FTAs that India is signing (is with) countries India has a fairly complementary relationship with. If you are signing an FTA with a country that, hypothetically, had very strong labour-intensive manufacturing or had cost structures which are similar to India, I think you would have had a greater challenge. Here, by and large, with UK – and if India signs with US and EU – there is a lot of complementarity in the relationship. As long as the FTA rates that India enjoys are competitive or better than the FTA of countries that it will be competing with to access that market, I think Indian companies are happy. So, the general view is that given the size of the Indian market, the quality of relationships that India enjoys, and the size and stature, we will get competitive or better deals. Otherwise, we are not going to sign the FTAs. That's the general sense. You could also be on the receiving end. Yes, there are some sectors – I don't think there will be a lot of sectors, especially if you are talking of UK and US – where there will be stress in terms of manufacturing. But there could definitely be some sectors – because your customs duty may come down from anywhere between 5-10 per cent, 15-20 per cent depending on the product and category. Till now, what companies are looking at is internal ways in which you can become more competitive. And secondly, to look at how the various factors of production can be reduced so that the competitiveness is there. Third – and the government's recent (Research Development and Innovation) scheme would also be helpful here – is how do you proactively invest in R&D (research and development) to become more competitive. Everyone cannot be happy. When two countries are negotiating…there will be some people who will feel slightly challenged. But, by and large, I would think that will be a smaller market segment compared to the overall. So far it seems that the best we can hope for with the US is a tariff differential vis-a-vis China. It should be better than China. China has higher (tariffs). But hopefully better than Vietnam and the others. I have no idea when it (FTA with US) will be signed. But given the amount of effort that is being put into this, it will be signed sooner rather than later. No. I think the RBI has done its job. We must compliment the RBI for being very proactive in doing this. We have one of the most benign inflation (conditions), low interest rates, Cash Reserve Ratio (cuts), liquidity in the system. If you talk to all the financial participants in the market, there is a lot of simplification that is happening on the ground; (for) a lot of the earlier issues and circulars, there are questions that are being asked 'What is the relevance, why (do we need it)?' So, I think the RBI has truly done a phenomenal job. My personal view is that most companies want to grow: capital markets are rewarding growth, balance sheets are – in general – in a good state for most companies, availability of capital is not an issue, and the outlook on India is generally very positive – you can argue whether it's 6 per cent, 7 per cent, or 8 per cent, but generally, it is positive. Earlier, a year-and-a-half back, rural consumption was a challenge and now urban consumption is a challenge; rural seems to be doing better now. Those issues will be there. But I still think that the posture of most of the companies in India and most of the members of CII that we talk to is generally positive and looking to invest. If you look at sectors and companies, if you read their balance sheets, their Annual General Meetings, the announcements they have made, they are pretty bold. Yes, these are the larger companies, but they have a trickle-down effect. If you look at the top-5, top-10 groups in India, the announcements that they have made are pretty significant in terms of investments. Now, some of them could be off by a quarter or two given what's happening globally. But I think there is more noise around the fact that the private sector is not investing. I think they are. Should they be investing more? The answer is probably yes. But the amount of investment that the private sector is doing, in the last 3-4 years, is gradually increasing. Yes, with what's happening in geopolitics and world trade today, people are just waiting and watching a bit to see what happens. So, if they wanted to invest X, they will probably invest 0.7-0.8X for the next 3-6 months and see how the FTAs, war, geopolitics settle and then take a call on investment because keeping cash on the balance sheet, the return that you get is nothing. No. Obviously, demand growth in some pockets is slower than what people anticipated, urban demand in particular and what's happening globally. The pace at which it (private investment) can happen is not there because of reforms, ease of doing business, or because of (lack of) availability of skilled manpower. I think that has reduced the speed at which things can get done. Also, technologies are changing and it takes time for people to decide. If I want to put a steel plant, should I do an electric arc furnace or a blast furnace? The whole world was in favour of sustainability, so I would have done electric arc. But now, sustainability has gone back. Should I do DRI (Direct Reduced Iron), should I use scrap, should I not use scrap? Will I be able to buy scrap from Russia? Tomorrow, if Russia is closed down, then what happens? Earlier, these things didn't come in the decision matrix… The question sets have become more complex. The issue of India-China relationship is very complex. On matters that relate to security, industry and industry bodies like CII would really advocate what the government is saying because there are layers within layers within layers. So, my view is that the government has a certain stand. Industry can definitely represent to the government and has been representing to the government the challenge, at least on rare earths. And it's a very significant challenge, probably understated till now because we may feel that it can get sorted out. But whether the government is doing enough or if it's a G2G issue, the government will have many considerations. We should also look at alternate geographies and maybe some longer-term solutions as well. We will have to find out as we go. But the Indian industry, by and large – more so in the services sector than manufacturing – is starting to adopt AI. I am pretty sure that India would be amongst the leading countries to adopt AI and invest in technology. But it's too early to say the benefits have started translating. It will take time. In some industries and sectors, I think jobs will start getting impacted. But at the same time, (we will have) competitiveness, efficiency, better labour productivity, and India becoming a global use-case centre – where through GCCs (Global Capability Centres) and others we do some bleeding edge work. Most of the countries who are looking at deploying AI at scale would want to leverage India not only on the innovation side but deployment side as well. So, AI is definitely something India should watch out for in terms of developing our own intellectual property, which through large LLMs (Large Language Models) and others we are trying to do. Second: implementing AI across our companies. Third is skilling our people and skilling at scale. Fourth is ensuring that legislation supports AI in a significant way. And fifth is how India becomes one of the leaders and global use-case capitals of AI. The reason (for the government's manufacturing focus) is that manufacturing as a percentage of GDP and what it employs is much lesser. So, India has to give greater impetus towards that. Secondly, services per se – most services, not all – don't require that much investment from the government; as long as you have good infrastructure – airports, good roads, power availability – that's fine. And India has an inherent competitive advantage in services and competitive disadvantage (in manufacturing) especially because the comparison point in terms of cost globally is one country and India is less competitive compared to that country. So, you would normally assume that manufacturing companies need more support. Going forward, if India has to achieve their goals that they have set for 2047, then manufacturing has to take off. So, I think the focus of the government on manufacturing is right. Services will have a natural buoyancy for growth. In areas like tourism that you mentioned – which are outside of IT services, technology, BPO – there the government should be doing much more. (Tourism generates) a lot of foreign exchange, localised jobs, and it's profitable. So, the economic advantages of tourism are a lot and India has a lot to offer. But are we getting the full bang for the buck? I am not sure. Aggam Walia is a Correspondent at The Indian Express, reporting on power, renewables, and mining. His work unpacks intricate ties between corporations, government, and policy, often relying on documents sourced via the RTI Act. Off the beat, he enjoys running through Delhi's parks and forests, walking to places, and cooking pasta. ... Read More Siddharth Upasani is a Deputy Associate Editor with The Indian Express. He reports primarily on data and the economy, looking for trends and changes in the former which paint a picture of the latter. Before The Indian Express, he worked at Moneycontrol and financial newswire Informist (previously called Cogencis). Outside of work, sports, fantasy football, and graphic novels keep him busy. ... Read More
New Indian Express
8 hours ago
- New Indian Express
India's global standing on manufacturing up: Minister Piyush Goyal
BENGALURU: Union Commerce and Industry Minister Piyush Goyal, who engaged with industry leaders, startups, deep-tech innovators and VCs at an interactive session here on Saturday, said, 'The country's ease of doing business is being strengthened by regulatory simplification and expedited processes for patents and trademarks.' Goyal underlined India's improved global reputation for quality manufacturing, especially in sectors like electronics, pharmaceuticals, textiles, and defence, while highlighting the Centre's efforts towards strengthening the country's startup and innovation ecosystem. He highlighted the government's launch of the Rs 10,000-crore Fund of Funds for Startups (FFS) and the Rs 1-lakh crore R&D and Innovation (RDI) Scheme, which aims to provide long-term, low-cost capital to private R&D through a dedicated SPV. Minister for Large and Medium Industries MB Patil said that of the Rs 5.56 lakh crore worth of investment commitments made in the manufacturing sector during Invest Karnataka-2025 Global Investors Meet (GIM), Rs 3.4 lakh crore — around 62%, has already translated into formal project applications. 'This shows our post-MoU follow-up has been effective. Companies like Krones, Safran, TASL, and others have filed proposals, and many have begun groundwork,' he said. The event was organised by the Department for Promotion of Industry and Internal Trade, Ministry of Commerce and Industry, and Confederation of Indian Industry, had over 100 key stakeholders participating, and focused on innovation-led growth, India's rising global competitiveness, and the progress of investments in the state.
