PSA urges suspension of IDT officials over oxygen plant tender
The PSA said it was outraged by revelations of alleged fraud and gross mismanagement in the R836m pressure swing adsorption oxygen plant project, overseen by the IDT.
Public works and infrastructure minister Dean Macpherson released the findings of an independent forensic investigation on Tuesday. The investigation report recommended disciplinary action against IDT CEO Tebogo Malaka, GM for supply chain management Molebedi Sisi and other officials.
The union said the project that aimed to install oxygen plants at 60 hospitals nationwide was seen as an opportunity for self-enrichment by greedy employees and service providers.
'What began as a R216m initiative to install life-saving oxygen plants at South Africa's public hospitals has inexplicably ballooned to R836m. This staggering escalation, reportedly owing to irregular procurement processes and cost overruns, is a grave betrayal of public trust and a direct threat to the integrity of South Africa's healthcare system.'
The forensic investigation further revealed several companies were awarded contracts without having valid South African Health Products Regulatory Authority licences.
The PSA condemned the apparent disregard for due process and fiscal responsibility, particularly in a sector as critical as public health. With millions of South Africans relying on state healthcare, every misallocated rand undermines the quality of care and endangers lives, it said.
'While investigations are under way, there is a need to implement stricter procurement and project management protocols to prevent further abuse of public resources.'
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
TimesLIVE
an hour ago
- TimesLIVE
No discussions with ZHRC about Zimbabweans denied access to healthcare services: public protector
The public protector's office has clarified it has not received complaints lodged by the Zimbabwe Human Rights Commission (ZHRC) regarding the denial of Zimbabwean nationals' access to healthcare services in South Africa. There has been a growing trend of advocacy groups such as Operation Dudula blocking illegal foreigners from receiving medical care. The small fringe group has been protesting outside clinics and hospitals, checking patients' nationalities and turning away non-South Africans. In a recent interview with Newzroom Afrika, ZHRC chairperson Jessie Majome said she had a conversation with public protector Kholeka Gcaleka about how the two countries can resolve the issue. 'This is not a new conversation. In September 2024 Gcaleka hosted the ZHRC for a benchmarking and learning visit,' Majome said. 'During the visit we agreed we want to come together and devise ways to come up with lasting solutions to ensure all human beings enjoy their rights freely.' The public protector's office said it did host the ZHRC delegation last year and no discussions were held about Zimbabweans being denied access to healthcare services in South Africa. 'The visit covered several issues commonly shared between institutions with a similar mandate, including but not limited to best practices within the environment, corruption and challenges relating to service delivery in the two countries, among those being healthcare systems,' the public protector's office said. 'Consequently, and on the request of the ZHRC, on October 14 the public protector of South Africa shared documents with the ZHRC that would assist to strengthen the ZHRC's institutional capacity to investigate malfeasance in its own country. At no point did the discussions then, or recently, focus on the denial of Zimbabwean nationals' access to healthcare services in South Africa. 'We are therefore surprised by reports in the media about discussions, which purportedly occurred recently, and were centred around matters relating to Zimbabwean nationals being denied access to healthcare services in South Africa, neither do we have record of a complaint of that kind.'
IOL News
2 hours ago
- IOL News
Solar Power in SA: Understanding the confusion, costs, and compliance for homeowners
We break down what the tariff changes mean for solar power users. Image: Freepik As more South Africans turn to solar panels to avoid electricity woes, many homeowners find themselves having to navigate complicated regulations, registration demands, and rising costs. Like financial independence, the promise of energy independence is appealing and a dream for many, but the reality involves compliance, financial implications, and differing rules from Eskom and local municipalities. We break down what all of it entails. How does registration work? Both the national power utility Eskom and municipal distributors like Johannesburg's City Power require the registration of small-scale embedded generation (SSEG) systems, such as rooftop solar photovoltaic (PV) installations. City Power's approach is actively registering these systems, and their meter readers are noting the presence of solar panels during standard meter audits. While registration is not yet being enforced, customers are urged to do so voluntarily to comply with National Energy Regulator of SA (Nersa) regulations. The utility is developing methods to identify unregistered systems in the future. This may include the possible use of satellite and drone-based detection. City Power emphasises that even small systems can pose risks like backfeeding, phase imbalances, or grid disturbances if not properly registered and integrated into the network. Now let's take a look at Eskom's campaign. Eskom launched a campaign in April 2025 to help residential owners in Eskom-supplied areas register their systems. For installations up to 50kVA (which covers most residential PV systems), Eskom has waived registration fees, installation costs, and the expense of a smart bi-directional meter until March 2026. This exemption could save households up to R9,132. Registered customers will be converted to the Homeflex tariff, allowing them to benefit from credits for exporting surplus energy to the grid. It's important to note that if your solar system is completely off-grid and has no connection to Eskom's network, you are not required to register. What are the challenges? Despite Eskom's efforts to simplify registration, organisations like the Organisation Undoing Tax Abuse (Outa) and AfriForum have challenged the legal basis of Eskom's registration requirements. AfriForum argued that Eskom cannot "threaten or force people to register their systems through statutory requirements, nor fine them". They also express concern that Eskom might be seeking data for future solar tariffs. Eskom's requirement for a registered electrical engineer or technologist to sign off on the system's safe integration has caused controversy. AfriForum contends that this is not a prescribed Nersa requirement and that the enforceable National Rational Standards primarily call for an accredited technician to sign off. This requirement, they warn, could create a big bottleneck in registrations due to a limited number of available electrical engineers across the country. The process for City Power customers requires submitting documentation, including a certificate of compliance, a single-line diagram, and an electricity supply application form. Once this has been approved, a smart bi-directional meter may be installed to track both consumption and feedback. Breaking down the costs In conjunction with registration and other expenses that may arise, solar power users connected to the grid are facing significantly higher electricity bills due to Eskom's new retail tariff plan (RTP), implemented on April 1, 2025. This plan shifts more of Eskom's cost recovery to fixed components, such as capacity charges, rather than variable consumption-based charges. For Eskom's most common residential tariff plans (Homepower 4 and Homeflex 4), the fixed charge increased by 88%, from R192.90 to R362.70, which customers pay before consuming any electricity. This change means that even households generating a large portion of their own electricity from solar are paying substantially more. For example, a small household using 450kWh per month but only drawing 90kWh from the grid could see its utility bill increase by over 51%. Large households are experiencing increases of over 36%. Eskom argues these fixed fees ensure all users contribute equally to grid maintenance. The impact of these fixed charges varies significantly by municipality. For instance, a household in City of Tshwane with the same entry-level solar system would pay less than half of what an Eskom Direct customer pays for the same amount of grid electricity. While some major municipalities have increased fixed charges, none have done so as drastically as Eskom. Adding to the confusion is the fact that each of South Africa's 177 municipalities that sell power has its own unique rules for connecting solar systems. The cost of compliance also varies. For Eskom, potential costs can include an administration fee (R2,500), meter change (R6,000 upwards), and, if required, R4,500 for line diagrams and engineer sign-off. IOL
Daily Maverick
5 hours ago
- Daily Maverick
How SA can transform promises into tangible improvements for all
South Africans want to see tangible improvements in their daily lives. They want to know whether the government is focusing on the right priorities to move the country forward. Development Indicators (DIs), produced annually by the Department of Planning, Monitoring and Evaluation, provide a strategic evaluation of South Africa's development trajectory and the impact of public policies. Aligned with its vision of being a catalyst for the country's development goals, the department produces the Development Indicators to support informed public discourse and evidence-based policymaking. This not only promotes transparency but also positions monitoring and evaluation as a tool for advancing democracy by creating space for diverse views and public engagement in assessing the country's development and exploring future scenarios. As researchers at the Harvard Centre for International Development observe, 'Policy success for whom?' is a crucial question, as perceptions of progress often vary among stakeholders. The Development Indicators 2024 provide a long-term trend analysis up to 2024 and serve as a baseline for the seventh administration to support the implementation of the Medium-Term Development Plan (MTDP) 2024-2029. The findings reaffirm the strategic focus of the Medium-Term Development Plan, of placing inclusive economic growth at the centre of government efforts. They also recognise that while the National Development Plan remains the country's long-term vision, its foundational assumptions have shifted significantly due to demographic changes including migration, the Covid-19 pandemic and global disruptions. It is therefore clear that processes for planning beyond 2030 need to be initiated. The findings are sobering. None of the high-level National Development Plan targets for reducing unemployment, poverty and inequality are currently on track to be attained by 2030. Of the 85 Development Indicators reviewed, about 13 (15%) are on track, while 31 (36%) show promising progress. Population growth has outpaced economic expansion and the recent global disruptions have necessitated revision of medium-term growth projections. The global context is that only 17% of Sustainable Development Goals targets are on track, with a third either stalled or regressing. Higher, inclusive and sustained economic growth is essential for shifting our development trajectory. We must accelerate economic reforms to surpass the 3% growth threshold if we are to meaningfully change outcomes. Inclusive growth must translate into more jobs, rising household incomes and improved wellbeing for all. To reduce household dependence on the social assistance programmes, the country must achieve stronger economic growth that will create jobs and income-generating opportunities and enable more people to participate in the economy and secure their livelihoods. Nonetheless, progress in key areas offers strategic opportunities to accelerate impact: Infrastructure development: Out of 268 priority infrastructure projects, 28 have been completed and about 80 are under implementation across sectors including energy, water, transport and housing. Budget 2025 allocates close to R1-trillion over 2024-2027, to be implemented through state-owned enterprises, municipalities, provinces, national departments and public-private partnerships. This requires both initiating new projects and maintaining existing ones. Labour market transformation: South Africa has built a more diverse labour force, with progressive labour laws advancing representation across race, gender, age and skill levels. Public employment programmes: The Presidential Employment Stimulus has provided work and livelihood support to approximately 2.2 million people since October 2020. The Expanded Public Works Programme created 923,718 work opportunities in 2024/25. Digital transformation: South Africa enjoys near-universal mobile network coverage, with the rollout of 5G gaining traction. Continued reforms in the telecommunications sector and digital public infrastructure initiatives must help to broaden connectivity and inclusion. International relations: South Africa remains an active player on global platforms such as BRICS+, the African Continental Free Trade Area, the G20 and others. Environmental sustainability: Greenhouse gas emissions remain within the country's Nationally Determined Contributions targets, and the marine and terrestrial conservation areas continue to expand. Land reform: 3 million hectares had been transferred (78.1% of the National Development Plan target). Focus must now shift to enhancing land claims processes, post-settlement support and the diversified use of land, including agriculture, tourism, housing and cultural preservation. Public finances: Gross tax revenue and compliance have improved, accompanied by sustained progress in audit outcomes at both the national and provincial levels. Education: Near-universal access to early childhood development for children aged 5-6 and basic education for ages 7-15 has been achieved, with gender parity across most educational levels. However, attention must now focus on improving school infrastructure, the quality of education and expanding the capacity of universities and Technical and Vocational Education and Training institutions to meet the growing demand and skills needs of industry. Health: Positive gains in life expectancy and reductions in maternal and child mortality point to improved health outcomes. Modernisation of the public health system and the rollout of the next phase of the National Food and Nutrition Security Plan are among the critical next steps to bring South Africa on par with its BRICS+ peers on health outcomes. Basic services: More than 80% of households have access to electricity, clean water and sanitation. Ongoing efforts aim to expand access through annual household connections, especially in under-served areas, while also ensuring quality of service delivery in local municipalities. Social protection: Expanded social assistance has helped to cushion the poor and enhance human capability. However, long-term reliance on grants must be reduced through employment-led growth. Efforts are being made to accelerate the implementation of key priorities as outlined in the Medium-Term Development Plan to build an inclusive economy and achieve National Development Plan ambitions. The Medium-Term Development Plan 2024-2029 outlines priority areas for consolidating progress while addressing persistent development challenges. Strategic interventions include: Implementing the Energy Action Plan, Digital Public Infrastructure Roadmap, and Freight Logistics Roadmap to deliver on their objectives. Modernising mining, agriculture and manufacturing, and promoting new growth sectors such as services. Enhancing export diversification and trade resilience. Leveraging international relations to attract investment, expand trade, tourism and access technology. The success of South Africa's economic growth strategy will be tested by the country's ability to maintain its status as Africa's largest economy; enhance the global competitiveness of key sectors and urban regions (e.g. Johannesburg, Cape Town, Durban); generate inclusive employment growth; and reduce long-term dependence on social support, particularly among working-age adults. Operation Vulindlela has unlocked critical reforms. The second wave of structural reforms are taking off, focusing on improving local government, expanding digital public infrastructure to broaden connectivity and inclusion, and building city regions that foster dynamic, business-friendly environments. Accelerating inclusive growth is critical to ensuring that no one is left behind. This means creating jobs, raising household incomes and improving well-being for all citizens — especially for historically marginalised groups. Achieving this requires economic redress, and equitable access to opportunities and spatial transformation, among others. Prioritising empowerment of women, youth and persons with disabilities should be central to these efforts. The Department of Planning, Monitoring and Evaluation continues to support government institutions in translating policy intentions into development results. The department does this through coordination of planning across government, monitoring of implementation and supporting performance management of ministers and heads of departments (HoDs) to hold them accountable for delivering results. Where service delivery fails, we intervene through frontline support to ensure that community concerns are swiftly resolved. We want to strengthen consequence management for poor performance and service delivery breakdowns. And we want to strengthen collaboration with social partners (business, labour and civil society) to foster a culture of service delivery excellence. DM
