&w=3840&q=100)
World has only 3 years left to avert worst impact of climate change: Study
We are living in a world that is warming at the fastest rate since records began. Yet, governments have been slow to act.
The annual global climate change conference of the parties (COP30) is just months away. All of the 197 countries that belong to the United Nations were supposed to have submitted updated national climate plans to the UN by February this year. These plans outline how each country will cut its greenhouse gas emissions in line with the legally binding international Paris Agreement. This agreement commits all signatories to limiting human-caused global warming to no more than 1.5 degrees Celsius above pre-industrial levels.
Governments must also bring their newly updated national climate action plans to COP30 and show how they plan to adapt to the impacts that climate change will bring.
But so far, only 25 countries, covering around 20 per cent of global emissions, have submitted their plans, known as Nationally Determined Contributions. In Africa, they are Somalia, Zambia and Zimbabwe. This leaves 172 still to come.
The nationally determined contributions are very important in setting out countries' short- to medium-term commitments on climate change. They also provide a direction of travel that can inform broader policy decisions and investments. Aligning climate plans with development goals could lift 175 million people out of poverty.
But arguably only one of the submitted plans – the UK's – is compatible with the Paris Agreement.
We are climate scientists, and one of us (Piers Forster) leads the global science team that publishes the annual Indicators of Global Climate Change report. This report gives an overview of the state of the climate system. It is based on calculations of the net emissions of greenhouse gases globally, how these are concentrating in the atmosphere, how temperatures are rising on the ground, and how much of this warming has been caused by humans.
The report also looks at how extreme temperatures and rainfall are intensifying, how much the sea levels are rising, and how much carbon dioxide can still be emitted before the planet's temperature exceeds 1.5 degrees Celsius more than it was in pre-industrial times. This is important because staying within 1.5 degrees Celsius is needed to avoid the worst impacts of climate change.
Our report shows that human-caused global warming reached 1.36 degrees Celsius in 2024. This boosted average global temperatures (a combination of human-induced warming and natural variability in the climate system) to 1.52 degrees Celsius. In other words, the world has already reached the level where it has warmed so much that it cannot avoid significant impacts from climate change. There is no doubt we are in dangerous waters.
Our dangerously hot planet
Although last year's global temperatures were very high, they were also alarmingly unexceptional. The data speaks for itself. Continued record high levels of greenhouse gas emissions have led to rising atmospheric concentrations of carbon dioxide, methane and nitrous oxide.
The result is rising temperatures that are rapidly eating into the remaining carbon budget (the amount of greenhouse gases that can be emitted within an agreed time). This will be exhausted in less than three years at current levels of emissions.
We need to face this head on: the window to stay within 1.5 degrees Celsius is essentially shut. Even if we can bring temperatures back down in future, it will be a long and difficult road.
At the same time, climate extremes are intensifying, bringing long-term risks and costs to the global economy but also, importantly, people. The African continent is now facing its deadliest climate crisis in over a decade.
It would be impossible to imagine economies operating without fast access to trusted data. When share prices plummet or growth stalls, politicians and business leaders act decisively. None would tolerate outdated intelligence on sales or the stock market.
But when it comes to climate, the speed of climate change often outpaces the data available. This means fast decisions can't be made. If we treated climate data as we do financial reports, panic would ensue after each dire update. But while governments routinely pivot when faced with an economic downturn, they have been far slower to respond to what key climate indicators – the Earth's vital signs – are telling us.
What needs to happen next
As more countries develop their climate plans, it's time for leaders across the globe to face the hard truths of climate science.
Governments need to have fast access to trusted climate data so that they can develop up-to-date national climate plans. The national climate plans need to take a global perspective too. This is really important for fairness and equity. For example, developed countries must acknowledge that they've emitted more greenhouse gases and take the lead in presenting ambitious mitigation efforts and in providing finance for other countries to decarbonise and adapt.
In Africa, the UN is hosting UNFCCC Climate Week in Addis Ababa in September. As well as making plans for COP30, there will be sessions on accessing climate finance and ensuring that the transition to zero human-caused carbon emissions by 2050 (net zero) is just and equitable. The summit also aims to support countries that are still working on their national climate plans.
If nationally determined contributions are implemented, the pace of climate change will slow down. This is vital not just for the countries – and economies – currently on the frontline against climate change, but for a functioning global society.
Just five of the G20 countries have submitted their 2035 plans: Canada, Brazil, Japan, the United States and the United Kingdom. But the G20 is responsible for around 80 per cent of global emissions. This means that South Africa's current G20 presidency can help to ensure that the world prioritises efforts to help developing countries finance their transition to a low-carbon economy.
Another worrying factor is that just 10 of the updated nationally determined contributions have reaffirmed or strengthened commitments to move away from fossil fuels. This means that national climate plans from the European Union, China and India will be key in testing their climate leadership and keeping the Paris Agreement's 1.5 degrees Celsius temperature goals alive. Many other countries will be scrutinising what these countries commit to before they submit their own national climate plans.
The data in our report helps the world to understand not just what's happened in recent years, but also what to expect further down the track.
Our hope is that these and other countries submit ambitious and credible plans well before COP30. If they do, this will finally close the gap between acknowledging the climate crisis and making decisive efforts to address it. Every tonne of greenhouse gas emissions matters.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Time of India
an hour ago
- Time of India
UNGA list of speakers suggests Modi might be visiting US in September
PM Modi (File Photo) NEW DELHI: PM Narendra Modi has been listed as one of the speakers at the upcoming UNGA session, suggesting that he might visit the US in Sept. According to the GA-80th session general debate provisional list of speakers, the Indian head of govt is slated to address the assembly on Sept 26. While names of speakers are inscribed after consultations with the country concerned, the leaders retain the option of withdrawing at a later date and nominating someone else to deliver the national statement. External affairs minister S Jaishankar had addressed the 79th UNGA general debate last year. Modi also travelled to the UN last year and addressed the GA's Summit of the Future. In the recent past, he has addressed the general debate in 2019, 2020 and 2021. Modi has a busy schedule in the next few months, with visits to China and Japan coming up late next month and early Sept. He is also expected to host Russian President Vladimir Putin this year for the annual summit and Quad leaders in Nov. As of now though, no incoming or outgoing meeting is scheduled in late Sept.
&w=3840&q=100)

First Post
an hour ago
- First Post
Iran agrees to let technical team from IAEA visit country after US 'Op Midnight Hammer' strikes
'The delegation will come to Iran to discuss the modality, not to go to the (nuclear) sites,' Deputy Foreign Minister Kazem Gharibabadi said. He was in New York for meetings at the UN. read more Iran on Wednesday (July 23) confirmed that it had agreed to allow a team from the International Atomic Energy Agency to visit the country in the coming weeks. Deputy Foreign Minister Kazem Gharibabadi said the team from the United Nations nuclear watchdog would discuss relations between IAEA and Tehran. 'The delegation will come to Iran to discuss the modality, not to go to the (nuclear) sites,' Gharibabadi said. He was in New York for meetings at the UN. STORY CONTINUES BELOW THIS AD IAEA has said that its chief Rafael Grossi is actively engaging with all the parties involved in the 'Iran nuclear issue." Concerns after Israel, US' strikes IAEA officials have stressed the urgency of restoring access to Iranian nuclear facilities after last month's air strikes by Israel and the United States, which targeted key components of Iran's nuclear infrastructure. Those attacks, aimed at impeding Tehran's ability to develop a nuclear weapon, have severely disrupted the IAEA's ability to verify the status of enriched uranium stocks and other critical components of Iran's nuclear programme. Tehran maintains that its nuclear activities remain peaceful and that no effort is underway to develop atomic weapons. Gharibabadi said Iran's Atomic Energy Organization is still assessing damage from the attacks. 'We do not know what has happened there … because of the risks of the radiation,' he said. 'Our Atomic Energy Organization is assessing, actually, the damages to the nuclear installations, and we are waiting to receive their report.' Diplomatic concerns have mounted over the fate of some 400 kg of highly enriched uranium, with the IAEA yet to receive an update from Iran regarding the material's status. The watchdog has deemed full resumption of inspections essential to rebuilding international confidence. Iran reluctant to share data with IAEA Gharibabadi claimed the IAEA has not formally inquired about the uranium and added, 'we cannot say anything now because we do not have any valid and credible report from (Iran's) Atomic Energy Organization.' The comment shows Tehran's continued reluctance to share data in the absence of what it deems a secure inspection environment. In June, the IAEA sparked Iranian ire by stating on the eve of the Israeli strikes that Tehran was in violation of non-proliferation treaty commitments, complicating the possibility of progress in any renewed talks over Iran's nuclear programme. Looking ahead, Gharibabadi said he would meet counterparts from Britain, France and Germany in Istanbul on Friday. These countries, along with China and Russia, remain signatories to the 2015 nuclear deal from which the United States withdrew in 2018. The agreement traded sanctions relief for restrictions on Iran's atomic activities. Alongside this track, Iran and the US have engaged in five rounds of indirect negotiations mediated by Oman since the beginning of the year. With inputs from agencies


India Today
2 hours ago
- India Today
Countries must act on climate or face legal action: UN court's landmark ruling
The United Nations' highest court on Wednesday said countries must address the "urgent and existential threat" of climate change by cooperating to curb emissions, as it delivered an opinion set to determine future environmental International Court of Justice said failure by countries to meet their climate obligations could, in specific cases, lead other states affected by climate change to opinion by the ICJ, also known as the World Court, was immediately welcomed by environmental groups. Legal experts said it was a victory for small island and low-lying states that had asked the court to clarify states' responsibilities. Judge Yuji Iwasawa said countries were obliged to comply with the "stringent obligations" placed on them by climate treaties and failure to do so was a breach of international law."States must cooperate to achieve concrete emission reduction targets," Iwasawa said, as he read out the court's advisory said that national climate plans must be of the highest ambition and collectively maintain standards to meet the aims of the 2015 Paris Agreement that include attempting to keep global warming below 1.5 degrees Celsius (2.7 Fahrenheit).Under international law, he said: "The human right to a clean, healthy and sustainable environment is essential for the enjoyment of other human rights."Earlier, as he started a just over two-hour reading of the court's opinion, Judge Iwasawa laid out the cause of the problem and the need for a collective response."Greenhouse gas emissions are unequivocally caused by human activities which are not territorially limited," he rich industrialised countries have been responsible for the most emissions. Iwasawa said these countries had to take the lead in addressing the AND LEGAL WEIGHTThe deliberation of the 15 judges of the ICJ in The Hague is non-binding, but it carries legal and political weight and future climate cases would be unable to ignore it, legal experts say."This is the start of a new era of climate accountability at a global level," said Danilo Garrido, legal counsel for Duyck, senior attorney, at the Center For International Environmental Law laid out the possibility of big emitters being sued."If states have legal duties to prevent climate harm, then victims of that harm have a right to redress," he QUESTIONSWednesday's opinion follows two weeks of hearings last December at the ICJ when the judges were asked by the UN General Assembly to consider two questions: what are countries' obligations under international law to protect the climate from greenhouse gas emissions; and what are the legal consequences for countries that harm the climate system?Wealthy countries of the Global North told the judges that existing climate treaties, including the 2015 Paris Agreement, which are largely non-binding, should be the basis for deciding their nations and small island states at greatest risk from rising sea levels argued for stronger measures, in some cases legally binding, to curb emissions and for the biggest emitters of climate-warming greenhouse gases to provide financial had sought clarification from the court after the failure so far of the 2015 Paris Agreement to curb the growth of global greenhouse gas last year, in the "Emissions Gap Report," which takes stock of countries' promises to tackle climate change compared with what is needed, the UN said that current climate policies will result in global warming of more than 3 C (5.4 F) above pre-industrial levels by campaigners seek to hold companies and governments to account, climaterelated litigation has intensified, with nearly 3,000 cases filed across almost 60 countries, according to June figures from London's Grantham Research Institute on Climate Change and the Environment.- Ends