logo
Federal officers' presence at Puerto Rican museum draws criticism, stokes deportation fears

Federal officers' presence at Puerto Rican museum draws criticism, stokes deportation fears

Chicago Tribune6 days ago
The federal agents on the screen wore black as they entered the museum's doors. One briefly spoke to a staff member before walking down the hallway and out of the camera's view, leaving the employees at the National Museum of Puerto Rican Arts and Culture in Humboldt Park feeling targeted and intimidated.
'Our community is under attack. The Latino community, brown people, are being targeted by this administration,' said Ald. Gil Villegas, 36th, at a hastily arranged news conference on Wednesday with other community leaders and other elected officials, including U.S. Rep. Delia Ramirez, who believed the federal government was there for immigration enforcement purposes.
But the U.S. Department of Homeland Security agents weren't there for immigration reasons, said Assistant Secretary Tricia McLaughlin in a statement. They were there to hold a briefing in the museum's parking lot ahead of an operation related to a narcotics investigation.
Museum staffers say the agents refused to identify themselves. In security footage reviewed by the Tribune and other media after the news conference, the agents were seen arriving in unmarked vehicles and standing in a group in the parking lot. Several of them entered without incident.
Still, the presence of federal officers at the museum on Tuesday set off a chain reaction of fear in a community already on edge. And regardless of why federal officers showed up unannounced at the museum, some local officials continued their criticism of their tactics.
'Agents of DHS … should identify themselves, like every law enforcement official is required to do,' said Ramirez, who represents Illinois' 3rd Congressional District, in a statement.
The strong response from community leaders and local officials mirrored nationwide panic that was sparked in January after two Secret Service officers — who were mistaken for U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement — attempted to enter a school in Back of the Yards on the city's South Side. Then, as on Tuesday, DHS confirmed to the Tribune that it was conducting a separate investigation, unrelated to immigration.
In recent weeks and months, nationwide fear has spread through images and videos on social media of President Donald Trump's administration detaining people in public spaces. Most notably in Los Angeles this week, armed federal agents showed up in a park considered to be the hub of a well-known immigrant neighborhood.
With that visible enforcement front of mind on Wednesday morning, dozens of organizers and city and state leaders gathered inside the museum to condemn the federal government for targeting Latino communities for deportation.
The museum staff reported that about 15 unmarked vehicles drove into the Puerto Rican museum's parking lot during operating hours on Tuesday, creating worry that the federal government was preparing to target upcoming festivals in the West Side park — the Barrio Arts Festival and the Colombian Festival, planned for the upcoming two weekends.
Although Puerto Ricans are U.S. citizens, the festivals are expected to draw large crowds of Latinos, a group frequently targeted in nationwide immigration enforcement raids.
'We have reason to believe that here in Humboldt Park, we may see what they demonstrated earlier this week in Los Angeles,' said Esmeralda Montesinos, an organizer with the Illinois Coalition for Immigrant and Refugee Rights.
On Tuesday, the agents were on site at the museum between 3 and 5 p.m., according to Veronica Ocasio, the museum's director of education and programming. They pulled their vehicles into the parking lot, she said, and then talked and milled around.
Ocasio said an employee of hers who was taking out the garbage overheard the agents talking about the upcoming festivals. The staff member immediately panicked, assuming they were discussing a strategy to detain people at the upcoming events.
Later, several tried to enter the building, Ocasio said, claiming they needed to use the bathroom. The agents and vehicles left after a different employee told them the parking lot was closing for the day. But they wanted to park their vehicles overnight, she said.
McLaughlin, the DHS assistant secretary, later clarified in a statement that the officials were part of the Financial Crimes Task Force, under the investigative arm of the federal agency.
'The Department of Homeland Security DID NOT target the National Museum of Puerto Rican Arts and Culture,' the statement read.
The museum's staff emphasized Wednesday that it didn't matter why DHS officials were there.
'If they had just said they were working on a drug case, maybe it would have been a different story, but we can't take that as fact now, after the point,' a spokesperson for the museum said.
Chicago police said they were not informed about the federal agents stopping for a briefing at the museum. Aldermen, meanwhile, expressed skepticism and concern about McLaughlin's statement.
Ald. Ruth Cruz, 30th, said that it's been 'difficult to believe the information they're sharing is accurate.' She cited a U.S. citizen who was pulled over in her ward by federal agents while walking his dog.
'They had him go up to his apartment and bring back his residence card,' she said. 'Our community is scared. We feel that we're under attack.'
At the news conference Wednesday, several elected officials shared their own immigrant stories, stressing that Latino communities in Chicago plan to present a united front against nationwide deportation efforts by the federal government.
'I am from Puerto Rico,' said Ald. Rossana Rodriguez Sanchez, 33rd. 'Our siblings that are coming into this country … for the same reason that I came here, because it was impossible to live under the conditions that we were in.'
They also shared harrowing stories of their own family members who have been affected by increased immigration enforcement.
State Sen. Graciela Guzmán, a Chicago Democrat, has several of her family members in Los Angeles, where she said 'militarization has been unavoidable.'
'We had a cousin disappear a couple of months ago. We just found out he's in Guantanamo,' Guzmán said, referring to a naval base in Cuba being used by Trump to detain dozens of foreigners.
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Assaults on ICE officers surge 830% as Democrats caught 'doxing and physically assaulting' agents: DHS
Assaults on ICE officers surge 830% as Democrats caught 'doxing and physically assaulting' agents: DHS

Fox News

time3 hours ago

  • Fox News

Assaults on ICE officers surge 830% as Democrats caught 'doxing and physically assaulting' agents: DHS

The Department of Homeland Security (DHS) is blaming Democrat politicians and the mainstream media for an 830% increase in assaults on U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) officers, saying their "lies and fake stories" continue to stir hate and violence. DHS announced Tuesday that its ICE officials have faced an 830% increase in assaults between Jan. 21, 2025 and July 14, 2025, compared to the same period in 2024. The timeframe recorded begins on the day after President Donald Trump returned to the Oval Office. "Just in: our brave @ICEGov law enforcement are now facing a 830% INCREASE in assault against them," DHS Secretary Kristi Noem said Tuesday in a post on X. "This new data reflects the violence against our law enforcement in cities across the country in the last few weeks. Politicians across the country, regardless of political stripe, must condemn this." The DHS accused political figures and the mainstream media of escalating anti-ICE rhetoric, particularly pointing to Congressional Democrats who the department said were caught "doxing and even physically assaulting" officials working for ICE. Rep. Salud Carbajal, D-Calif., DHS said, shared an ICE employee's business card with a violent group of people this week, placing a target on the employee's back and prompting the mob to attack him. As a result, the official was hit by a rock and taken to a hospital where he received stitches. Another Democratic lawmaker, Rep. LaMonica McIver, D-N.J., is accused of storming the Delaney Hall detention facility in May, where she allegedly assaulted an ICE officer. She was indicted on federal assault charges. "Brave ICE law enforcement are risking their lives every day to keep our communities safe from the worst of the worst criminals," DHS Assistant Secretary Tricia McLaughlin said. "ICE law enforcement are succeeding to remove terrorists, murderers, pedophiles and the most depraved among us from America's communities, even as crazed rhetoric from gutter politicians are inspiring a massive increase in assaults against them. It is reprehensible that our officers are facing this threat while simply doing their jobs and enforcing the law." DHS also pointed to instances in Portland, Oregon, where ICE officers were doxed and threatened by antifa-affiliated groups. The agency said the groups posted pictures and personal addresses of the ICE officers and threatened them and their families. One officer, DHS noted, had someone show up at their house and dump trash on their lawn, which included signs that read "f--k you" along with the officer's name. While groups call out ICE agents by name, DHS also accused the mainstream media of publishing false stories about federal immigration enforcement efforts. "During an enforcement operation where ICE and federal law enforcement rescued 14 children from potential exploitation, forced labor, and human trafficking, the media falsely reported that a man died in law enforcement custody," DHS said. "This was an outright lie. The man was not being pursued by law enforcement but still chose to climb up to the roof of a green house, where he fell 30 feet." DHS said some media organizations are also accusing ICE of "targeting" children. "Rather than separate families, ICE asks mothers if they want to be removed with their children or if the child should be placed with someone else safe [who] the parent designates," DHS said to clear up the reports.

Colorado Firebomb Attack Case Moving Forward: What to Know
Colorado Firebomb Attack Case Moving Forward: What to Know

Time​ Magazine

time3 hours ago

  • Time​ Magazine

Colorado Firebomb Attack Case Moving Forward: What to Know

Prosecutors' case against the man accused of throwing Molotov cocktails at a crowd of demonstrators in Boulder, Colo., who were calling for the release of Israeli hostages in Gaza will move ahead after the suspect waived his right to a preliminary hearing on Tuesday. The hearing was intended to assess whether there was enough evidence for the suspect, Mohamed Sabry Soliman, to stand trial. But Soliman's lawyer told the judge he would give up his right to hear the evidence, the Associated Press reported, and the judge ruled that prosecutors could proceed with their case. An arraignment hearing, where Soliman will enter a plea in the state case, is scheduled for September 9. Soliman, 45, faces a total of more than 150 state charges and 12 federal hate crime counts after allegedly throwing an incendiary device towards a crowd of demonstrators in the June 1 attack while yelling 'Free Palestine,' according to law enforcement. The Boulder District Attorney's Office has identified nearly 30 victims of the attack, including 13 who suffered physical injuries. Eight people who sustained burns and other injuries were hospitalized. A dog was also harmed during the incident. Soliman was originally charged with 118 criminal counts, including several for attempted first degree murder, on June 5. The Boulder County District Attorney charged him with an additional 66 counts and amended some others he previously faced after 82-year-old Karen Diamond passed away as a result of wounds she sustained in the attack later in June. Soliman previously pleaded not guilty to the federal charges. He requested that the preliminary hearing be set back to the end of October due to what his counsel referred to as 'significant collateral implications' that could not be addressed ahead of the July 15 date. 'Counsel is not aware of an autopsy report being produced yet,' the motion read. 'Additionally, there will be significant medical records that need to be provided and reviewed in advance of such hearing.' The request was denied. Here's what to know about Soliman and what he's accused of. Who is Mohamed Sabry Soliman? Soliman is an Egyptian national who first entered the U.S. in August 2022 on a B-2 tourist visa, according to the Department of Homeland Security (DHS). He applied for asylum in September of that year, though details on his application have not publicly been reported. A spokeswoman for DHS previously told TIME that Soliman overstayed his visa, which expired in February 2023. The suspect was living in Colorado Springs with his family prior to his arrest on June 1. Soliman told police following the attack that he wanted to kill all Zionists, adding that he 'wished they were dead,' according to an FBI affidavit. He also allegedly informed authorities that he was waiting for his daughter to graduate to conduct the attack, which he said he had been planning for at least a year. Soliman's wife and five children were detained by immigration authorities in June to investigate whether the family knew of the suspect's intention, according to Homeland Security Secretary Kristi Noem. Officials moved to expedite the removal of Soliman's family from the country, but their deportation was temporarily blocked by a federal judge. Earlier this month, a federal judge in Texas dismissed the family's petition to be released from immigration custody. What happened in the attack? Demonstrators from 'Run for Their Lives,' which stages weekly events to advocate for the release of Israeli hostages held by Hamas, gathered at a park in front of the Boulder County Courthouse on June 1. Soliman allegedly entered the park carrying a backpack with 18 glass bottles and jars, as well as flammable liquid and red rags, and approached the group, according to the Justice Department. At around 1:30 p.m. local time, authorities allege Soliman threw two Molotov cocktails towards the crowd and yelled 'Free Palestine!' Twenty-nine victims have been identified, one of whom, 82-year-old Diamond, died on June 25 as a result of her injuries. Following the attack, authorities recovered a handwritten document from Soliman's vehicle that said, 'Zionism is our enemies untill [sic] Jerusalem is liberated and they are expelled from our land.' Soliman confessed to authorities that he committed the attack, according to the FBI affidavit. He said he initially tried to buy a firearm, per Acting U.S. Attorney for the District of Colorado J. Bishop Grewell, but could not purchase one because he was not a legal citizen and instead used Molotov cocktails.

The attorney fighting Trump's immigration raids in LA
The attorney fighting Trump's immigration raids in LA

Politico

time3 hours ago

  • Politico

The attorney fighting Trump's immigration raids in LA

Presented by COURT CLASH: California immigrants swept up in aggressive Los Angeles ICE raids recently scored a legal victory that could undermine a key strategy in Donald Trump's mass deportation agenda. A federal judge on Friday blocked federal immigration officials from conducting 'roving patrols' for undocumented residents, saying they've been arresting people on the basis of their race, accent and workplace, not 'reasonable suspicion' that they're in the United States illegally. We're awaiting a ruling on the Trump administration's emergency motion to stay the judge's block on ICE tactics. But Mark Rosenbaum — an attorney working with the coalition of organizations that secured the restraining order — thinks they've already won, because there's been 'a public change in attitude.' (In fact, Gallup polling conducted in June and released recently found a dramatic swing nationally toward support for immigration). 'The highest officials in this land lied when they said this was about killers and rapists and drugs,' Rosenbaum said. 'I think the American public knows that. I think they see the scope of the abuse of power here. I think the federal government is already the big loser, because they couldn't level with the American people as to what they were really doing and why they were doing it.' Playbook spoke with Rosenbaum about how he and others crafted their case, whether the ruling has been effective and what comes next in court. This conversation has been edited for length and clarity. What went into preparing this lawsuit? What went on in terms of the preparation of that complaint was a serious, thorough investigation as to what federal agents were doing in Los Angeles and surrounding communities. The scope of their activities geographically throughout different communities was so broad that it's not the sort of thing that you can collect and document overnight. What made it even more complicated was that what the government was doing was sweeping up large numbers of individuals of Latino appearance and then taking them to this basement facility down in downtown Los Angeles that was supposed to be a temporary processing center … What that meant is we did not have an opportunity to speak to individuals who were, in fact, swept up like that because of the second part of the case, and that was the denial of access to attorneys. The denial of access to attorneys wasn't accidental. It wasn't incidental. It was part of a purposeful design to keep the facts of the practices that ICE agents and other federal agents were following in Los Angeles secret. It was to make certain that those whose rights were denied were not available to speak to lawyers… The other thing that I think goes to this is that we wanted to make the strongest record possible, and that means talking to a lot of people, a lot of witnesses, many of whom were fearful that providing their names and identities, regardless of legal status, would put them in harm's way. And that wasn't an unreasonable belief. Were things at all delayed because immigration organizations are in triage mode right now? The federal government literally brought in an army, not just figuratively. They literally brought in an army. And in order to make sure that civil rights were addressed to the maximum extent possible, it means that those groups that work with that population, they were stretched to the breaking point. They always delivered. But it meant that there was an awful lot going on — that the first priority wasn't always getting the facts for a lawsuit. The first priority was making sure that people's well being was dealt with, because they were brutal. What went into finding the people who were detained and documenting their stories? What you had was a community that was unquestionably under siege, that was targeted because of their race, in a community that was targeted because it was a blue community. But lawyers did not get that TRO. It was the car wash workers and nannies and the farm workers and the day laborers who stood up to the federal government and told their stories. And we work with the groups that work with those communities and people did, in fact, come forward, and that's why we won. Given the makeup of the higher courts, what we've seen from the Supreme Court — do you have any confidence the Trump administration won't win on appeal? I never predict those sort of things, but I think this: that the stories of individuals of all legal statuses who were pulled out of their stores and pulled out of windows and thrown into a dungeon because of the color of their skin — that's devastating, and the government doesn't have an answer for that. But equally powerful is that the government doesn't have a single document, a single piece of paper, that legally justifies any of the 2,000 or so detentions and arrests that they made … This isn't hard stuff. What do they do — take all their justification documents and put them in a vault and then lose the combination? This is like law enforcement training 101. If you have a justification, you write it down. And the reason there are no documents presented to the court with justification is because there are no documents. Do you think the Trump administration is following the TRO? We are certainly monitoring it. The indication we have is that they've slowed down because of the TRO. The TRO is working. There are people out in the field right now that are checking, but if you're asking me if the TRO made a difference, absolutely… One thing you can say for sure is that they are not appealing the part of the decision that dealt with access to lawyers. They have not filed an appeal on that. They have not asked for a stay on that. What does that tell you? That tells you that they know that they were violating those rights and they don't want to present that to a court. So this TRO, it truly is absolutely life or death. IT'S TUESDAY AFTERNOON. This is California Playbook PM, a POLITICO newsletter that serves as an afternoon temperature check on California politics and a look at what our policy reporters are watching. Got tips or suggestions? Shoot an email to lholden@ WHAT YOU NEED TO KNOW TODAY POINTING FINGERS: Republican House Speaker Mike Johnson said today that the federal government has 'not seen the calculation or formal request' for California wildfire aid, saying that there is a 'multi-step process' that has not been completed. 'For whatever reason, Gavin Newsom seems to enjoy trying to stick his thumb in the eye of the White House and Congress, which seems to be counter purpose if he is requesting relief,' he said. Newsom's office said in a post on X that they have been in contact with the speaker's office. 'It's our understanding that the Speaker was referring specifically to the White House's formal appropriations request,' the office said. Newsom traveled to Washington in February to meet with lawmakers on both sides of the aisle on the issue. That month, he also sent a letter to Johnson and other House leaders asking for almost $40 billion to help with immediate and long-term recovery. — Nicole Norman IN OTHER NEWS UNMASKED: Sen. Scott Wiener's effort to prohibit ICE agents from wearing certain types of face coverings appeared poised to advance from the Assembly Public Safety Committee today, although moderate Democrats aligned themselves with law enforcement groups and declined to vote on the bill. At the time of publication, the bill was still awaiting final passage, with some members absent during its hearing. The legislation would ban specific masks for local, state and federal law enforcement, although it's targeted at the immigration enforcement agents who've worn neck gaiters and ski masks to conceal their faces during raids. ON THE HILL: UC Berkeley Chancellor Rich Lyons was grilled by a congressional panel in Washington this morning along with other university leaders about allegations of antisemitism on their campuses. Lyons was not chancellor when protests and encampments roiled campus following the Oct. 7, 2023, Hamas attack on Israel, but was pressed repeatedly about a 2024 social media post from history professor Ussama Makdisi that said he 'could have been one of those who broke the siege on October 7.' Lyons paused when Rep. Lisa McClain (R-MI) asked what he thought Makdisi meant by the post, eventually stating he believed it 'was a celebration of the terrorist attack of Oct. 7.' He did call Makdisi a 'fine scholar,' which drew a rebuke from Rep. Tim Walberg (R-MI), chair of the House Committee on Education and the Workforce. Lyons, who is just a year into his tenure, also emphasized the difficulty of balancing protecting the community from discrimination and harassment while also upholding the First Amendment right to free speech. He received the backing of leading Jewish faculty members ahead of the hearing. 'Does it frustrate us as presidents? I'll speak for myself: This is frustrating,' Lyons said. 'People say, 'Well, just drive down the middle of the road.' This is a very complex road to drive down. And so we are constantly making judgments around, 'How do we keep people safe and supported, and also how do we make sure that we are protecting free speech and the marketplace for ideas''? — Eric He and Bianca Quilantan WHAT WE'RE READING TODAY — A new group of Camp Pendleton Marines has been posted at the southern border alongside U.S. Customs and Border Protection and U.S. Border Patrol for 'operational responsibilities.' (OC Register) — California's largest public employee pension fund surpassed its annual investment target, bouncing back from a spring stock market crash following Trump's tariff announcement earlier this year. (CalMatters) — A new program steering students toward specific job-ready training now has a waiting list as roughly 160 students are receiving $1,000 this summer while learning about vocational skills in high-demand sectors. (Los Angeles Times) AROUND THE STATE — Locals in California's North Coast are expressing concern after one of the last undeveloped oceanfront properties in the area was put on the market. (SF Gate) — Clean energy in California's retail electricity supply is up from previous years, as data released earlier this week shows that solar, wind, hydropower and other carbon-free sources in 2023 increased slightly from 2022. (The Mercury News) — compiled by Juliann Ventura

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store