Proposal to not exempt tax on cross-border e-commerce goods in Vietnam
HANOI: The Vietnam Chamber of Commerce and Industry (VCCI) has called for clearer regulations on import tax for goods traded via e-commerce.
In a recent move, the VCCI submitted its comments on the draft decree concerning customs management of e-commerce imports and exports to the Ministry of Finance (MoF).
Evaluating the regulation on import tax exemption for orders with a value of VNĐ1 million (US$40) or less, VCCI said that this mechanism was not really suitable, creating inequality with domestically-produced goods.
First, the value of each e-commerce order is often low, mostly not exceeding VNĐ1 million. For example, more than 324.1 million imported products were sold through Shopee last year, generating revenue of VNĐ14.2 trillion, or an average value of only about VNĐ43,682 per product.
Thus, the regulation on the tax exemption threshold of VNĐ1 million means that most imported e-commerce goods will not be subject to import tax.
Second, domestic manufacturing enterprises must pay import tax on input materials, while imported e-commerce goods are completely exempted. This creates inequality in tax policy, giving foreign goods a competitive advantage.
The VCCI believes that the drafting agency should consider applying a comprehensive import tax policy, without exemptions or reductions for imported e-commerce goods.
However, the development of import tax policies for e-commerce goods will face many challenges, including the difficulty in applying HS code regulations as for traditionally imported goods for e-commerce goods.
The diversity of goods via e-commerce can lead to large-scale difficulties in accurately determining HS codes, delaying customs clearance and delivery, and even leading to order cancellations, causing damage to both sellers and e-commerce platforms.
The tax exemption threshold of VNĐ1 million was essentially based on the principle that the administrative costs for low-value goods could far exceed the amount of tax collected, emphasised VCCI.
To solve this problem, international experience showed that it was necessary to simplify the tax schedule for e-commerce goods.
For example, HS codes (codes for classifying goods in import and export) can be grouped into a number of 'goods baskets' according to industry groups or uses. Each 'basket' corresponds to a specific tax rate.
For example, basket one includes clothing, footwear, textiles, bedding; basket two includes electronic devices such as computers, phones, headphones.
In this way, businesses can easily classify goods instead of having to determine specific HS codes for each individual product.
Canada has applied this form since 2012, using three groups of goods to replace nearly 5,400 HS codes.
Therefore, VCCI recommended that the drafting agency consider amending the regulations on import tax on goods via e-commerce in the direction of building a simplified tax rate schedule and applying it to all orders, regardless of value. - Vietnam News/ANN
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
New Straits Times
26 minutes ago
- New Straits Times
Foreign holdings of US Treasuries rise in May despite China drop
NEW YORK: Foreign holdings of US Treasuries increased in May to top US$9 trillion for a third straight month, data from the Treasury Department showed on Thursday, with buyers other than China returning after tariff turmoil led to outflows in April. Holdings of US Treasuries rose to US$9.045 trillion, up from April's level of US$9.013 trillion, and up 11.20 per cent from a year earlier. In March, Treasuries held by foreigners hit a record US$9.049 trillion. On a transaction basis, foreigners bought US$146 billion worth of US Treasuries in May, compared with an outflow of US$40.8 billion in April as President Donald Trump's back-and-forth tariff policy roiled markets. Tariffs were announced on April 2, causing a tumble in equities and the dollar and massive volatility in US Treasuries. Treasury debt buying by foreigners in May was the largest since August 2022. China, the third-largest Treasuries holder, further reduced its holdings to US$756.3 billion in May, the lowest since February 2009 when the country's stock of Treasuries dropped to US$744.2 billion. Its holdings declined for a fourth straight month and were far below their peak of more than US$1.3 trillion between 2012 and 2016. The world's second-largest economy has been selling Treasuries to bolster its currency, the yuan. Analysts said a slowing Chinese economy, post-COVID industrial challenges, and trade barriers have reduced China's dollar inflows from exports. Japan remained the largest non-US holder of Treasuries, with a record US$1.135 trillion in May. UK investors, the second-largest owner of US government debt, raised their pool of Treasuries to an all-time peak of US$809.4 billion, up from US$807.7 billion in April. The UK overtook China as the second-largest non-US holder of Treasuries in March. The UK is typically viewed as a custody country, which is generally a proxy for hedge fund investments. Other countries used by hedge funds for custody services include the Cayman Islands and the Bahamas. In May, Canadians increased their Treasuries holdings to US$430.1 billion from US$368.4 billion. That was a turnaround from April when they were the biggest sellers of US government debt as Trump hit Canada with tariffs on steel, aluminium and automobiles. Foreign investors also poured back into US equities, with massive inflows of US$114.3 billion in May, from an outflow of US$18.8 billion in April. Data also showed the net capital inflow into the United States totalled US$311.1 billion in May, compared with an outflow of US$14.6 billion in April. The May inflow was the largest since September 2024. After including adjustments, such as estimated foreign portfolio acquisitions of US stocks through stock swaps, overall net foreign inflows into long-term securities hit a record US$259.4 billion in May.
New Straits Times
an hour ago
- New Straits Times
California sues to challenge Trump's US$4bil high-speed rail clawback
WASHINGTON: California Governor Gavin Newsom on Thursday vowed to fight the "illegal" move by President Donald Trump's administration to cancel more than US$4 billion in federal grants for the state's ambitious but much-delayed high-speed rail project. A lawsuit challenging the rescission as an "arbitrary and capricious" abuse of authority was filed on Thursday in US District Court in Los Angeles by the California High Speed Rail Authority, which oversees the project. Trump's announcement on Wednesday added yet another hurdle to the 16-year effort to link Los Angeles and San Francisco by a three-hour train ride, a project that would deliver the fastest passenger rail service in the United States. Newsom said the move by Trump's Transportation Department came as the high-speed rail project was on the verge of laying track, with "active construction" under way on the initial 171-mile segment between Bakersfield and Merced in California's politically conservative Central Valley. The governor said termination of the grants amounted to "petty, political retribution, motivated by President Trump's personal animus toward California and the high-speed rail project, not the facts on the ground." The rail system, whose first US$10 billion bond issue was approved by California voters in 2008, has built more than 50 major railway structures, including bridges, overpasses and viaducts, and completed more than 60 miles (97 km) of guideway, the governor said. "California is putting all options on the table to fight this illegal action," Newsom said in a statement hours before the lawsuit was filed. The funding cancellation marked the latest confrontation between the Republican president and a Democratic governor widely viewed as a leading contender for his party's 2028 White House nomination. The two men have clashed over issues from transgender athletes and electric car rules to the use of National Guard troops during Los Angeles protests and even egg prices. 'LEGALLY BINDING AGREEMENTS' Ian Choudri, chief executive officer of the California High Speed Rail Authority, said that canceling the federal rail grants "without cause isn't just wrong, it's illegal." "These are legally binding agreements, and the authority has met every obligation, as confirmed by repeated federal reviews, as recently as February 2025," Choudri said, adding that the program has created some 15,500 jobs. The Federal Railroad Administration issued a 315-page report last month finding the project was plagued by missed deadlines, budget shortfalls and questionable ridership projections. Choudri's rail authority has called those conclusions "misguided," saying they failed to reflect "substantial progress made to deliver high-speed rail in California." Transportation Secretary Sean Duffy chided the project for having failed to lay a single mile of track after spending US$15 billion over 16 years. But Choudri said installing track is a final step after land acquisition, environmental clearances and construction of supporting structures. Still, the project has faced its share of setbacks. The San Francisco-to-Los Angeles route was initially supposed to be completed by 2020 for US$33 billion. But the projected cost has since risen to US$89 billion to US$128 billion, and the start of service is estimated no sooner than 2030. As designed, the system would feature electric locomotives traveling at up to 220 mph (354 kph), powered entirely by renewable energy. Planners said it would eliminate 200 million miles driven by vehicles on highways. 'WE HAVE TO PULL THE PLUG' A second phase of the project called for extending the rail line north to Sacramento and south to San Diego. A separate project plans to link Los Angeles and Las Vegas with high-speed rail. Duffy said on Thursday that he was confident the Trump administration will defeat any lawsuit challenging the department's move. "We have to pull the plug," he told reporters outside the department's headquarters. In 2021, Democratic President Joe Biden restored a US$929 million grant for the project that Trump revoked in 2019 during his first term in office after calling the project a "disaster." State Assembly member Corey Jackson, a Southern California Democrat who has questioned the project's soaring costs, said Newsom's call to fight the funding cut could galvanize support for Democrats from organized labor and voters in the area where the first railway jobs would be created despite its Republican leanings. "The people of San Joaquin Valley will now know that their economic engine is coming from the Democratic Party," Jackson said. "This is also a message to our labor friends. Democrats continue to deliver these high-paying jobs. Republicans continue to try to kill them." Rufus Jeffris, senior vice president of the Bay Area Council, a business-sponsored policy group in the San Francisco area, pointed to economic benefits associated with high-speed rail and called the funding cut unfortunate.
New Straits Times
an hour ago
- New Straits Times
BHP delays Jansen potash project as costs surge; logs record copper output
KUALA LUMPUR: BHP Group flagged delays and cost overruns of about 30 per cent for its key Jansen Stage 1 potash project on Friday, even as the miner reported record annual copper production above 2 million metric tons and warned of a decline next year. The cost blowouts that could be up to US$1.7 billion represents a significant setback for BHP, which had accelerated potash production following Russia's invasion of Ukraine, anticipating higher fertiliser prices due to supply disruptions from sanctioned Russian and Belarusian producers. The world's largest listed miner has spent more than a decade trying to break into the potash market as part of its diversification strategy. BHP attributed the cost blowouts to design and scope changes, inflationary pressures, and lower-than-expected productivity during construction. BHP said first production from its Jansen Stage 1 potash project in Canada has been pushed back to mid-2027 from the previously targeted end-2026, while capital expenditure estimates have surged to US$7 billion-US$7.4 billion from US$5.7 billion. Adding to the project's challenges, BHP is considering delaying the second stage of Jansen by two years due to concerns about potential oversupply in the global potash market. "Given potential for additional potash supply coming to the market in the medium term, and as part of our regular review of the sequencing of capital projects under the capital allocation framework, we are considering a two-year extension for the execution of Jansen Stage 2," the company said in a statement. BHP committed US$4.9 billion towards Jansen's second stage development in October 2023, with first production scheduled before June 2029. The company said it had spent only US$400 million of the committed funds for the second phase. The miner reported copper production of 2.02 Mt for fiscal 2025, at the upper end of its forecast range. However, it said it expects output to drop to between 1.8 Mt and 2.0 Mt in fiscal 2026, reflecting planned lower grades at its flagship Escondida mine in Chile. Shares of the company rose 2.9 per cent to A$40.26 by 0144 GMT, outperforming a 1.6% jump in the mining sub-index. BHP logged record annual iron ore production of 290 Mt, at the upper end of its guidance, while its fourth-quarter output of 77.5 Mt beat consensus estimates. BHP is also assessing a potential divestment of its Western Australia Nickel assets as part of a review, citing balance sheet impacts from the nickel business.
