ActionSA threatens to take action on Lily Mine tragedy to recover the remains of three victims
After nine years of government inaction, ActionSA has delivered a firm ultimatum to Mineral and Petroleum Resources Minister Gwede Mantashe: 'Retrieve the bodies of the three Lily Mine workers buried since 2016 within 60 days – or the party will take on the mission themselves.'
ActionSA Chief Whip Athol Trollip has written to Mantashe, renewing the party's years-long call for the retrieval of the bodies of Solomon Nyirenda, Pretty Mkambule, and Yvonne Mnisi, in line with the minister's latest undertakings.
In a letter dated May 8, Trollip voiced his frustration over continued delays, reminding the minister that he had recently assured both him and party president Herman Mashaba during a meeting at the Inanda Club that the retrieval of the miners' remains was "imminent." Trollip questioned this promise, asking what 'imminent' truly means, given that nearly nine years have already passed.
He also mentioned that ActionSA has obtained permission from the Business Rescue Practitioners to enter the mine and collaborate with qualified rescue specialists to develop proposals and quotations for the retrieval of the container containing the victims' remains.
'We are prepared to give the minister 60 days to honour his promise. Should he fail to do so, ActionSA will have no choice but to proceed independently. Such a failure would further expose the government's continued insensitivity towards the plight of poor South Africans, particularly black citizens.
'Minister Mantashe has, on numerous occasions, promised that his department would facilitate the retrieval of the bodies. These undertakings have consistently been communicated to the affected families, who continue to wait in anguish.'
Last year, ActionSA leader Herman Mashaba suggested that the party might pursue legal action once again to secure the retrieval of the bodies from Lily Mine.
At an event in Barberton, Mpumalanga, held in 2024 to commemorate the deaths of the three mine workers, Mashaba revealed that he had sought legal advice on the next course of action against the mine.
'Of course, I can't reveal at this stage what our next step is. However, I have been speaking to the lawyers and we will be in a position to announce what legal steps we will be taking in the next few days,' Mashaba said.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
IOL News
an hour ago
- IOL News
SAHRC faces sharp criticism amid debates over healthcare access for foreign nationals
The South African Human Rights Commission (SAHRC) is facing backlash over its recent reaffirmation of the right to access healthcare services as a universal right for everyone within the Republic, a principle enshrined in the South African Constitution. The South African Human Rights Commission (SAHRC) is facing backlash over its recent reaffirmation of the right to access healthcare services as a universal right for everyone within the Republic, a principle enshrined in the South African Constitution. The South African Human Rights Commission (SAHRC) has come under fire for asserting the universality of healthcare access within the country's borders, a stance that has spurred heated debate among political parties. In its recent communication to stakeholders, the SAHRC reaffirmed that every individual, including illegal foreign nationals, is entitled to healthcare services as enshrined in the South African Constitution. This position, however, has led to criticism from various corners, including the political party ActionSA. The party vehemently opposes what it terms the 'abuse' of the public healthcare system by illegal foreigners, arguing that this influx strains an already overburdened system. It claims that Section 27 of the Constitution, which guarantees the right to access healthcare, has been misapplied, creating a scenario where the rights of South African citizens are compromised. The statement also details that this misinterpretation not only places pressure on healthcare resources but also dilutes the quality of care available to law-abiding South Africans. In May, ActionSA took a proactive step by proposing a set of constitutional amendments aimed at reforming these provisions, which they believe have been exploited to exacerbate the crisis of illegal immigration. The party also highlights that while the intentions of the Constitution are noble, its current application leads to an untenable situation where hospitals are overwhelmed and lacking essential resources. It further questioned why healthcare responsibilities seem to fall disproportionately on South Africa, suggesting that other nations enforce stricter regulations regarding medical insurance for incoming foreigners. 'No South African can enter another country legally without providing proof of medical insurance. This is because responsible governments do not budget to provide public services to foreign nationals without limits. Yet in South Africa, we are expected to carry this burden indefinitely,' argued ActionSA. Adding to the chorus of criticism, local activist and politician Anele Mda voiced concerns on social media, suggesting the SAHRC's actions represent an unconstitutional infringement on South Africans' rights. 'We definitely need to petition Parliament to address the unconstitutional infringement of SAHRC on the rights of South Africans, acting as an unrepentant demagogue to consistently use its power as a Chapter 9 institution to advance/conceal acts of criminality by foreigners,' said Mda. The SAHRC says it is engaging with healthcare administrators and relevant departments to foster better conditions for all healthcare users. In a public statement, the SAHRC urged both the Department of Home Affairs and the South African Police Service (SAPS) to fulfil their roles diligently to prevent citizens from taking matters into their own hands. [email protected] Saturday Star
IOL News
2 hours ago
- IOL News
ActionSA criticizes SAHRC for supporting undocumented migrants' right to public healthcare
ActionSA has hit back at the South African Human Rights Commission (SAHRC) after the organisation clarified that everyone, including undocumented immigrants, may access the country's healthcare facilities. The party claimed that there is 'abuse' of the nation's public healthcare system by undocumented foreign nationals. In a statement issued on Wednesday, ActionSA Parliamentary Chief Whip Lerato Ngobeni accused the government of enabling an unsustainable burden on healthcare facilities by allowing undocumented migrants to access services without restriction. Ngobeni argued that the 'misapplication' of Section 27 of the Constitution has overwhelmed clinics and hospitals, placing the well-being of South African citizens at risk. "It is unconscionable that a public clinic in Johannesburg can report that over 70% of its patient records belong to foreign nationals. No South African can enter another country legally without proof of medical insurance, yet here we are expected to carry this burden indefinitely," Ngobeni said. ActionSA has proposed a suite of constitutional amendments aimed at restricting access to healthcare for undocumented migrants.
SowetanLIVE
4 hours ago
- SowetanLIVE
DA rejects Simelane, Nkabane departmental budgets
The DA has followed through on its threat to vote against departmental budget votes of ministers who are facing allegations of wrongdoing. This after the party this week voted against budgets of the departments of human settlements and higher education led by Thembi Simelane-Nkadimeng and Nobuhle Nkabane respectively. This decision was taken as a direct response to President Cyril Ramaphosa axing trade and industry deputy minister Andrew Whitfield, of the DA, last week for defying his order that none of the members of his executive were allowed to go to the US at the height of the diplomatic tensions between the two countries. The DA in response argued that Ramaphosa had been harsh on Whitfield and that it was not acceptable that he fired him for such a minor transgression while he still kept Simelane and Nkabane in his cabinet. Unlike Whitfield, the DA argued, Simelane was accused of corruption and Nkabane stood accused of lying to parliament. Instead of dealing with the two ministers who were facing serious allegations, Ramaphosa decided to axe Whitfield for going on a trip without getting permission, the DA argued. DA MP Luyolo Mphithi on Wednesday said his party was voting against Simelane's budget vote because of the corruption allegations she was facing. Mphithi said the DA was concerned that instead of firing Simelane, Ramaphosa had moved her from the department of justice to human settlements. 'You'd think that the response to this that the president would have shown minister Simelane the door, he did not. He asked for the report that he stayed with for three months,' said Mphithi. 'And even though the DA sustained pressure asking the president to act, he lacked courage to act and instead decided to dump minister Simelane at human settlements, one of the most important departments for South Africans.'
