logo
US critical networks are prime targets for cyberattacks. They're preparing for Iran to strike.

US critical networks are prime targets for cyberattacks. They're preparing for Iran to strike.

Politico18-06-2025
The organizations representing critical networks that keep the lights on, the water running and transportation systems humming across the U.S. are bracing for a possible surge of Iranian cyberattacks.
Virtually every critical infrastructure sector is on high alert amid a deepening conflict between Iran and Israel, though no major new cyber threat activity has been publicly reported so far.
As these groups proactively step up their defenses, it's unclear whether Washington is coordinating with them on security efforts — a change from prior moments of geopolitical unrest, when federal agencies have played a key role in sounding the alarm.
'Iranian cyber activity has not been as extensive outside of the Middle East but could shift in light of the military actions,' said John Hultquist, chief analyst for Google Threat Intelligence Group.
As the conflict evolves — and particularly if the U.S. decides to strike Iran directly — 'targets in the United States could be reprioritized for action by Iran's cyber threat capability,' he said.
During previous periods of heightened geopolitical tension, U.S. agencies, including the Cybersecurity and Infrastructure Security Agency, stepped up to warn the operators of vital U.S. networks about emerging threats. Ahead of Russia's full-scale invasion of Ukraine in 2022, CISA launched its 'Shields Up' program to raise awareness about potential risks to U.S. companies emanating from the impending war.
Anne Neuberger, who served as deputy national security adviser for cyber and emerging tech at the White House under President Joe Biden, coordinated with CISA and other agencies, including the Office of the Director of National Intelligence, to support critical infrastructure sectors before Russia attacked Ukraine. She stressed that the government is crucial in helping these companies step up their defenses during a crisis.
'The government can play a very important role in helping companies defend themselves, from sharing declassified intelligence regarding threats to bringing companies together to coordinate defenses,' Neuberger said. 'Threat intel firms should lean forward in publicly sharing any intelligence they have. ODNI and CISA should do the same.'
Spokespersons for CISA, the White House and the National Security Council did not respond to requests for comment on increasing concerns that cyber adversaries could target U.S. critical networks.
Beyond federal resources, thousands of the nation's critical infrastructure operators turn to information sharing and analysis centers and organizations, or ISACs, for threat intelligence.
The Food and Ag-ISAC — whose members include the Hershey Company, Tyson and Conagra — and the Information Technology ISAC — whose members include Intel, IBM and AT&T — put out a joint alert late last week strongly urging U.S. companies to step up their security efforts to prepare for likely Iranian cyberattacks. In a joint statement from the groups provided to POLITICO on Monday, the organizations cautioned that even if no U.S.-based companies were directly targeted, global interconnectivity meant that 'cyberattacks aimed at Israel could inadvertently affect U.S. entities.'
ISACs for the electricity, aviation, financial services, and state and local government sectors are also on alert. Jeffrey Troy, president and CEO of the Aviation ISAC, said that in the past, companies in the aviation sector had been impacted by cyberattacks disrupting GPS systems, and that as a result, 'our members remain in a constant state of vigilance, sharing intelligence in real time and collaborating on prevention, detection, and mitigation strategies.'
Andy Jabbour, founder and senior adviser for the Faith-Based Information Sharing and Analysis Organization, said his organization is monitoring potential efforts by Iranian-linked hackers to infiltrate the websites of U.S. religious groups or spread disinformation.
Jabbour said his organization is working with the National Council of ISACs on scanning for these threats, and noted that the council had stood up a program following the first strikes by Israel on Iran late last week to monitor for specific threats to U.S. infrastructure.
The National Council of ISACs did not respond to a request for comment on whether they are preparing for evolving Iranian threats.
Concerns about attacks on U.S. critical infrastructure linked to conflicts abroad have grown in recent years. Following the Oct. 7, 2023, attack on Israel by militant group Hamas, Iranian government-linked hacking group Cyber Av3ngers hacked into multiple U.S. water facilities that were using Israeli-made control panels.
The intrusions did not disrupt water supplies, but they served as a warning to utility operators about devices that could be easily hacked and potentially targeted first in a cyber conflict with Iran.
'If anti-Israeli threat actors make good on any claim of impacting critical infrastructure at this time … they're going to look for the low-hanging fruit, easily compromised devices,' said Jennifer Lyn Walker, director of infrastructure cyber defense at the Water ISAC.
Walker said that while her team has not yet detected any enhanced threats to member groups since last week, the Water ISAC would be sending out an alert this week, encouraging organizations to stay vigilant.
'We don't want to cause any undo panic, but for those members that aren't already watching and aren't already vigilant, we definitely want to amplify the message that the potential exists,' Lyn Walker said.
Some of these groups noted that the lack of federal support so far in preparing for Iranian cyberattacks may be due to widespread changes across agencies since President Donald Trump took office. CISA, the nation's main cyber defense agency, is expected to lose around 1,000 employees, and many of its programs have been cut or put on pause, including funding for the organization that supports the ISACs for state and local governments. CISA has also been without Senate-confirmed leadership since former Director Jen Easterly departed in January.
'CISA is in a state of transition,' Jabbour said, noting that while 'CISA is still accessible,' there had been no outreach to strengthen defenses against Iranian hackers since tensions erupted last week.
It isn't a complete blackout. Lyn Walker said that the Water ISAC has 'received reporting from DHS partners who are striving to maintain continuity of operations and valuable information sharing during this challenging time.'
There could also be another reason for the less visible federal response: 'Shields Up' advisories are still available from 2022, when CISA worked with organizations to prepare for an onslaught of Russian cyberattacks tied to the war in Ukraine. Kiersten Todt, who served as chief of staff at CISA when the program was stood up, said that its legacy has heightened awareness of potential cyber pitfalls across the nation's critical operations.
'Because the [cyber] threat is so serious, all of those things ended up sustaining,' Todt, current president of creative company Wondros, said. 'That 'Shields Up' mentality has now become part of the culture of critical infrastructure.'
The enhanced level of vigilance reflects concerns that the threats from Iran could change quickly. Jabbour noted that a lot is in the hands of Trump as he weighs how heavily to assist Israel.
'The next 24-48 hours will be interesting in that sense, and his decisions and his actions could certainly influence what we see here in the United States,' Jabbour said.
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Making sense of Trump's weapons deal
Making sense of Trump's weapons deal

Politico

time11 hours ago

  • Politico

Making sense of Trump's weapons deal

With help from Phelim Kine, Maggie Miller and Daniel Lippman Subscribe here | Email Robbie | Email Eric President DONALD TRUMP and NATO Secretary General MARK RUTTE made a big announcement that the U.S. will be sending Patriot missile defense systems and other weapons to Ukraine — via sales to NATO countries. Exactly how will that work? That's still being hammered out, with timing even less certain. In one scenario, European countries could buy American weapons for transfer to Ukraine. Or they could send their own weapons to Kyiv and then buy American replacements, the leaders said in the Oval Office. It's not yet clear how far along the planning the effort is, and defense officials and allies all expressed some confusion in the hours after the morning press conference. Two officials from close NATO allies told NatSec Daily today that they haven't been fully briefed on the plan and don't know exactly how their countries would participate, but they did appear willing. A U.S. defense official, who like the allies was granted anonymity to speak to a developing policy matter, said there are some questions that the two sides need to iron out. 'I know our industry can and will sell to allies, but there are already delivery backlogs on most weapons so these deals will either jump to the top of the list or they'll have to wait a couple years for delivery,' the official said. MARK MONTGOMERY, a retired Navy officer now at the Foundation for the Defense of Democracies, pointed out that the Pentagon has increased its purchases of Patriot missiles over the past year, 'which tells me Patriot really is challenged,' in keeping a healthy stockpile which military leaders want to restock in big numbers. After supplying Ukraine and Israel, the U.S. also shot off a huge number of Patriots defending U.S. bases in the Middle East during Iranian ballistic missile and drone attacks last month. One of the reasons the Pentagon gave for stopping the delivery of weapons to Ukraine this month was a worry over the depth of U.S. stockpiles, a view that some Pentagon officials on the Joint Staff challenged. Defense industry analyst ROMAN SCHWEIZER of TD Cowen sent a note to investors pointing out that the deal looks a lot like foreign military sales, in which American defense firms sell to allies. Those deals are notoriously slow and cumbersome, given the months of negotiations it takes to reach an agreed-to contract. He noted however that 'countries may also accelerate transfers of their own weapons and be back-filled by USA supplies,' and that current weapons sales to allies is at a record pace, hitting $80.5 billion in preliminary agreements this year, 22 percent of which is tied to NATO members. The Inbox THE OTHER PEACE DEALS: In rattling off his frustrations with Russian President VLADIMIR PUTIN today, Trump hinted at some other U.S.-brokered peace deals that could be coming down the pike soon. In the Oval Office, Trump noted the administration's progress in securing a ceasefire between Congo and Rwanda last month. He also mentioned that there could be a peace deal between Armenia and Azerbaijan imminently, potentially resolving the three-decade dispute between the two countries once and for all. 'We just seem to have Armenia and Azerbaijan. It looks like that's going to come to a conclusion — a successful conclusion,' Trump said. As for the Middle East, Trump identified a potential deal to help Egypt restore water flows of the Nile River. In the Gaza Strip, Trump sounded less optimistic but still celebrated the successes of special envoy STEVE WITKOFF, who was in the Oval Office for the meeting with Rutte. 'I think we could have something very soon,' Trump said. The likelihood of all these deals materializing in the near future is unclear. Ceasefire talks to end the war in the Gaza Strip are still ongoing, and Armenia and Azerbaijan have only agreed to resume bilateral engagements. WAR GAMES DOWN UNDER: The U.S. and Australia conducted war games alongside Indo-Pacific allies today and tested out the HIMARS long-range rocket system, in spite of increased disagreements between the two allies. As Reuters' Kirsty Needham reports, the test of the HIMARS system came as part of the 'Talisman Sabre' war games. During these exercises, the U.S., Australia, Japan, France, South Korea and Singapore held a live-fire exercise in northern Queensland and tested out U.S.-made F-35s and HIMARS systems. HIMARS have been in intense demand in both Ukraine and the Indo-Pacific. The joint exercises are occurring as Pentagon policy chief ELBRIDGE COLBY has placed considerable pressure on U.S. allies in the Indo-Pacific, specifically Canberra and Tokyo, to telegraph more publicly what they would do if China invaded Taiwan in the near future. It also follows Colby's review of the AUKUS submarine pact with Australia and the United Kingdom. Australia has insisted it won't make any public commitments. 'The decision to commit Australian troops to a conflict will be made by the government of the day, not in advance but by the government of the day,' Australian Defense Industry Minister PAT CONROY said Sunday. PENTAGON PULLS OUT OF ASPEN: The top brass at DOD will no longer be participating in the Aspen Security Forum, Eric and our Felicia Schwartz report (for Pros!). Why the change? Pentagon spokesperson SEAN PARNELL said the conference's 'values do not align with the values of the DOD.' He argued the Aspen confab 'is not in alignment' with Trump administration goals to 'increase the lethality of our warfighters, revitalize the warrior ethos, and project Peace Through Strength on the world stage.' The move, first reported in conservative-leaning outlet Just the News, came the day before the conference was set to start. Initially, attendees were slated to include Navy Secretary JOHN PHELAN, Defense Intelligence Agency chief JEFF KRUSE, INDOPACOM Commander SAMUEL PAPARO and Space Command chief STEPHEN WHITING, among other top military brass and Pentagon officials. It's unclear if this move will trigger more withdrawals from the annual nonpartisan gathering. Guess who's not pulling out of Aspen? Your favorite national security newsletter! Eric will be on the ground, along with Felicia and Nahal Toosi, to bring you the highlights from the forum here and across our POLITICO coverage areas. Drop us some lines if you plan on being there too. IT'S MONDAY: Thanks for tuning in to NatSec Daily! This space is reserved for the top U.S. and foreign officials, the lawmakers, the lobbyists, the experts and the people like you who care about how the natsec sausage gets made. Aim your tips and comments at ebazail@ and follow Eric on X @ebazaileimil. While you're at it, follow the rest of POLITICO's global security team on X and Bluesky at: @dave_brown24, @HeidiVogt, @jessicameyers, @RosiePerper, @ @PhelimKine, @ak_mack, @felschwartz, @connorobrienNH, @paulmcleary, @reporterjoe, @JackDetsch, @samuelskove, @magmill95, @johnnysaks130 and @delizanickel Keystrokes GOP DOESN'T SAY HOLA, HUAWEI: A top Republican on Capitol Hill slammed reports that the Spanish government is entering into a contract with Huawei to use the Chinese tech giant's software in wiretap operations. House Intelligence Chair RICK CRAWFORD (R-Ark.) said today that 'Spain is playing with fire.' 'By leveraging a known agent of the CCP to collect and store insurmountable amounts of sensitive data, Spain has made itself vulnerable to clear threats to the security and sovereignty of not only itself but allies around the world,' Crawford said. Over the weekend, reports emerged that the Spanish government gave millions of dollars in contracts to Huawei. That news is surprising for a few reasons. For one, it bucks a general trend of U.S. allies ditching Huawei given its ties to Beijing. Moreover, it comes as Spain has tried to throw cold water on the Trump administration's goals of ramping up NATO defense spending. The Spanish Embassy in Washington did not immediately reply to a request for comment. The Complex GROK JOINS THE PENTAGON: X launched Grok for Government today — and announced it already has a major customer. The Pentagon issued a new contract for the ELON MUSK-owned artificial intelligence model's government product, the company announced on X today. Grok for Government will also be available for purchase by other government agencies as it is now part of the General Services Administration schedule of products. XAi joins OpenAI, Anthropic and Google in reaching contracts with the Pentagon. It will have a $200 million ceiling. The partnership suggests that Musk is no longer as internally toxic for the Trump administration as he was after leaving government and torching Trump's 'big, beautiful' spending bill. And two, the announcement follows reports that developers in a recent update allowed Grok to make antisemitic, racist, sexist and otherwise offensive comments. At one point, Grok offered X users tips on how to rape a Democratic policy thinker. European officials have raised the matter of Grok's antisemitic posts with X executives. Musk said that the new update of Grok was 'too compliant to user prompts. Too eager to please and be manipulated, essentially. That is being addressed.' On the Hill DEMS HONE CHINA MESSAGE: Democrats on the Senate Foreign Relations Committee released a long report today arguing that Trump's foreign policy has undercut U.S. strategy against China. The report says cuts to the U.S. Agency for International Development and other U.S. foreign assistance bodies have hampered Washington's ability to outcompete China in Latin America, Asia and Africa. It also says disruptions to U.S. alliances — including AUKUS and NATO — and cuts to U.S. government broadcasters have weakened U.S. partnerships in the Indo-Pacific and the ability of the United States to compete in the 'information space' against Beijing-backed misinformation campaigns. The report comes as Democrats have looked to sharpen their messaging on Trump's foreign policy ahead of the 2026 midterms. Loyal NatSec Daily readers will remember that former national security adviser JAKE SULLIVAN met with Democrats on the House China Select Committee in February to help them strategize around bipartisan areas of collaboration. Sen. JEANNE SHAHEEN (D-N.H.), the top Democrat on the committee, told reporters today that China is 'probably at the top of the list' of foreign policy priorities for Democrats going forward, though the committee will also continue to focus on other flashpoints like Ukraine and Sudan. A Democratic committee staffer, granted anonymity to speak freely about strategy moving forward, said that Democrats plan on raising the findings of the report in successive hearings and hammering home the point that Trump administration policy moves may be boosting, not stymying, China's competitive edge. Broadsides MALAYSIA MIFFED AT ADAMS: Conservative Muslim Malaysian lawmakers and officials are aghast at Trump's nomination of the Australian-born conservative commentator and self-described 'alpha male' NICK ADAMS to be the country's next U.S. ambassador. Adams qualifies for the role as an 'incredible patriot and very successful entrepreneur,' Trump said in announcing Adams' nomination. Malaysian lawmakers see it differently. 'Nick Adams is not a diplomat, not a statesman. He is merely an extreme right-wing propagandist, a Trumpist and vocal supporter of Israel's Zionist regime,' said MUS'AB MUZAHAR, a member of the Islamist Amanah party, the South China Post reported today. Other Malaysian officials piled on. Adams' 'extremist ideologies and divisive rhetoric' aren't welcome in Malaysia, said Parti Keadilan Rakyat's Youth International Relations Bureau chief ARIEF IZUADIN, per the Independent. 'Nick Adams is not just a controversial figure. He openly spreads hatred towards Islam and supports the Zionist colonial regime without consideration,' said MOHAMED SUKRI, the Malaysian Islamic Party youth chief in the state of Selangor,per The Star. Those officials were reacting to Adams' long history of inflammatory social media postings including his assertion last year that he pressured a restaurant owner to fire a server for wearing a 'Free Palestine' pin. The Malaysian government of Prime Minister ANWAR IBRAHIM hasn't officially commented on Adams' nomination. Transitions — Ukrainian President VOLODYMYR ZELENSKYY tapped deputy prime minister and close ally YULIA SVYRYDENKO to be the country's next prime minister. Svyrydenko, who has been a main broker of the controversial U.S.-Ukraine critical minerals pact, will replace DENYS SHMYHAL, who has been in his post since 2020. — SCOTT PHILLIPS is now a member of the Aviation practice at Eckert Seamans. He previously was the resident legal officer for Central America and Mexico Programs at the U.S. Agency for International Development. What to Read — Jacopo Barigazzi, Nektaria Stamouli and Giorgio Leali, POLITICO: Italy and Greece sound the alarm over Libya. But allies aren't rushing to help. — Dexter Filkins, The New Yorker: Is the U.S. Ready for the Next War? — Michael Smetana, War on the Rocks: How Iran Overplayed its Hand Tomorrow Today — Center for Strategic and International Studies, 8:45 a.m.: U.S. Soft Power and Competition with China — Hudson Institute, 9 a.m.: Drone Warfare and Securing America's Military Against Emerging Threats — House Homeland Security Transportation and Maritime Security Subcommittee, 10 a.m.: Surveillance, Sabotage, and Strikes: Industry Perspectives on How Drone Warfare Abroad Is Transforming Threats at Home — Senate Foreign Relations Committee, 10 a.m.: Nominations of JOHN ARRIGO to be U.S. ambassador to Portugal; CHRISTINE TORETTI to be U.S. ambassador to Sweden; and MIKE WALTZ to be U.S. ambassador to the United Nations — House Armed Services Committee, 10 a.m.: Full committee markup of the FY26 NDAA — House Foreign Affairs East Asia and Pacific Subcommittee, 10 a.m.: Breaking China's Chokehold on Critical Mineral Supply Chains — Arab Center, 11 a.m.: The Future of US-Syria Relations and the Implications of Lifting the Sanctions — Brookings Institution, 11 a.m.: 'Rising Risks of Conflict in the Horn of Africa,' focusing on Ethiopia — Quincy Institute for Responsible Statecraft, 1 p.m.:Book discussion on 'Total Defense: The New Deal and the Origins of National Security' — House Foreign Affairs Committee, 2 p.m.: FY2026 State Department Posture: Management and Resources — Hudson Institute, 2 p.m.: Countering Communist Cyborgs: China's Dystopian AI Ambitions and the Robotics Race — Tom Lantos Human Rights Commission, 2 p.m.: 'Pakistan: Ongoing Political Repression,' focusing on 'Pakistan's persecution of opposition political figures and journalists, and its actions to control media communications and prevent free and fair elections in Pakistan.' — Aspen Institute, 7 p.m.: 2025 Security Forum Thanks to our editors, Heidi Vogt and Emily Lussier, whose values are not aligned with ours.

Trump administration to spend $1 billion on ‘offensive' hacking operations
Trump administration to spend $1 billion on ‘offensive' hacking operations

TechCrunch

time12 hours ago

  • TechCrunch

Trump administration to spend $1 billion on ‘offensive' hacking operations

The Trump administration, through the Department of Defense, plans to spend $1 billion over the next four years on what it calls 'offensive cyber operations.' The provision in Trump's landmark One Big Beautiful Bill does not say what those 'offensive cyber operations' are, nor what specific tools or software would qualify. The budget does note that the money will go towards enhancing and improving the capabilities of the U.S. Indo-Pacific Command, which operates in the Asia-Pacific region, including China, the U.S.' biggest geopolitical rival. The move to spend a billion on cyber comes as the newly passed budget also slashed a billion from the U.S.' cyber defense budget, at a time when the U.S. faces ongoing cyber threats from China. Sen. Ron Wyden, a Democrat and long-standing member of the Senate Intelligence Committee, said that the provision also comes as the Trump administration cut funding for defensive cybersecurity programs, including gutting the U.S. cybersecurity agency CISA and its budget. The cuts have been only in part rolled back after a federal court ruled the firing of 130 employees unlawful. 'The Trump administration has slashed funding for cybersecurity and government technology and left our country wide open to attack by foreign hackers,' Wyden said in an emailed statement to TechCrunch. 'Vastly expanding U.S. government hacking is going to invite retaliation — not just against federal agencies, but also rural hospitals, local governments and private companies who don't stand a chance against nation-state hackers.' Offensive cyber operations can describe a wide range of targeted hacks against U.S. adversaries, which include the use of zero-day exploits — unknown flaws in software that give their operators the ability to hack into a target's device — or the deployment of spyware, which can be used to steal data from a person. But these operations can also include more everyday components needed to support those operations, such as setting up the infrastructure needed to carry out cyberattacks, intelligence gathering, such as collecting or buying internet traffic (known as 'netflow'), and more. Techcrunch event Save up to $475 on your TechCrunch All Stage pass Build smarter. Scale faster. Connect deeper. Join visionaries from Precursor Ventures, NEA, Index Ventures, Underscore VC, and beyond for a day packed with strategies, workshops, and meaningful connections. Save $450 on your TechCrunch All Stage pass Build smarter. Scale faster. Connect deeper. Join visionaries from Precursor Ventures, NEA, Index Ventures, Underscore VC, and beyond for a day packed with strategies, workshops, and meaningful connections. Boston, MA | REGISTER NOW Spokespeople from the White House and the Department of Defense acknowledged receipt, but did not respond to a request for comment.

Air defenders like the Patriot soldiers who shot down Iranian missiles are becoming a 'new tip of the spear,' Army secretary says
Air defenders like the Patriot soldiers who shot down Iranian missiles are becoming a 'new tip of the spear,' Army secretary says

Business Insider

time13 hours ago

  • Business Insider

Air defenders like the Patriot soldiers who shot down Iranian missiles are becoming a 'new tip of the spear,' Army secretary says

Air defenders are becoming some of the US Army's most in-demand soldiers, Army Secretary Daniel Driscoll said. After Patriot crews intercepted Iran's missile attack on a US base in Qatar last month, Driscoll said that air defenders are in some ways becoming the Army's "new tip of the spear," a phrase that is typically used for troops like special operators. In a recent interview with Business Insider, Driscoll and Gen. James Rainey, the commanding general overseeing Army Futures Command, said Army leadership has seen a strong demand signal in recent conflicts. Integrated air and missile defenses are " one of the most demanded and deployed capabilities we as an Army have," the Army secretary said. "We have been stressing those units for a long time." He added that the demand signal will only increase, noting that Army leadership "likes to refer to them as, in some ways, the new tip of the spear." The phrase often refers to elite, forward-deployed forces, like special operations forces like the Green Berets, Delta Force, or Rangers, because these forces are often deployed ahead of conventional forces and lead operations or shape the battlefield for strategic impact. It is not typically applied to defensive assets. Air and missile defenses are critical for blunting strikes and threatening enemy airpower. Recruiting more soldiers for air defense battalions in 2026 and fielding additional Patriots and Terminal High Altitude Area Defense systems are priorities for the Army. A need for more Patriots The Army has 15 Patriot battalions, Gen. James Mingus, vice chief of staff of the Army, said at a Center for Strategic and International Studies event last week, although one is undergoing a major revamp. Three are deployed to the Indo-Pacific and one is in Europe. One Patriot in US Central Command has been there, Mingus said, for close to 500 days. The rest are service retained, or unassigned. Mingus described the Patriot battalions as "a very stressed force element," and said the Army was aware it had to grow its number of systems, with plans to increase to 18 battalions, not including one going to Guam as part of the Guam Defense System. The Army is also stockpiling munitions critical to this air defense mission. In its 2026 budget proposal, the service requested to quadruple its Patriot Advanced Capability-3 missile. The Army has previously spoken about the need to increase the magazine depth for its munitions given the potential for a protracted conflict to chew through critical weapon stockpiles. Recent reporting suggested US Patriot interceptor stockpiles could be critically low. The Army's big plans to dramatically increase its stockpile include a request for $1.3 billion in extra funding. A high-risk situation could demand numerous interceptors. Recently, Patriot missile batteries were used to shield the US military's Al Udeid Air Base in Qatar from Iranian ballistic missiles launched in retaliation for US strikes on Iranian nuclear facilities. Chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff Gen. Dan Caine described the intercepts as "a lot of metal flying around." The top general said it was believed to be "the largest single Patriot engagement in US military history." The Pentagon acknowledged last week, as a satellite image showing damage at the base surfaced, that one enemy missile got through, causing "minimal damage to equipment and structures on the base." The rest of over a dozen missiles fired are said to have been intercepted. Driscoll told BI that the soldiers involved in those air defense operations demonstrated "incredible bravery and an ability to stand back and do their job under immense stress." M1M-104 Patriots are sophisticated surface-to-air missile defense platforms that long had mixed reviews but have been invaluable for Ukraine, which received the systems from the US and has been employing them against Russian missile and drone strikes. Ukraine has requested more of these systems and the interceptors, calling them critical for keeping civilian centers and cities safe. Weapons to Ukraine There's been recent confusion about whether the US intends to provide more Patriot interceptors to Ukraine. Earlier this month, the White House said a decision had been made to pause ammunition delivery to Ukraine amid concerns about American stockpiles decreasing, with reports identifying Patriots as one of the capabilities being halted, specifically much-needed interceptor missiles. The shipment had been promised by the Biden administration. Last week, President Donald Trump reversed the pause, telling reporters he didn't know who approved it. The Pentagon then said it would send additional defensive weapons to Ukraine. In an interview, US Secretary of State Marco Rubio said the initial decision to pause the shipment "unfortunately was mischaracterized. It was a pause pending review on a handful of specific type munitions." Trump said over the weekend that the US would be sending Patriots to Ukraine but that " the European Union is paying for it." "We're not paying anything for it, but we will send it," he said. The president didn't specify how many systems or interceptors would be included or when Ukraine might receive the weapons. Speaking at the White House Monday alongside NATO Secretary General Mark Rutte, the president said that a deal was in the works to move Patriots out of NATO countries into Ukraine. The US would then backfill the lost capability. "A couple of the countries that have Patriots are going to swap over, and we'll replace the Patriots," Trump said. Patriots are made by US defense firms RTX and Lockheed Martin, both of which are working to expand essential production.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store