Dutton claims majority of veterans don't want welcome to country at Anzac Day ceremonies
It comes days after a neo-Nazi booed and heckled a welcome to country ceremony at a dawn service in Melbourne.
On Monday, Dutton again condemned those extremist protests, saying Anzac Day ceremonies were 'sacred' and not a place for booing, but repeated comments from Sunday night's televised debate that Indigenous acknowledgments were 'over the top'.
In an at-times testy press conference in the NSW central coast seat of Paterson – a key Liberal target – Dutton said 'significant events' like opening of parliament were appropriate for a welcome to country, but downplayed the need in other areas.
Asked about Qantas' practice of giving acknowledgment of country where their planes land, Dutton dubbed it 'over the top'. The airline was contacted for comment.
During his press conference, pressed on whether Anzac Day ceremonies warranted a Welcome to Country, Dutton replied: 'No, would be my answer to that.
'It's ultimately a decision for the individual organisers at the events, and they can make a decision based on their membership and what their board wants to do, and that's a decision for them, and I respect that,' Dutton said.
'Anzac Day is about our veterans … I think if you are listening to their sentiment, and we are respectful of that sentiment on Anzac Day, I think the majority view would be that they don't want it on that day. But I think it is an individual decision for the RSLs.'
Dutton did not say how his view about the 'majority' of veterans was formed. Several media organisations have referred to an online survey run by news.com.au, which was an unscientific and unrepresentative opt-in poll, which found 65% of 50,000 respondents wanted Welcomes to Country to end completely and another 23% said they wanted fewer welcomes.
On 15 April, the Cairns RSL sub branch asked the local state MP, Michael Healy, not to acknowledge country in his speech at a dawn service.
'In defence to [sic] our members' wishes, we respectfully request that you refrain from including the welcome to country in your speech at our Anzac Day dawn service,' said an email seen by Guardian Australia.
skip past newsletter promotion
Sign up to Afternoon Update: Election 2025
Free daily newsletter
Our Australian afternoon update breaks down the key election campaign stories of the day, telling you what's happening and why it matters Privacy Notice: Newsletters may contain info about charities, online ads, and content funded by outside parties. For more information see our
Newsletters may contain info about charities, online ads, and content funded by outside parties. For more information see our Privacy Policy . We use Google reCaptcha to protect our website and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
after newsletter promotion
The Queensland RSL was contacted for comment. It is not known whether Healy was asked not to provide a welcome to country acknowledgment as one had been delivered earlier in the service. Healy has also been contacted for comment.
When contacted for a response to Dutton's remarks, the national RSL referred Guardian Australia to a website providing advice on hosting an Anzac Day service, which includes a 'welcome including acknowledgment of country'. The Victorian branch of the RSL was also contacted for comment.
Labor cabinet minister Jason Clare told Sunrise on Monday morning that he hoped the issue would not become a political football in the final days of the election.
'Remember where all of this began on Friday. It spawned out of the actions of neo-Nazis interrupting an Anzac Day Dawn Service. I don't think any of us want to find ourselves on the same side of this argument as neo-Nazis,' he said.
Anthony Albanese, during the Seven debate on Sunday, said it was up to individual organisations to decide whether to open their event with a welcome to country but noted the ceremonies were a 'matter of respect'. He noted that in New Zealand, the national anthem was sung in Māori language as well as English.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Daily Mirror
an hour ago
- Daily Mirror
Donald Trump makes bizarre arm gesture after saying he'll put nukes on White House roof
The bizarre moment Reporters gathered in the White House grounds shouted questions up at the President, who had been on a tour of the roof Donald Trump performed a very unusual gesture during a walkabout on the roof of the White House - just after apparently claiming he wanted to install nuclear missiles up there. Reporters gathered in the White House grounds shouted questions up at the President, who had been on a tour of the roof of the building. He's planning extensive renovations to the iconic residence and office building. His first change was to pave over the famous Rose Garden - something that has sparked anger among critics. The next project he has announced is to tack a huge ballroom on the side of the East Wing - designs of which closely resemble the ballroom in his Mar A Lago club in Florida. Today, he responded to questions about what he wanted to build next by apparently shouting "missiles. Nuclear missiles." He pointed to the roof of the White House beneath his feet, then made a stiff-armed gesture, twice. It seems likely that the President was merely miming the launch of a missile. But after the furore around a similar gesture Elon Musk compared at a party to celebrate his inauguration, it's likely his critics will note the gesture's similarity to a Nazi salute. Trump appeared to be taking stock of several areas including the roof of the press briefing room and the Rose Garden. Wearing a suit with a red tie, Trump walked the area with several other people, as someone with them took photographs. Get Donald Trump updates straight to your WhatsApp! As the world attempts to keep up with Trump's antics, the Mirror has launched its very own US Politics WhatsApp community where you'll get all the latest news from across the pond. We'll send you the latest breaking updates and exclusives all directly to your phone. Users must download or already have WhatsApp on their phones to join in. All you have to do to join is click on this link, select 'Join Chat' and you're in! We may also send you stories from other titles across the Reach group. We will also treat our community members to special offers, promotions, and adverts from us and our partners. If you don't like our community, you can check out any time you like. To leave our community click on the name at the top of your screen and choose Exit group. If you're curious, you can read our Privacy Notice. Trump may have been surveying ongoing renovation and construction work at the White House. He returned to the presidency with grand ideas for remaking the building, like paving over the Rose Garden and building a massive ballroom. After making observations from the White House roof, Trump walked over to an area above the briefing room, briefly interacting with reporters gathered below. Asked why he was on the roof, Trump said he was 'taking a little walk' and mentioned the 'ballroom on the other side.' Last month, the White House announced that construction on a massive, new $200 million ballroom — the first structural change to the Executive Mansion itself since the addition of the Truman balcony in 1948 — would begin in September. One of the five men with him appeared to be James McCrery, architect for the project. 'Just another way to spend my money for this country,' Trump said. 'Anything I do is financed by me.'
Daily Mirror
3 hours ago
- Daily Mirror
MIKEY SMITH: 7 unhinged Donald Trump moments as he gets really weird about Sydney Sweeney
Trump took to the airwaves this morning, spouting a torrent of untruths in lengthy and increasingly unhinged rants Donald Trump has returned from another weekend of golf - and jumped straight into a day of lies, falsehoods and being weird about young women. Not satisfied with firing the head of a government body that delivered some statistics he didn't like, Trump took to the airwaves this morning, spouting a torrent of untruths in lengthy and increasingly unhinged rants. Also, he's being weird about Sydney Sweeney in perhaps the most predictable turn of events in his Presidency so far. It comes after he made a major change to the White House that people are very upset about. Here's everything that's happened in Trump World in the last 24 hours that you need to know about. Deep breaths, we're going in. 1. Donald Trump keeps telling you to reject the evidence of your eyes and ears Trump is still fuming about those job numbers that were published on Friday. You remember, the ones that were so bad that Trump decided to shoot the messenger and fire the head of the Bureau of Labour Statistics (BLS). Erika McEntarfer was confirmed as commissioner of the BLS last year, with the Senate voting in favour by 86 to 8. She was a credible, career public servant who just happened to have been hired during the Biden administration. And because Trump didn't like the numbers her organisation announced on Friday, he smeared her as a political operative and accused her baselessly of essentially committing fraud. He claimed the numbers were "RIGGED in order to make the Republicans and ME, look bad." And on the tarmac at Allentown airfield in Pennsylvania, as he switched between Marine One and Air Force One, Trump indicated he was still fuming. "The numbers were ridiculous, that she a scam, in my opinion. In my opinion it's just additional scam." 2. Trump has some thoughts about Sydney Sweeney You will be delighted to learn that 79-year-old convicted felon and, according to a New York Court, sex abuser Donald Trump has some thoughts about 27 year old actor Sydney Sweeney. It follows the definitely not confcted discourse carnage after she featured in an American Eagle advert with the slogan "Sydney Sweeney has great genes". While people were working out whether the ads were a bit Nazi, or just thirsty, someone looked her up and found she was a registered Republican. Well, someone told Trump that during a huddle on the tarmac and he "She's a registered Republican?" he said. "Ohhh, now I love her ad. Is that right? Is Sydney Sweeney? I wouldn't have known, but I'm glad you told me that. "If Sydney Sweeney is a registered Republican, I think her ad is fantastic." He went on to describe the ad as "the "HOTTEST" ad out there" on Truth Social, and compared it to the "TOTAL DISASTER" of Jaguar's "WOKE" rebrand. Then, for some reason he brought up Taylor Swift. "Just look at Woke singer Taylor Swift. Ever since I alerted the world as to what she was by saying on TRUTH that I can't stand her (HATE!). She was booed out of the Super Bowl and became NO LONGER HOT" None of these things are true. 3. Democrats flee Texas so Trump can't rig the midterms Meanwhile, Democrats in Texas have literally fled the state to avoid Trump's Republicans re-drawing the constituency map to rig the mid-term elections. The Republican-dominated House was unable to establish the quorum of lawmakers required to do business. Texas Gov. Greg Abbott has made threats about removing members who are absent from their seats. And the House quickly issued civil arrest warrants for absent Democrats and Abbott ordered state troopers to help find and arrest them, but lawmakers physically outside Texas are beyond the jurisdiction of state authorities. Trump, calling into CNBC this morning, was pretty straightforward about what the aim of the gerrymandering is. "We have an opportunity in Texas to pick up five seats..." He said. "I got the highest vote in the history of Texas as you probably know. And we are entitled to five more seats." 4. Obama and co to face a Grand Jury Trump is delighted to hear that a Grand Jury will be set up to consider the harebrained conspiracy nonsense the Justice Department keep pumping out making unsubstantiated claims of election interference and manufacturing intelligence, neither of which are actually crimes. Even if they found a crime to claim was committed - say, obstruction of justice - the statute of limitations is 5 years on that, so they'd be SOL with that too. It's almost like this isn't actually about indictments and prosecutions, and all about trying to steal news cycles away from Jeffrey Epstein. Either way, Trump is delighted. "You've talked how you want success, not retribution," CNBC host Joe Kernan said, incredibly charitably. "The DOJ is now tapping a grand jury to look into the intelligence community's assessment of what was happening with Russia. "You have nothing to do with directing that?" "Nope," Trump replied. "I have nothing to do with it. I will tell you this, they deserve it. I was happy to hear it." 5. 'We can't relitigate that' In the same interview, Trump repeatedly lied about the 2020 election being "rigged", which countless court cases and investigations have proved it was not. Still, the best Kernan could do was to tell the President: "We can't relitigate that". 6. Trump says he'd "like to run again" Trump said (again) that he got the highest numbers in the history of Texas - adding: "A record that won't be beat unless I run again..." Asked if he was going to run again, which would be illegal, Trump said: " not." Of course, he couldn't just leave that hanging. "I'd like to..." He added. 7. ...and he keeps lying about his numbers - even when challenged Then he went into an unhinged (and entirely untrue) rant about how his numbers are the best he's ever had, and that his approval is up in the 70s. "I have the best poll numbers I ever had," he said. Kernen, to his credit, corrected the President, saying his numbers are only good "among Republicans". "No. I'm talking about generally," Trump insisted. Kernen (sigh)... said: "Your haters cite polls that have you down in the 30s." To be clear, it's not just the "haters" who have Trump down in the 30s. It's people who are at all interested in facts and reality. "They're fake polls," Trump retorted. "You also have me in the 70s." He also went on at length about a segment CNN analyst Harry Enten presented a day earlier, where he "went crazy about how well Trump was doing." The segment he was referring to - which has generated a huge number of complaints to CNN - saw Enten declare Trump "the most influential President" this century. Didn't say anything about his poll numbers, though. So where are Trump's numbers? Get Donald Trump updates straight to your WhatsApp! As the world attempts to keep up with Trump's antics, the Mirror has launched its very own US Politics WhatsApp community where you'll get all the latest news from across the pond. We'll send you the latest breaking updates and exclusives all directly to your phone. Users must download or already have WhatsApp on their phones to join in. All you have to do to join is click on this link, select 'Join Chat' and you're in! We may also send you stories from other titles across the Reach group. We will also treat our community members to special offers, promotions, and adverts from us and our partners. If you don't like our community, you can check out any time you like. To leave our community click on the name at the top of your screen and choose Exit group. If you're curious, you can read our Privacy Notice. Well, according to The New York Times' poll of polls, he's averaging 44%, which is the second worst of any President at this point in their term. Who was the worst? He was, in his first term. Is he less popular than Joe Biden? You bet he is. On Day 198 of his presidency, Biden was +9 approve. Trump is +9 disapprove. And the most recent polls are pretty eye-watering. YouGov's poll, published today, sees Trump hit an astonishing +14 points net disapprove - with his approval on just 41%. And another published this week by Leger had the same net +14 disapprove, with just 37% of those polled saying they approved of his performance.
The Herald Scotland
13 hours ago
- The Herald Scotland
Now will the small minds of the SNP twig what voters care about?
Gus Connelly, Calderbank. Time to trim constituency Yet another bright light in Holyrood is dimmed, as Deputy First Minister [[Kate Forbes]] announces her intention to stand down from politics in 2026. Ms Forbes certainly lit up the Chamber back in 2020 as the first female to deliver a Scottish Budget (incidentally at short notice) and she brought great ability and commitment to her new-found position. To be an MSP in such a rural and geographically taxing constituency as Skye, Lochaber & Badenoch would be difficult for anyone, but for a mum with a young child it presents a scenario which raises questions. Should the Boundary Commission be considering geographically halving the constituency to make it manageable? Should Parliament be looking for options for such a widely-spread constituency? The make-up of constituencies should be manageable in the interest of constituents and their representatives. Catriona C Clark, Falkirk. Read more letters How much did Sturgeon cost us? In her paean of praise for Nicola Sturgeon's 'many achievements', Ruth Marr (Letters, August 2) draws a veil over the costs to the public purse of these policies. With regard to the SNP's abolition of prescription charges, perhaps one example will suffice to illustrate the financial impact of this policy. The cost to NHS Scotland in 2023-24 for paracetamol prescriptions alone was £14 million. Adding pharmacy dispensing charges of £7m brings the total cost to £21m. A Google search reveals that a pack of paracetamol can be bought for around 90p in any supermarket. Alan Ramage, Edinburgh. • It is notable that the list of "achievements" by Nicola Sturgeon given by Ruth Marr all involve her spending other people's money. I wonder if Ms Marr can come up with an example of Ms Sturgeon making a positive contribution to achieving economic growth in Scotland. She certainly made many negative contributions like destroying the ferry service to Arran and allowing her erstwhile allies in the Green Party to introduce measures like National Planning Framework 4 that are strangling economic development all over Scotland. I also wonder if Ms Marr is aware that her hero's actions in relation to the ferries, including having the Glen Sannox launched on her direct orders six months before the ship was ready so that she could upstage the Conservative Defence Secretary when he was announcing new jobs, and her contribution to the closure of the Grangemouth oil refinery by further high-handed actions, have resulted in the new "greener" ferries actually being responsible for more emissions of carbon dioxide than their conventionally powered predecessors. This is because the diesel fuel that the conventional ferries use can be brought to Ardrossan by electrically powered railway trains but the Liquefied Natural Gas needed to make the new ferries "greener" has to be transported from Essex on diesel-powered lorries. You couldn't make it up. Peter Wylie, Paisley. Indy target should be two-thirds As GR Weir (Letters, August 2) has not answered my simple question as to how he would define his 'stable majority" for independence, allow me to propose two-thirds for consideration. In my view, irrespective of how, when and by whom the decision to hold another inevitably divisive referendum on independence is taken, the stable polling majority sufficient to justify it must be understood in advance, and to achieve independence the actual voting result must at least confirm that polling majority. That result can then be taken as the settled will of the people at that time. The same requirements would apply to any subsequent calls for a rejoin referendum. As Mr Weir will know, to change the constitution of the [[SNP]], the principal advocate of independence, requires at least a two-thirds majority (Article 27), so nationalists should have no difficulty in supporting my proposal. Alan Fitzpatrick, Dunlop. Why can't they admit mistakes? Kevin McKenna's interview with Jackie Baillie on Saturday (''I hated how Sandie Peggie's daughter was used', says Scottish Labour deputy leader', The Herald, August 2) highlights an uncomfortable but increasingly familiar feature of our politics: an unwillingness to accept responsibility for past decisions. In December 2022 Scottish Labour gave full support to the Gender Recognition Reform (Scotland) Bill. The party whipped its MSPs to vote in favour and, with their backing, the legislation was passed by the Scottish Parliament. Since then, the well-publicised cases of Isla Bryson and Sandie Peggie have shown that public concern is widespread – particularly about allowing individuals to legally change their gender through self-identification, thereby acquiring all the rights of their preferred gender. Labour now appears to be pivoting in response to that unease. Jackie Baillie attempts to distance the party from the fallout by suggesting Labour's support of the bill was dependent on key amendments and a future consultation with the UK Government. This rings hollow. If those amendments were so crucial, why did the party not withdraw its support when they were not accepted? And what purpose does consultation serve after a bill has been passed? This kind of political hedging only deepens public distrust in the integrity of politicians. Would it not be more honest and more effective to simply say "Sorry. We got this wrong"? George Rennie, Inverness. How will Nicola Sturgeon be remembered? (Image: PA) Let the media into Gaza The first and continuing victim of war is truth. Despite evidence from non-Palestinians, western doctors among them, about the near-famine conditions in Gaza, it has not come as a surprise to watch and listen to Israeli officials claim it is a lie that Palestinians are facing starvation. From what I have seen from interviews with [[Israel]]i citizens, they too believe the world is subject to Hamas propaganda. There is a way for the world to see, without bias, the actual conditions under which Palestinians are now compelled to live – reverse the present [[Israel]]i policy and let the world's media into [[Gaza]] so that we can all see for ourselves from objective reporting. If not, why not, is the question Keir Starmer should put to his [[Israel]]i counterpart. As for Hamas, is it not past time for those in its leadership languishing in the safety of Qatar to be asked why, given its ability to construct miles of tunnels in Gaza, it did not build shelters for the population when it must have known that Israel would respond to the atrocity of October 7 with a fury not seen before? Jim Sillars, Edinburgh. Shame on Ian Murray The Secretary of State for Scotland's antipathy towards the Scottish Government is persistent, but surely reached a new low when he castigated Public Finance Minister Ivan McKee for using the word 'genocide' during a BBC broadcast discussion about recognising the state of Palestine ("Minister confirms Scottish Government 'genocide' in Gaza position", heraldscotland, August 3). Ian Murray wants the courts to decide what is genocide, presumably before the UK Government acts, and despite the fact that the UN Special Committee, Amnesty International and Médicin San Frontières have all used the term to describe the continuing Israeli actions in Gaza. In addition, reports from the front line bring us daily reports of massive fatalities, destruction of infrastructure, displacement of communities, murder of aid workers, and human rights abuses, all of which meet the criteria for genocide. But Ian Murray wants to wait on the courts, and by doing so extends the United Kingdom's complicity in the despicable acts of the Israeli state. Shame on him. Graeme Forbes, Edinburgh.
