Hultman: $3 million fee hike to touch all employers
The legislation, Senate Bill 26, calls for raising the fee to $12 per employee from the current $3. That would generate $3 million, according to state Labor Secretary Marcia Hultman. To offset the higher fee, state reemployment tax rates would be reduced by $3 million.
How 2 Sioux Falls restaurants view possible tariffs
Hultman told the Senate Commerce and Energy Committee that keeping the administrative fee at the current $3 per employee would force the state Reemployment Assistance Division to reduce its workforce from the current 76 to 51.
'This would leave a skeletal crew and an inability to perform basic functions of the division,' she warned.
And if that happened, Hultman continued, South Dakota employers would face a federal unemployment tax increase of $183 million.
Many South Dakota businesses aren't welcoming the fee increase, but lobbyists representing their groups nonetheless spoke in favor.
'If we don't do this fee swap, our businesses will pay more in taxes,' South Dakota Retailers Association executive director Nathan Sanderson testified.
Hultman last year presented the proposal to the state Reemployment Assistance Advisory Council. Sanderson is one of the members.
Julie Johnson, lobbyist for South Dakota Society of Human Resource Managers, attends the advisory council's meetings. She told lawmakers on Tuesday that the legislation is 'a very complicated bill to read' and difficult for some to understand.
Johnson, a former secretary of labor, said she was pleased that Hultman laid out the proposal to the advisory council before submitting the legislation. 'Even though we don't love this bill, we have to deal with it,' she said.
Deb Mortenson, representing Associated General Contractors of South Dakota, noted that many of her members use the reemployment program. That's because some construction projects such as roadbuilding stop during the winter.
The legislation says all employers would pay a $12 administrative fee per employee, regardless of whether they currently pay into South Dakota's reemployment fund. In return, those employers who currently pay into the fund would see a reduction in the amounts they contribute.
Hultman explained that federal funding for the reemployment fund's operation has decreased from $5.5 million in 2021 to $4.9 million in 2024. During the same time, many of the fund's operational costs increased, as state government salaries, benefits and technology charges all rose. She said the higher administrative fee would cover those as well.
No one testified as an opponent.
David Owen, president for the South Dakota Chamber of Commerce and Industry, serves on the advisory council, too. 'This bill is irksome, irritating annoying and objectionable – and we support it,' he said.
The committee voted 9-0 to recommend its passage. The full Senate could consider it as early as Wednesday afternoon. If the Senate approves it, the House of Representatives would act next.
Copyright 2025 Nexstar Media, Inc. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten, or redistributed.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


The Hill
an hour ago
- The Hill
Trump labor secretary touts ‘native-born' share of job gains
Labor Secretary Lori Chavez-DeRemer touted that native-born employment increased in the latest dismal jobs report, which showed the U.S. added only 73,000 jobs in July. While calling for the Federal Reserve chair Jerome Powell to cut interest rates, Chavez-Deremer argued that businesses need to be able to borrow money at a lower rate so they can invest in their companies. She then pointed to the data about jobs for American-born workers. 'We've seen positive job growth. We have seen consumer confidence go up. We've seen unemployment hold steady,' Chavez-DeRemer said Friday in an interview with Fox Business. 'While we could have seen better jobs numbers, right now we're seeing American workers are being put first — native-born workers account for all of the job growth and that's key.' 'We're setting the table for a positive economy and the American worker is going to win in this occasion because the president has their back,' she told 'Varney & Co' host Stuart Varney. The Bureau of Labor Statistics (BLS) report released on Friday suggested the economy and labor market are much weaker than previously thought. The report though found that job growth among American-born individuals was 133,035,000, an increase from 131,037,000 for the same month in 2024. Among foreign-born individuals, employment declined to 30,764,000 in July from 31,001,000 a year ago. President Trump's response to the jobs report was furious. He fired BLS commissioner Erika McEntarfer, accusing her, without evidence, of politicizing previous job reports in the run-up to last year's presidential election. Chavez-DeRemer praised Trump's decision, saying she agreed 'our jobs numbers must be fair, accurate, and never manipulated for political purposes,' without offering any evidence to support Trump's claim.
Yahoo
4 hours ago
- Yahoo
The dominant economic narrative has been revised: Chart of the Week
The US labor market has not been adding nearly as many jobs as initially reported. Friday's jobs report showed the US economy added 73,000 jobs while the unemployment rate moved higher to 4.2%. But the portion of the release that sent markets stumbling was "larger than normal" revisions to previous reports, according to the Bureau of Labor Statistics. Sign up for the Yahoo Finance Morning Brief By subscribing, you are agreeing to Yahoo's Terms and Privacy Policy Changes to May's and June's reports showed more than a quarter million fewer jobs were added to the economy over those months. May's job gains were revised down to 19,000 from 144,000, while June's additions were cut to just 14,000 from the 147,000 initially reported. Monthly jobs numbers are always revised in later months. But these are not standard revisions. Outside of the 2020 pandemic, May and June's downward revisions were the largest since at least 1979, according to data compiled by Yale Budget Lab's director of economics Ernie Tedeschi. The job revisions came just two days after the Federal Reserve opted to hold interest rates steady at its July meeting despite two officials dissenting and arguing the central bank should be lowering interest rates. In the subsequent press conference, Fed Chair Jerome Powell described the labor market as "solid" and pointed to a "historically low" unemployment rate as a key metric to watch when assessing the health of the jobs picture in America. Powell admitted job creation has shown slowing, but that has come with a decrease in labor supply due to less immigration, therefore keeping the broad labor market picture in balance. But market pricing and economists argue Friday's report was likely a game changer for the overall economic narrative and how the Fed will move forward. Following Friday's jobs report, the probability of a September interest rate cut from the Fed surged to 83%, up from just 38% the day prior, per the CME FedWatch Tool. "Surely, Chair Powell wishes he had these numbers 48 hours ago," Jefferies chief US economist Thomas Simons wrote in a note to clients. "A much more downbeat view on the health of the labor market would have made a more dovish message easier to deliver with confidence." Powell has argued the unemployment rate is the most important metric in the labor market to watch right now. At 4.2%, it's still historically low, but it did move higher in July. The number of Americans filing for weekly unemployment claims has also been calm. This illuminates the fact that Friday's job revisions aren't sounding a code red alarm on the labor market. But the Fed chair also talked extensively about "downside risks" to the labor market during his recent press conference. Friday's revisions certainly feed those fears. "The picture of labor market weakening has become much clearer now," BlackRock chief investment officer of global fixed income Rick Rieder wrote in a note following Friday's jobs report. "If the slack in the labor force builds at all, or we continue to see a below 100,000 jobs hiring rate persistently, we would expect the Fed to start moving rates lower, and a 50-basis point cut in September might be possible depending on how the data evolves." Josh Schafer is a reporter for Yahoo Finance. Follow him on X @_joshschafer. Click here for in-depth analysis of the latest stock market news and events moving stock prices Sign in to access your portfolio
Yahoo
5 hours ago
- Yahoo
The dominant economic narrative has been revised: Chart of the Week
The US labor market has not been adding nearly as many jobs as initially reported. Friday's jobs report showed the US economy added 73,000 jobs while the unemployment rate moved higher to 4.2%. But the portion of the release that sent markets stumbling was "larger than normal" revisions to previous reports, according to the Bureau of Labor Statistics. Sign up for the Yahoo Finance Morning Brief By subscribing, you are agreeing to Yahoo's Terms and Privacy Policy Changes to May's and June's reports showed more than a quarter million fewer jobs were added to the economy over those months. May's job gains were revised down to 19,000 from 144,000, while June's additions were cut to just 14,000 from the 147,000 initially reported. Monthly jobs numbers are always revised in later months. But these are not standard revisions. Outside of the 2020 pandemic, May and June's downward revisions were the largest since at least 1979, according to data compiled by Yale Budget Lab's director of economics Ernie Tedeschi. The job revisions came just two days after the Federal Reserve opted to hold interest rates steady at its July meeting despite two officials dissenting and arguing the central bank should be lowering interest rates. In the subsequent press conference, Fed Chair Jerome Powell described the labor market as "solid" and pointed to a "historically low" unemployment rate as a key metric to watch when assessing the health of the jobs picture in America. Powell admitted job creation has shown slowing, but that has come with a decrease in labor supply due to less immigration, therefore keeping the broad labor market picture in balance. But market pricing and economists argue Friday's report was likely a game changer for the overall economic narrative and how the Fed will move forward. Following Friday's jobs report, the probability of a September interest rate cut from the Fed surged to 83%, up from just 38% the day prior, per the CME FedWatch Tool. "Surely, Chair Powell wishes he had these numbers 48 hours ago," Jefferies chief US economist Thomas Simons wrote in a note to clients. "A much more downbeat view on the health of the labor market would have made a more dovish message easier to deliver with confidence." Powell has argued the unemployment rate is the most important metric in the labor market to watch right now. At 4.2%, it's still historically low, but it did move higher in July. The number of Americans filing for weekly unemployment claims has also been calm. This illuminates the fact that Friday's job revisions aren't sounding a code red alarm on the labor market. But the Fed chair also talked extensively about "downside risks" to the labor market during his recent press conference. Friday's revisions certainly feed those fears. "The picture of labor market weakening has become much clearer now," BlackRock chief investment officer of global fixed income Rick Rieder wrote in a note following Friday's jobs report. "If the slack in the labor force builds at all, or we continue to see a below 100,000 jobs hiring rate persistently, we would expect the Fed to start moving rates lower, and a 50-basis point cut in September might be possible depending on how the data evolves." Josh Schafer is a reporter for Yahoo Finance. Follow him on X @_joshschafer. Click here for in-depth analysis of the latest stock market news and events moving stock prices Error in retrieving data Sign in to access your portfolio Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data