Idaho judge relaxes abortion ban in cases where woman's life at risk

Reuters

15-04-2025

April 14 (Reuters) - Idaho's abortion ban does not prevent doctors from performing abortions when a pregnant woman's life is in danger, even if her death is "neither imminent nor assured," a judge has ruled, a victory for four patients and two doctors who sued the state to expand the ban's narrow exception for medical emergencies.
District Judge Jason Scott in Ada County state court on April 11 said that an abortion is allowed if, in the doctor's "good faith medical judgment," the patient faces "a non-negligible risk of dying sooner" without one.
Scott said the exception did not extend to cases where the danger arises from a risk of self-harm due to mental health issues. He ruled that the method of abortion must be one that, without further endangering the woman, "best facilitates the unborn child's survival outside the uterus, if feasible."
The judge also rejected the women's argument that abortion should be allowed in case of a lethal condition which would mean the fetus would not survive long after being born.
All four patients in the lawsuit were denied abortions in Idaho despite carrying fetuses which had lethal conditions and were forced to travel out of the state to have abortions, according to their 2023 lawsuit, opens new tab.
Scott did not explain his reasoning in the brief order, opens new tab, which is his final judgment in the case. The state can appeal it.
"Pregnant Idahoans whose health is in danger shouldn't be forced to remain pregnant, and we are glad the court recognized that today," Gail Deady of the Center for Reproductive Rights, a lawyer for the plaintiffs, said in a statement. "But this decision leaves behind so many people, including some of the women who brought this case.'
The office of Idaho Attorney General Raul Labrador did not immediately respond to a request for comment.
Idaho's strict abortion ban had also faced a legal challenge under Democratic President Joe Biden from the federal government, which had alleged that the exception for preventing a pregnant woman's death was too narrow and conflicted with a federal law requiring hospitals to stabilize patients facing medical emergencies.
Republican President Donald Trump's administration last month dropped that case, but Idaho's largest hospital system is continuing with its own similar lawsuit and has won a preliminary order blocking enforcement of the ban in medical emergencies.
Idaho passed its near-total abortion ban, which includes an exception for saving the mother's life, in 2020 as a so-called "trigger law".
It was set to take effect when the U.S. Supreme Court reversed Roe v. Wade, its landmark decision that had established abortion rights nationwide, which it did in June 2022.
The case is Adkins et al vs. State of Idaho et al, District Court of the Fourth Judicial District of the State of Idaho, in and for the County of Ada, No. CV01-23-14744.
For plaintiffs: Gail Deady of the Center for Reproductive Rights, Leah Godesky of O'Melveny & Myers and others
For the state: James Craig of the Idaho Attorney General's office