Venues urged to sign up to Ask for Angela code-word scheme
Cheltenham has been recognised for many years with Purple Flag status for its vibrant and diverse mix of evening and night-time dining, entertainment and culture, whilst also promoting the safety and wellbeing of visitors and local residents. Venues' participation in the Ask for Angela scheme has helped achieve this status."We promote it through our PubWatch scheme and through our meetings with our local publicans," said Louis Krog, Head of Public Protection at Cheltenham Borough Council."We provide bystander training, there's Ask for Angela messaging, so it is engrained in everything we do in our engagement with the trade."Nationally and locally, violence against women and girls is on the national agenda, so awareness of this type of thing is definitely growing. Cheltenham has a large student population so we are trying to educate them on this as well."
Stroud District Council said it actively promotes Ask for Angela through its Stroud Safe scheme, but it is still voluntary. However the authority intends to include participation in the scheme as a policy expectation when it reviews its Licensing Policy this year.Ms Bienek's staff are all aware of the Ask for Angela scheme, and there are posters promoting the scheme in her pub."I think it should go hand in hand with your license. I don't think it should be a choice, I think it should be mandatory that any extra safety measures are put in place," said the The Retreat pub boss.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
BBC News
4 days ago
- BBC News
Removed black man's head sign set to go on display in Ashbourne
A controversial sculpture is set to return to public display in Derbyshire five years after it was removed amid a row over Black's Head sculpture, which formed part of a Grade-II*-listed sign above St John's Street in Ashbourne, was taken down by residents in June 2020 but is now due to be placed in Ashbourne its removal, the sculpture has been kept in Derbyshire County Council's Matlock Records Office for five years "for safekeeping".The district council has now applied for permission to house the head in Ashbourne Historical Centre inside a glass container alongside a display detailing its history and the circumstances of its removal. The district council has filed plans for permission to house the head sculpture in Ashbourne Historical Centre inside a glass container alongside a display detailing the item's history and the circumstances of its Local Democracy Reporting Service (LDRS) said documents submitted with the plans detail a brief summary of the events of the sculpture's planning documents state: "The current situation is that the head element was removed from the sign on 8 June 2020 by persons unknown without the consent of the district council in its capacity as owner of the sign or as local planning authority."The removal was at the time of heightened tensions nationally about statues and structures with an actual or alleged connection with the slave trade."After a period of time, the head was returned to the district council and was deposited at Derbyshire County Archives Office for safekeeping, where it currently remains."It details that the history of the sign and its connection with the slave trade is "inconclusive". The document continues: "It is considered that the return of the head to the sign in such a prominent position spanning the main A515 road through the centre of Ashbourne would not allow an explanation of the sign to be included as it might be with a statue in a public square."A small sign directing people to the museum would be placed on the bottom of the sign which once carried the sculpture in St John's Street, if the plans are people who removed the sculpture were photographed and filmed throughout the removal on June 8 and their identities were were part of a group of around 150 campaigners who gathered to remove the sculpture. 'Racialised stereotype' More than 45,000 people signed a petition calling for the Black's Head sculpture to be removed, with a counter-petition to "save" it gathering 4,000 signatures.A cultural historian report carried out by two doctors at the University of Nottingham, on behalf of the council, submitted with the plans, concludes: "We conclude that the design of the Ashbourne Head is likely not derived from a specific individual but draws on wider racialised stereotypes of people of African descent in the 17th and 18th Centuries, a period associated with British colonisation and transatlantic enslavement."We recommend that the Ashbourne Head is not reinstated in its former position in the streetscape of Ashbourne."The proposal that it is placed within a heritage or museum setting and appropriately interpreted would be in keeping with the evidence found."
Reuters
23-07-2025
- Reuters
US Justice Dept civil rights unit faces mass exodus
WASHINGTON, July 23 (Reuters) - The U.S. Justice Department office tasked with protecting peoples' civil rights has lost 368 employees since President Donald Trump took office, in a mass exodus that has coincided with a dramatic policy shift away from its historical mission of protecting marginalized populations. The staffing decrease at the Civil Rights Division, disclosed on Wednesday in a congressional memo, opens new tab from U.S. Senator Peter Welch, represents an unprecedented exodus of career officials who usually remain in their roles from administration to administration, regardless of political party. He said DOJ provided the figures to his office on July 15. Prior to Trump's inauguration, the division employed more than 400 attorneys. Reuters could not determine how many of the departed 368 officials worked as attorneys, as opposed to other roles such as office support staff. Of those who left, 270 took the government's deferred retirement program while 98 resigned. Welch, a Democrat from Vermont, released the figures ahead of a Senate Judiciary subcommittee hearing on Wednesday where Harmeet Dhillon, Trump's head of the Civil Rights Division, will testify to Congress for the first time since her confirmation hearing in February. In his memo, Welch said that since Trump took office in January, the Civil Rights Division had disregarded its statutory responsibilities to enforce laws that prohibit discrimination, and had enabled civil rights violations to be committed against people and institutions as part of Trump's political agenda. The Civil Rights Division's mandate dates back to the passage of the 1957 Civil Rights Act, which was initially enacted to protect the rights of Black people by undoing discriminatory Jim Crow segregation, enforce peoples' voting rights and pursue hate crime cases. Congress has expanded the division's responsibilities over the years to include protecting Americans from discrimination on the basis of race, national origin, sex, disability, religion, sexual orientation, gender identity and military status. Dhillon has upended the division's traditional enforcement priorities and refocused them on Trump's directives mandating such actions as curbing the use of diversity, equity and inclusion policies, banning transgender youth from playing on sports teams that do not align with their birth gender and prohibiting transgender youth from accessing gender-affirming care. Earlier this year, Dhillon rescinded most of the investigative findings issued by the division during President Joe Biden's tenure, which documented widespread civil rights abuses by police departments against predominantly people of color or people with disabilities. She also nixed two pending court-approved settlements to implement reforms with the Minneapolis and Louisville police departments following the deaths of George Floyd and Breonna Taylor. The division's leadership has also ordered career staff to dismiss a variety of other ongoing civil rights cases involving discrimination against people of color, while simultaneously pursuing probes against jurisdictions and institutions it accuses of improperly implementing DEI policies. Dhillon and some of the division's other politically-appointed attorneys have also taken the unusual step of publicly announcing the targets of various employment discrimination probes, such as the University of California and George Mason University, over DEI policies or antisemitism. At the start of her tenure, Dhillon issued new mission statements to each section of the Civil Rights Division, some of which were previously reported on by Reuters. Many of the new mission statements appeared to omit key statutes customarily enforced by each of the units, while at the same time ordering attorneys to focus on other issues such as ensuring women and girls have "unfettered access" to sports programs that "exclude males." Welch's memo on Wednesday highlighted each new mission statement and expressed concerns with each of them.
The Guardian
21-07-2025
- The Guardian
Nigel Farage on UK crime: how do his statements stack up?
Nigel Farage has launched a six-week campaign and policy blitz, pledging to halve overall crime in the first five years of a Reform UK government. At a press conference on Monday, the Reform leader made a series of claims about crime levels in the UK and government efforts to lower them. In an article teeing up his proposals for the Daily Mail, Farage wrote that 'over the past 20 years, crime has become commonplace across Britain' and that ministers seemed to be spending money on 'everything except keeping the people of this country safe'. Here are some of his main claims and how they stack up. Crime has rocketed since the 1990s Farage's central argument is that crime has risen so much that the UK is 'facing societal collapse', while politicians are in complete denial. He wrote on Monday that total crime is 50% higher than it was in the 1990s. He told reporters that the crime survey for England and Wales was 'based on completely false data' and that 'if you look at police-recorded crime … there are some significant rises in crimes of all kinds, particularly crimes against the person'. He went on to argue that the true figures were even higher than the records showed, because 'most of us now don't even bother to report crime'. In fact, the Office for National Statistics regards the crime survey for England and Wales as the more accurate metric of long-term crime trends, because it includes incidents that haven't been reported to the police and is unaffected by changes in how crime is recorded. It is unclear what Farage's claim that it is based on 'completely false data' is founded on. The ONS also says police-recorded crime 'does not tend to be a good indicator of general trends in crime' and should only be used in conjunction with other data. ONS analysis of crime survey and police-recorded crime data concludes that crime against individuals and households has generally fallen over the last 10 years, with some important exceptions including sexual assault. There have been long-term decreases in violence with or without injury, theft offences and criminal damage since the mid-1990s. There are, however, some increases in the short-term. The latest survey shows a 33% increase in fraud last year, and a 50% increase in theft from the person compared with 2023. People in the UK no longer feel safe Farage claimed that 'people are scared of going to the shops' or 'to let their kids out' and that 'witnessing and experiencing crime has become normalised'. It's true that a significant proportion of British voters – 22% according to YouGov's poll tracker – regard crime as one of the biggest issues the country faces. Crime ranks behind the NHS, however, cited by 33% of people, and immigration and asylum, cited by 53%. One concrete data point Farage mentioned was that 57% of women felt it was unsafe to walk on the streets of London, which came from a Survation poll carried out this spring. Other parties don't care about crime Sign up to First Edition Our morning email breaks down the key stories of the day, telling you what's happening and why it matters after newsletter promotion Farage claimed to be 'astonished there's been so little debate in Westminster amongst all the political classes on this issue'. In fact Labour and the Conservatives put pledges on crime at the centre of their manifestos in the run-up to the July 2024 election, and both parties are spending a considerable amount of time debating and legislating in this area. One of the government's five driving 'missions' is to halve serious violent crime and raise confidence in the police and criminal justice system to its highest level. London is lawless Farage made a series of claims about crime in London, including that tourists were increasingly reluctant to visit the capital and that wealthy people such as the oil magnate John Fredriksen were leaving. Fredriksen – a Norwegian-born Cypriot billionaire who is selling his £250m mansion in Chelsea – in fact cited Rachel Reeves' tax changes as the main reason behind his decision and said the UK was becoming too much like Norway. He has said nothing about crime. Farage also said one in three people in London had been subject to phone theft. This appears to have come from a survey of 1,000 people by a UK fintech start-up called Nuke From Orbit, rather than the police-reported figures that Farage said he preferred. According to the Metropolitan police, 80,000 phones were reported stolen in London in 2024, which suggests the crime affected far fewer than one in three people. The Reform UK leader did cite some official figures, including that shoplifting in London was up 54% last year compared with 2023, which came from the ONS.
