Warren Buffett Warns Inflation Turns Business Into ‘The Upside-Down World of Alice in Wonderland' But Weeds Out ‘Bad Businesses'
'...inflation takes us through the looking glass into the upside-down world of Alice in Wonderland. When prices continuously rise, the 'bad' business must retain every nickel that it can. Not because it is attractive as a repository for equity capital, but precisely because it is so unattractive, the low-return business must follow a high retention policy. If it wishes to continue operating in the future as it has in the past — and most entities, including businesses, do — it simply has no choice.'
More News from Barchart
China, Chips, and Chaos: Where Smart Investors Are Putting Their Money Now
Alphabet Had a 'Standout Quarter.' Should You Buy GOOG Stock Here?
The Saturday Spread: Leveraging Practical Math to Extract Alpha in Hidden Places
Markets move fast. Keep up by reading our FREE midday Barchart Brief newsletter for exclusive charts, analysis, and headlines.
This observation came at a time when the U.S. economy was grappling with high inflation and rising interest rates, conditions that posed unique challenges for both investors and managers. Buffett's metaphor of an 'upside-down world' captures the counterintuitive reality that, in inflationary periods, even companies with poor returns are forced to reinvest heavily just to maintain their existing operations. Unlike high-quality businesses that can generate surplus cash and reward shareholders, low-return enterprises must retain capital simply to keep pace with rising costs of inventory, receivables, and fixed assets.
Buffett's authority on this subject is grounded in decades of experience navigating different economic cycles. Since taking control of Berkshire Hathaway in the 1960s, he has consistently emphasized the importance of investing in businesses with durable competitive advantages and strong pricing power — traits that allow companies to pass rising costs on to customers and maintain profitability in inflationary environments. By contrast, businesses with weak economics are forced into a perpetual cycle of capital retention, leaving little room for dividends, growth, or debt reduction.
This insight has enduring relevance for investors and corporate leaders. Even as inflationary pressures ebb and flow over time, the underlying principle remains: capital allocation decisions should be based on the ability of a business to generate real returns above the rate of inflation. Buffett's warning also serves as a caution against being misled by headline earnings or reported profits during inflationary periods. What matters most is not the nominal growth in revenues or assets, but the true economic value created for shareholders after accounting for the 'silent tax' of inflation.
Buffett's 1981 letter to investors continues to be studied for its timeless lessons on business quality, capital allocation, and the dangers of inflation. His ability to distill complex macroeconomic realities into practical guidance has made his annual letters essential reading for investors seeking to build resilient, value-driven portfolios in any market environment.
On the date of publication, Caleb Naysmith did not have (either directly or indirectly) positions in any of the securities mentioned in this article. All information and data in this article is solely for informational purposes. This article was originally published on Barchart.com
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
a minute ago
- Yahoo
58-Year-Old Lottery Winner Tried To Strike A Deal With Teen Son, But Backed Out When The 19-Year-Old Wanted 80% —'I Didn't Realize How Greedy He Was'
Benzinga and Yahoo Finance LLC may earn commission or revenue on some items through the links below. We all daydream about winning the lottery. Maybe it's a beach house. Maybe it's early retirement. Or maybe—if you're a parent—you imagine setting your kid up for life. That's exactly what a 58-year-old father tried to do when he hit the jackpot with a $1,000-a-day-for-life prize. But instead of gratitude, he got a negotiation that made him rethink everything. In a viral Reddit post, the dad explained how he approached his 19-year-old son with a plan: he'd hand over the winning ticket, and in return, the son would give him half the money until the father passed. After that, the son would receive 100% of the daily payout for the rest of his life. Related: 'Scrolling To UBI' — Deloitte's #1 fastest-growing software company allows users to earn money on their phones. You can invest today for just $0.30/share. Warren Buffett once said, "If you don't find a way to make money while you sleep, you will work until you die." Here's how you can earn passive income with just $10. Although he didn't spell out all the logic, the intent seemed clear: his son, being 19, had a much longer life expectancy and could benefit from the "for life" prize far longer than he could. The father was essentially trying to gift his son a lifetime of financial security—while covering himself with a fair 50/50 arrangement in the meantime. The teen's response? Not exactly a warm embrace. "He came back and said it wasn't really fair for me to want half," the dad wrote. "He said that I could live another 40 years. That he might need the money more and that I should take 20%." So the dad thought about it—and then signed the ticket and claimed the lump sum himself. He's now working with a lawyer to set his son up in other ways: college will be covered, a house fund will be waiting, and a trust is being arranged to ensure long-term support. Still, the son is angry—and so is the dad's ex, who apparently expected a cut too. Reddit, of course, had thoughts. A lot of them. "Dad is a sweetheart, son a greedy pig," one user wrote. Another called it "rage bait," adding, "No way is someone that greedy and s*****." One of the top-rated replies summed it up like this: "A 19-year-old kid tried to negotiate from $180K/year for doing nothing to $290K/year with zero leverage and was surprised when it blew up in his face." Some were quick to defend the father's pivot to the lump sum. "It was probably for the best," a commenter wrote. "Judging the son's character... the father was probably going to get hosed on that deal pretty much immediately." Others pointed out just how generous the original offer was. "If my father had offered me that deal, I would show up at his doorstep every morning with his cash, a dozen doughnuts, and his coffee exactly the way he likes it." For what it's worth, the dad isn't leaving his son high and dry—but he's not pretending the whole thing didn't sting. "I thought I was being smart, but I didn't realize how greedy he was," he wrote. In cases like this—where family, money, and long-term plans collide—it's often smart to bring in a professional. Even if you're not lucky enough to win the lottery, platforms like SmartAsset can connect you with financial advisors who help with everything from retirement planning to tax strategy to making sure your kids don't end up arguing over the inheritance. Whether you're setting up support for your kids, planning your estate, or just trying to avoid a financial decision you'll regret later, good advice can go a long way. Because giving your kid the golden goose? That's one thing. Watching him complain it's not laying fast enough—that's something else entirely. See Next: Maximize saving for your retirement and cut down on taxes: Schedule your free call with a financial advisor to start your financial journey – no cost, no obligation. It's no wonder Jeff Bezos holds over $250 million in art — this beloved alternative asset has outpaced the S&P 500 since 1995, delivering an average annual return of 11.4%. This article 58-Year-Old Lottery Winner Tried To Strike A Deal With Teen Son, But Backed Out When The 19-Year-Old Wanted 80% —'I Didn't Realize How Greedy He Was' originally appeared on Sign in to access your portfolio
Yahoo
a minute ago
- Yahoo
I missed Nvidia – could this be the next big US growth stock?
Let's be honest — most of us missed the boat on Nvidia (NASDAQ: NVDA). And by the time we realised just how vital graphics processing units (GPUs) would become to artificial intelligence (AI), the share price had already soared into the stratosphere. Over the past five years, the stock has climbed almost 1,600%. In the last six months alone, it's up almost 50%, adding over $1.5trn to its market value. It's now the most valuable company in the world, overtaking Microsoft and Apple in June. I have exposure to the stock through several ETFs and investment trusts, so I didn't entirely miss out on the action. But I certainly made nowhere near the gains I would have had I bought individual shares. Which makes me wonder, how did Nvidia get here, and what stock could be next? Crunching the numbers The numbers behind the hype are jaw-droppingly impressive. For the fiscal year ending January 2025, revenue reached $130bn, a staggering increase from $27bn just two years ago. Net income exploded from $4.3bn in 2022 to more than $70bn this year. And its margins are enormous — a return on equity of 115% and gross margins consistently above 70%. Yet despite the parabolic growth, I don't think it's entirely overvalued yet. In fact, I still think it's worth considering as a long-term investment. It's a world-class company with room to expand further and the global AI arms race is just getting started – with Nvidia at its core. Realistically, though, the biggest gains have already been made. Buying now means betting on continued dominance that may already be priced in, which is a risk. The stock trades at a price-to-earnings (P/E) ratio of 45 – not outrageous considering its growth, but not cheap either. So where should investors look if they want to catch the next killer growth stock before it becomes a trillion-dollar giant? Could SymphonyAI be next? One company on my radar is SymphonyAI, a private US firm reportedly preparing for a Nasdaq IPO later this year. It's not yet listed, but when it does go public, I'll be watching closely. Founded by billionaire Romesh Wadhwani, it specialises in applying AI to specific industry verticals – retail, finance, manufacturing, and healthcare. It doesn't build chips like Nvidia, but it builds the enterprise software that helps businesses harness AI to improve decision-making and productivity. Unlike many AI startups, SymphonyAI already has real revenues and customers. Its retail division serves over 1,200 brands, while its industrial arm works with giants like Nestlé and ArcelorMittal. While financials are still private, it reportedly generates hundreds of millions in annual revenue and is growing fast. If the IPO goes ahead this autumn, it could be one of the most closely watched tech listings of the year. Long-term mindset Nvidia's success was powered by timing, technology, and a growing reliance on data. It may still reward shareholders but the days of 10x returns are likely behind us. SymphonyAI might never reach Nvidia's heights but it could offer early-stage exposure to enterprise AI – the next leg of this growth story. If the valuation is right, it could turn out to be a once-in-a-decade opportunity. The post I missed Nvidia – could this be the next big US growth stock? appeared first on The Motley Fool UK. More reading 5 Stocks For Trying To Build Wealth After 50 One Top Growth Stock from the Motley Fool Mark Hartley has no position in any of the shares mentioned. The Motley Fool UK has recommended Apple, Microsoft, and Nvidia. Views expressed on the companies mentioned in this article are those of the writer and therefore may differ from the official recommendations we make in our subscription services such as Share Advisor, Hidden Winners and Pro. Here at The Motley Fool we believe that considering a diverse range of insights makes us better investors. Motley Fool UK 2025 Error in retrieving data Sign in to access your portfolio Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data
Yahoo
9 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Bill limiting use of sales tax passes
GUILFORD COUNTY — Voters will be asked again to approve a sales tax increase of 0.25% of a penny for every $1 of sales, but this time legislation dictates how the revenue must be spent if the increase is approved. House Bill 305 was amended by Sen. Phil Berger Sr., R-Rockingham and Senate president pro tem, to set parameters on how the revenue, estimated at $28.7 million a year, would be allocated, with most of it going for teacher pay. The bill passed the General Assembly this week. The Guilford County Board of Commissioners voted unanimously in mid-June to place the sales tax referendum issue on the November 2026 general election ballot. A little more than a week after the commissioners' action, Berger amended House Bill 305 to address the sales tax proposal. Berger, whose legislative district includes Guilford County and some precincts in High Point, has said he placed directives on allocating the tax revenue to assure Guilford County voters on how the money would be spent. Although the county commissioners have pledged that all revenue raised by the proposed sales tax increase would go to teacher pay, there was no provision in state law preventing the money from being directed to other purposes. 'House Bill 305 now provides them with information so they can make an educated decision,' Berger previously said. If the proposed tax increase is approved by voters and raises $28.7 million, this is how the money would have to be allocated, according to the new legislation: • Teacher pay supplements in Guilford County Schools, $19.2 million. • Guilford County Fire and Rescue Council for equipment purposes and capital expenditures, $5.5 million. • Guilford Technical Community College capital projects, $2.7 million. • Allocations for Whitsett, Summerfield, Stokesdale, Pleasant Garden and Oak Ridge, $1.3 million. Berger's allocation approach apparently was the first time that has been applied in North Carolina to a sales tax referendum. Whether it will change how Guilford County voters view the proposal is uncertain. Voters have rejected the same proposed sales tax increase six times in the past 20 years, most recently in the November 2024 general election. Solve the daily Crossword
