
America's deep freeze is a fitting end to Democrats' electric car nightmare
How appropriate that the president signed his executive order on one of the coldest days of the year. Electric vehicles are estimated to lose an average of 20 per cent of their battery range in cold weather. Research has found that, in freezing temperatures, a Tesla Model X (with a heat pump) loses 11 per cent of normal range. A Volkswagen ID.4 loses 37 per cent.
Americans love choice, and drivers want to be able to choose their cars. Eight per cent of cars sold in 2024 were battery-powered electric, but president Joe Biden ordered his Environmental Protection Agency and his Department of Transportation to issue unpopular regulations that could have required the majority of all new passenger cars sold and a quarter of heavy lorries to be battery-powered electric by 2032.
President Trump has promised to undo these regulations and get rid of electric vehicle subsidies for manufacturers and drivers.
Electric cars can run out of power in ice storms. In many areas, the only cars seen on roads in the current spate of snowstorms are sport utility vehicles, pickup trucks, or other four-wheel-drive vehicles.
New York City dropped its electric snowploughs because 'they could not plough the snow effectively' and 'conked out after four hours,' compared with 12 to 24 hours of operation for diesel snowploughs, according to New York Department of Public Sanitation commissioner Jessica Tisch, now New York City police commissioner.
Small businesses and farmers cannot take snow days off, so they rarely work with electric vehicles. That's good – imagine the economic loss of farmers and technicians and small businesses unable to work on snow days because their trucks and tractors 'conked out'.
President Trump plans to end the tax credit of up to $7,500 per car to buy or lease an electric vehicle, passed by Congress in the Inflation Reduction Act. Even with the $7,500 tax credit, car salesmen are not selling enough EVs to meet the mandate. In 2023 and 2024 they wrote to president Biden begging him to 'hit the brakes' on his regulations.
Over 80 per cent of these EV tax credits are claimed by households in the top fifth of the income distribution. Many use the vehicles as second cars for in-town trips, but for longer trips they have a gasoline-powered car.
The electric version of the base version of the Ford 150 pickup truck, the best-selling vehicle in America, costs almost an additional $30,000. Tesla's base prices start at $39,000 for a Model 3 and go up to almost $100,000 for a Model X. A diesel lorry can cost about $120,000; an electric lorry can cost as much as $450,000- $500,000, raising costs of transporting goods for everyone.
Plus, America doesn't even have the electrical grid capacity, the charging stations, or the technology to operate a fleet of EVs and long-haul electric lorries – and won't for quite some time. Vehicle chargers are competing for room on the electric grid with data centres, artificial intelligence technology, and demands for more heating and air conditioning.
Conventional cars can be easily refuelled at the pump in five or 10 minutes, but recharging an electric vehicle can take 45 minutes. If someone is already using the charging station, the wait can double. Most people don't want to let their EV batteries go below 20 per cent, and the charging rate can go down when it is charged over 80 per cent.
Privileged EV owners can recharge cars at home or at work. But not everyone has such facilities. Some live in houses and flats without garages and must rely on public charging stations for their EVs.
Although Congress allocated $5 billion in 2022 to the National Electric Vehicle Infrastructure Program to build 500,000 charging stations, only 58 are in operation today, according to The Washington Post. Tesla has its own network of charging stations for its cars, but drivers of other vehicles rely on private or government-provided charging stations.
Americans want to be energy-independent, but requirements for EVs make America's transportation network dependent on China, which strengthens the Chinese economy. China makes 80 per cent of the world's electric batteries, and the Chinese car company BYD is the world's largest electric vehicle producer.
In order to produce supplies of batteries for EVs and other components, China is increasing its construction of coal-fired power plants and carbon emissions. America has 204 coal-fired power plants, and China has 1,161 (half of all the coal-fired plants in the world). That's why president Biden's regulations on EVs would not achieve his objective of lowering global temperatures. At least 60 per cent of the electricity used to charge EVs in the US will have come from fossil fuels.
The bottom line is this: while some prefer EVs, others need conventional or hybrid cars for the advantages they offer – especially in snow. With president Trump's new executive orders, everyone will get their choice.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


The Independent
3 minutes ago
- The Independent
Blow for Trump's ICE raids as court upholds ban on snatching people based on appearance or job
The Trump administration suffered another blow to its mass deportation agenda on Friday after an appeals court upheld a lower court's ruling that prevents Immigration and Customs Enforcement agents from detaining a person based on their appearance, native language, or job. A three-judge panel on the Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals in Los Angeles said the plaintiffs, a cohort of five individuals and three immigration advocacy organizations, were likely to succeed on their claim that ICE agents violated the Fourth Amendment by relying on four factors to form reasonable suspicion to support detention stops. Those four factors include apparent race or ethnicity, speaking Spanish or English with an accent, presence at a particular location such as a laborer pick-up site, and the type of work a person does. Three plaintiffs who are day laborers said in their original lawsuit against Trump administration officials that they were waiting to be picked up to go to a construction site job when ICE agents swooped in and intimidated them. The plaintiffs said the immigration law enforcement officers never identified themselves, stated they had arrest warrants, nor informed the plaintiffs of the bases for the arrests. The Ninth Circuit panel upheld a previous temporary injunction set by District Court Judge Maame Ewusi-Mensah Frimpong in June. In keeping with Trump's mass deportation agenda, immigration law enforcement officers were deployed throughout Southern California to begin conducting sweeping raids. Many of those raids, according to the lawsuit, were conducted at 'certain types of businesses' such as car washes, because immigration law enforcement officials determined those businesses were more likely to hire people without legal documentation. Plaintiffs in the lawsuit referred to those as 'roving patrols' and said they were being detained without reasonable suspicion. The Fourth Amendment protects people from unreasonable search and seizures. The raids, which led to protests in downtown Los Angeles back in May, have been challenged by multiple individuals and immigration advocacy groups. One plaintiff, Jason Brian Gavidia, said ICE agents stopped him in June after he stepped onto the sidewalk outside of a tow yard in Montebello, California. Gavidia, who is an American citizen, identifies as Latino and said ICE agents pushed him up against a chain-link fence and interrogated him. Even after Gavidia gave ICE agents his Real ID, they seemingly did not believe him. In her earlier ruling, Frimpong said Gavidia and other plaintiffs were likely to succeed 'in proving that the federal government is indeed conducting roving patrols without reasonable suspicion and denying access to lawyers.' Frimpong ordered immigration law enforcement not to rely solely on the four factors 'except as permitted by law.' While the appeals court panel upheld much of Frimpong's ruling, they did strike the 'except as permitted by law,' saying that language was too vague.


Scottish Sun
2 hours ago
- Scottish Sun
Three major car brands slash £1,500 off EV prices in huge boost for millions of Brits
The German car manufacturer has introduced a 'grant guarantee' scheme for some of its all-electric vehicles PLUGGED IN Three major car brands slash £1,500 off EV prices in huge boost for millions of Brits Click to share on X/Twitter (Opens in new window) Click to share on Facebook (Opens in new window) THREE major car brands have slashed the price of some of its electric cars by £1,500, giving a boost to millions of Brits. The move by the Volkswagen Group includes brands from Volkswagen, Skoda and Cupra and comes ahead of the Government's new EV scheme. Sign up for Scottish Sun newsletter Sign up 4 A £650million grant will knock up to £3,750 off the price of low-priced EVs - with concerns raised over taxpayer funding and infrastructure issues Credit: Getty 4 The Volkswagen ID.3 will see it's price slashed by £1,500 Credit: Getty A new Electric Car Grant will see taxpayers foot the bill for EVs costing under £37,000, and only models from brands that have committed to a so-called Science-Based Target (SBT) for emissions. The grant worth £650million in total, which was announced by the government recently, will see prices slashed for some fully electric cars although it is so far unclear which models will be eligible for £1.500 or £3,750 off their respective price tags. It will be dependent on a complex sustainability criteria which is not entirely clear. Transport Secretary Heidi Alexander confirmed the Government's new scheme last month. The Electric Car Grant will offer between £1,500 and £3,750 off qualifying electric vehicles, depending on how sustainably they are made. However, it's not available yet, as carmakers must apply for approval — a process that could take weeks. The Volkswagen EVs that come under the firm's new £1,500 'Grant Guarantee' include the ID.3 in Pure, Pro and Pro trim levels, as well as the ID.4 in both Pro and Pure versions but excluding the GTX from both. The grant of £1,500 means the entry-level ID.3 Pure Essential's price drops to £29,360 while the ID.4 Pure Match is reduced to £38,090. Meanwhile, the Skoda's brands covered by the grant are the Elroq and Enyag, in SE, SE L, Edition and SportLine trim. The grant means the Elrog's price will start at £30,010 while the Enyag begins at £38,190. Volkswagen launch its new entry-level electric car, the Cupra's models covered by the grant is for the Born hatchback on V1, V2 and V3 trim levels, dropping the asking price to £34,190. The £1,500 'Grant Guarantee' for all three badges runs until August 31. Volkswagen, Skoda and Cupra all state the grant 'will honour the £1,500 grant on the vehicles specified, even if the government's grant is not awarded'. However, buyers won't be able to get both the 'Grant Guarantee' and the government's Electric Car Grant on any of the models, Auto Express reports. The move by the German car manufacturer follows similar deals or incentives from the likes of Hyundai, Alfa Romeo, Kia and Leapmotor. According to Auto Express, fewer than 50 new EV models would be eligible for the grant - provided they pass the necessary criteria. The scheme will also provide additional support for electric car purchases for Motability customers - as revealed in The Sun's recent report - offering substantial discounts. Find Your Next Car by What You Can Actually Afford Sun Motors has created the UK's First Finance-First Marketplace *Finance Powered by DSG Finance who are a Credit Broker Not A Lender. Representative 12.9%. Your rate may differ depending on individual circumstances You can check in less than 60 seconds if you are eligible for financing, and then search for your dream used car within your monthly budget. Here's how... Soft credit check , with no impact on your score , with no impact on your score 60-second decision , get a real finance decision in less than a minute , get a real finance decision in less than a minute Instant match , only see cars that fit your real budget , only see cars that fit your real budget AI-powered help, get tailored advice, suggestions, and instant answers from an AI advisor called Theo Find out what you can afford in just 60 seconds here. This has raised concerns among some critics, who argue that taxpayers may effectively be contributing twice - once through the Motability scheme and again through the EV grant subsidies. Furthermore, some welfare users have expressed difficulties with EVs, with issues such as limited home charging facilities and inadequate public charging infrastructure causing frustration for some. There are also several key points to keep in mind before you set out to choose your shiny new discontinued EV. Firstly, the scheme will not be immediately accessible - even though it officially launched on July 16. This is because car brands must apply for eligibility for the vehicles in their ranges, rather than buyers being able to register grants at the point of purchase. Also, not all grants will amount to £3,750 as the scheme adopts a two-tier system, with the value deducted from the recommended retail price (RRP) depending on how environmentally friendly the manufacturing process is for each model. According to the RAC, these restrictions encourage drivers to choose models that are not only cost-effective, but also more sustainable for the planet. Transport Minister Lilian Greenwood has warned that vehicles made in China may not be eligible. Speaking previously on the BBC's Today programme, she said factories powered by coal are unlikely to meet the Government's strict criteria. She added that only brands reaching minimum environmental standards will be approved for taxpayer support. 4 Skoda's Elroq will also see it's price slashed Credit: PR Handout


Daily Mirror
2 hours ago
- Daily Mirror
Trump makes decision on pardoning P Diddy after conviction
Donald Trump has said he is unlikely to pardon Sean 'Diddy' Combs following the music mogul's conviction for transportation to engage in prostitution, In an interview with Newsmax on Friday, the former president addressed speculation that he might offer Combs a presidential pardon, revealing he had been 'seriously considering' the possibility. However, Trump ultimately suggested the answer would be 'more likely a no'. 'Well he was essentially, sort of, half-innocent. I don't know what they do that he's still in jail or something,' Trump said. 'He was celebrating a victory but I guess it wasn't as good a victory.' EAD MORE: Sharon Osbourne breaks down in tears at Ozzy's funeral in heartbreaking scenes. READ MORE: Meghan Markle and Prince Harry are set for new 'goldmine' offer - but could face issue. Combs, 55, was acquitted earlier this month of sex trafficking and racketeering conspiracy charges related to ex-girlfriend Cassie Ventura and another woman referred to as Jane. But he was found guilty on two federal counts of transportation to engage in prostitution, which was a violation of the Mann Act, and now faces up to 10 years in prison. His sentencing is scheduled for October 3. Trump recalls having a friendly rapport with Combs in the past as they were both prominent figures in New York. But he claimed that their relationship soured after Trump entered politics, pointing to Combs' vocal support of Joe Biden in the 2020 presidential race. 'When I ran for office he was very hostile,' Trump told interviewer Rob Finnerty. 'He made some terrible statements, so I don't know — it makes it more difficult to do.' When he was pressed on whether a pardon was off the table, Trump replied: 'I'd say so.' Behind the scenes, sources previously indicated that the idea of a pardon had moved beyond idle talk and was being taken seriously by the Trump team. One insider told Deadline it had progressed from 'just another Trump weave to an actionable event'. Combs' legal team has already filed for either an acquittal or a retrial. In a strongly worded motion, his lawyers argued that his conviction under the Mann Act was unprecedented and should be overturned. 'This verdict is unsound. And this conviction, rooted in a misapplied, overbroad statute, should not stand,' they wrote, and maintained that all parties involved in the so-called 'Freak-Offs' were consenting adults and that no commercial sex acts had taken place. They also claimed that Combs' activities were in the same vein as producing amateur adult films for private viewing, and therefore protected by the First Amendment. 'The men were paid for their time,' the motion continued. 'They enjoyed the activities and had friendships with Ms. Ventura and Jane and were not merely traveling to have sex for money.' If a full acquittal isn't granted, Combs' attorneys argue a retrial should be ordered due to 'severe spillover prejudice' from the inclusion of inflammatory evidence during the trial, including surveillance footage from a 2016 incident showing Combs physically assaulting Ventura. Combs remains in custody at a Brooklyn detention centre.