16 states sue Trump over deal ending ban on rapid fire triggers
Sixteen states have filed a lawsuit against the Trump administration regarding its proposal to permit the sale of forced-reset triggers, which enable semiautomatic rifles to fire at an increased rate, and return devices already seized to their owners.
The lawsuit, which was announced on Monday, argues that the return of the triggers would violate federal laws, endangering both residents and law enforcement personnel, as well as potentially worsening gun violence. The suit was filed in a federal court in Maryland.
There had been several legal battles over the devices, which replace the typical trigger on an AR-15-style rifle. The Biden administration had previously argued the triggers qualify as machine guns under federal law because constant finger pressure on the triggers will keep a rifle firing, essentially creating an illegal machine gun.
Rare Breed Triggers – the manufacturer of the devices – says that the Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco, Firearms and Explosives (ATF) misclassified them and disregarded requests to cease sales of the triggers prior to being sued by the Biden administration.
The Justice Department announced a deal last month with the company permitting the sale of forced-reset triggers. Previously, the company was represented by David Warrington, who currently serves as Trump's White House counsel.
As per the settlement, Rare Breed Triggers has agreed to refrain from manufacturing the devices for handguns, according to the Justice Department.
The settlement also requires the ATF to return triggers that were either confiscated or voluntarily surrendered by their owners to the government.
The lawsuit initiated by the states is being spearheaded by the attorneys general from Delaware, Maryland, and New Jersey.
Other participating states include Colorado, Hawaii, Illinois, Maine, Massachusetts, Michigan, Minnesota, Nevada, Oregon, Rhode Island, Vermont, Washington, as well as the District of Columbia.
All attorneys general from these states are affiliated with the Democratic Party, although the office in Hawaii is officially nonpartisan.
US Health Secretary Robert F. Kennedy Jr has fired every member of a vital scientific committee, that advises the Centres for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC), on how to use vaccines, pledging to replace them with his own staff.
His actions have come under the radar with various groups having criticised his decision, which they feel may endanger the future use of vaccines in the US. Major physicians in the country have slammed the decision to oust all 17 members of the panel.
Tom Frieden, president and CEO of Resolve to Save Lives and former director of the CDC, accused Kennedy of 'politicising' the Advisory Committee on Immunisation Practices (ACIP), warning that it could undermine public trust established through years of commitment and hard work.
'We'll look back at this as a grave mistake that sacrificed decades of scientific rigour, undermined public trust, and opened the door for fringe theories rather than facts,' he added.
But Kennedy insists the decision was taken on merit since several members had many conflicts of interest while they were holding a position on the board.
Members are currently required to declare any potential such conflicts, as well as business interests, that arise during their tenure. They also must disclose any possible conflicts at the start of each public meeting.
Although it's typically not viewed as a partisan board, the entire current roster of committee members were Biden appointees.
The health secretary said in an op-ed for the Wall Street Journal that the Trump administration would not have been able to appoint new members until 2028 without removing the current roster.
'A clean sweep is needed to re-establish public confidence in vaccine science,' said Kennedy Jr.
Frieden says the health secretary's actions were based on false conflict of interest claims and sets 'a dangerous and unprecedented action that makes our families less safe' by potentially reducing vaccine access for millions of people.
Georges Benjamin of the American Public Health Association (APHA) called the ouster 'a coup.' Bruce Scott of the American Medical Association (AMA) warned the decision could lead to lower vaccination rates and more disease outbreaks.
Scott also called the ACIP a trusted source of science- and data-driven advice and said Kennedy's move, coupled with declining vaccination rates across the country, will help drive an increase in vaccine-preventable diseases.
Kennedy has long been a staunch critic of vaccination programmes, gaining popularity as one of the nation's leading anti-vaccine activists, prior to his appointment as top US health official.
Last month, he changed the CDC's COVID-19 guidelines – without first consulting the committee – removing it as a recommended vaccination for children and pregnant women, leaving that decision in the hands of patients.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
LeMonde
an hour ago
- LeMonde
Trump dismantles Syria sanctions program as Israel eyes ties with new leadership
President Donald Trump on Monday, June 30 formally dismantled US sanctions against Syria, hoping to reintegrate the war-battered country into the global economy as Israel eyes ties with its new leadership. Trump lifted most sanctions against Syria in May, responding to appeals from Saudi Arabia and Turkey after former Islamist guerrilla Ahmed al-Sharaa ended a half-century of rule by the Assad family. In an executive order, Trump terminated the "national emergency" in place since 2004 that imposed far-reaching sanctions on Syria, affecting most state-run institutions including the central bank. "These actions reflect the president's vision of fostering a new relationship between the United States and a Syria that is stable, unified and at peace with itself and its neighbors," Secretary of State Marco Rubio said in a statement. Rubio said he would start the potentially lengthy process of examining whether to delist Syria as a state sponsor of terrorism, a designation dating from 1979 that has severely discouraged investment. He also said he would look at removing the terrorist classification of Sharaa and his movement Hayat Tahrir al-Sham (HTS), which was once linked to Al-Qaeda. The United States already removed a bounty on Sharaa's head after he came to power. Brad Smith, the Treasury Department official in charge of sanctions, said the new actions "will end the country's isolation from the international financial system." Syria recently carried out its first electronic transfer through the international banking system since around the time it descended into a brutal civil war in 2011. The orders still maintain sanctions on elements of the former government, including Bashar al-Assad, who fled to Russia late last year. Syrian Foreign Minister Assaad al-Shibani hailed the US move as a "major turning point." "With the lifting of this major obstacle to economic recovery, the long-awaited doors are opening for reconstruction and development" as are the conditions "for the dignified return of displaced Syrians to their homeland," he wrote on X. Israel sees opportunity Israel kept pounding military sites in its historic adversary after the fall of Assad and initially voiced skepticism over the trajectory of its neighbor under Sharaa, who has swapped jihadist attire for a business suit. Help us improve Le Monde in English Dear reader, We'd love to hear your thoughts on Le Monde in English! Take this quick survey to help us improve it for you. Take the survey But Israel said earlier Monday that it was interested in normalizing ties with Syria as well as Lebanon in an expansion of the so-called "Abraham Accords," in what would mark a major transformation of the Middle East. Iran's clerical state's once-strong influence in Syria and Lebanon has declined sharply under pressure from Israeli military strikes since the October 7, 2023 attacks by Hamas. Trump administration officials argued that lifting the sanctions on Syria would better integrate the country into the region and incentivize it to open up to Israel. Israel's intensive attacks on Iran in June opened a "window that has never existed," said Tom Barrack, the US ambassador to Turkey who serves as Trump's pointman on Syria. "It's an opportunity that we have never, ever seen, and this president's put together a team that can actually get it done," Barrack told reporters. Despite his upbeat picture of the new Syrian leader, the country has seen a series of major attacks against minorities since the fall of Assad, a largely secular leader from the Alawite minority sect. At least 25 people were killed and dozens more wounded in a suspected Islamist attack against a Greek Orthodox church in Damascus on June 22. Until Trump's surprise announcement of sanctions relief during a trip to Saudi Arabia, the United States had insisted on progress first in key areas including protection of minorities.
Euronews
an hour ago
- Euronews
Denmark assumes EU presidency in stormy times. Here's what to expect
Denmark has officially taken over the six-month rotating presidency of the EU Council, with two overarching priorities: security and competitiveness. The task is usually a tough challenge, but it will be more formidable as a result of the extreme uncertainty and volatility that the European Union faces today. "Europe is at a defining moment in time," Danish Prime Minister Mette Frederiksen said in her welcome message. "The world that secured our freedom and made us prosper can no longer be taken for granted." The country inherits from Poland the unenviable title of "honest broker": the chief arbiter among the other 26 member states, moderating complex and fraught debates, drafting tortuous compromises and sitting face-to-face with the European Parliament to negotiate legislation. For the Danes, this marks the eighth time they assume the rotating chairmanship. Their reputation in Brussels as pragmatic, efficient and cool-headed operators bodes well for navigating the sharp, often intractable divisions between capitals. Here's what you need to know about the Danish presidency. The T word Whether the Danish presidency runs smoothly or descends into chaos might not depend on Brussels but on a city that is more than 6,000 kilometres away. Donald Trump's return to Washington, DC has deeply rattled Europeans, forcing them into a reactive posturing to protect themselves against the shockwaves unleashed by the mercurial president. Take trade, where Trump is attempting to unilaterally redesign the post-WWII economic order with sweeping, across-the-board tariffs. The European Commission still hopes a preliminary deal can be achieved with the White House before the 9 July deadline to avoid the worst-case scenario of a 50% tariff. But if the agreement falls below expectations – or if there is no agreement at all – the executive is preparing to hit back with retaliatory tariffs against American-made products. As the presidency, Denmark will be tasked with ensuring the 27 act as one and close ranks behind the Commission. It is doubtless an out-of-character role: the country is a traditional advocate of free and open markets. Exports account for almost 70% of its GDP, with iconic brands like Lego, Ozempic and Carlsberg sold worldwide. But for Denmark, Trump does not only represent a trade irritant but also an existential threat: the US president has refused to rule out using military force or economic coercion to seize Greenland, the semi-autonomous territory of the Kingdom of Denmark. Elusive consensus Denmark comes into the presidency at a time when the EU feels besieged by countless international crises, starting with the one closer to home: Russia's war on Ukraine. From the start of the invasion, Denmark has been a vocal supporter of Ukraine, becoming one of the largest donors of military aid. According to the Kiel Institute for the World Economy, Denmark has individually pledged €8.60 billion in weapons and ammunition, surpassing bigger countries like France, Italy, Spain and Poland. The Danish presidency is eager to ramp up these deliveries at the EU level and make up for the diminishing aid provided by the Trump administration. At the same time, it is determined to tighten the screws on the Kremlin to cripple its war machine. Here, the presidency is off to a rocky start: Slovakia has vetoed the 18th package of sanctions over an unrelated dispute about the phase-out of Russian fossil fuels. Prime Minister Robert Fico has asked for financial "compensation", and Brussels seems to have little space left in its strained budget to accommodate the sudden request. Denmark will contend with yet another veto in another top priority: enlargement, which the official programme defines as a "geopolitical necessity". Hungary continues to block the opening of negotiating clusters with Ukraine, despite the Commission concluding the war-battered country has met all the criteria to kick-start the talks. Last week, Prime Minister Viktor Orbán showed up at the EU summit with the results of a controversial national consultation to justify his solitary veto. The impasse is so entrenched that officials and diplomats have begun mulling the idea of decoupling Moldova from Ukraine to allow the former to progress while the latter awaits. Frugal no more Vladimir Putin could be credited for prompting one of the most spectacular political reinventions in the bloc's recent history. Back in 2020, Mette Frederiksen joined a small group of like-minded leaders to advocate fiscal discipline and cautious spending in the next multi-annual budget, which was then paired with the history-making COVID-19 recovery fund. The Frugal Four was thus born: Denmark, together with the Netherlands, Austria and Sweden, stood up against the expansionary vision espoused by France and Southern Europe. Fast forward five years, and Frederiksen has switched sides. "As Danes, we will always be tough in the negotiations on the budget," she said last month. "But being a part of the Frugal Four is no longer the right place for us." In her view, Russia's war on Ukraine has irreversibly transformed the bloc's financial equation and put rearmament above "all other priorities and all other principles". If the EU fails to develop the capabilities to defend itself, "then it's game over", she warned. Frederiksen is not alone in her assessment. Ursula von der Leyen has also espoused a security-first mindset and is expected to put defence spending at the core of the next multi-annual budget (2028-2034), which she will present before the summer break. This means Denmark will be able to commence the debate on the proposed budget, take the temperature among member states and identify the first fracture lines. Germany, for example, has already ruled out common borrowing on a permanent basis. "The categories we've had in the past still exist, so the frugals versus the rest. But the groupings are changing, who is part of the frugals is changing," says Janis Emmanouilidis, deputy chief executive at the European Policy Centre (EPC). "A lot will depend on other member states (like Denmark) putting pressure on others who are still very much coming from a frugal approach." Red vs green Cutting red tape has become the dominating trend in Brussels. The Commission's economic agenda is head-on focused on simplifying regulation, reducing administrative burden and making it easier for companies and investors to do business. For many leaders, this big push should come at the expense of the Green Deal. Germany's Friedrich Merz, Italy's Giorgia Meloni and Poland's Donald Tusk are among those openly calling for certain environmental laws to be outright repealed. Denmark disagrees with this approach and believes the green transition can go hand-in-hand with a competitive economy, drive prosperity and create high-quality jobs. The argument is hardly surprising: the Nordic country has managed to foster growth and innovation while rapidly slashing greenhouse gas emissions and deploying renewable energy, most notably offshore wind farms, to replace imported fossil fuels. As a declaration of intent, Frederiksen has invited the College of Commissioners to visit the Laura Maersk, the world's first container ship capable of sailing on green methanol. But with the bloc tilted to the right and the backlash against the Green Deal intensifying by the day, the presidency might soon find itself in a shrinking minority. Going Danish There is one policy area in which Denmark finds itself right in the mainstream: migration. Thanks to its decades-long opt-out clause from EU migration rules, the country has been able to deviate from the norm and adopt heavily restrictive measures to curb the number of asylum seekers and maintain a relatively homogenous population. Initially controversial, the so-called "Danish model" has become increasingly popular across the bloc, earning praise from leaders and attention from policy-makers. "What Denmark has achieved in recent years is truly exemplary, and together we are also moving towards new and stricter asylum rules in the European Union," Merz said recently. The Commission has dropped its long-standing hesitations and is now fully on board with exploring "innovative solutions" to manage irregular migration, including the construction of deportation centres in faraway countries to transfer rejected applicants. Copenhagen feels vindicated and is keen to use its presidency to advance the process, even if outsourcing remains plagued with logistical, financial and legal questions. "Denmark's model of migration control is being advertised as the gold standard and worthy of imitation because it aims to deter asylum-seekers from coming," said Céline Mias, EU director at the Danish Refugee Council (DRC). "Political winds can shift, but our values and obligations to the rule of law and asylum seekers and refugees must not."
Euronews
2 hours ago
- Euronews
Donald Trump signs executive order lifting US sanctions on Syria
US President Donald Trump signed an executive order late on Monday ending many economic sanctions on Syria. The order follows through on promises made to Syria's interim President Ahmed al-Sharaa during their meeting in Riyadh in May. White House Press Secretary Karoline Leavitt says the order is designed to 'promote and support the country's path to stability and peace.' The executive order is meant to 'end the country's isolation from the international financial system, setting the stage for global commerce and galvanizing investments from its neighbours in the region, as well as from the United States,' said Brad Smith, US Treasury's acting undersecretary for terrorism and financial intelligence. Washington granted Syria sweeping exemptions from sanctions in May, which was a first step towards fulfilling Trump's pledge to lift the half-a-century old of penalties on a country shattered by 13 years of brutal civil war. Along with the lifting of economic sanctions, Monday's executive order lifts the national emergency outlined in an executive order issued by former Republican President George W. Bush. Bush's order was in response to Syria's occupation of Lebanon and the pursuit of weapons of mass destruction and missile programs, Treasury officials said. Five other previous executive orders related to Syria were also lifted. Monday's order does not however revoke sanctions imposed on ousted former President Bashar al-Assad, his top aides, family members and officials who had been determined to have committed human rights abuses, been involved in drug trafficking or part of Syria's chemical weapons programme. It also leaves intact a major set of sanctions passed by Congress targeting anyone doing business with or offering support to Syria's military, intelligence or other suspect institutions. While the Trump administration has passed temporary waivers on those sanctions, known as the Caesar Act, they can only be permanently rescinded by law. Sanctions targeting terrorist groups and manufacturers and sellers of the amphetamine-like stimulant Captagon, which al-Assad regime officials were widely accused of having benefited from its trade in the Middle East, will remain in place. Trump met with al-Sharaa in the Saudi Arabian capital, Riyadh, in May as part of his three country tour of the Middle East. The 47th US president told his Syrian counterpart he would lift sanctions and explore normalising relations in a major policy shift between Washington and Damascus. 'This is another promise made and promise kept,' Leavitt said Monday. Since Trump's first announcement in Riyadh of removing sanctions on Syria, the European Union and United Kingdom have since followed suit. The EU has lifted nearly all of its remaining sanctions on Syria. While Trump's order is a major move for Damascus, carrying potentially major positive effects on its struggling economy, some restrictions still remain in place. The US has still not removed its designation of Syria as a state-sponsor of terrorism. The group al-Sharaa led – Hayat Tahrir al-Sham (HTS) – is also still regarded as a foreign terror organisation. A State Department official says those designations are being reviewed.
