Canada Strong Pass expanding to include more museums and galleries
In most cases, this means that children under the age of 17 will get free admission, and those aged 18 to 24 will receive a 50 per cent discount on fees to the newly added museums and galleries, according to the Government of Canada.
Introduced in April, the Canada Strong Pass was promoted by the federal government as an incentive to support Canadian tourism and local businesses by offering free or reduced admission to national parks, museums and galleries, as well as fares on Via Rail.
At the time, Prime Minister Mark Carney said that the pass was being launched as the United States was, 'threatening our economy and sovereignty, (and as) Canadians are uniting to find new ways to discover and celebrate our beautiful country.'
Story continues below advertisement
The trade war stemming from U.S. President Donald Trump's tariff policies has led many Canadians to choose alternative destinations to the U.S. for travel and tourism, with many looking to explore more that Canada has to offer.
Get daily National news
Get the day's top news, political, economic, and current affairs headlines, delivered to your inbox once a day. Sign up for daily National newsletter Sign Up
By providing your email address, you have read and agree to Global News' Terms and Conditions and Privacy Policy
'It has been about a month since Canadian families began exploring our country with the Canada Strong Pass. I welcome the enthusiastic response of provincial and territorial governments in joining this initiative at a time we need to be united and strong,' said Minister of Canadian Identity and Culture and Minister responsible for Official Languages Steven Guilbeault in a Thursday release.
'Museums are where stories are told, art is preserved, and traditions live on. They help shape our understanding of history and culture. I invite all Canadians to choose Canada this summer and enjoy the benefits of the Pass.'
1:59
Canada Strong Pass expected to boost summer travel
The release notes that as of the end of June, more than 700,000 people visited the Canada Strong Pass website.
Story continues below advertisement
Some of the newly included attractions include the Royal B.C. Museum in Victoria, the Oil Sands Discovery Centre in Fort McMurray, The Winnipeg Art Gallery-Qaumajuq, the Art Gallery of Ontario in Toronto, Fisheries Museum of the Atlantic in Nova Scotia and the Yukon Beringia Interpretive Centre in Whitehorse.
All visitors will continue to receive free admission to national historic sites, national parks and national marine conservation areas administered by Parks Canada, and there is still a 25 per cent discount on camping fees at applicable locations, the release says.
The Canada Strong Pass continues to be available without registrations or a physical pass, and the release adds that the Pass is eligible to 'all visitors, whether you are Canadian or coming from abroad.'
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Winnipeg Free Press
an hour ago
- Winnipeg Free Press
Settlement dollars paying for broken promises, missed opportunities, devastated lives
This week, the federal government agreed to a $99-million settlement with Muscowpetung Saulteaux Nation, a First Nation approximately 60 kilometres northeast of Regina, for Canada's failure to provide agricultural support and materials as promised under Treaty 4. That seems like a lot of money, but it's really not. And, far more important, is the profit from the opportunity gained when justice is finally served. Under Treaty 4, signed in 1874, 35 First Nations across what is now northwestern Manitoba, almost all of southern Saskatchewan and southeastern Alberta were promised farming tools including plows, seeds and animals to rebuild their lives after losing their traditional territories — and, indeed, their livelihoods — due to urbanization and settlement. The federal government didn't keep its promises, resulting in massive poverty, starvation and death as communities struggled to build economies, feed themselves and stave off sickness due to weakened immune systems. Add in the fact First Nations had to endure laws such as the Indian Act, which forbade movement, provided substandard education and prevented economic growth, and you get — in many cases — the dire situations that exist now. Farming is the financial and cultural bedrock of life in Manitoba, Saskatchewan and Alberta, and First Nations didn't even get a chance to participate. So, how much does it cost to compensate 151 years of suffering and lost opportunities? Much more than $99 million. Meanwhile, the other 34 First Nations in Treaty 4 are owed the same thing. This week, alongside the agreement with Muscowpetung Saulteaux Nation, the federal government also announced settlements with two other Treaty 4 communities: Big River First Nation ($208 million) and One Arrow First Nation ($124 million). The claims don't end at Treaty 4. Agricultural materials and opportunities were promised to virtually every First Nation from northwestern Ontario to B.C. to the Northwest Territories in what is often called the (11) 'numbered' treaties, negotiated between 1871 and 1921. Those promises weren't kept, either. In fact, more than 50 specific such 'cows and plows' claims against the federal government have now been negotiated with First Nations. The total so far is $6.9 billion. There are another 100 or so additional cases under negotiation and about 150 legitimate claims yet to come. In Manitoba, there are 24 in process, which leaves 39 more First Nations— including my home community of Peguis First Nation — with claims they can (and likely will) pursue. Most Manitoba claims are currently in the 'assessment' or 'negotiation' stage, according to information provided by the Government of Canada. Five Manitoba claims have been settled: Gambler First Nation, Pine Creek First Nation, Sapotaweyak Cree Nation, Tootinaowaziibeeng Treaty Reserve and Wuskwi Sipihk First Nation, each in the hundreds of millions of dollars. Don't get caught up in the numbers. It's about new opportunities. This is why many don't like the term 'cows and plows' when describing these agreements; treaty promises of agricultural materials and support wasn't about providing First Nations with one-time payments, but opportunities to grow their economies, thrive and live like anyone else. This is why some communities choose different paths when obtaining a settlement. In some cases, First Nations governments provide their members a 'per-capita' payment. Muscowpetung, for example, approved a $40,000 one-time payment for each member. Ironically, it's probably more a benefit passed on to Canadian businesses and citizens, as First Nations beneficiaries will spend their settlement dollars buying things for themselves and their families. Most First Nations governments have set up trust funds to pay for community infrastructure projects and programs — a long-missed opportunity to build the lives of residents, provide employment and facilitate the growth of educational and cultural paths. It's easy to get caught up in the money when it comes to settling legitimate claims First Nations have with the Canadian government over failed promises. What's harder to see are the opportunities that should have been, and the ones now possible when justice is finally served. Status report on specific claims Niigaan SinclairColumnist Niigaan Sinclair is Anishinaabe and is a columnist at the Winnipeg Free Press. Read full biography Our newsroom depends on a growing audience of readers to power our journalism. If you are not a paid reader, please consider becoming a subscriber. Our newsroom depends on its audience of readers to power our journalism. Thank you for your support.
Toronto Star
an hour ago
- Toronto Star
After a reference to Trump's impeachments is removed from a history museum, complex questions echo
NEW YORK (AP) — It would seem the most straightforward of notions: A thing takes place, and it goes into the history books or is added to museum exhibits. But whether something even gets remembered and how — particularly when it comes to the history of a country and its leader — is often the furthest thing from simple. The latest example of that came Friday, when the Smithsonian Institution said it had removed a reference to the 2019 and 2021 impeachments of President Donald Trump from a panel in an exhibition about the American presidency. Trump has pressed institutions and agencies under federal oversight, often through the pressure of funding, to focus on the country's achievements and progress and away from things he terms 'divisive.'
Winnipeg Free Press
an hour ago
- Winnipeg Free Press
It's Trump's economy now. The latest financial numbers offer some warning signs
WASHINGTON (AP) — For all of President Donald Trump's promises of an economic 'golden age,' a spate of weak indicators this week told a potentially worrisome story as the impacts of his policies are coming into focus. Job gains are dwindling. Inflation is ticking upward. Growth has slowed compared to last year. More than six months into his term, Trump's blitz of tariff hikes and his new tax and spending bill have remodeled America's trading, manufacturing, energy and tax systems to his own liking. He's eager to take credit for any wins that might occur and is hunting for someone else to blame if the financial situation starts to totter. But as of now, this is not the boom the Republican president promised, and his ability to blame his Democratic predecessor, Joe Biden, for any economic challenges has faded as the world economy hangs on his every word and social media post. When Friday's jobs report turned out to be decidedly bleak, Trump ignored the warnings in the data and fired the head of the agency that produces the monthly jobs figures. 'Important numbers like this must be fair and accurate, they can't be manipulated for political purposes,' Trump said on Truth Social, without offering evidence for his claim. 'The Economy is BOOMING.' It's possible that the disappointing numbers are growing pains from the rapid transformation caused by Trump and that stronger growth will return — or they may be a preview of even more disruption to come. Trump's economic plans are a political gamble Trump's aggressive use of tariffs, executive actions, spending cuts and tax code changes carries significant political risk if he is unable to deliver middle-class prosperity. The effects of his new tariffs are still several months away from rippling through the economy, right as many Trump allies in Congress will be campaigning in the midterm elections. 'Considering how early we are in his term, Trump's had an unusually big impact on the economy already,' said Alex Conant, a Republican strategist at Firehouse Strategies. 'The full inflationary impact of the tariffs won't be felt until 2026. Unfortunately for Republicans, that's also an election year.' The White House portrayed the blitz of trade frameworks leading up to Thursday's tariff announcement as proof of his negotiating prowess. The European Union, Japan, South Korea, the Philippines, Indonesia and other nations that the White House declined to name agreed that the U.S. could increase its tariffs on their goods without doing the same to American products. Trump simply set rates on other countries that lacked settlements. The costs of those tariffs — taxes paid on imports to the U.S. — will be most felt by many Americans in the form of higher prices, but to what extent remains uncertain. 'For the White House and their allies, a key part of managing the expectations and politics of the Trump economy is maintaining vigilance when it comes to public perceptions,' said Kevin Madden, a Republican strategist. Just 38% of adults approve of Trump's handling of the economy, according to a July poll by The Associated Press-NORC Center for Public Affairs. That's down from the end of Trump's first term when half of adults approved of his economic leadership. The White House paints a rosier image, seeing the economy emerging from a period of uncertainty after Trump's restructuring and repeating the economic gains seen in his first term before the pandemic struck. 'President Trump is implementing the very same policy mix of deregulation, fairer trade, and pro-growth tax cuts at an even bigger scale – as these policies take effect, the best is yet to come,' White House spokesman Kush Desai said. Recent economic reports suggest trouble ahead The economic numbers over the past week show the difficulties that Trump might face if the numbers continue on their current path: — Friday's jobs report showed that U.S. employers have shed 37,000 manufacturing jobs since Trump's tariff launch in April, undermining prior White House claims of a factory revival. — Net hiring has plummeted over the past three months with job gains of just 73,000 in July, 14,000 in June and 19,000 in May — a combined 258,000 jobs lower than previously indicated. On average last year, the economy added 168,000 jobs a month. — A Thursday inflation report showed that prices have risen 2.6% over the year that ended in June, an increase in the personal consumption expenditures price index from 2.2% in April. Prices of heavily imported items, such as appliances, furniture, and toys and games, jumped from May to June. — On Wednesday, a report on gross domestic product — the broadest measure of the U.S. economy — showed that it grew at an annual rate of less than 1.3% during the first half of the year, down sharply from 2.8% growth last year. 'The economy's just kind of slogging forward,' said Guy Berger, senior fellow at the Burning Glass Institute, which studies employment trends. 'Yes, the unemployment rate's not going up, but we're adding very few jobs. The economy's been growing very slowly. It just looks like a 'meh' economy is continuing.' Trump's Fed attacks could unleash more inflation Trump has sought to pin the blame for any economic troubles on Federal Reserve Chair Jerome Powell, saying the Fed should cut its benchmark interest rates even though doing so could generate more inflation. Trump has publicly backed two Fed governors, Christoper Waller and Michelle Bowman, for voting for rate cuts at Wednesday's meeting. But their logic is not what the president wants to hear: They were worried, in part, about a slowing job market. But this is a major economic gamble being undertaken by Trump and those pushing for lower rates under the belief that mortgages will also become more affordable as a result and boost homebuying activity. Monday Mornings The latest local business news and a lookahead to the coming week. His tariff policy has changed repeatedly over the last six months, with the latest import tax numbers serving as a substitute for what the president announced in April, which provoked a stock market sell-off. It might not be a simple one-time adjustment as some Fed board members and Trump administration officials argue. Trump didn't listen to the warnings on 'universal' tariffs Of course, Trump can't say no one warned him about the possible consequences of his economic policies. Biden, then the outgoing president, did just that in a speech last December at the Brookings Institution, saying the cost of the tariffs would eventually hit American workers and businesses. 'He seems determined to impose steep, universal tariffs on all imported goods brought into this country on the mistaken belief that foreign countries will bear the cost of those tariffs rather than the American consumer,' Biden said. 'I believe this approach is a major mistake.'
