
‘Stolen' director Karan Tejpal: ‘The film is about trust and having a conscience'
The Hindi movie's emergence has benefitted from the backing of directors Anurag Kashyap, Kiran Rao, Nikkhil Advani and Vikramaditya Motwane. Written by Tejpal, Gaurav Dhingra and Swapnil Salkar-Agadbumb, Stolen stars Shubham Vardhan, Abhishek Banerjee, Mia Maelzer, Harish Khanna and Sahidur Rahaman.
In an interview, 40-year-old Tejpal described himself as an 'accidental filmmaker'. A product of Mayo College in Ajmer and St Stephen's College in Delhi, Tejpal set out to be a hockey player but instead veered towards cinema.
Tejpal worked in the Hindi film industry as an assistant director for several years, starting with Lage Raho Munnabhai (2006). Tejpal squeezed in a filmmaking course at the New York Film Academy, returning to Mumbai to develop scripts and shoot commercials.
Stolen was inspired by a lynching that took place in Assam in 2018, a horrific incident that haunts Tejpal to this day, he told Scroll. Here are excerpts from the interview.
Stolen is meant for the big screen. Why is it getting a release on a streaming platform?
It would have done quite well in theatres. But the theatrical landscape across the world has become muddled with big-ticket films and star-led vehicles.
Nobody is willing to take a punt or has a risk-taking appetite any longer. As more and more films with stars fail, this opportunity is shrinking further. In fact, it was a challenge even to get the film onto a streamer.
Why is that, considering that Stolen was well received at the Mumbai Film Festival in 2023? It is exactly the kind of movie that streaming platforms are supposed to be championing.
It's been an uphill battle. It was eventually only because of the filmmakers who got attached to Stolen as executive producers that we managed to push the film over the line. The Indian landscape is very determined by who is attached to a film.
I always thought that if you made a good film, there would be a home for it. The streamers were so busy in the market that you were confident.
Perhaps the latest downturn has got them thinking twice about every project. Also, they have backed films that have done poorly on their platforms. That has affected everybody else's chances as well.
Every film has its own journey. This has been our journey – a trial by fire. At this point, I am relieved that audiences will get to watch the film.
What inspired Stolen?
The film was initially a 30-page treatment born out of an incident that took place in Karbi Anglong in Assam. Two men, a musician and a businessman, were wrongly accused of being child kidnappers and were beaten to death by a mob. The videos still give me nightmares.
I had already been working as a screenwriter for smaller projects and on advertising films. I met Gaurav Dhingra during an advertising campaign. I pitched the Stolen treatment note.
The coronavirus pandemic hit soon after. It was a start-and-stop time for the industry as a whole. We managed to start the shoot in January 2023. Since then, it has been like a bullet train.
We shot for 26 days. We were at the Venice Film Festival in August that year.
Stolen is set over a night and day, and involves fast-paced action sequences. What went into its making?
It was really tough to make. A lot of work went into finding the locations.
We shot the film close to where I grew up, in Pushkar, although it isn't set there or any other place in Rajasthan. I was looking for particular things in the locations, and I found them in Pushkar.
I've not yet been paid a penny on the film. But what I gave up in terms of a salary, I got back multi-fold in terms of creative freedom to shoot the way I wanted and get the actors I wanted. That's the only way Stolen could have been made.
No traditional producer would have let me hire Shubham or Mia, or allow me to shoot long takes. Nearly 50% of the film is one for one – meaning, there are no options for the edit, and you use the scenes as they have been shot. The film was edited in a month, I think.
It was a tight schedule. Everything had to be efficient. It was such a rewarding experience that if I had to do it again the same way, I would.
What conversations did you have with the cinematographers Isshaan Ghosh and Sachin S Pillai?
The in- camera principles were very simple. I wanted the audiences to be on the same journey as my protagonists. I wanted to send viewers on a journey that felt a bit like a social horror.
The moment this was decided, every shooting decision was backtracked onto that one principle. We shot 90% of the film with 25mm and 35mm lenses. We decided to shoot only with wide-angle lenses because we wanted an immersive experience that wouldn't be possible with long lenses because then you are looking at things from a distance.
Once you have decided on the lenses, the camera position is automatically decided. You need to get close. You're over your main character's shoulder. The perspective becomes very personal because you are in a small space.
Since the film is set over the period of a few hours, there are long takes. The less I cut, the more I stay with immediacy.
Things are playing out in front of your eyes. There is a crunching of time, a feeling of breathlessness or claustrophobia, which is what the men who inspired the story must have felt like when they were being chased by a mob for no good reason at all.
How do you prepare the actors for this kind of a shoot?
The five primary actors are all highly trained. Several actors are semi-professional or real persons.
Abhishek Banerjee was the first person we went to for the film. Shubham and Abhishek have been friends since college. They are super-close buddies. The chemistry that you see on the screen is real.
Abhishek is instinctual and acts from his gut. Shubham is very mental, he performs in his mind. They are different in that sense.
Mia Maelzer was cast after I saw some of her films. Harish Khanna and Sahidur Rahaman are again trained actors.
It was a collaborative process. Since we shot for such a short period, we did a lot of in-camera rehearsals in advance. The performances were always on the lower scale of the spectrum. Because the shots were complicated and long, the actors were free to do what they had to do because they couldn't repeat the performance.
We didn't even have a continuity supervisor. The spontaneity was maintained. If you are shooting from 25 angles and trying to match the shots later, it deadens the performances.
What is Stolen saying about the perilous encounter between urban India and rural India? Is it inadvisable to help out in a crisis?
The film does talk about the perils of having a conscience. That said, the film is about trust too. Without trust, civilisation would be nowhere, and none of our systems would work.
I didn't want to make a nihilistic film. If you have a conscience in this country or anywhere else in the world, you could get into trouble. But have a conscience, do something.
Perhaps the film is my callout to myself. Would I stand up in such a situation? I don't have the courage to get out onto the streets and picket against subjects, but perhaps that's why I make movies.
The film could be viewed as privilege meeting the rest of India.
Absolutely. I come from a privileged background. I got the best education. I belong to a bubble, and I engage with the rest of the country from within that bubble.
But the inside and outside worlds intersect in weird ways. The film is about why the two worlds need to coexist, or at least be cognisant of each other.
Now that Stolen will be out soon, what are your plans?
I'm writing a feature for Mira Nair that will be set in Delhi. I'm also heading the writers' room for the second season of Dahaad.
I have a couple of my own projects, one of which is called Umeed, a horror film about a lesbian couple trying to have a baby, written by Abhishek Banerjee, the writer of Pataal Lok and Pari. There's another film I have been working on for a long time, a romantic thriller about a young couple in a taboo relationship.
The idea of combining genres with the subjects that I want to talk about is my sort of jam.
Play
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


The Hindu
22 minutes ago
- The Hindu
Péro's spring-summer capsule Flowers Flower, explores floral whimsy and legacy textiles
After its last year's collaboration with Japan's iconic brand Hello Kitty, Péro, a 15-year-old Indian fashion label by designer Aneeth Arora, has now teamed up with British luxury department store and brand Liberty London for its spring-summer capsule 2025. Titled Flowers Flower, the collection is deeply personal to Aneeth and reflects her love for legacy. Launched in Chennai on Friday, at fashion boutique Collage, the edit brings together iconic fabrics from Liberty London and Péro's rootedness and love for Indian craft and textiles. 'Dating back to 1875, there is this old-school charm about Liberty London's prints. We have been working with flowers too and Liberty London is all about those ditsy flowers. I felt that makes us a perfect match, and we decided to work with some of their classic prints,' Aneeth says. Liberty London's fine tana lawn cotton, described as a cotton that behaves like silk, is often dotted with flower prints — forget-me-nots, daffodils, peonies and speedwell. 'For this collection, we are working with the classic Tana Lawn textile that has strong legacy, and we did not want to overpower the floral prints by using very bold textiles. The Indian textiles we have used with these prints are basic, handwoven textiles from different parts of India,' she says, of the elements that make up the garments in the whimsy collection. This includes Chanderi from Madhya Pradesh, mashru stripes from Gujarat, stripes and checks from Maheshwar, silks and solids from the South of India, and cotton from West Bengal, Aneeth says. This is a departure for Péro, where the main line often features bright influences like tartans. In Péro's signature flowy, androgynous silhouettes, the capsule has shirts, dresses, tops, jackets, skirts, pants and shorts. Liberty London's signature floral prints are layered with embroidered beadwork, fabric origami, tassels, appliqué, patchwork and custom wooden buttons. Aneeth says, at heart, she feels like Péro is becoming more childlike with time. 'Nothing is a limit for us and we don't have any inhibitions. When we started, we were working with a lot of constraints, and, over the years, we have become open to things; The brand as well is evolving in such a way that nothing seems impossible now,' she says, adding that the brand's collaborations with Hello Kitty, where it channelled a 'cottagecore kawaii', and now with Liberty London, allows it to experiment and craft without rules or constraints. 'Collaboration with an iconic brand like Hello Kitty or even dreaming of working with Liberty prints now seems possible, and something we are enjoying. I think, the brand has become mature in the way we deal with materials, but it has also become more free in terms of dreaming and knowing that if you dream you can achieve,' says Aneeth. Latha Madhu of Collage calls Péro an 'enduring' brand, a word Aneeth says is a beautiful description. 'We do timeless clothing season by season, so yes, I relate to this. Be it Chennai or any other place in the world, we are consistent in the kind of design language of the brand even though we experiment with diverse themes. There are classics that we keep repeating; some of our shapes, textiles and silhouettes are always a constant,' Aneeth says. This, Aneeth says, is probably why people come back to Péro: 'I feel that the word 'enduring' resonates, and season after season, people resonate with what we are offering to them, in spite of having such drastic changes in themes.' Flowers Flower is now available at Collage, 6, Rutland Gate, Nungambakkam.


Hindustan Times
27 minutes ago
- Hindustan Times
Jr NTR fans throng to theatres to watch him ‘breathe fire' in War 2 trailer during face-off with Hrithik Roshan. Watch
Ayan Mukerji's War 2 marks the Hindi debut of Tollywood star Jr NTR. The actor, who will share the screen with Hrithik Roshan and Kiara Advani, will play an Indian agent called Vikram in the film, facing off against Hrithik's Kabir. Hundreds of Jr NTR fans thronged to theatres across Andhra Pradesh and Telangana where the trailer of War 2 was screened. See their reactions. (Also Read: War 2 trailer: 'Ghost' Hrithik Roshan fights 'juggernaut' Jr NTR, Kiara Advani kicks butt; fans say 'Bollywood is back') Jr NTR and Hrithik Roshan play Indian agents who face off in Ayan Mukerji's War 2. Jr NTR catch War 2 trailer in theatres It looks like fans are in the mood to celebrate Jr NTR's Bollywood debut because even before the film hits screens on 14 August, they thronged to theatres just to watch the trailer. One video posted on X (formerly Twitter) shows fans lining up outside a theatre and rushing in with excitement as soon as the theatre doors open. Another video taken inside a theatre as the War 2 trailer is being screened shows fans screaming so loudly that they drown out the dialogue in the trailer. Fans can be seen with their phones whipped out to record the euphoria, and their screaming gets louder whenever Jr NTR comes on screen. Some fans even posted videos of the scenes before the trailer was even released. One video shows fans cheering and waving flags while seated inside a theatre as they wait for the trailer to drop. Fans think Jr NTR 'breathed fire' in War 2 trailer If the reactions on social media are anything to go by, fans could not get enough of Jr NTR in the War 2 trailer. They praised everything from his emotional performance to the action scenes that were shown in the trailer. One fan wrote on X, 'Every @tarak9999 film has one guarantee: goosebumps. #FansPride #War2Trailer.' Another wrote, '#JrNTR is breathing fire in the #War2 trailer. Stole the show.' One fan wrote that their favourite shot in the trailer is when Jr NTR looks Hrithik in the face with intensity, writing, 'Which one is your favourite shot from the #War2 trailer??? Let me goooo first. This shot >>> WHOLE TRAILER.' Another wrote, 'Lifetime settlement. If you show me a better elevation than any other actor in the YRF SPY UNIVERSE. Can't wait to witness the #WAR2TrailerEuphoria.' War 2 is the sequel of the 2019 film War, which starred Hrithik, Tiger Shroff and Vaani Kapoor. The film will clash with Lokesh Kanagaraj's Rajinikanth-starrer Coolie on August 14.


Mint
an hour ago
- Mint
‘Sarzameen' review: Strained family drama has little insight into Kashmir
Kayoze Irani's Sarzameen reminded me of another, very different Kajol film. I won't say which, or why. What I will say is that if you're hoping to land a wild plot twist, at least flesh out enough characters that the viewer can't figure out the reveal through simple deduction. Something about eliminating the impossible... This is the second film in two months set in modern-day Kashmir and revolving around the armed forces serving there. Ground Zero, released days after the Pahalgam attack, is about a model BSF officer, devoted to his wife and young daughter. It's the more interesting of the two films, building to the verge of critical self-assessment before retreating to the safer ground of patriotic duty. Sarzameen has a more fractious military family at its centre. Colonel Vijay Menon (Prithviraj Sukumaran) is introduced with a dramatic victory, leading the capture of separatist Qaabil (K.C. Shankar), believed to be the shadowy string-puller 'Mohsin'. But in the very next scene—in what will become a pattern—he's handed a defeat at home, at a party hosted by his wife, Meher (Kajol). She has a surprise: their son, Harman, wants to say a few words about his father. But the boy can't overcome his stutter, and is embarrassed into silence by the pointed murmuring of guests and his father's clear discomfort. Vijay's coldness in this moment is consistent with his attitude towards the timid, sensitive boy who can't seem to please his demanding father. Meher tries to get him to be nicer, but you can sense it's no use, that army-obsessed Vijay has deemed his son unfit to serve, even on the homefront. One night, when Vijay is on duty, the boy is kidnapped by Qaabil's people. A prisoner exchange is demanded. Somehow, after it's done, Vijay still doesn't have his son. If you've seen a trailer or a poster or heard anything about this film, you'll know that Harman returns. Or, at any rate, a young man who calls himself Harman, who turns up conveniently during an army sweep. Grown-up Harman, played by Ibrahim Ali Khan, is buff and bearded; he looks plausibly Kashmiri, despite neither of his parents looking remotely so. Vijay brings him home, but almost immediately—to his wife's disgust—suspects the young man is hiding something. Sarzameen joins a growing list of films that see Kashmir only as a picturesque setting and a hook to hang their patriotism on. Almost all the Kashmiri characters in the film are terrorists; all the non-Kashmiris are army personnel. There's barely anything in the music, the detailing, the language to tie the film to its setting. When Qaabil and his son talk, it's in Hindi, without any sort of accent. The only thing that says Kashmir is the snow and the barbed wire and soldiers everywhere. Shankar plays Qaabil with as much dignity as possible, but he's fighting a film that isn't interested in his character's reasons. Though Sarzameen isn't nasty like Article 370 (2024), it's not shy of stereotypes either. There are multiple scenes where assuming a Muslim name enables a character to become a true separatist. 'Why are you eating with your hands?' Vijay asks Harman on his first night home—a crazy thing to associate with Muslims, considering Indians of all kinds, all over the country, eat this way. In his second film after Nadaaniyan, Khan still looks tentative. He doesn't give the impression of enjoying being in front of a camera, something you rarely see even in the least promising star kids. A more seasoned director could have helped him channel his wariness into the unhappy Harman, but Irani (son of Boman Irani, who appears in a small role), directing his first film, is tentative himself. The biggest miscalculation is barely developing Meher beyond being a worried mother, despite having Kajol in the role; there's a reason for this, a gamble that backfires spectacularly. A lesser stumble, but one that made me roll my eyes, is the scene where boy Harman and young man Harman have a conversation, a device much too tricky for a film this simple. Sarzameen seems afraid to look the Kashmir conflict in the face. The film it superficially resembles is Vidhu Vinod Chopra's Mission Kashmir (2000), in which police superintendent Inayat Khan adopts the child of civilians who are killed during a operation he's leading, only for the boy to grow up, find out the truth and vow to end his life. It's a far more provocative scenario, and though it has its blind spots, the film is alive to the place, its people and their troubles. Sarzameen, on the other hand, remains an outside observer, and doesn't do a good job of that either.