
A Year Before Declaring Independence, Colonists Offered 'Olive Branch' Petition to King George III
Mindful of next year's 250th anniversary of American independence, organizers called the movement 'No Kings.' Had the same kind of rallies been called for in the summer of 1775, the response likely would have been more cautious.
'It ('No Kings') was probably a minority opinion in July 1775,' says H.W. Brands, a prize-winning scholar and chair of the history department at the University of Texas at Austin.
'There was a lot of passion for revolution in New England, but that was different from the rest of the country,' says Pulitzer Prize–winning historian Joseph Ellis. 'There were still people who didn't want to be drawn into what they feared was an unnecessary war.'
This month marks the 250th anniversary–the semiquincentennial–of a document enacted almost exactly a year before the Declaration of Independence: The Olive Branch Petition, ratified July 5, 1775, by the Continental Congress. Its primary author was John Dickinson, a Pennsylvanian whose writing skills led some to call him the 'Penman of the Revolution,' and would stand as a final, desperate plea to reconcile with Britain.
They put forth a pre-revolutionary argument. The notion of 'No Kings' is a foundation of democracy. But over the first half of 1775, Dickinson and others still hoped that King George III could be reasoned with and would undo the tax hikes and other alleged abuses they blamed on the British Parliament and other officials.
Ellis calls it the 'Awkward Interval,' when Americans had fought the British in Lexington and Concord and around Bunker Hill while holding off from a full separation.
'Public opinion is changing during this time, but it still would have been premature to issue a declaration of independence,' says Ellis, whose books include Founding Brothers, The Cause, and the upcoming The Great Contradiction.
The Continental Congress projected unity in its official statements. But privately, like the colonies overall, members differed.
Jack Rakove, a professor of history at Stanford University and author of the Pulitzer Prize–winning Original Meanings, noted that delegates to Congress ranged from radicals such as Samuel Adams, who were avid for independence, to such moderates as Dickinson and New York's John Jay.
The Olive Branch resolution balanced references to the 'delusive pretences,' 'fruitless terrors,' and 'unavailing severities' administered by British officials with dutiful tributes to shared ties and to the king's 'royal magnanimity and benevolence.'
'(N)otwithstanding the sufferings of your loyal Colonists during the course of this present controversy, our Breasts retain too tender a regard for the Kingdom from which we derive our Origin to request such a Reconciliation as might in any manner be inconsistent with her Dignity or her welfare,' the sometimes obsequious petition reads in part.
The American Revolution didn't arise at a single moment, but through years of anguished steps away from the mother country–a kind of weaning that at times suggested a coming of age, a young person's final departure from home.
In letters and diaries written in the months before July 1775, American leaders often referred to themselves as children, the British as parents, and the conflict a family argument.
Edmund Pendleton, a Virginia delegate to the Continental Congress, urged a reconciliation with 'Our mother Country.'
Jay, who would later help negotiate the treaty formally ending the Revolutionary War, proposed informing King George that 'your majesty's American subjects are bound to your majesty by the strongest ties of allegiance and affection and attached to their parent country by every bond that can unite societies.'
In the Olive Branch paper, Dickinson would offer tribute to the 'union between our Mother country and these colonies.'
An early example of peace through strength. The Congress, which had been formed the year before, relied in the first half of 1775 on a dual strategy that now might be called peace through strength, a blend of resolve and compromise.
John Adams defined it as 'to hold the sword in one hand, the olive branch in the other.'
Dickinson's petition was a gesture of peace. A companion document, The Declaration of the Causes and Necessity of Taking Up Arms, was a statement of resolve.
The 1775 declaration was drafted by Thomas Jefferson, who a year later would be the principal writer of the Declaration of Independence, revised by Dickinson and approved by the Congress on July 6.
The language anticipated the Declaration of Independence with its condemnation of the British for their 'intemperate Rage for unlimited Domination' and its vows to make known the 'Justice of our Cause.'
But while the Declaration of Independence ends with the 13 colonies absolved from all Allegiance to the British Crown, the authors in 1775 assured a nervous public that 'we mean not to dissolve that Union which has so long and so happily subsisted between us, and which we sincerely wish to see restored.'
'Necessity has not yet driven us into that desperate Measure, or induced us to excite any other Nation to war against them,' they wrote.
John Adams and Benjamin Franklin were among the peers of Dickinson who thought him naive about the British and were unfazed when the king refused even to look at the Olive Branch petition and ruled that the colonies were in a state of rebellion.
Around the same time Dickinson was working on his draft, the Continental Congress readied for further conflict. It appointed a commander of the newly formed Continental Army, a renowned Virginian whom Adams praised as 'modest and virtuous … amiable, generous and brave.' His name: George Washington.
His ascension, Adams wrote, 'will have a great effect in cementing and securing the Union of these Colonies.'
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Al Arabiya
9 hours ago
- Al Arabiya
Landlord imprisoned for hate-crime attack on Palestinian American family has died
A landlord sentenced to decades in prison after he killed a Palestinian American boy and wounded his mother has died. Three months ago, Joseph Czuba was sentenced to 53 years behind bars for the attack. He was found guilty in February of murder, attempted murder and hate-crime charges in the death of 6-year-old Wadee Alfayoumi and the wounding of the boy's mother, Hanan Shaheen. The 73-year-old Czuba targeted them in October 2023 because of their Islamic faith and as a response to the war between Israel and Hamas, which started days earlier. Czuba died Thursday in the custody of the Illinois Department of Corrections, according to a statement from the Will County Sheriff's Office. Ahmed Rehab, the executive director of Council on American-Islamic Relations' Chicago office, said in a statement on Saturday that 'this depraved killer has died, but the hate is still alive and well.' Evidence at trial included harrowing testimony from Shaheen and her frantic 911 call, along with bloody crime scene photos and police video. Jurors deliberated less than 90 minutes before handing in a verdict. The family had been renting rooms in Czuba's home in Plainfield, about 40 miles (64 kilometers) from Chicago when the attack happened. Central to prosecutors' case was harrowing testimony from the boy's mother, who said Czuba attacked her before moving on to her son, insisting they had to leave because they were Muslim. Prosecutors also played the 911 call and showed police footage. Czuba's wife, Mary, whom he has since divorced, also testified for the prosecution, saying he had become agitated about the Israel-Hamas war, which had erupted days earlier. Police said Czuba pulled a knife from a holder on a belt and stabbed the boy 26 times, leaving the knife in the child's body. Some of the bloody crime scene photos were so explicit that the judge agreed to turn television screens showing them away from the audience, which included Wadee's relatives. The attack renewed fears of anti-Muslim discrimination and hit particularly hard in Plainfield and surrounding suburbs, which have a large and established Palestinian community. Wadee's funeral drew large crowds, and Plainfield officials have dedicated a park playground in his honor.


Arab News
9 hours ago
- Arab News
Landlord imprisoned for decades in hate-crime attack on Palestinian American family has died
JOLIET: A landlord sentenced to decades in prison after he killed a Palestinian American boy and wounded his mother has months ago, Joseph Czuba was sentenced to 53 years behind bars for the attack. He was found guilty in February of murder, attempted murder and hate-crime charges in the death of 6-year-old Wadee Alfayoumi and the wounding of the boy's mother, Hanan 73-year-old Czuba targeted them in October 2023 because of their Islamic faith and as a response to the war between Israel and Hamas, which started days died Thursday in the custody of the Illinois Department of Corrections, according to a statement from the Will County Sheriff's Rehab, the executive director of Council on American-Islamic Relations' Chicago office, said in a statement on Saturday that 'this depraved killer has died, but the hate is still alive and well.'Evidence at trial included harrowing testimony from Shaheen and her frantic 911 call, along with bloody crime scene photos and police video. Jurors deliberated less than 90 minutes before handing in a family had been renting rooms in Czuba's home in Plainfield, about 40 miles (64 kilometers) from Chicago when the attack to prosecutors' case was harrowing testimony from the boy's mother, who said Czuba attacked her before moving on to her son, insisting they had to leave because they were Muslim. Prosecutors also played the 911 call and showed police footage. Czuba's wife, Mary, whom he has since divorced, also testified for the prosecution, saying he had become agitated about the Israel-Hamas war, which had erupted days said Czuba pulled a knife from a holder on a belt and stabbed the boy 26 times, leaving the knife in the child's body. Some of the bloody crime scene photos were so explicit that the judge agreed to turn television screens showing them away from the audience, which included Wadee's attack renewed fears of anti-Muslim discrimination and hit particularly hard in Plainfield and surrounding suburbs, which have a large and established Palestinian community. Wadee's funeral drew large crowds, and Plainfield officials have dedicated a park playground in his honor.


Arab News
13 hours ago
- Arab News
Trump immigration raids threaten US food security, farmers warn
VENTURA, California: Lisa Tate, whose family has been farming in Ventura County since 1876, cannot recall a threat to crops like the one emanating from Donald Trump's anti-immigrant onslaught. Tate fears that the crackdown on illegal workers, far from addressing the problems of this vital agricultural region north of Los Angeles, could 'dismantle the whole economy' and put the country's food security at risk. 'I began to get really concerned when we saw a group of border control agents come up to the Central Valley and just start going onto farms and just kind of trying to chase people down, evading the property owner,' the 46-year-old farmer, who grows avocados, citrus and coffee, told AFP in an interview. 'That's not something we're used to happening in agriculture,' she added. The impact goes beyond harvesters, she said. 'There's a whole food chain involved,' from field workers to truck drivers to people working in packing houses and in sales. 'It's just, everybody's scared,' she said — even a multi-generational American like her. 'I'm nervous and I'm scared, because we're feeling like we're being attacked.' Other farmers contacted by AFP declined to speak to the media, saying they feared potential reprisals from the Trump administration. Perennial labor shortage The agricultural sector has for years been trying to find permanent solutions for its perennial labor shortages, beyond issuing temporary permits for migrant workers. 'Some of the work we have is seasonal. But really, around here, we need workers that are year-round,' Tate says. The number of government certified positions for temporary agricultural workers practically tripled between 2014 and 2024, Department of Labor statistics show, underlining just how much American agriculture depends on foreign workers. On top of that, some 42 percent of farm workers are not authorized to work in the United States, according to a 2022 study by the Department of Agriculture. Those numbers line up with the struggles many farmers go through to find labor. They say US citizens are not interested in the physically demanding work, with its long days under extreme temperatures, rain and sun. Against that backdrop, Tate warns that removing people who are actually doing the work will cause immeasurable damage. Not only will it harm farms and ranches, which could take years to recover, it will also send food prices soaring, and even endanger US food security, possibly requiring the country to start importing provisions that may previously have been grown at home, she says. 'What we really need is some legislation that has the type of program that we need, and that works for both the workers, that ensures their safety, it ensures a fair playing field when it comes to international trade, as well as as domestic needs,' Tate said. 'Between a rock and a hard place' Some farmworkers agreed to speak to AFP on condition of not being fully identified, for fear of being arrested. 'All we do is work,' a worker named Silvia told AFP. She saw several friends arrested in a raid in in Oxnard, about 10 miles (16 kilometers) west of Ventura. The 32-year-old Mexican lives in constant fear that she will be the next one picked up and, in the end, separated from her two US-born daughters. 'We're between a rock and a hard place. If we don't work, how will we pay our bills? And if we go out, we run the risk of running into them,' she said, referring to US Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) agents. 'The way the goverment is working right now, everybody loses,' said Miguel, who has been working in the fields of southern California for three decades. The 54-year-old said that workers are losing jobs, farm owners are losing their labor, and as a result, the United States is losing its food. Miguel has worked in various different agriculture sector jobs, including during the Covid-19 pandemic. All of them were 'very hard jobs,' he said. Now he feels like he has a target on his back. 'They should do a little research so they understand. The food they eat comes from the fields, right?' he said. 'So it would be good if they were more aware, and gave us an opportunity to contribute positively, and not send us into hiding.'