logo
The NZ economy is still sick, doubts are growing about the Govt prescription

The NZ economy is still sick, doubts are growing about the Govt prescription

NZ Herald3 days ago
Are these the right antibiotics? Are the antibiotics making me feel sick?
I do feel a little better I think. But it's taking longer than I expected.
Maybe I should see the doctor again. Or am I just being impatient?
Ugh, so much uncertainty.
Hopefully, those who've tuned in for a fresh read on the state of the economy can see where this is going.
Never let a metaphor go by, I say!
Anyway, here's me and the New Zealand economy, both sick in the midst of a miserable wet winter and worrying about whether our recoveries have stalled.
A run of negative data has knocked the wind out of the nation's sails.
The bad vibes are being pushed along by a strong political current.
Both the left and right are telling us that the Government has prescribed the wrong medicine.
The left blames the Government for cutting spending into a downturn.
The logic is pretty simple.
Any good Keynesian will tell you, when demand in the private sector falls, that's the time for the Government to come to the party.
Borrow a bit more, don't slash and burn civil service, hire more teachers and nurses, build more stuff ... it won't be inflationary because it won't be crowding out private sector competition, which is in recession.
The trouble is, we're still in the aftermath of the last big spend-up, which went on too long.
Labour's stimulus, once we got through the initial Covid shock, did clash with a private sector boom and exacerbated inflation.
That muddied the political narrative.
It made it inevitable that the incoming centre-right coalition would cut back despite the extra damage that would do to economic growth.
In the context of using fiscal policy to drive economic prosperity, you can make a good case that successive governments have got things completely arse about face.
You'd expect this argument from the left.
But Christopher Luxon and Nicola Willis are being savaged even more aggressively from their right flank.
The monetarists, the supply-side guys, the neo-liberals, (whatever you want to call them) are berating the Government for not dealing with the national debt and Crown deficit by administering a Rogernomics-style reboot of the whole economy.
I doubt that would make the current downturn any more pleasant, but they argue it couldn't be much worse. And the payoff would be longer-term gains as the economy found a more productive and financially secure baseline.
Both arguments can be compelling and, if nothing else, add to the concern that the current strategy of subtle market-oriented tweaks risks underdelivering on all sides.
But through all of this gloom, one thing we need to remember is that most economists still believe the foundations of recovery are in place.
Step back a bit from the mess of ugly recent economic data – the second quarter sucked, we get it!
What are we actually experiencing?
The labour market is tough. Unemployment is rising, and new job creation is almost non-existent.
But this is not a surprise. In fact, while economists do get things wrong, they've been forecasting unemployment to be about where it is now for more than a year.
We know it's one of the last pieces of data to turn in any recovery.
Unfortunately, it is now overlapping with an unwanted and unexpected spike in inflation.
Like a jump scare in the final scene of a horror movie, food prices (with rates and power, and insurance) have conspired to pause Reserve Bank rate cuts and rattled our faith in the recovery.
Then there are tariffs and global unrest and all of that.
It's not really surprising that it all feels bleak.
So it's a bit ironic to be writing an optimistic take on the economy, especially given the rough week stuck at home that I've just had.
My view wouldn't have been so upbeat if I hadn't been woken from my sick bed on Friday morning by a text from investment bank HSBC's Australian head of communications.
He was asking how far away I was from my scheduled meeting with their global chief economist, Janet Henry and and Australia-New Zealand chief economist Paul Bloxham.
Oops ... I was a long way away.
But they kindly let me Zoom in later, and I'm very glad I did.
As anyone with Australian cousins will know, sometimes it's healthy to be slapped in the face with a slightly condescending, external view of the New Zealand condition.
Bloxham told me his forecasts currently make him one of the gloomiest economists on Australian growth.
However, he's one of the most positive on New Zealand growth.
Last year, New Zealand had the single largest contraction of any economy in the developed world, Bloxham points out.
That inevitably comes with a hangover. But if you believe in the fundamentals of the New Zealand economy, which he does, there is no reason to assume the cycle won't turn.
'I suspect why I'm a little bit more upbeat than others is I sit in Sydney and watch it from the outside and go: hey, you've got two big forces at work that are set to continue to lift growth and give you a recovery.'
No prizes for guessing those two forces – falling interest rates and booming agricultural commodity prices.
The money flowing into the rural economy must eventually flow through to the cities and lift growth, Bloxham says.
It won't happen overnight, but it will happen (my words, not his).
We've had a big downswing, which means we're due a pretty big upswing to get back to trend, he says.
And we've got monetary policy and the terms of trade in place to drive that cyclical upswing.
'All cycles look different. We always ask the same question going through: oh, it's not quite happening as quickly as we thought.
'The question you ask yourself is: is that because it's not working? Is it that interest rates aren't going to have the same effect? That a positive-terms-of-trade shock won't have the same effect? Or are things just a bit different this time around?'
Great question. And look, the sun's finally out and I think my head's clearing. Time to go for a walk and ponder it all.
Liam Dann is business editor-at-large for the New Zealand Herald. He is a senior writer and columnist, and also presents and produces videos and podcasts. He joined the Herald in 2003.
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Number of high-security beds at Hawke's Bay Regional Prison could rise by up to 460, document shows
Number of high-security beds at Hawke's Bay Regional Prison could rise by up to 460, document shows

NZ Herald

time2 hours ago

  • NZ Herald

Number of high-security beds at Hawke's Bay Regional Prison could rise by up to 460, document shows

It said the population would increase rapidly until June 2028 and then rise gradually until June 2035. In a section of the long-term network configuration plan entitled The Future Prison Network – what could the prison network look like in the next 20 Years, the plan calls for new high-security capacity at Hawke's Bay Regional Prison. Between 240 and 720 new high-security beds would be built at the facility, to replace 256 existing beds deemed to be poor quality, the plan shows. The report also mentions the refurbishment of six hut units – typically low-security buildings for prisoners nearing release – which would improve quality and decrease bed numbers in these units from 380 to 252. A spokesperson from Corrections said on August 4, 2025, Hawke's Bay Regional Prison had 755 operational beds, 68 of which were vacant. Hawke's Bay Regional Prison. Photo / Paul Taylor Labour Corrections spokeswoman Dr Tracey McLellan said the party had warned before the 2023 election that the coalition Government was laying the groundwork for a 'mega-prison' in Hawke's Bay. 'The plan for up to 720 new high-security beds turns Hawke's Bay Regional Prison into one of the largest custodial sites in the country,' McLellan said. 'People in Hawke's Bay didn't ask for a mega-prison. They asked for better housing, safer communities and support for youth – not more cells.' Before the 2023 general election, then Tukituki Labour MP Anna Lorck said she didn't want any more beds built at the prison. 'What we know happens is, if we build a mega-prison, there will be more serious criminals brought into Hawke's Bay to serve their time and with them come their associates,' Lorck said at the time. Wedd said at the time that Lorck was peddling 'desperate misinformation' with her 'mega-prison' claim. When contacted by Hawke's Bay Today, Lorck, no longer in politics, said she hoped the region fights back against any plan to build a larger prison. 'It's the last thing our region needs,' she said. Wedd said Corrections had a range of projects under way to increase the number and quality of beds across the prison network, but no projects at Hawke's Bay Regional Prison had been confirmed. A Corrections spokesperson said public safety was their top priority, and ensuring they had sufficient fit-for-purpose prison capacity was critical to keeping the public safe. 'The Hawke's Bay Regional Prison redevelopment is a potential project being planned to meet the forecast rising demand for high-security beds at the prison,' the spokesperson said. 'This project would deliver additional high-security accommodation and necessary upgrades and replacements to essential site infrastructure such as the gatehouse and visitor facilities. 'The detailed scope of the project is being developed and the project remains subject to approvals and funding decisions.' The spokesperson said they could not provide timings of when decisions would be made. Inmate numbers at NZ's largest prisons*: Mt Eden Corrections Facility – 1318 Rimutaka Prison – 1024 Auckland South Corrections Facility – 960 Spring Hill Corrections Facility – 904 Christchurch Men's Prison – 896 Hawke's Bay Regional Prison – 703 Auckland Prison – 679 Northland Regional Corrections Facility – 601 Whanganui Prison – 519 * as of March 31, 2025 Jack Riddell is a multimedia journalist with Hawke's Bay Today and has worked in radio and media in Auckland, London, Berlin, and Napier.

Former Attorney-General criticises marine and coastal rights law changes
Former Attorney-General criticises marine and coastal rights law changes

RNZ News

time2 hours ago

  • RNZ News

Former Attorney-General criticises marine and coastal rights law changes

Former Attorney-General and National MP Chris Finlayson. Photo: Nicola Edmonds A former Attorney-General and National MP has lashed out at the government over its decision to push on with controversial legislation that would make it harder for Māori to get customary marine title. Chris Finlayson is calling the move foolish and "extremely harmful" to race relations. But Prime Minister Christopher Luxon says it will see the law returned to its "original intention" and strike a better balance for the rights of all New Zealanders. The changes to the Marine and Coastal Area (Takutai Moana) Act would toughen the test for judging whether customary rights should be given. Customary title recognises exclusive Māori rights to parts of the foreshore and seabed, provided certain legal tests are met, including proving continuous and "exclusive" use of the area since 1840 without substantial interruption. A 2023 Court of Appeal ruling , however, declared that groups only needed to show they had enough control over the area that they could keep others from using it, and that situations where the law itself had prevented them from doing so could be ignored. The Supreme Court subsequently overturned that and the government put a pause on any amendments to the law. On Tuesday, Treaty Negotiations Minister Paul Goldsmith said after the discussing the ruling, Cabinet felt it still did not achieve the "balance" the government wanted and the test to win customary rights was still too low. His comment were echoed by Luxon who, speaking from Papua New Guinea, said the change would get the legislation back to its "original intention". "We obviously have looked at the Supreme Court decision pretty closely [and] think it's quite broad and able to be interpreted in quite a broad way," he said. "We think the best way to do [that] is actually to get legislation to put it back to its original intent, which struck the right balance." Chris Finlayson disputes that, and told RNZ the Supreme Court had already expressed "very well" what Parliament's intention back in 2010 was. "These amendments do not restore the original intention of Parliament. They undermine them. Let there be no doubt about that at all," he said. Finlayson was Attorney-General at the time the legislation was enacted in law in 2011, which replaced the controversial Foreshore and Seabed Act . "What they are doing by these foolish amendments is destroying the settlement that the National Party and the Māori Party reached in 2010." Finlayson said there was no justification for the move, which he said was "extremely harmful" to race relations in New Zealand. "Tangata whenua have a few wins in court, and it's ripped away from them by the government, which changes goal posts 15 years later. "I am very, very saddened by what they have done, and I think it's a very bad day for race relations in New Zealand. "I just can't believe that they're as foolish as they appear to be," he said. Labour Party Māori Crown-Relations spokesperson Peeni Henare said the changes would restrict the ability of Māori to test their rights in court. "In 2011, the National Party made much of their commitment to Māori 'having their day in court' and this proposed change takes that away again." Henare said the law, as it stands today, does not give Māori ownership rights like control over public access. "This action by the government does nothing to strengthen the Māori-Crown relationship, despite them saying they value iwi Māori. "The government needs to be straight up and admit they don't care about Māori. Their actions don't match their words," he said. The amendments prompted fierce backlash from iwi last year, including Ngāpuhi who walked out of an Iwi Chairs Forum meeting with the Prime Minister in protest of the legislation. It also drew the ire of Northland iwi Ngāti Wai , who said at the time they would not accept the Crown "exercising an authority we do not believe they possess". In September last year, The Waitangi Tribunal found the changes were characterised by a "blind adherence" to pre-existing political commitments at the expense of Māori. Sign up for Ngā Pitopito Kōrero , a daily newsletter curated by our editors and delivered straight to your inbox every weekday.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store