Why Wall Street's Dr. Doom now wants to be Dr. Boom
The economist has scaled back his recession call and thinks the US is headed for an investment boom.
He told BI there are three things that have driven his newfound optimism.
Wall Street has been calling him "Dr. Doom" for 17 years, but Nouriel Roubini — the economist famous for his persistently bearish and frequently dystopian takes on the world economy — is sounding surprisingly positive lately.
He's rescinded his earlier call for a recession, and now sees a US tech and artificial intelligence investment boom unfolding that will uplift the economy through the rest of this decade.
By 2030, Roubini thinks economic growth in the US will double from around 2% to 4%, while productivity growth surges from around 1.9% to 3%. The stock market is also likely to climb higher, he told Business Insider in an interview, predicting the S&P 500 would see high single-digit percentage growth in 2025, on par with its historical return.
It's a sharp turnaround from the gloomy forecasts he' is known for. Roubini told BI the nickname started to stick in 2008, when the New York Times referred to him as "Dr. Doom" after he correctly called the Great Financial Crisis, he told BI.
"Even before, I always said I'm not Dr. Doom and I'm Dr. Realist, first of all," Roubini said. He said that he's made numerous forecasts that were more bullish than the consensus throughout the years when the evidence lines up. "So I don't know why people think that I'm always Dr. Doom. It's not the case."
His outlook, though, has brightened considerably since 2022. Back then, he appeared on TV and penned op-eds warning of a coming stagflationary debt crisis. At the time, he described the turmoil he saw looming as an all-in-one financial crisis involving spiraling debt levels, soaring inflation, and a severe recession.
Roubini told BI there are a few things that have gotten him to change his tune.
Roubini says he began to hear the murmurs of the AI revolution well before ChatGPT went viral at the end of 2022. In his 2022 book, "Megathreats," he acknowledged the potential for artificial intelligence to significantly boost economic growth and serve as a major tailwind for markets.
That's become a reality way faster than Roubini expected, and a major reason he's become more bullish, he told BI.
He believes the economy could start to reap the growth and productivity benefits of AI in the next several years, particularly as humanoid robots enter the mainstream.
A breakthrough in fusion energy would be another bullish force for the economy, Roubini said.
Fusion energy hasn't been achieved yet, but tech firms are pouring vast sums of money into making it happen. Chevron and Google contributed to a more than $150 million funding round this week for TAE Technologies, a fusion energy company that plans to have a working prototype power plant by the early 2030s. Type One Energy, another fusion energy firm, also plans to roll out a power plant by the middle of the next decade.
"We're not in an AI winter anymore. We had the fusion winter for 40 years. We're not anymore," Roubini said, pointing to the stagnation in tech and fusion energy development is the past. "Now it's happening."
President Donald Trump's tariffs may not be as harmful to the US economy as some investors think, Roubini says. He thinks it's more likely that markets will throw a tantrum and force Trump to walk back his most aggressive policies.
That's already happened a few times this year. Roubini pointed to sharp sell-offs in the bond market that preceded Trump's 90-day pause of his "Liberation Day" tariffs, and the softening of his tone regarding firing Jerome Powell.
"That means the bond vigilantes are the most powerful people in the world," Roubini said. "The instincts might be very bad, but then, markets are unforgiving," he added of policymakers.
Roubini speculates that tariffs on China, for instance, could wind up somewhere around 39%, well-below the 145% tariff rate Trump proposed earlier in the year.
Meanwhile, AI, quantum computing, and other tech advancements in the US can more than offset the impact of the trade war, Roubini said. Tariffs are expected to drag down GDP growth by 0.06% a year through 2035, according to estimates from the Congressional Budget Office. It's a fraction of the 2 percentage point increase in growth Roubini expects to see by the end of the decade.
Roubini now pegs the odds of a recession to just around 25%. Even if the US enters a downturn this year, Roubini says he expects it to be shallow and short, as the Fed can cut interest rates to boost the economy, while tech powers growth over the long-run.
That's not to say Dr. Doom has shed all of his bearish views. Roubini says many of the things he feared several years ago — stagflation, spiraling government debt levels, and rising geopolitical conflict — still loom.
He rattled off a list of potential risks the US could conceivably face in the future: migration controls fueling stagflation in the economy, the US dollar collapsing in value, and China and the US not reaching a trade agreement and seeing an escalating cold war, to name a few scenarios.
"So there's plenty of stuff in the world that can go wrong," he said.
Read the original article on Business Insider
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


CNBC
36 minutes ago
- CNBC
CNBC Daily Open: A week when everything happens
Choose a comfortable seat and grab your popcorn. These five days will basically be the Olympics for market watchers: And looming over all those financial and macroeconomic events is U.S. President Donald Trump's August 1 deadline for his new tariffs. As Kim Forrest, founder at Bokeh Capital, said, "What isn't happening in this week?" Here's the ideal scenario for investors. The Magnificent Seven companies reporting earnings this week and the U.S. economy secure gold at their respective events. (The Fed is expected to keep rates unchanged — whether this qualifies the central bank for a medal is up for debate). Big trading partners of the U.S., such as South Korea and India, secure a deal with the White House and join the European Union and Japan at the podium, while Beijing extends its tariff suspension with Washington. If those events happen, U.S. stocks will probably have legs clear hurdle after hurdle — and the S&P 500 can continue topping record announces a trade agreement with the European Union. Most European goods, including cars, exported to the U.S. will face a 15% tariff, Trump said Sunday. The bloc also agreed to purchase $750 billion worth of U.S. energy, he added. The Fed is ready to start lowering rates, Trump said. On Friday, the U.S. president said Fed Chair Jerome Powell told him "the country is doing well," which Trump took to mean "he's going to start recommending lower rates." Futures markets disagree. Perfect week for the S&P 500. The broad-based index rose Friday to close at a high — its fifth record in a row last week. The Nasdaq Composite and Dow Jones Industrial Average also advanced. The Stoxx Europe 600 lost 0.29%. Palantir joins rank of top 20 most valuable U.S. companies. After rising more than 2% on Friday to hit a market cap of $375 billion, Palantir bumped Home Depot out of the list. The software provider has more than doubled in value this year. [PRO] Keep an eye on these overbought stocks. Using CNBC Pro's stock screener tool, the team has identified 18 stocks that might be trading at levels higher than their fair value, based on their 14-day relative strength index. Under Trump, Uncle Sam is becoming an active investor The Trump administration has taken direct stakes in companies on a scale rarely seen in the U.S. outside wartime or economic crisis, pushing a Republican Party that traditionally championed free-market capitalism to embrace state intervention in industries viewed as important for national security. More interventions could be on the horizon as the Trump administration develops a policy to support U.S. companies in strategic industries against state-backed competition from China.
Yahoo
an hour ago
- Yahoo
Dow futures rise on US-EU trade pact as investors brace for fast and furious week of earnings, China talks, Fed, GDP, jobs report, tariff deadline
U.S. stock futures pointed to more gains after a week filled with record highs as Wall Street cheered the U.S.-EU trade deal announced on Sunday. Investors are also bracing for a frantic week loaded with market-moving events such as earnings from top companies, key economic reports, the Fed's policy meeting and more trade news. Wall Street looks to begin a jam-packed week on a high note as investors cheer the U.S.-EU trade deal that was announced on Sunday. The agreement with America's biggest trading partner removes a key source of market uncertainty and the threat of a damaging trade war. It also adds to an increasingly bullish narrative as the S&P 500 notched five record highs last week. Futures tied to the Dow Jones Industrial Average climbed 161 points, or 0.36%. S&P 500 futures were up 0.34%, and Nasdaq futures rose 0.46%. The yield on the 10-year Treasury was flat at 4.386%. The U.S. dollar dipped 0.12% against the euro but was steady against the yen. Trump's deals with the EU and Japan set 15% tariffs rates on both trade parters, who have also vowed to invest hundreds of billions of dollars in the U.S. Gold edged down 0.15% to $3,330.50 per ounce. U.S. oil prices rose 0.1% to $65.22 per barrel, and Brent crude climbed 0.1% to $68.51. Investors will not be able to look away over the coming week as every single day could produce significant market-moving news. High-stakes trade negotiations between Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent and Chinese Vice Premier He Lifeng are scheduled to start on Monday in Stockholm. That comes as a tariff truce between the two sides is due to end Aug. 12, though they are reportedly going to extend the deadline by 90 days. Tariff drama will continue throughout the week as other countries try to reach deals with the U.S. before Friday's deadline, when a pause on aggressive 'reciprocal' rates will expire. Meanwhile, Trump's tariffs face legal challenges, with a court hearing scheduled Thursday on whether the president has authority under the International Emergency Economic Powers Act to impose wide-ranging duties. On Tuesday, the Federal Reserve will begin its two-day policy meeting. Analysts don't expect the central bank to adjust rates, but Governor Christopher Waller has indicated he will dissent and call for a cut. Chairman Jerome Powell's press briefing on Wednesday afternoon will likely be dominated by questions related to the White House's attacks about renovations at the Fed's headquarters and calls from Trump allies for Powell to be ousted due to the project's cost overruns. Meanwhile, several closely watched datasets are due that will offer more clues on how tariffs may—or may not—be impacting the economy. On Tuesday, reports on consumer confidence, home prices, and job openings will come out. On Wednesday, ADP's private-sector payroll survey, second-quarter GDP data, and pending home sales are scheduled. On Thursday, weekly jobless claims and the personal consumption expenditures report, which includes the Fed's preferred inflation gauge, are due. And on Friday, the Labor Department's monthly jobs report, the Institute for Supply Management's manufacturing activity index, and construction spending round out the week in data. Don't forget earnings. Boeing announces quarterly results on Tuesday, Microsoft follows on Wednesday, while Apple and Amazon report Thursday. Oil giants Exxon Mobil and Chevron put out their numbers on Friday. This story was originally featured on Error in retrieving data Sign in to access your portfolio Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data

Business Insider
2 hours ago
- Business Insider
Torn between Amsterdam and the US for grad school, she made a pros and cons list to guide her decision. Take a look.
When Royanne Ng got into Columbia University last year, she should have been elated. Instead, the nearly $80,000 first-year tuition and fees — not including housing — made her stomach turn. The Singaporean student turned the Ivy League program down and chose one across the Atlantic instead for a fraction of the cost. At Columbia, she was offered a spot in the Film and Media Studies MA with a concentration in emergent media — a track that explores formats like virtual and augmented reality. The 28-year-old is now pursuing a one-year master's in cultural data and AI at the University of Amsterdam, a program that blends machine learning with theory and tech policy. Ng also applied to NYU but wasn't accepted, and she ultimately dropped her application to the University of Edinburgh in the UK. Her postgrad degree had to be "very strategic," she told Business Insider — a move to boost her job prospects and reposition her career in Singapore. "If I'm going to spend this much of my financial savings on a degree, it has to be really, really worth it," she said. The US once had a near-monopoly on elite higher education. But as tuition rises, safety concerns grow, and political rhetoric turns hostile toward international students, the calculation is shifting. Here's how Ng made her choice. Please help BI improve our Business, Tech, and Innovation coverage by sharing a bit about your role — it will help us tailor content that matters most to people like you. Continue By providing this information, you agree that Business Insider may use this data to improve your site experience and for targeted advertising. By continuing you agree that you accept the Terms of Service and Privacy Policy . Prestige vs practicality Columbia's program offered big advantages: name recognition, accomplished alumni, and the implicit promise of career opportunities, Ng said. The brand name, she added, carried the common assumption that it gives students "a head start when it comes to job opportunities." But the costs were impossible to ignore. Columbia's program ran for two years and charged nearly $80,000 in tuition and fees just for its first-year students. In contrast, the University of Amsterdam's fees were about €17,000 for a one-year program. "The difference is just so stark," she said, especially when Columbia required a hefty deposit that felt like too much commitment. It wasn't just about money. She said many US courses were "more traditional" — rooted in legacy disciplines and slower to adapt. Europe had programs that were a lot more novel and flexible, often designed with interdisciplinary or future-facing themes, she added. Amsterdam's curriculum hit the mark. Ng said it aligned with her goal of transitioning from tech communications and a humanities background into a career that connects AI and policy — one she hopes to pursue in Singapore. Safety and geopolitical concerns Ng's family was also worried about her safety if she chose to study in New York — and so was she. For someone who had lived in Singapore her whole life — a country known for its low crime rates and political calm — she was concerned about gun violence, racial politics, and geopolitical uncertainty in the US. Still, she said the right school depends on the student's goals after graduation. Students hoping to stay and work in the US might prioritize a school's brand, alumni network, and credentials. But Ng plans to return to Singapore, so standing out in the local job market mattered more. Ng is set to finish her program in August. Here's her pros-and-cons list of US graduate schools: Ng had created a rough version at the end of 2023 while debating whether to choose the US for graduate school. When BI reached out to her in June, she pulled it together into a neat table: Pros Cons 1) Education quality Vibrant and mentally stimulating study environment, with motivated students and highly reputable professors. There's also an assumption that many top US schools have extremely good courses and teaching 1) Health and safety Worries among family members about safety of living in certain cities, with more risk due to geopolitical instability. Not sure if causing my loved ones to constantly worry would be a worthwhile trade-off for great education 2) Reputation and optics Excellent brand name, which would be helpful for future job securing and possible advancement 2) Financial costs Some schools I applied to cost about 5x more than graduate schools in Europe. Not sure if this cost difference can really be compensated by an equivalent degree of education quality. There were also a lot of miscellaneous fees involved just in applying to schools and securing spots when offered. 3) Solid alumni network Would be in connection with illustrious alumni network, which could also be helpful for career and job advancement 3) Local labour market incompatibility Given that I was looking at programmes within humanities and social sciences departments, I was also very conscious about whether certain courses would help me stand out or gain an edge in the Singapore job market. I had to consider the possibility that even excellent brand names might not be able to change the fact that many companies still look for science, tech and data roles. 4) Course material and programmes During my research of graduate schools, I observed that many US schools offered relatively traditional programmes, based on the write-up and descriptions of Masters courses. I did tend to see more exciting and novel courses offered in the UK and Europe, marketing interdisciplinary skills combining humanities/social sciences, data science or specific sector knowledge. I felt that this interdisciplinary angle was of particular interest as someone wanting to stay relevant in the job market, so this was a major consideration in choosing my graduate programme.