logo
Aston Martin's 24-hour scramble to get lower US tariffs pays off

Aston Martin's 24-hour scramble to get lower US tariffs pays off

The Guardian6 days ago
Aston Martin scrambled to deliver three months' worth of cars to dealers in the US within 24 hours as it rushed to qualify for lower tariffs that came into effect on 30 June.
By invoicing the whole quarter's cars on that same day it also avoided having to report a sales slump that might have alarmed investors.
The operation may not have matched the drama of the James Bond films that have long featured the brand, but it 'was quite exciting, to put it mildly', said Adrian Hallmark, Aston Martin's chief executive.
Donald Trump has shaken the global economy with a trade war, causing particular pain in the car industry with his imposition of a 25% tariff on 3 April on top of an existing 2.5% levy.
Germany's Mercedes-Benz said on Wednesday Trump's border taxes would cost it about €360m (£311m) this year, while the sportscar maker Porsche said it had taken a €400m hit from the levies in the first half of the year.
However, in early May the US president and Keir Starmer agreed a deal to limit tariffs on 100,000 British-made cars per year to 10%. That rate came into force at one minute past midnight on 30 June, the final day of the second financial quarter.
Aston Martin Lagonda manufactures all its cars in factories in Gaydon, Warwickshire, and St Athan, south Wales. It shipped 328 cars to dealers in the Americas between April and June but the majority were only sent on 30 June. It was a 'mammoth task', Hallmark said. 'This left us with 24 hours to invoice the entire quarter's worth of vehicle sales in the US.'
The one-day scramble illustrates the tariff turmoil causing headaches for goods exporters around the world. Aston Martin revealed that it had raised prices for US customers by 3% to absorb some of the hit from the border taxes.
Getting the cars to dealers early would have meant a big financial blow from absorbing the higher tariff rate, while late arrivals that missed the quarter-end would have meant reporting a major slump in sales.
So Aston Martin decided to send hundreds of cars to bonded warehouses in the US – where goods can be stored without being subject to tariffs – before delivery firms raced to get them all to dealers before the end of day on 30 June. Those cars attracted the 10% rate, rather than 27.5%.
Other carmakers face higher costs. The EU reached a deal with the US to cut tariffs on most goods including cars to 15%. Mercedes-Benz boss Ola Källenius said he did not expect any improvement on that for the car industry, despite lobbying for a lower rate from Germany's carmakers.
Sign up to Business Today
Get set for the working day – we'll point you to all the business news and analysis you need every morning
after newsletter promotion
Aston Martin also said that it had cut production and limited exports to the US to try to limit the financial impact.
Even after its 30 June operation, Aston Martin could still be hit later in the year when it launches its million-dollar Valhalla, a mid-engine hypercar that it hopes will be a major contributor to profits.
However, it is worried that the quota of 100,000 cars covered by the 10% tariff could be used up before it can get the Valhalla to dealers – potentially adding over £100,000 to the price if importers must pay the 27.5% rate. British companies exported just over 100,000 cars to the US last year, with the bulk being Range Rovers shipped by JLR.
The quota could mean an end-of-year race between British carmakers to get their vehicles into the country, with 'pressure on the number of slots available on the 100,000 quota', Hallmark said.
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Trump shouts about 'nuclear missiles' to press from White House roof
Trump shouts about 'nuclear missiles' to press from White House roof

Metro

time4 minutes ago

  • Metro

Trump shouts about 'nuclear missiles' to press from White House roof

To view this video please enable JavaScript, and consider upgrading to a web browser that supports HTML5 video President Donald Trump shouted from a rooftop of the White House down at reporters and joked that he was installing 'nuclear missiles' there. Trump emerged on a roof of the West Colonnade flanked by Secret Service agents and went for a stroll as the press gathered below and across a lawn on Tuesday morning. When journalists asked what he was trying to build, Trump seemed to say 'nuclear missiles'. The president wasn't wearing a microphone, so his response was not entirely clear. 'Did you say more missiles?' one reporter asked. Another yelled: 'Are you building missiles?' Another member of the media said with a laugh, 'Did he say missiles?' Trump appeared to confirm that, by making gestures with his hands that mimicked projectiles shooting off of the balcony. The president first said he was 'just taking a little walk'. Then he shouted at Fox News senior White House correspondent Peter Doocy about finding more ways to spend his money for the US. More Trending Trump also made a circular hand gesture and yelled, 'Anything I do is financed by me!' On Thursday, Trump unveiled his plans to build a ballroom in the East Wing of the White House, that he said he will personally fund along with private donors. His nuclear missiles joke came four days after he announced on his Truth Social platform that he ordered two nuclear submarines 'to be positioned in the appropriate regions, just in case these foolish and inflammatory statements' from Russia 'are more than just that'. The tone of that post was much more serious than his joke on Tuesday. It was the first time that he mentioned the US's nuclear arsenal and that he deployed it. Get in touch with our news team by emailing us at webnews@ For more stories like this, check our news page. MORE: Search for missing 'body' in river turns up life-size sex doll MORE: When the world 'likely' ends you can blame these three people, expert says MORE: Donald Trump gives major update on if he'll run for president again

Why Robert Jenrick wants Law Society to withdraw its ‘race and ethnicity' guidance
Why Robert Jenrick wants Law Society to withdraw its ‘race and ethnicity' guidance

The Independent

time4 minutes ago

  • The Independent

Why Robert Jenrick wants Law Society to withdraw its ‘race and ethnicity' guidance

Robert Jenrick has demanded the Law Society withdraw new guidance that he claimed 'seeks to divide people on the basis of race and ethnicity'. The shadow justice secretary has written to the body, which represents solicitors across England and Wales, complaining about new advice aimed at promoting the use of inclusive language by legal professionals. The guidance says that racial categorisation is based in white supremacy, and 'was developed as an attempt to prove biological superiority and maintain dominance over others'. Mr Jenrick said these were 'dangerous ideas' and that society should be 'colour-blind and merit-based'. He claimed the guidance runs contrary to 'the principle of equal treatment' and 'seeks to divide people on the basis of race and ethnicity'. 'It is unacceptable for the Law Society to promote this kind of ideology, particularly as other legal bodies back away from these ideas,' Mr Jenrick said in a letter to Law Society president Richard Atkinson. 'I urge you to withdraw this guidance immediately.' The Law Society has been contacted for comment. It comes after a row over new guidance directing judges to consider the lives of offenders from ethnic minority and other backgrounds before sentencing. Opponents claimed the changes could lead to a 'two-tier justice system' in which people from minority groups are treated more leniently. The guidance, which the Sentencing Council argued would ensure courts had comprehensive information to decide on an appropriate punishment, was later abandoned after ministers tabled legislation to override it. The Law Society's guide is separate, and its stated intention is to help solicitors 'be more inclusive with the language we use'.

Police chief hits back after accusations of ‘cover-up' regarding rape suspects
Police chief hits back after accusations of ‘cover-up' regarding rape suspects

The Independent

time4 minutes ago

  • The Independent

Police chief hits back after accusations of ‘cover-up' regarding rape suspects

Police have denied a 'cover up' after a Reform UK councillor accused the force of withholding information following the alleged rape of a 12-year-old girl. Warwickshire Police's chief constable, Alex Franklin-Smith, has asked the Home Office to confirm the full immigration status of Ahmad Mulakhil and Mohammad Kabir, who have been charged in connection with the offence. It comes after Reform UK's leader Nigel Farage and Warwickshire County Council leader George Finch claimed there had been a 'cover up' after police charged the two men, who are Afghan asylum seekers. In a letter to the Home Secretary and Warwickshire Police's chief constable, Mr Finch, the youngest council leader in the country, claimed that not publicising the pair's immigration status 'risks public disorder breaking out on the streets of Warwickshire'. Responding to Mr Finch, Mr Franklin-Smith wrote that the force 'did not and will not' cover up alleged criminality. 'I am confident that Warwickshire Police has treated this investigation seriously from the outset working tirelessly to identify, locate, arrest and charge those suspected of being responsible for this awful crime as quickly as possible.' Of the suspects, he wrote: 'The immigration status of Ahmad Mulakhil and Mohammad Kabir is now public knowledge, having been placed into the public domain by yourself. 'In light of that, I have asked the Home Office to confirm the full immigration status of Ahmad Mulakhil and Mohammad Kabir as per the information we shared with the Crown Prosecution Service and the courts as part of this case.' Of a conversation he and Mr Finch had on July 31, Mr Franklin-Smith wrote: 'You informed me you had already received a confidential briefing from your chief executive and that you knew the person charged was an asylum seeker. 'I confirmed this was accurate and we wouldn't be releasing immigration status at point of charge as we follow national guidance. 'I explained the information would become public knowledge as part of the court process and that all partners must ensure we are prepared to manage any potential protest and/or disorder at that stage. 'I explained we had a police gold commander leading the overall response to this case and that the communications plan agreed by them followed consultation with the Crown Prosecution Service. 'I also explained we had briefed the Home Office. 'To be clear, I cannot tell elected individuals what to do.' Following the reported attack in Nuneaton, Mulakhil, 23, was arrested on July 26 and charged the next day with rape, according to police. Mulakhil appeared at Coventry Magistrates' Court last Monday and has been remanded in custody. Kabir, 23, was arrested in Nuneaton on Thursday and charged with kidnap, strangulation and aiding and abetting rape of a girl under 13, the force added. Kabir appeared at Coventry Magistrates' Court on Saturday and has been remanded in custody. The issue of how much information is revealed by police regarding suspects has been the subject of fierce debate following a string of high-profile cases including the Southport killings last year. On Tuesday, Home Secretary Yvette Cooper said 'we do think more transparency is needed' in the information given by police and that 'guidance needs to change'. In a statement released on Tuesday evening, a Home Office spokesperson said: 'As the Home Secretary said this morning, it has been widely reported that this case involves two Afghan individuals who are in the asylum system, some of which information has already been confirmed in open court. 'The Home Secretary has made clear that there is a strong public interest in maximum transparency wherever that is possible. 'That is why the Home Office and College of Policing are working together to strengthen and clarify the guidance around how and when information is released.' Warwickshire Police previously said they do not believe anyone else was involved in the reported rape but are continuing to appeal for witnesses who may have information that could assist inquiries.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store