
How Trump's 'Big Beautiful Bill' May Reshape Gen-Z Retirement Strategies?
The 'Big Beautiful Bill,' formally known as H.R. 1, entitled ''An Act to provide for reconciliation pursuant to title II of H. Con. Res. 14.'' is a policy bill that includes tax policy changes, retirement benefit modifications, and broad fiscal reforms aimed at reducing federal spending and revising how the government administers key programs, including retirement savings and public services.
The bill includes changes to how retirement savings work, which could have lasting effects on younger generations, many of whom are already facing various financial stressors, such as economic uncertainty, student debt, and high housing costs. Since Trump's policy bill proposes changes to a critical tactical and strategic tool for building retirement savings, this article will explore how the repeal of automatic enrollment requirements and the introduction of new savings tools could influence Gen-Z's ability to build long-term financial security, including addressing the disparities faced by many younger workers of color within the current system.
What Is The 'Big Beautiful Bill'?
H.R. 1 is a comprehensive legislative package that includes tax reforms, spending cuts, and rollbacks of several initiatives from the previous administration. Among the bill's provisions are key changes to retirement policy, including the repeal of certain provisions of the SECURE 2.0 Act and the introduction of new "Trump Accounts."
The SECURE 2.0 Act, passed in 2022 with bipartisan support, expanded retirement plan access by requiring automatic enrollment for eligible workers and increasing contribution opportunities. H.R. 1 specifically repeals Section 103(e) of SECURE 2.0, removing the auto-enrollment requirement for employer-sponsored plans. Additionally, the bill proposes the creation of 'Trump Accounts,' a new savings tool designed for minors. These accounts are designed to promote early saving habits, but they come with restrictions on withdrawals and investment options.
What Does Trump's Policy Bill Mean For Gen-Z's Retirement?
Trump's policy bill includes a repeal of Section 103(e) of the SECURE 2.0 Act of 2022, which would otherwise have required new retirement plans to automatically enroll eligible workers starting in 2025. This change removes a key federal mandate that aimed to make retirement savings more accessible through employer-sponsored plans, placing the responsibility back on the individual.
For the generation currently between 13 and 28 years old, better known as Gen-Z, Trump's policy bill represents a shift in retirement policy that places more responsibility on the individual. The removal of auto-enrollment provisions could reduce participation in retirement savings plans, especially among younger workers who may not take proactive steps to enroll. As highlighted in Vanguard's 2025 report, automatic enrollment designs are rooted in behavioral finance and have been shown to promote saving behaviors, particularly among those who may lack knowledge about retirement, have limited planning skills, or tend to procrastinate. "Some employees are not active, motivated decision-makers when planning for retirement,' according to the report and often default to inaction. The report adds that, in traditional voluntary enrollment plans, 'doing nothing' results in no participation, whereas automatic enrollment reframes the saving decision, making participation the default outcome.
Marc Russell, financial educator and founder of BetterWallet, noted, "H.R. 1 could pose long term challenges for Gen-Z's retirement security, despite the fact that this generation is showing strong financial instincts early on." Gen-Z is a generation known for thinking about financial well-being as a balancing act between maintaining peace of mind and accumulating savings in the bank account. And despite being one of the most exposed to financial education generations, they still face significant challenges. According to Intuit Prosperity Index 2025, "Sixty-nine percent of respondents say today's financial environment makes long-term planning feel out of reach, and 68% aren't sure they'll ever be able to retire."
While financial prosperity may be on the mind of future generations, learning how to navigate the system just as you enter the workforce can be overwhelming, and retirement talks take a backseat as you try to manage a new lifestyle, rent, student loans, and many other changing factors at the same time. "Benefits feel like a side note,' Russell adds. 'Auto-enrollment helps fill that gap by making sure retirement contributions start happening in the background, even before you fully understand what a target date fund is. It sets the foundation early, which makes a huge difference in the long run."
He also emphasized the uneven playing field that many younger workers of color face in the current system. 'Black and Brown graduates face a different starting line,' he said. 'According to Brookings, Black college graduates owe, on average, $25,000 more than their white peers just four years after graduating. That debt burden delays saving, delays homeownership, and increases the likelihood of supporting family members financially. Add in reduced access to employer-sponsored retirement plans, and you have a formula that makes it extremely difficult to build wealth.'
Trump's policy is a lengthy legislation that also discusses cutting some federal support, such as Medicaid, nutrition assistance, and student loan protections, which are crucial to understand in order to grasp the full extent of the behavioral impact the bill could have on the saving behavior of younger generations.
Trump Accounts And New Retirement Opportunities?
The bill's proposed 'Trump Accounts' aim to encourage early financial literacy and wealth-building by establishing tax-deferred investment accounts for minors born between 2025 and 2028. While the concept of seeding investment early is generally positive, realizing its full benefits will require a strong pairing of financial education and systemic support to ensure a broad and equitable impact.
Russell noted that while Trump Accounts are 'well-intentioned in theory, [However] their design is not there yet. Unlike Roth IRAs or 529 plans, Trump Accounts do not offer tax-free growth or flexible withdrawal options, and they limit investments to U.S. equity index funds, excluding international diversification.'"Restricting the account to one slice of the market introduces unnecessary concentration risk and limits its long-term growth potential," he adds.
Trump's policy bill also includes provisions aimed at expanding access to retirement savings for small business employees and independent workers. By enhancing the Saver's Credit and broadening the types of contributions that qualify, including ABLE account deposits and voluntary employee contributions, H.R. 1 could help increase participation among Gen-Z workers in the gig economy or at startups who lack access to traditional employer-sponsored retirement plans. Linda Jensen, founder of Heart Financial Group & Increase Business Profits, notes that provisions like eliminating federal income taxes on tips and overtime could increase take-home pay for younger workers, allowing more flexibility to contribute to Roth IRAs, HSAs, or other long-term vehicles. 'Predictability in tax policy empowers younger earners to build financial strategies with confidence,' Jensen said. She adds that while tools like Health Savings Accounts (HSA) and the proposed Trump Accounts offer long-term tax advantages, 'the potential upside won't materialize unless Gen-Z takes action.'
Financial Trauma And The Importance Of Default Systems
Many Gen-Z workers (particularly those from lower-income or historically marginalized backgrounds) enter adulthood with a sense of financial trauma, often shaped by past recessions, their parents' experiences with money, navigating pandemic-era disruptions, or managing student debt. This trauma can manifest as financial avoidance or anxiety about long-term planning.
According to Credit One Bank, 59% of Gen-Z report feeling stressed or anxious about their financial situation, and only 35% feel financially empowered. Societal expectations also contribute to financial trauma. A staggering 72% of Gen-Z say societal norms such as the pressure to own a home or maintain a certain lifestyle worsen their financial anxiety, a rate far higher than that reported by baby boomers (48%).
Without default systems like auto-enrollment, these individuals may not engage with retirement savings at all, also due to avoidance as a trauma response. Removing this mechanism could unintentionally widen generational and racial retirement gaps, despite well-intentioned alternatives like tax credits.
Shannah Game, a Certified Financial Planner, trauma of money specialist, and author of Unraveling Your Relationship with Money, emphasized the emotional impact 'Money stress is already a thing for Gen-Z. This legislation just ups the stakes. It's time to double down on financial literacy so they can navigate higher taxes, inflation, or benefit changes with confidence.' She identified two major stress triggers in this context: uncertainty and ripple effects. 'Anytime we see legislation with a massive price tag,' she noted, 'there's a good chance it could mean higher taxes in the future or changes to benefits like Social Security. For a generation already juggling student debt, high living costs, and anxiety about housing affordability, the idea of their safety nets being less reliable just adds another layer of pressure.'
Game also highlighted how this uncertainty shapes Gen-Z's perception of traditional systems. 'If they think Social Security might not be there for them—or not in the way it is today—they're more likely to question how much they should save, when they can retire, and even if retirement as we know it is realistic. That could lead to analysis paralysis or, worse, putting off investing because it feels out of reach.'
Financial trauma may be one of the leading behavioral nudges that impact how consumers interact with money, often influencing whether they engage with long-term financial planning at all. This trauma is frequently shaped by the individual burden of navigating complex systems that create barriers to successful participation in the economic system. When the system supports individuals, particularly those who may not be financially literate enough to override their subconscious trauma responses, the outcomes are significantly more positive. Default systems, such as automatic enrollment, are one such support, nudging participation and helping to bypass the hesitation and anxiety that financial trauma can cause.
'The average American doesn't start investing until their early 30s, often because of uncertainty or inertia. But the gap between when someone starts earning income and when they begin investing can be incredibly expensive. For example, if someone invests $200 per month starting at age 22, they could have over $500,000 by age 65 (assuming 8% annual growth). If they wait just 10 years and start at 32, that number drops to around $225,000. That 10-year delay can cost them more than half their future value.' Russell said.
Dr. Jovan Jackson, president and senior financial advisor at Good News Financial & Investment Advisors, added, 'In my experience, early financial struggles and economic pressures have led many younger individuals to adopt a 'live for today' mindset. With the rising cost of living and student debt burdens, retirement often feels like a distant and almost unattainable goal. As a result, long-term planning gets deprioritized, and saving for the future can seem less urgent or even out of reach.'
Tackling and overcoming financial trauma is more successful when well-designed systems minimize friction and enhance accessibility. These structures can be vital support mechanisms for younger workers dealing with economic instability and uncertainty. For Gen-Z, re-establishing or strengthening default pathways that simplify navigating the financial landscape may be crucial to prevent the lasting impacts of financial trauma or structural barriers from undermining their long-term retirement security.
What Can Gen-Z and Younger Generations Do To Best Prepare For Retirement?
While the 'Big Beautiful Bill' does not eliminate retirement savings opportunities, it reshapes the framework through which many young workers engage with long-term financial planning. To successfully navigate retirement under the current administration, Gen-Z individuals may want to consider various aspects as early as possible:
Financial Education: When the responsibility for the financial future falls heavily on the individual, a strong and early financial education becomes essential. Increase understanding of financial tools, including Roth IRAs, compound interest, contributions to retirement as a side job, and employer match programs.
Automation: Where possible, set up automatic transfers into savings or retirement accounts to simulate the effects of auto-enrollment and make it part of your financial planning.
Early Contributions: Begin saving early, even in small amounts, to take advantage of compounding over time. Dedicate part of your monthly budget to contribute to retirement.
Tax Optimization: Use the Saver's Credit and maximize any available employer-sponsored plan benefits.
Community Engagement: As recognized, Gen-Z's unique strength is discussing money like no previous generation, which can reduce financial shame and improve long-term financial outcomes. This is the time to leverage this strength to talk about different money moves and financial tools. Support local and state policies that promote inclusive access to retirement plans.
While Trump's policy bill, H.R. 1 or 'Big Beautiful Bill,' does not eliminate retirement savings opportunities, it reshapes the framework through which many young workers engage with long-term financial planning. The removal of federally mandated auto-enrollment, despite its proven effectiveness in raising participation and deferral rates—especially among younger generations—may slow the retirement readiness gains achieved over the past few years. For Gen-Z, particularly those from underserved backgrounds, understanding these changes and responding proactively will be key to securing a stable financial future.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Gizmodo
21 minutes ago
- Gizmodo
Elon Musk Deflects Bill Gates' Foreign Aid Alarm With Personal Swipe
The tech world's most consequential feud has flared up again. Elon Musk and Bill Gates, two men who have shaped the modern world, are locked in a bitter public dispute, this time over foreign aid cuts with life or death stakes. The conflict pits Musk, in his role spearheading a government efficiency initiative, against Gates, the world's most prominent philanthropist. A little over a month after Musk's departure from his role in the Trump administration, where he led efforts to slash federal spending, Gates took to X, Musk's own social network, to condemn the devastating impact of those cuts on global health. Drawing on new reports, Gates presented a grim tally of the human cost. 'A study in the Lancet recently looked at the cumulative impact of reductions in American aid. It found that, by 2040, 8 million more children will die before their fifth birthday,' Gates posted on July 3, linking to the medical journal's study. He followed up by highlighting the threat to HIV treatment programs. 'According to a @UNAIDS analysis, ending PEPFAR-supported programs for people living with HIV could result in an additional 4.2 million deaths by 2029,' Gates stated, providing a link to the report. Driving the point home, he warned that pulling vaccine funding would have catastrophic results. Gavi, the Vaccine Alliance, has helped immunize over 1.1 billion children since 2000. 'The U.S. announced that, after this year, it's pulling out all its money,' Gates wrote. 'If that happens, Gavi estimates that 75 million children will miss vaccinations over the next five years—and of those, 1.2 million children will die.' His conclusion was blunt: 'The facts are simple and devastating: Aid cuts have already cost lives, and the number of deaths will continue to rise.' Gates argued for a reversal, noting that global health is a tiny fraction of the federal budget. 'In 2023, the US spent less than one percent of the federal budget on lifesaving global health programs.' While Gates never mentioned Musk by name, the world's richest man felt targeted and seized on another user's post to launch a counterattack. The user blasted Gates, writing, 'Bro, you are worth $117 billion. If you really think aid cuts are costing lives, feel free to make up the difference.' Musk's reply was a single, cutting word: 'Exactly.' He then added a personal jab, dismissing Gates's philanthropic motives. 'The real reason Gates is unhappy is that HIS organization isn't getting billions in US taxpayer money anymore.' Exactly. The real reason Gates is unhappy is that HIS organization isn't getting billions in US taxpayer money anymore. — Elon Musk (@elonmusk) July 6, 2025As of July 5, Musk's net worth is estimated at $361 billion by the Bloomberg Billionaires Index, while Gates's fortune sits at $124 billion. The animosity between Musk and Gates is not new. It stems from a deep grudge Musk holds over Gates for shorting Tesla stock. Think of short selling as betting on failure. A short seller borrows shares of a stock, immediately sells them, and waits for the price to crash. If it does, they buy the shares back at the new, lower price, return them to the lender, and pocket the difference. It's a high risk move that infuriates founders like Musk, who see it as a direct attack on their company. Shorting is not illegal, but it's one of the most aggressive moves you can make in the market. Musk has never forgotten Gates's bet against his electric car company and brings it up frequently. 'Gates placed a massive bet on Tesla dying when our company was at one of its weakest moments several years ago,' Musk posted in September 2023. 'Such a big short position also drives the stock down for everyday investors.' He then added, 'To the best of my knowledge, Gates still has that massive bet against Tesla on the table. Someone should ask him if he does.' Just so that the public understands: Taking out a short position against Tesla, as Gates did, results in the highest return only if a company goes bankrupt! Gates placed a massive bet on Tesla dying when our company was at one of its weakest moments several years ago. Such a… — Elon Musk (@elonmusk) September 11, 2023While Gates has acknowledged placing a short position on Tesla in the past, he has never publicly confirmed if the position is still active, leaving the door open for Musk to continue fueling the feud.
Yahoo
23 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Bitcoin investor moves $8 billion worth of crypto after 14 years, originally bought for less than $210,000 — 80,000 BTC transferred from dormant Satoshi-era wallet
When you buy through links on our articles, Future and its syndication partners may earn a commission. An ancient beast has suddenly risen from its slumber after lying dormant for 14 years. In the realm of crypto, such a beast is known as a whale—an early adopter of the blockchain holding massive amounts of currency. Whales are often closely monitored by the community due to their foresight; therefore, even the slightest activity can be read as a signal based on which the markets can shift. One of these whales, currently speculated to be Roger Ver, has moved 80,000 Bitcoin over the past 24 hours. That's more than $8.6 billion in regular people's money, made from an initial investment of less than $210,000 back in 2011. Doing the math, this mystery whale has achieved a hypothetical return of nearly 4 million percent over its initial purchase, or approximately 40,000 times the original amount. All of these Bitcoins are from the highly revered Satoshi era, the infancy period between 2009 and 2011, when the cryptocurrency was first introduced. Wallets from this time are from true believers of Bitcoin, people who invested in the radical idea of a decentralized financial system when a single coin wasn't even worth $1. So, you can imagine the delight on crypto bros' faces when someone decided to move a record-breaking amount of Bitcoin yesterday. The previous record for the largest single transaction in Bitcoin history was a mere 3,700 BTC, and a whopping 10,000 BTC has now surpassed it, moving at once. There was a total of eight wallets involved in this transaction, each containing the aforementioned 10K Bitcoin, and they're all owned by the same person, according to leading crypto analyst Arkham. The tide started around early Friday, when two wallets that had been inactive for 14 years suddenly transferred 10,000 BTC each to new addresses. These original wallets date back to April 3, 2011, when they initially received a large amount of Bitcoin. At the time, one Bitcoin was worth just 78 cents, so 10,000 BTC would be valued at $7,800. That chalks up to a nearly 14 million percent increase. Eight hours later, six more wallets from the same era—each containing 10,000 BTC—moved their holdings without any prior test transactions. These are from May 4, 2011, when Bitcoin had risen to $3.25. In total, these eight wallets make up 80,000 Bitcoin, the entire stash believed to have been held by the mysterious whale. Bitcoin is currently trading at $108,000, slightly down from its historic high of $110,000, which it had reached shortly before the transfers occurred. Interestingly, during our research, we came across a 2023 Reddit post that discussed six Bitcoin wallets, each holding 10,000 BTC, and speculated on their ownership. The curious OP floated names like the Winklevoss twins and even jokingly suggested this might be "Satoshi's inheritance to his children." These six wallets, dating back to May 4, 2011, are the very same ones involved in the historic transaction, which moved their Bitcoin just hours after the earlier set of wallets from April 2, 2011, made their move. Forget our mystery whale, Reddit user RealVoldermort was the one who saw the storm coming before it ever even brewed. The Mysterious 6 Wallets Holding 10k BTC each from r/CryptoCurrency Of course, no one knows where these Bitcoins went. Was it a sale? Was it inheritance, simply moving from a deceased investor to their heir? Perhaps, it was Roger Ver—one of the earliest investors of Bitcoin, who championed the currency around its creation more than a decade ago. At least, that's what @SaniExp on Twitter claims with "99%" assurance. Constituents around the world have interesting theories as to why such a transaction occurred on a random Friday without any prior indications. Believing that Roger Ver is our leading man, some speculate that he executed the "sale" as part of a potential plea deal with the U.S. government. Ver, currently residing in Spain, is wanted in the United States on tax fraud charges and, earlier this year, appealed to President Trump for a pardon to avoid extradition. Regardless of who is revealed to be the whale swimming in the ocean, it's safe to say that it has shaken the world of crypto and finance as a whole. The new wallets, now containing over $8 billion of Bitcoin, have had no further movements since, and the true identity of our new owner remains unknown. We will update the story with more details if anything valuable surfaces. Follow Tom's Hardware on Google News to get our up-to-date news, analysis, and reviews in your feeds. Make sure to click the Follow button.


Fox News
23 minutes ago
- Fox News
Iran at 'decision point' after Trump strikes on nuclear program, says US NATO ambassador
U.S. Ambassador to NATO Matt Whitaker argued Iran is at a "decision point" following its war with Israel and U.S. airstrikes on its nuclear program — all while U.S. officials remain on high alert for sleeper cell concerns. Whitaker urged Iran to seek peace during "Sunday Morning Futures," while noting that the U.S. is still dealing with the implications of an open border – and the national security implications of it – from the Biden administration. "It's obviously a very dangerous world, Jason," Whitaker told Fox News' Jason Chaffetz on Sunday. "I think… President Trump, as a peacemaker, has made it safer, but at the same time, we're still dealing with a lot of the consequences of four years of Joe Biden, including a porous border, where not only did we have, as Tom Homan points out, over 1,200 Iranian nationals that came into our country that we know of, but you had over a million known gotaways that we have no idea who they are, where they went, and that's a real challenge." "But, at the same time, you know, President Trump has been very clear about his policy towards Iran, that they cannot have a nuclear weapon," he added. "And they're at a decision point. They should move forward and seek peace." Over 1,500 Iranian nationals who illegally entered the U.S. at the southern border were arrested during the Biden administration, and nearly 50% of them were released back into the country, according to a senior U.S. Customs and Border Protection (CBP) source last month. More specifically, Border Patrol agents arrested 1,504 Iranian nationals from fiscal year 2021 through fiscal year 2024. Of the 1,504 individuals who were arrested, 729 were released into the United States. Meanwhile, just hours after Trump addressed the nation about U.S. military strikes on Iranian nuclear sites, DHS released a new memo sounding the alarm on a "heightened threat environment in the United States." The bulletin from the National Terrorism Advisory System did not cite any specific threats but comes as Iranian officials have threatened retaliation. "It is our duty to keep the nation safe and informed, especially during times of conflict," the Department of Homeland Security said in a statement to Fox News Digital. "The ongoing Israel-Iran conflict brings the possibility of increased threat to the homeland in the form of possible cyberattacks, acts of violence, and antisemitic hate crimes." Whitaker argued the growing threat of possible Iranian sleeper cell activity in the United States puts tremendous pressure on law enforcement to be right "100 percent of the time." "Iran should come to the table and should sue for peace, and should make a peace deal with the United States, with Israel, and just say, 'No more. We want to be in the world where people seek prosperity and a bright future for their citizens,'" he said. "So, Jason… right now, this puts a lot of pressure on our law enforcement, puts a lot of pressure on… DOJ and the FBI to be right 100 percent of the time and seek out these sleeper cells and to make sure that they can't activate," he added.