Katina Curtis: Ley shifts away from culture wars but WA Liberals drag them back
The 70-odd members of the party's State council voted for motions — backed by Michaelia Cash and Andrew Hastie — calling to abandon the net zero emissions target, ditch Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander flags at official proceedings and cut back on welcomes to country.
Since taking on the leadership, Ley has in word and deed sought to shift her party away from culture wars and onto turf that could be better labelled constructive disagreement.
But she hasn't been helped by the Nationals, and she isn't being helped by party branches like those in WA, South Australia and Queensland.
The country was last week treated to the unedifying spectacle of two grown men, each of them once upon a time deputy prime minister, publicly declaring they were 'virile' and play-acting as bulls as they sought to shred the Coalition's position on climate action. Again.
After the election that delivered a majority vote to progressives — Labor, Greens and teal independents — the Liberal Party membership and their Nationals cousins aren't just sticking the finger up at the leader, they're also telling the electorate where it should go.
Yes, the WA branch of the party is traditionally conservative and yes, the motions aren't binding on any elected representatives, although they do point out how the people who preselect them feel on such issues.
But it does show the party base is out of step with ordinary voters.
That should be a concern to Liberals who want to win seats back.
The Liberals haven't picked up a new WA Federal seat since 2013. Over the past two elections, they've gone from six senators to four.
Basil Zempilas, who didn't vote on the motions on Saturday due to a pressing other engagement, is alive to this, saying on Monday that flags, welcomes and net zero aren't top of mind for voters.
'The WA parliamentary Liberal Party … are very comfortable with standing in front of the Aboriginal flag. We are very comfortable with the welcome to country, and we support the status quo on the net zero targets,' he said.
'I'll just note that the former leader of the Federal Liberal Party put some of these issues on the agenda pre the federal election, and we know the results of that Federal election.'
Ley isn't overly concerned, saying she knows individuals in her party room have passionate views on these things.
She also will be acutely aware there's no love lost between her and WA's Federal Liberals, only two of whom backed her in the leadership ballot and some of whom are quietly questioning her tactical nous.
These are the fights for the soul of the party the Liberals should have had three years ago, but didn't under Peter Dutton's steely 'unity.'
Airing such divisions now gives them time to focus on how to win seats closer to an election — as long as they haven't hurt their leader too much along the way.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Sydney Morning Herald
2 hours ago
- Sydney Morning Herald
Even for less than honourable professions, this was way out of bounds
It is a serious allegation which, if proven under Victorian law, would make Sam Groth, a parliamentarian with ambitions to lead his party and the state, guilty of a sex crime against a minor. The Herald Sun investigation did not substantiate the allegation, which on Wednesday was denied by Groth. Instead, it has created a likely test case for Australia's strengthened privacy laws, which include a new statutory tort for serious invasion of privacy. The paper's interest in the Groths' sexual history was piqued by the Groths' comments in previous interviews when they said the first met in 2011 at the Templestowe Park Tennis Club. This would make Brittany 16 or 17 years old and Sam Groth either 23 or 24. Drill reported that unnamed Liberal Party colleagues raised the issue with Groth amid concerns it could be weaponised by his political opponents. This suggests Groth's enemies within the Liberal Party fuelled this grubby exposé. Groth says the matter was never raised with him by a colleague. He also says neither he nor Brittany – the only two people who know the circumstances of when their sexual relationship started – spoke to the Herald Sun about the story before publication. The Groths' lawyers, defamation expert Patrick George and barrister Sue Chrysanthou, SC, are the team which successfully sued former Liberal leader John Pesutto on behalf of colleague Moira Deeming. On Wednesday morning, their legal letter landed in the inbox of Herald Sun editor-in-chief Sam Weir. Loading If this case progresses to trial, it will be nervously watched by rival media organisations including Nine, the publisher of this masthead, which lobbied for years against the introduction of a statutory privacy tort. The concerns notice seen by this masthead makes clear that while the defamatory imputations are against Sam Groth – the most serious being that 'he sexually assaulted Brittany when she was under 18' and 'committed a crime of sexual assault against a minor in his care or supervision' – the most egregious invasion of privacy was against Brittany Groth. Any woman, even one married to a politician, should be safe in thinking their teenage sexual history is off-limits to political skulduggery and newspaper snooping. The concerns notice describes the decision to 'name and shame' Brittany Groth as an alleged victim of child sexual assault as a 'grotesque act'. 'There was no basis to allege that any relevant sexual misconduct took place merely because our clients are said to have met when Mrs Groth was 17,' the notice read. 'Mr Groth has not been charged with any crime, or even investigated or questioned by police.' The privacy laws recognise media freedom as a countervailing public interest. The Herald Sun, which is standing by its reporting, will seek to test the strength of this provision. The outcome of any trial could have far-reaching implications for journalism and the politicians we report on. But at its heart, this story turns on questions that, frankly, feel wrong to ask. Are any of us entitled to know when and in what circumstances a politician and their partner consummated a loving, ongoing relationship? To return to Ferguson's observation about journalists, we're not awful people, really.
Sydney Morning Herald
2 hours ago
- Sydney Morning Herald
What's in a number? New carbon target sparks new climate warfare
Our free Environment newsletter is sent every second Wednesday. Below is an excerpt. Sign up to get the whole newsletter delivered to your inbox. Casual observers of federal parliament might this week have been startled by a sudden resumption of conflict over climate, but the timing was no accident. Australia, like the rest of the world, is due to set its 2035 carbon-emission reduction target under the Paris Agreement. As a result, Canberra is crawling with those who have an interest in influencing that target (or Nationally Determined Contribution, more on which shortly). Setting the scene for many turning their attention to parliament as it resumed for the Albanese government's second term, were Nationals MPs Barnaby Joyce and Michael McCormack, who introduced a private members' bill to have Australia abandon entirely the effort to cut emissions in line with the Paris Agreement. Also in Canberra this week was Simon Stiell, the UN's chief climate diplomat or, more properly, executive secretary of the United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change. He has been travelling the world urging nations to submit ambitious targets that will keep Paris Agreement goals within reach. Far too careful a diplomat to recommend an Australian target, he has been making the case that, on economic and security grounds, Australia should be ambitious. 'Bog standard is beneath you … Go for what will build lasting wealth and national security,' he said in a speech in Sydney before travelling to Canberra. 'Go for what will change the game and stand the test of time.' So, what's a Nationally Determined Contribution? When world governments signed the Paris Accord almost a decade ago they agreed that to halt climate change before catastrophic tipping points kicked in, warming needed to be arrested below 2 degrees and as close as possible to 1.5 degrees.
The Age
2 hours ago
- The Age
What's in a number? New carbon target sparks new climate warfare
Our free Environment newsletter is sent every second Wednesday. Below is an excerpt. Sign up to get the whole newsletter delivered to your inbox. Casual observers of federal parliament might this week have been startled by a sudden resumption of conflict over climate, but the timing was no accident. Australia, like the rest of the world, is due to set its 2035 carbon-emission reduction target under the Paris Agreement. As a result, Canberra is crawling with those who have an interest in influencing that target (or Nationally Determined Contribution, more on which shortly). Setting the scene for many turning their attention to parliament as it resumed for the Albanese government's second term, were Nationals MPs Barnaby Joyce and Michael McCormack, who introduced a private members' bill to have Australia abandon entirely the effort to cut emissions in line with the Paris Agreement. Also in Canberra this week was Simon Stiell, the UN's chief climate diplomat or, more properly, executive secretary of the United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change. He has been travelling the world urging nations to submit ambitious targets that will keep Paris Agreement goals within reach. Far too careful a diplomat to recommend an Australian target, he has been making the case that, on economic and security grounds, Australia should be ambitious. 'Bog standard is beneath you … Go for what will build lasting wealth and national security,' he said in a speech in Sydney before travelling to Canberra. 'Go for what will change the game and stand the test of time.' So, what's a Nationally Determined Contribution? When world governments signed the Paris Accord almost a decade ago they agreed that to halt climate change before catastrophic tipping points kicked in, warming needed to be arrested below 2 degrees and as close as possible to 1.5 degrees.
