NASA just took the closest-ever images of the sun, and they are incredible (video)
NASA's Parker Solar Probe is no stranger to breaking records.
On Dec. 24, 2024, Parker made history by flying closer to the sun than any spacecraft in history. The probe reached a distance of just 3.8 million miles (6.1 million kilometers) from the solar surface, entering the outermost layer of the sun's atmosphere, known as the corona. During this flyby, it also reached a top speed of 430,000 miles per hour (690,000 kilometers per hour), breaking its own record as the fastest ever human-made object.
Now, NASA has released remarkable video captured during the historic flyby, offering the closest views of the sun ever recorded. The new images were captured with Parker's Wide-Field Imager for Solar Probe, or WISPR, revealing a never-before-seen view of the sun's corona and solar winds shortly after they are released from the corona.
Video not playing?
Some ad blockers can disable our video player.
"Parker Solar Probe has once again transported us into the dynamic atmosphere of our closest star," said Nicky Fox, associate administrator, Science Mission Directorate at NASA Headquarters in Washington, in a statement accompanying the images. "We are witnessing where space weather threats to Earth begin, with our eyes, not just with models. This new data will help us vastly improve our space weather predictions to ensure the safety of our astronauts and the protection of our technology here on Earth and throughout the solar system."
WISPR's images revealed an important boundary in the sun's atmosphere called the heliospheric current sheet, where the sun's magnetic field changes direction from north to south. It also captured, for the first time in high resolution, collisions between multiple coronal mass ejections (CMEs), which are major drivers of space weather, and are important in understanding risks to astronauts and technology on Earth such as power grids and communications satellites.
"In these images, we're seeing the CMEs basically piling up on top of one another," said Angelos Vourlidas, the WISPR instrument scientist at the Johns Hopkins Applied Physics Laboratory, which designed, built, and operates the spacecraft in Laurel, Maryland. "We're using this to figure out how the CMEs merge together."
Before the Parker Solar Probe, NASA and its international partners could only study solar wind from afar, which is why the spacecraft has been instrumental in closing key knowledge gaps. It identified the widespread presence of "switchbacks" — zig-zagging magnetic field patterns — around 14.7 million miles from the sun and linked them to the origins of one of the two main types of solar wind.
Closer in, at just 8 million miles, Parker discovered that the boundary of the sun's corona is far more uneven and complex than previously believed.
But more remained to be discovered.
"The big unknown has been: how is the solar wind generated, and how does it manage to escape the sun's immense gravitational pull?" said Nour Rawafi, the project scientist for Parker Solar Probe at the Johns Hopkins Applied Physics Laboratory. "Understanding this continuous flow of particles, particularly the slow solar wind, is a major challenge, especially given the diversity in the properties of these streams — but with Parker Solar Probe, we're closer than ever to uncovering their origins and how they evolve."
Prior to Parker Solar Probe, distant observations suggested there are actually two varieties of slow solar wind, distinguished by the orientation or variability of their magnetic fields. One type of slow solar wind, called Alfvénic, has small-scale switchbacks. The second type, called non-Alfvénic, doesn't show these variations in its magnetic field.
As it spiraled closer to the sun, Parker Solar Probe confirmed there are indeed two types of solar wind. Its close-up views are also helping scientists differentiate the origins of the two types, which scientists believe are unique. The non-Alfvénic wind may come off features called helmet streamers — large loops connecting active regions where some particles can heat up enough to escape — whereas Alfvénic wind might originate near coronal holes, or dark, cool regions in the corona.
"We don't have a final consensus yet, but we have a whole lot of new intriguing data," said Adam Szabo, Parker Solar Probe mission scientist at NASA's Goddard Space Flight Center in Greenbelt, Maryland.
The Parker Solar Probe is built to endure extreme conditions — from the freezing cold of deep space to the intense heat near the sun. A key factor in its survival is the difference between temperature and heat. While space near the sun can reach temperatures of several million degrees, that doesn't necessarily mean there's a lot of heat. This is because the sun's corona is extremely thin, meaning there are fewer particles. Even though individual particles in the corona are incredibly hot, there aren't many. The probe, therefore, doesn't receive much heat.
"While Parker Solar Probe will be traveling through a space with temperatures of several million degrees, the surface of [its] heat shield that faces the sun will only get heated to about 2,500 degrees Fahrenheit (about 1,400 degrees Celsius)," write NASA scientists.
These temperatures are, of course, still incredibly hot, which makes its heat shield, the Thermal Protection System (TPS), essential. The shield is made from a carbon composite foam sandwiched between two carbon plates. Carbon is ideal for this purpose because it is both lightweight and able to withstand extremely high temperatures without melting.
"Tested to withstand up to 3,000 degrees Fahrenheit (1,650 degrees Celsius), the TPS can handle any heat the sun can send its way, keeping almost all instrumentation safe," explained NASA.
Its structure allows it to endure intense heat while minimizing weight, making it crucial for a spacecraft that needs to travel at extreme speeds. The outer surface of the TPS is also coated with a white ceramic paint, which helps reflect as much solar energy as possible and further reduces the amount of heat absorbed.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Gizmodo
29 minutes ago
- Gizmodo
There's a Strange New Hole in Yellowstone National Park
Last April, geologists conducting routine maintenance at temperature logging stations in Yellowstone National Park's Norris Geyser Basin found something unexpected: a previously undocumented thermal pool of blue water. The newly identified pool, found in the Porcelain Basin subbasin, is about 13 feet (4 meters) wide, its idyllic blue water is around 109 degrees Fahrenheit (43 degrees Celsius), and the water's surface sits about one foot (30 centimeters) below the rim of the pool, according to a United States Geological Survey statement. The geologists found light-gray mud-covered rocks, including rocks up to one foot wide (30 cm), surrounding the pool. How did this feature form? According to the geologists, the clues actually paint a relatively clear picture: the pool likely resulted from a hydrothermal explosion—when liquid water turns to steam and causes underground pressure changes, creating a steam blast. Hydrothermal explosions are not uncommon at Norris Geyser Basin, which has experienced similar events before. Well-documented ones include the 1989 explosion of Porkchop Geyser. More recently, a new monitoring station installed in 2023 detected an explosion in the Porcelain Terrace area on April 15, 2024. Satellite imagery shows that the new pool did not exist before December 19, 2024. By January 6, 2025, a small cavity had begun to take shape, and on February 13, the water pool had fully formed. However, the recently installed monitoring station—which detects hydrothermal activity via infrasound (extremely low-frequency sound waves)—did not register any strong or distinct explosions during that time. It did, though, detect a number of weak acoustic signals from the direction of the pool, including on December 25, 2024, January 15, 2025, and February 11, 2025, but without an associated seismic signal that would normally accompany a strong explosion. As such, the pool likely formed after a number of smaller explosions chucked out rocks and silica mud, as opposed to a single big event. Silica-rich water then filled the resulting hole. The activity probably started on December 25, 2024, and continued in January and early February of this year. Norris Geyser Basin is the oldest and most active thermal area in Yellowstone and hosts the tallest geyser—a sporadically explosive hot water spring—on Earth. Yellowstone itself has over 10,000 thermal features, such as geysers, hot springs, steam vents, and mudpots, which attract tourists and scientists alike from all over the globe. The thermal activity is driven by an underground magma reservoir (part of the giant Yellowstone volcano complex), which heats up groundwater and triggers a series of chemical and physical reactions. Ultimately, the finding shows that even the most studied landscapes can still surprise us.
Washington Post
an hour ago
- Washington Post
Blood tests promise to detect cancer early. How well do they work?
For years, it has been one of the most tantalizing ideas in medicine: One day, a simple blood test will detect nascent cancers — allowing doctors to intervene when tumors may be easier to treat. A study published this month in Cancer Discovery found that three years before a handful of cancer patients were diagnosed, some promising tests could detect trace amounts of cancer genetic material floating in their blood, shed by tumors the people didn't yet know existed. Start-up companies have developed different versions of these 'multi-cancer early detection' tests designed to flag the errant genetic signatures of more than a dozen cancers. Some doctors and medical practices are already using them, and the field has been propelled forward by innovation and hype. Turning these innovative technologies into usable medical tools for the broader population has been complex. But a study recruiting subjects this summer, funded by the National Cancer Institute, seeks to begin to do that by answering basic questions about how the tests perform in comparison to more conventional cancer screening. A screening test given to millions of healthy people has to be accurate to avoid costly and anxiety-inducing follow-ups. And for it to become part of routine medical care, there needs to be evidence that the test can reliably find cancers — perhaps far earlier than routine methods. Most importantly, scientists want to see clear evidence that earlier detection leads to longer lives. To begin to fill this knowledge gap, scientists at nine sites around the country are recruiting up to 24,000 people between the ages of 45 and 75 for the Vanguard Study. Participants will be randomly assigned to receive either regular screening or one of two multi-cancer detection tests. All of the groups will be told to continue with regular cancer screenings and will be followed over two years. The blood tests used in the study will screen for a variety of cancers, including many for which there aren't more traditional screening tests: bladder, breast, colorectal, esophageal, stomach, liver, lung, ovarian, pancreatic and prostate. Researchers, guided by what they learn from this first trial, hope to launch a much larger trial, with about 150,000 people, to definitively establish the effectiveness of these tests in preventing deaths. Bert Vogelstein has been working on these ideas for 30 years at Johns Hopkins Medicine and is a scientific founder of Exact Sciences, a company working to make blood tests for cancer screenings, but is not involved in the new trial. He said the field is still in its adolescence. 'But adolescents can do a lot of great things, that's clear in athletics and it's clear in science,' Vogelstein said. 'I think what NCI is doing is great. And I applaud those efforts, because tests can do good or harm.' The benefit of early cancer detection is intuitive. People could roll up their sleeves and get a blood test to flag 20 cancers, allowing physicians to give early treatments when they have no symptoms. That could dramatically reduce the need for people to go through years of illness and advanced cancer treatments. 'That dream, to me, is decades off, but we're starting on it now — which is why it's so exciting,' said Scott Ramsey, a physician and researcher at the Fred Hutchinson Cancer Center and a principal investigator with the Cancer Screening Research Network, which will be running the Vanguard Study. 'We're not talking about treating people who are sick; we're talking about preventing people of dying in cancer in the first place.' The harms of screening are not always as clear to the public, but they show the trade-offs inherent when providing a medical intervention to healthy people. Ramsey pointed to the history around prostate specific antigen (PSA) tests, which identified many prostate cancers early — some of which would have never shown symptoms or caused death. That meant that many men were aggressively treated, with surgery and radiation that caused them to be incontinent or impotent for years or decades. The recommendations on how to test for prostate cancer changed as these trends became clear over decades. Ramsey said that now is the right moment to be subjecting these cancer blood tests to scrutiny. The potential for the tests is enormous, but there are fundamental questions that need to be answered about how and when they should be used — and, perhaps, when they shouldn't. The recent study in Cancer Discovery illustrated one of the major problems facing the field. To detect cancers early, the tests need a big boost in sensitivity, because they need to find fragments of cancer tumor DNA that are scarce. That study found that it was possible to detect cancer three or more years than a traditional diagnosis. 'It can be done — and that's an important part of the article, much earlier than had ever been shown before,' said Vogelstein, part of the team behind the study. But to detect those trace amounts of genetic material, the sensitivity of the test had to be roughly 50 times higher than what it is in tests today, he said — and would likely cost a few thousand dollars. Ramsey said current tests can be $900 or more. Health insurance carriers typically won't pay for them yet, because it isn't clear what their benefits and harms are. 'The bottom line is we don't know whether when taking one of these tests will give you an opportunity to live longer without cancer — or longer overall,' Ramsey said. 'There's never been a study that established that.'
Yahoo
an hour ago
- Yahoo
2025 Pacing As Earth's Second Warmest Year Behind 2024, Report Says
The first six months of 2025 were Earth's second warmest on record, keeping 2025 on a pace to finish slightly behind 2024 for the planet's warmest year, according to just-released data from several agencies. June's warmth: June 2025's globally average temperature was 1.76 degrees Fahrenheit above the 20th-century average, only 0.42 degrees cooler than the record warmest June in 2024 and 0.18 degrees cooler than the second warmest June in 2023, according to a report released Thursday by NOAA. Separate analysis from the European Copernicus Climate Change Service (C3S) and NASA's Goddard Institute for Space Studies also found Earth had its third warmest June, behind the two previous Junes. Only Behind Last Year: With the first six months over, 2025 has a roughly 2 in 3 chance to be the planet's second warmest year on record, climate scientist Zeke Hausfather estimated in a post on Bluesky. NOAA similarly concluded "95% confidence" of a second to fourth warmest year on record in 2025 in their temperature rankings outlook. NOAA global temperature records date to 1850. Each month in 2025 has been at least among the top three warmest of those respective months, according to NOAA. January was the planet's warmest in 176 years, NOAA found. 2024 was the planet's warmest year in records dating to the late 19th century, according to both NOAA and NASA. (For even more granular weather data tracking in your area, view your 15-minute details forecast in our Premium Pro experience.) Above The Threshold? June 2025 was only the third in the last 24 months in which global temperatures were not more than 2.7 degrees Fahrenheit (1.5 degrees Celsius) above the pre-industrial (1850-1900) levels, according to the C3S. Despite that, the most recent 12-month period through June was more than 2.7 degrees above late 19th-century temperatures. That doesn't necessarily mean we've broken above the 2.7 degree limit agreed upon in the 2015 Paris Climate Agreement. According to climate scientists, that would require that threshold to be topped for over a decade. But they also stress it means we're closer to that threshold than ever June was the warmest on record in Japan, as well as in dozens of cities in South Korea. It was the second warmest June in France and the United Kingdom. Spain smashed its national June heat record on June 28, when a high of 114.8 degrees was measured in El Granado, according to NOAA. In the U.S., it was the hottest June on record in Raleigh, North Carolina, and Yakutat, Alaska, according to the Southeast Regional Climate Center. As you can see on the map below, parts of western Europe, Australia and Asia were record warm in the first six months. Hawaii had its hottest January-June on record, according to NOAA. Oceans still warm: Global ocean temperatures are still much warmer than in any years from 1979 through 2022, C3S found. C3S noted that since March 2023, global daily sea surface temperatures have been warmer than in other years prior. Among patches of ocean record warmth in the first six months of 2025 included swaths of the Philippine Sea, the Pacific Ocean near Hawaii, the northeast Atlantic Ocean near Ireland, the U.K. and Scandinavia, the western Mediterranean Sea, the Arctic Ocean from Greenland to Canada and the southern Indian Ocean. Despite all that, 2025's ocean warmth has been less extreme than the off-the-charts ocean warmth of 2023 and 2024, which included both record tropical Atlantic warmth and an El Niño, the periodic warming of water in the equatorial eastern and central Pacific Ocean. Jonathan Erdman is a senior meteorologist at and has been covering national and international weather since 1996. Extreme and bizarre weather are his favorite topics. Reach out to him on X (formerly Twitter), Threads, Facebook and Bluesky.
