US power company to pay $82.5m for California wildfire
The 2020 Bobcat Fire destroyed dozens of buildings as it tore through the San Gabriel Mountains north of Los Angeles.
The US government said Southern California Edison had not properly controlled vegetation near its power lines and the blaze erupted when trees touched a live wire.
A 2023 lawsuit claimed damages from the company for the cost of fighting the fire on Forest Service land as well as for remediation of damage caused to campgrounds, trails and wildlife habitats.
"This record settlement against Southern California Edison provides meaningful compensation to taxpayers for the extensive costs of fighting the Bobcat Fire and for the widespread damage to public lands," said US Attorney Bill Essayli.
"My office will continue to aggressively pursue recovery for suppression costs and environmental damages from any entity that causes harm to the public's forests and other precious national resources."
Southern California Edison is no stranger to paying out large sums of money for wildfires where its equipment was suspected to have been at fault.
The company handed over more than $2.7-billion in settlements over the 2017 Thomas Fire that tore through Ventura and Santa Barbara counties, killing two people and destroying hundreds of buildings.
It paid $2.2-billion for the 2018 Woolsey Fire that burned through Los Angeles and Ventura counties, killing three people and damaging more than 1,600 buildings.
Investigators probing the deadly Eaton Fire, one of two blazes that ripped through Los Angeles at the start of this year, are homing in on SCE transmission lines as a possible source of ignition.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
The Star
a few seconds ago
- The Star
Pakistan jails eight from former PM Imran Khan's party 2023 riots
LAHORE (Reuters) -A Pakistani anti-terrorism court sentenced eight senior members of former Prime Minister Imran Khan's party to 10 years in prison late on Tuesday over riots that targeted military sites following Khan's 2023 arrest, their lawyer said. Khan is on trial on similar charges, being tried separately. The government accuses him and other leaders of inciting the May 9, 2023, protests, during which demonstrators attacked military and government buildings, including the army headquarters in Rawalpindi and the residence of a senior commander in Lahore. The prosecution is still presenting witnesses in Khan's proceedings, and Tuesday's verdict does not directly affect his case. The sentences, issued in a jail trial in Lahore, are among a series of prosecutions involving Khan's Pakistan Tehreek-e-Insaf (PTI) party. Defence lawyer Burhan Moazzam said they would appeal. 'It is surprising that six people were acquitted while eight were convicted, even though they were all charged under the same allegations,' he said. The case relates to one of several incidents stemming from the May 9 unrest, involving alleged incitement during attacks near a major intersection in Lahore. Moazzam said separate trials were ongoing in connection with other incidents that day. Those sentenced include senior PTI figures who held positions in Khan's Punjab government: Yasmin Rashid, a former provincial health minister; Ejaz Chaudhry, a senator; Mehmoodur Rashid, a former housing minister; and Umar Sarfraz Cheema, a former provincial governor and aide to Khan. The court also acquitted PTI Vice Chairman Shah Mehmood Qureshi who is in custody in connection with other cases, and it was not immediately clear whether the acquittal would lead to his release. Commenting on the verdict, junior law minister Aqeel Malik told local media the decision was 'in line with the law and the constitution.' Khan, who was ousted in a no-confidence vote in 2022, remains in prison facing multiple cases, including charges of corruption, contempt, and disclosure of official secrets. He denies wrongdoing and says the cases are politically motivated. The military denies targeting PTI. Authorities say the May 9 violence caused billions in damage and led to over 3,000 arrests in Punjab. (Reporting by Mubasher Bukhari in Lahore and Ariba Shahid in Karachi; Additional reporting by Asif Shahzad in Islamabad; Editing by Daniel Wallis)
Irish Times
a few seconds ago
- Irish Times
Inquiry begins into historical use of anti-epileptic drug and effects on pregnant women
The historical licensing and use of the anti-epileptic drug sodium valproate for women of childbearing age will be examined as part of an inquiry that started its work on Tuesday. Mothers of children diagnosed with foetal valproate spectrum disorder (FVSD) have long called for a public inquiry to investigate why they were not warned about the risks of taking the drug while pregnant . FVSD is caused by exposure in the womb to valproic acid, which is the key ingredient in sodium valproate, better known in Ireland as Epilim. An Irish Medical Journal study published in 2021 said diagnosing the condition was 'difficult' due to the lack of any specific diagnostic test or biomarker. READ MORE However, it said dysmorphic facial features, neural tube defects, congenital heart disease and cleft lip were among the most commonly associated characteristics. The study noted that Irish public health data suggested 3,126 babies were potentially exposed to sodium valproate before birth between 1975 and 2015. Minister for Health Jennifer Carroll MacNeill said the inquiry would give people directly affected by sodium valproate an 'opportunity to have their voices heard'. She welcomed the commencement of the inquiry, which was announced last year by her predecessor, Stephen Donnelly. She said she recently met the Organisation Anticonvulsant Syndromes Ireland (OACS Ireland), a campaign group dedicated to supporting and advocating for families affected by foetal anticonvulsant syndrome. 'I know this is an important day for them and the families they represent,' Ms Carroll MacNeill said. 'I have every confidence that the chair will conduct an independent and fair inquiry and finally get answers for those affected and their families.' The inquiry, involving three distinct phases, is chaired by barrister Bríd O'Flaherty. The Department of Health said it envisaged she would spend 12 to 18 months conducting an 'independent, fair and rigorous process'. The first phase will establish a timeline for the use of sodium valproate in women of childbearing potential in the State, including information on regulation, prescribing, dispensing and safety information issued. The inquiry will document the evolution of the drug's regulation and practices around its control. The second phase will focus on oral statements from people diagnosed with FVSD, their mothers and other family members. The final strand will assess the health service's capacity to respond to safety issues related to the use of anti-seizure medications in women of child-bearing potential.
Irish Times
a few seconds ago
- Irish Times
Settlement of €1.9m for boy who suffered ‘severe personal injury' at Portlaoise hospital
A boy born in Midland Regional Hospital in Portlaoise who was allegedly delivered after a delayed Caesarean section amid rowing doctors and who suffered 'severe personal injury' has had a €1.9 million settlement in his favour approved by the High Court . The now 16-year-old was born on January 30th, 2009, at the hospital, which has been subject to investigation over patient safety. His mother sued the HSE on behalf of her son for breach of statutory duty – alleged medical negligence – to adequately provide medical services to her and her son in 2009 at the Co Laois hospital. It was submitted that she was due to give birth around January 25th, 2009, and had attended all of her antenatal appointments, culminating with a clinic at the hospital on January 29th, 2009, when no 'significant abnormal conditions in relation to the pregnancy were present'. READ MORE She was admitted to the hospital on January 30th, 2009, five days after her due date, but had 'slow and irregular' pain. A cardiotocography trace (CTG) was carried out and was found to be 'abnormal', as the unborn baby displayed 'frequent decelerations' in his heart rate. However, despite the abnormal readings, the CTG was discontinued. A second CTG was carried out at 8.45am the same morning that showed decelerations and abnormalities up to around 12.30pm. It was claimed that then a syntocinon treatment – an injection involving the drug oxytocin – was administered to augment labour. It was claimed that the readings from the CTG were not reproduced in a legible fashion and were difficult to interpret. A decision was made to deliver the boy by emergency Caesarean section and the boy was born at 1.36pm, allegedly 80 minutes after a decision to perform the Caesarean was made – 50 minutes outside the usual time frame. It was claimed the boy suffered 'extreme difficulties' with breathing, due to hypoxia, and that there was a delay in his resuscitation. In addition, an altercation between members of the hospital staff occurred during the attempts at resuscitation of the plaintiff, it was alleged. During a second attempt at intubation, a doctor was interrupted by an anaesthetic doctor without invitation who attempted to force an oxygen mask on the child, it was claimed. It was alleged that the anaesthetist 'brushed aside' the attending doctor and raised his voice, shouting 'for f*** sake just bag him'. The doctor was eventually able to drain meconium – a baby's first stool – from the child through suction, after which safe intubation was performed. The doctor, it was submitted, was 'considerably interrupted in his attempts to intubate and resuscitate the plaintiff by actions of the anaesthetist doctor'. In the aftermath of his birth, the plaintiff was noted as being in pain, jaundiced, vomiting with streaks of blood, having hypoxic metabolic acidosis, high blood pressure and in need of ventilation. The plaintiff spent 11 days in intensive care, and an MRI scan showed the plaintiff's kidney and brain had an infarct resulting in 'severe personal injuries', it was claimed. At the High Court on Tuesday Mr Justice Paul Coffey was told by John Healy SC, instructed by David O'Malley of Callan Tansey solicitors, for the plaintiff that a final settlement of €1.9 million for breaches of duty by the defendant, albeit without an admission of liability, could be recommended to the court for what he said was the boy's 'turbulent' introduction to the world. Mr Justice Coffey approved the settlement and addressed the boy, who was present in court, saying he was pleased to see him 'looking so well and I wish you all the best for the future'. Reacting to the settlement, solicitor David O'Malley, in a statement on behalf the family, said: 'The family welcomes the settlement and for the security it will provide.' He added: 'It truly is a second-tier maternity system outside of The Pale. 'The family echoes calls by advocate groups to urgently review maternity care in Ireland. One cannot think of a more important right than the right to breathe and be protected at birth.'
