Miccosukee Tribe moves to join environmental lawsuit against Alligator Alcatraz
The Miccosukee Tribe of Indians of Florida filed a motion on Monday to join nonprofits Friends of the Everglades, Center for Biological Diversity and Earthjustice as plaintiffs in the lawsuit that accuses the state of Florida and federal agencies of skirting environmental regulations to build Alligator Alcatraz.
'The Tribe remains committed to ensuring its traditional lands are not used as a detention facility,' the tribe said in a statement.
Florida is operating the facility in Big Cypress National Preserve, a federally protected section of the Florida Everglades. 'If people get out, there's not much waiting for them other than alligators and pythons. Nowhere to go, nowhere to hide,' Attorney General James Uthmeier said in a video posted on X in June announcing the site.
But the Miccosukee beg to differ. There are over a dozen traditional Indian villages surrounding Alligator Alcatraz, including one village and school bus stop 1,000 feet away from the facility's entrance, according to the tribe's statement. Traditional ceremonial grounds and 11 villages are within three miles of the facility.
'The Miccosukee Tribe is committed to ensuring that our ancestral lands in Big Cypress will not become a permanent detention facility,' Talbert Cypress, the Miccosukee chairman, said in a statement issued Tuesday. 'We have reached out to the State and Federal governments and expressed our concerns, but we have not yet been advised of a closure date. As a consequence, we must take legal action to compel the parties to remove this facility, given its outsized budgetary, environmental, community safety, and logistical impacts. We are hopeful that the administrations will change course and preserve these lands.'
The Miccosukee argue in their motion to intervene that 'the construction and operation of a detention facility without necessary environmental studies potentially poses a substantial threat to the rights and interests of the Tribe and the livelihood of Tribal members who live adjacent thereto.'
The Miccosukee people have traveled from north Florida to the Everglades to fish, hunt and hold sacred ceremonies 'since time immemorial,' the document states. The Miccosukee were relocated to the Everglades during the Seminole Wars. The state of Florida has legally recognized the Miccosukee's right to live on and use the land, including Big Cypress, for over a century, the motion says.
Though the detention facility is expected to hold thousands of people in a sparsely populated area, the state and federal governments have not conducted any studies to determine how the construction and operation of Alligator Alcatraz will impact the nearby village residents and students at the Miccosukee Indian School, court documents say.
The tribe argues that the detention facility is likely to impact the daily lives of village residents, with concerns that include water pollution and significantly increased traffic on the two-lane Tamiami Trail, which residents rely on to evacuate during emergencies.
Gov. Ron DeSantis has said Alligator Alcatraz will have 'zero impact on the Everglades.' But environmental groups and experts say the facility puts endangered and threatened species in the area, like the Florida panther, the bonneted bat and Everglade snail kite, in serious danger.
Immigration advocates have also raised concerns over the facility. Detainees, many of whom have no criminal record, described harsh and disgusting conditions inside the facility, like massive bugs, extreme heat and malfunctioning toilets, during the first days of operation. Immigration attorneys told the Herald they can't contact their clients.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
16 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Access Ready Strategic Joins the Consortium for Constituents with Disabilities (CCD) and Independence Through Enhancement of Medicare and Medicaid, The ITEM Coalition, Along with Many Other Organizations on Vital Policy and Public Interest Positions
Many Groups and Organizations Respond to Policy Issues WASHINGTON, July 17, 2025 /PRNewswire/ -- The recent rapid approach to policy changes at the Federal and State levels are prompting detailed responses by the effected communities through the organizations that represent their collective interests. Access Ready Strategic questions those proposing such sweeping changes."What if you're wrong?What if your policies and attitudes result in the deadly damage many are concerned about?How will we fix the damage done?What are we supposed to do then?" July 15, 2025Walberg Applauds DOL Decision to Withdraw Misguided Biden-Era 14(c) Rule Change July 15, 2025U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) July 11 Update! New Attempt to Roll Back Accessibility Requirements July 15, 2025U.S. Department of Education Ends Taxpayer Subsidization of Postsecondary Education for Illegal Aliens July 15, 2025The-Anti-Immigrant-Policies-in-Trumps-Final-Big-Beautiful-Bill-Explained July 15, 2025Secretary Rollins Prevents Illegal Aliens from Receiving Taxpayer-Funded SNAP Benefits July 15, 2025ITEM Coalition Support Letter for the Limb Loss and Paralysis Resource Centers (Final Draft) (D1188285) July 15, 2025ITEM Coalition Comments in Response to Deregulation RFI on Standing Systems (Final) July 15, 2025HRC Statement on SRVAW Report July 15, 2025HRC Statement on SRVAW Report Final With Signatories July 15, 2025HHS Bans Illegal Aliens from Accessing Its Taxpayer-Funded Programs July 15, 2025FY26 Fair Housing Funding Sign-on Letter FINAL July 15, 2025CCD HTF Comments Rescission AFHM Regs July 15, 2025CCD Reaffirming Advocacy for All Statement Update July 15, 2025CCD ED TF FY 2026 Updated Oppose WH budget IDEA-ESEA (Editor's Note) We apologize for duplicate or cross postings made in our effort to include as many as possible in our information stream. Access Ready Strategic Social Purpose Corporation is an independent, cross-disability education and advocacy organization promoting a policy of civil rights, and equality for all. It advocates for digital inclusion and accessibility across information and communications technology (ICT).The business, government and nonprofit sectors at all levels are becoming increasingly dependent on information and communications technology to provide goods and services. For people with disabilities, accessible information and communications technology is a necessity, not a luxury or a convenience, which fosters independence, economic self-sufficiency, and active, meaningful participation in civic life. Access Ready is pleased to support the Policies and Positions of our compatriot organizations and civil rights advocates. These positioning statements and communications of support will all be found on at: Media Contact:Douglas George TowneChair and Chief Executive OfficerAccess Ready Strategic(Email) 398186@ (Cell) (727) 452-8132(Office) (727) 531-1000(Website) (Press) View original content to download multimedia: SOURCE Access Ready Inc. Error in retrieving data Sign in to access your portfolio Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data


Washington Post
19 minutes ago
- Washington Post
The Latest: Senate passes $9 billion in spending cuts to public broadcasting, foreign aid
Just after 2 a.m. ET, the Senate passed about $9 billion in federal spending cuts requested by President Donald Trump , including deep reductions to public broadcasting and foreign aid, moving forward on his top priorities despite concerns from several Republican senators. The legislation, which now moves to the House, would have a tiny impact on the nation's rising debt but could have major ramifications for the Corporation for Public Broadcasting and U.S. food aid internationally. It also could complicate efforts to pass additional spending bills this year, as Democrats and even some Republicans voice objections to broadly ceding congressional spending power with little idea of how the White House Office of Management and Budget would apply the cuts.


The Hill
2 hours ago
- The Hill
Don't get upset with Mamdani for trying to take advantage of DEI
When he was 17, Zohran Mamdani did what any teenager with a plausible claim to African identity might have done to get into Columbia: he checked both 'Asian' and 'African American' on his application. For that, Mamdani, of Indian extraction but born in Uganda, is being accused of 'pretending to be Black.' The backlash has come largely from the right. Fox jumped at the chance to bash the soon-to-be mayor, calling him a 'racist' and citing the event as evidence that he 'clearly despises America and everything that [it stands] for.' Mayor Eric Adams called Mamdani's racial identification 'deeply offensive.' Andrew Cuomo's people, who are, of course, the paragons of moral integrity, warned this might be 'the tip of the iceberg' of some deeper intellectual fraud. It's funny, because Mamdani is, in some sense, all of those things. But to suggest that this particular college application box debacle is the almighty smoking gun would be incoherent and all too hypocritical. Most of the voices now howling about Mamdani's supposed dishonesty were just two years ago fervently denouncing affirmative action, blanket preference of marginalized groups in admissions, as discriminatory. So what, exactly, is their objection to someone navigating that system strategically? If the policy itself was unjust, then exploiting its flaws has to be a rational decision. Of course, Mamdani's politically correct explanation hasn't exactly reassured anyone beyond his base. 'Most college applications don't have a box for Indian Ugandans,' he said. 'So I checked multiple boxes trying to capture the fullness of my background. Even though these boxes are constraining, I want my college application to reflect who I was.' The fullness of his background? He was 17 and trying to get into Columbia. He knew then, and he certainly knows now, even after the Supreme Court struck down affirmative action in admissions, that identifying as Black on a college application gives you an advantage. You get bonus points. It's easier to get in. Thus, setting his own implausible explanation aside, teenage Mamdani's decision makes sense. He was born in Uganda, and his family later moved to South Africa before immigrating to the U.S. That gives him a plausible de jure claim to the African American label, and he identified himself accordingly. Whether that qualifies him, in any cultural or historical sense, as 'African American' is debatable, but the college admissions process doesn't care much. And Mamdani had a practical reason: his SAT score, as reported by Christopher Rufo, was below the typical threshold for Asian admits but higher than the average for Black applicants at Columbia at the time. So he checked the box. That's not a scandal. The 17-year-old Mamdani responded rationally to a system that was openly perverse. Understandably, he can't exactly admit that he was trying to get admissions points without getting booed off the stage at his next campaign rally. But maybe the rest of us should. Because the question is: If I had been Mamdani, would I have done the same? And if I believed the policy was structurally unjust, wouldn't my actions have been a logical choice — even a moral choice? My answer to both is a resounding yes. If anything, Mamdani's Columbia application shows he wasn't always some doctrinaire radical. He was once a student capable of making normal human decisions. To judge him as if he were already a politician at that time is a ludicrous premise. And above all, if one believes that the racial preferences the government enforced for decades were unjust, why attack a teenager responding strategically to that unfair process? To subvert a discriminatory policy is itself an indictment of that policy. Conservatives should be celebrating the young Mamdani for having had the gumption to do so. Yes, Mamdani is a left-wing radical and socialist. He wants fare-free transit, government-run grocery stores, and to tax the rich until they flee the city. He has floated a rent freeze, a move that would absolutely worsen New York's housing shortage. He won't condemn terrorism, he supports race-based redistribution, and he has backed defunding the police department. There are many good reasons to oppose Mamdani touching on policy, competence, and judgment. He's an easy target. But this? This is the weakest possible attack. For this, he deserves praise. Conservatives grabbing their pitchforks and getting ready to explode over how offensive this is are being hypocrites, both morally and intellectually. If race-based admissions really are unjust, then it is unfair and dishonest to censure the people who worked the system in their own favor. Put down the sticks, grab some popcorn, and join the rest of us awaiting New York's descent into total farce.