A-League rocked by betting scandal as Western United and state player charged over yellow card manipulation
On Sunday, Victoria police charged two Melbourne men, aged 24 and 27, for numerous offences including the use of corrupt conduct for gambling purposes in four A-League matches during April and May.
While the individuals are yet to be named, it is understood one of the men charged is a current player at Western United, while the other is a player in the state league.
And on Sunday, the Australian Professional Leagues – the body in charge of the A-League competitions, confirmed a player had been charged.
'The Australian Professional League is aware that one A-League player has been charged by Victorian Police with offences related to gambling,' a spokesperson said.
'The integrity of our sport is something that has to be protected without compromise, and we are engaging with all relevant authorities to assist with this matter.'
Both men were placed under no-fault interim suspensions by Football Australia following the charges.
'The club is aware that one Western United men's player has been charged about an alleged breach of sports betting guidelines,' the club said in a statement.
'We take this matter seriously, condemn any actions that compromise the integrity of the game, and are co-operating fully with all relevant authorities. Given the nature of the investigation, we are unable to comment any further on the matter.'
Police executed warrants on Friday morning after an investigation involving Football Australia and the Sporting Integrity Intelligence Unit.
The man from West Melbourne was charged with 10 offences including four counts of engaging in conduct that corrupts or would corrupt a betting outcome, four counts of facilitating conduct that corrupts or would corrupt a betting outcome, use of information derived from corrupt conduct for betting purposes, and attempting to commit an indictable offence.
The man from Kingsville was charged with 16 offences, including 11 counts of using information for betting purposes, four counts facilitating conduct that corrupts or would corrupt a betting outcome, and attempting to commit an indictable offence.
They were bailed to appear at Melbourne Magistrates' Court on July 31.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
ABC News
17 minutes ago
- ABC News
Cattle producers move towards grain-fed beef as consumer demand and drought risks rise
As cost-of-living pressures force many shoppers to tighten their purse strings, premium meat options like grass-fed beef are getting harder to sell, and cattle producers are taking note. Across Australia they are opting to feed their stock grain rather than relying on pasture, both to meet consumer demand for cheaper meat and protect themselves from drought. While an abundance of grass on western Queensland grazier Josh Phelps's Tambo property might be reassuring right now, he said previous droughts had taught him not to rely on temporary feed. "We're really tending towards the grain-based model," he said. Initially his stock graze on pasture across 19,000 hectares before being finished in a feedlot — a purpose-built facility where cattle are kept in large outdoor pens and fed a consistent diet for up to 120 days. "We've had a run of [good] seasons which we're very grateful for," he said. "To be honest, it's been a bit of a healing period. Those terrible teens are still front of mind for some people, but I think we came through that and learned a lot of lessons. He said the approach not only ensured the animals had a reliable source of food in dry times, but also produced a more consistent animal before being sold to meatworks. "It creates a lot more control and a bit of a safety net," he said. But it was not just drought that pushed the producer in this direction. Mr Phelps said increasingly red meat consumers were being lead by price. "In the end it comes down to the consumer," he said. "They're just happy to buy that regular cut from the supermarket which is generally grain-fed. Mr Phelps is one example of a trend toward grain-fed beef that is playing out across the country with more cattle in feedlots at the start of 2025 than ever before. Erin Lukey, senior market analyst with Meat and Livestock Australia, said 1.5 million head of cattle were in feedlots in the first quarter of 2025, up 11 per cent on the previous year. "The grain sector has grown drastically and consistently, especially in the last five years," Ms Lukey said. "Nationally we have 90 per cent utilisation, which is how full pens are. "Feedlots as a drought mitigation tool has also increased in popularity." According to MLA, which researches and markets Australian beef globally, Queensland feedlots are at 93 per cent capacity and New South Wales are at 91 per cent. With feedlots so full, meat processors have limited capacity to take new animals, but Ms Lukey said that would not stop producers making the switch. "More grain-fed product is going to flow to the processor," she said. "Which means we're going to produce more grain-fed beef." Stefan Vogel, general manager of research at Rabobank, said most of the beef on Australian shelves was grain-fed or finished on grain, and consumer habits had a large impact on production. "When they [customers] go to supermarkets, they're trying to find ways to save money and increase the value of their basket," Mr Vogel said. "There's a demand for quality products at a reasonable price. "Feedlots play an integral role not only for the local consumer but also for Australia as a reliable supplier of meat in the global market."
News.com.au
17 minutes ago
- News.com.au
Confused players starting to hesitate in games knowing they could be banned for accidents
AFL players have already begun to 'hesitate slightly', knowing the 'margins' between a fair contest and a lengthy ban are slim as the impact of a three-match suspension handed to Melbourne defender Steven May reverberates through the game. May was suspended despite the AFL tribunal conceding his collision with Carlton's Francis Evans last Saturday night was not a bump. In the final minutes of his defence, May's legal counsel Adrian Anderson declared 'there was not much more he could do', but after more than 90 minutes of deliberation, the three-man tribunal panel determined he should have slowed down or changed his path to avoid Evans. Debate has raged since the incident, with some pundits adamant the game could no longer allow players to charge headlong towards opponents, whether the ball was in play or not. Evans, who lost a tooth and was left bloodied and bruised, conceded to the tribunal that he didn't think he was going to get to the ball before May, adding to the confusion over the ban. Essendon vice-captain Andy McGrath conceded the incident was a 'tricky' one for the tribunal but said over the course of his career his on-field attitude had changed, and he now asked himself questions despite the 'split second' nature of making calls. 'They are split-second decisions, there are so many in game, and the longer I play – this is my ninth season – those split-second contests have changed a lot,' he said. 'If you are second to the ball, you have a big responsibility to not make contact with your opponent's head. 'It definitely comes through your mind, whether that causes us to hesitate slightly, I am questioning that more and more in the game to protect the opposition player's head.' Carlton captain and Brownlow medallist Patrick Cripps said he wasn't sure what May could have done and McGrath agreed. 'It didn't look great but it's really hard to pull out of that contest at the last second,' he told SEN. 'As players, it's pretty tricky to know what penalty lies based on the act and we know that's margins between a fair play and a pretty significant sanction.' Melbourne has the opportunity to appeal the verdict.
Perth Now
an hour ago
- Perth Now
Australia paves way for US beef as Trump tariffs loom
Australia has opened the door to more US beef imports by lifting biosecurity restrictions, as the government seeks ways to dampen the blow from Donald Trump's tariff regime. The federal government revealed the changes on Thursday while stressing that the decision follows a decade-long science-based review. "The Albanese Labor government will never compromise on biosecurity," Agriculture Minister Julie Collins said. "Australia stands for open and fair trade - our cattle industry has significantly benefited from this. "(The department) is satisfied the strengthened control measures put in place by the US effectively manage biosecurity risks." Although the US has been able to send beef to Australia since 2019, any beef raised in Canada or Mexico before being slaughtered and processed in the US was previously barred due to biosecurity concerns. One concern was that Mexico's livestock tracking system could inadvertently lead producers to import beef from parts of the continent where there were disease outbreaks. But the latest announcement will lift the ban on beef sourced from Canada or Mexico after the US introduced more robust movement controls in late 2024 and early 2025 allowing for improved identification and tracing throughout the supply chain. The change could be used as a bargaining chip as Australia continues to push for tariff exemptions from the US after the US president earlier this year demanded Canberra lift the beef import restrictions. Australia is the biggest exporter of beef to the US. According to Bendigo Bank's recent mid-year agriculture outlook, Aussie beef will continue to be on the menu in the US, where herd numbers are in decline due to drought and increased costs of agricultural inputs. Most Australian goods sent to the US currently face a 10 per cent tariff, while steel and aluminium products have been slapped with a 50 per cent tariff. Mr Trump has also threatened a tariff on pharmaceutical imports to the US, which is one of Australia's biggest exports to its ally. Although Prime Minister Anthony Albanese is yet to secure a face-to-face meeting with Mr Trump - after their first scheduled talks were scuppered by the conflict in the Middle East - Australia has largely avoided the brunt of the tariffs as most of its exports are only exposed to the baseline levy. But other aspects of the US-Australia relationship remain uncertain. The nuclear submarine deal between Australia, the US and the UK - under the AUKUS security alliance - could be in peril after the Pentagon launched a review to examine whether the agreement aligns with Mr Trump's "US first" agenda. However, Mr Albanese has confirmed Australia made another scheduled payment as part of the deal to acquire US nuclear submarines, taking the total paid to $1.6 billion so far. "It's about increasing ... their industrial capacity" to build the submarines, he told ABC television on Wednesday. Under the $368 billion program, Australia will buy at least three Virginia-class submarines from the US sometime in the early 2030s. A new class of nuclear submarines will be built in Adelaide to be delivered in the 2040s.
