‘Wasn't sure I would return': ‘Pushed into Bangladesh' despite case in Supreme Court, Assam man is back home in time for Eid
Two weeks after he was detained from his home and allegedly pushed into Bangladesh by security forces, 51-year-old Khairul Islam celebrated Eid with his family in Assam's Morigaon district after he was brought back and handed over to his family.
'There are no words for the thoughts that were going through my head during those two days that I was in Bangladesh. I was fearful, I was not sure if I would ever be able to come back to my family,' he told The Indian Express, speaking from his home.
Islam, a former government school primary teacher, had been declared a foreigner by a Foreigners Tribunal in 2016. As reported by The Indian Express, his special leave petition against the FT order was granted by the Supreme Court in December 2024, despite which he was detained by police on May 23 as part of an ongoing crackdown against declared foreigners in Assam.
On May 27, a video uploaded on social media by a Bangladeshi journalist of Khairul Islam was the first indication that declared foreigners were being pushed across the International Border into the country.
In the video, which purportedly shown Islam in Bangladesh's Kurigram district, he could be heard saying that on May 23, he was taken by the police from his home to the Matia transit camp – the dedicated detention centre to house 'illegal foreigners' in Assam – and that he was put into a bus with his hands tied and pushed across the border with 13 others on May 27.
A few days later, Assam Chief Minister Himanta Biswa Sarma confirmed that the government is pushing back declared foreigners, citing a February 4 Supreme Court order. However, Sarma also said that those with appeals pending before the Gauhati High Court or the Supreme Court 'are not being troubled.'
'My wife had seen the video of me stuck in no-man's land. At the same time, the CM also said that people with cases in the High Court and Supreme Court can't be picked up. Because I have my Supreme Court case, she made an appeal to the border branch of the Superintendent of Police's office and they assured her that they will try to bring me back in a few days. So that's how I was brought back to Assam, and I came back to my home on Thursday night,' he said.
He recounted the day that the video of him was taken: 'After the security forces took us to the border and pushed us into Bangladesh, there was nowhere for us to go. The Border Guard Bangladesh (BGB) also pushed us away and sent us back to the zero line or the no-man's land. That was where we were the whole day, under the sun in the paddy field. I was with 13 other people. When the media there wanted us to speak, I had to speak about our plight because the rest were unable to speak with clarity. After spending the whole day there, the BGB took us to their camp and gave us food to eat. I remember it was egg and dal. The next morning, we were taken to another camp and we spent the rest of the day there until, in the evening, seven of us were handed over back to the BSF,' he said.
Islam has been battling his citizenship case for a decade now and had spent two years in detention in Tezpur central jail after the Gauhati High Court had upheld the FT order in 2018.
'I have complete hope that I will be given justice by the Supreme Court when the time comes. For now, I am glad that I am with my family today,' he said.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Indian Express
8 minutes ago
- Indian Express
How a Maharashtra village is using tax waivers to woo children to its Zilla Parishad school
Addressing the issue of the declining number of enrolments in village government schools has been a cause of concern for authorities. A panchayat in Maharashtra's Amravati district has offered a new carrot — Send your child to the local Zilla Parishad (ZP) school, and waive your property tax and water tax for the year. Sayat panchayat has come up with the exciting offer as the strength of its primary school, which once used to be the heart of the village's educational system with 90 children until three years ago, today has shrunk to just 38 students. 'It's quite disheartening to see empty classes,' said Amol Akhade, the Sayat ZP school's headmaster. 'Private English medium schools, often called 'convent schools' locally, have become the new aspiration for parents. Even families with modest incomes are willing to stretch their budgets, believing these schools offer their children a better future, and this is one of the main reasons for reduced enrollments in public schools,' added Akhade. The response was immediate. 'Within days of announcing the tax waiver scheme on June 24, six families enrolled their children. It may seem like a small number, but for a school fighting for survival, every child matters,' said Annapurna Mankar, the Sayat village sarpanch. When admissions for the 2024-25 academic year showed only five children enrolling in the first grade, the village knew something had to be done. 'After seeing the abysmally low admissions this year, the villagers and gram panchayat members together decided to take this decision,' said Mankar. 'So we came up with this simple yet unprecedented initiative to reward families who choose the government school,' she added. Nasir Shah, one of the parents who enrolled their daughter after the decision told The Indian Express, 'Being a mason, a low-paying job, my wife and I both need to be at work for the whole day to make up the month's financial needs and are not able to take care of our daughter's studies. The ZP school provides free and quality education, along with mid-day meals. Now, considering the gram panchayat's new initiative to waive taxes, we decided to drop the private school option.' The tax waiver is just one part of a larger transformation happening at Sayat ZP School. Recognising that parents want English education for their children, the school has become 'semi-English,' Mankar said. 'We are a team of three faculty members, and to retain students, we are giving our best by paying special attention to each child. The school also runs a regular mid-day meal programme and carries out extracurricular activities like meditation, cultural programmes, dance, and others to make learning enjoyable,' said Prashant Bhakre, assistant teacher. The village panchayat is also investing in better infrastructure, with fresh paint, and focusing on regular maintenance to make the school more attractive and be able to compete with private schools. Beyond the statistics lies another aspect of the issue. Akhade pointed out that family problems often affect children's education. 'In most cases, a fight between husband and wife usually affects their children, where either of the partners leaves the village and takes their children away. This contributes to both low enrollment and increasing dropout rates,' the headmaster said. 'So the school staff has learned to be more than just teachers. We're counsellors, mentors, and sometimes the stable presence in children's lives when everything else seems uncertain. From convincing parents for admissions to opening their bank accounts for scholarship-eligible students, we try to make their experience hassle-free,' added Bhakre. Akhade said it will take at least a year before the real impact becomes visible. But already, there are signs of hope. 'Now that parents are opting for ZP schools, we feel energised, and it has given us more energy to teach,' he remarked. 'The village is now running awareness campaigns to spread the word about both the tax benefits and the improvements being made to the school. A detailed list of eligible families has been prepared, and the tax waivers for the previous financial year are being processed,' said Mankar.
Mint
28 minutes ago
- Mint
Trump Runs Up Supreme Court Winning Streak, Amassing More Power
The US Supreme Court's just-completed term had a clear winner: President Donald Trump. With a 6-3 ruling Friday restricting the power of judges to issue nationwide blocks on presidential initiatives, the court put an exclamation mark on a term dominated by Trump victories. The court's conservative supermajority sided with Trump on both broad legal questions and an unprecedented barrage of emergency requests to let his policies take effect right away. The end result was a stack of decisions deferring to Trump. The court let him discharge transgender people from the military, fire top officials at government agencies and open hundreds of thousands of migrants to deportation. The Supreme Court repeatedly reinstated Trump policies found by lower courts to be illegal, and it undercut judges who said the administration had violated their orders. At times, the court gave little if any explanation for its actions, even as liberal justices blasted the majority for rewarding what they said was Trump's lawlessness. 'The court treated him as if he were a normal president, and I think that was probably a mistake,' said Kermit Roosevelt, a professor who teaches constitutional law at the University of Pennsylvania. The court has yet to grapple with 'what to do with the president who does not seem to be motivated by public spiritedness or the good of the country and doesn't necessarily subscribe to American values like due process and liberty and equality.' The ruling Friday gives the administration a new tool to try to stop judges from putting policies on hold. Writing for the majority, Justice Amy Coney Barrett faulted three trial judges for issuing so-called nationwide injunctions halting Trump's plan to restrict automatic birthright citizenship. 'Federal courts do not exercise general oversight of the executive branch,' said Barrett, one of three Trump appointees on the court. Trump, who thanked by name the six Republican-appointed justices in the majority, declared the decision a 'monumental victory.' He said the administration would move to lift holds judges have placed on a number of his policies, mentioning fights over refugee resettlement, federal spending and so-called sanctuary cities. 'The Supreme Court has finally put a stop to this judicial activism, which has abused our constitutional separation of powers for too long,' Alabama's Republican Attorney General Steve Marshall said in an emailed statement. The decision was one of five rulings the court released Friday as it issued the term's last opinions in argued cases. Among other decisions was one that backed Trump's position by declaring that parents have the right to opt their children out of public-school lessons for religious reasons. Earlier in the month, the court agreed with Trump in another culture-war clash, upholding state bans on certain medical treatments for transgender children. The court on Monday and Thursday will likely indicate new cases the justices will hear in their next nine-month term, which will start in October. Trump suffered a rare setback in May when the court blocked the administration from using a rarely used wartime law to send about 176 Venezuelans to a Salvadoran prison before they had a chance to make their case to a judge. 'This ruling was particularly significant because it showed the court's willingness to enforce constitutional constraints even on immigration enforcement — typically an area where the court defers strongly to executive authority,' said Stephanie Barclay, a professor who teaches constitutional law at Georgetown Law School. But the following month, the court appeared to undercut the decision when it let the administration resume quickly deporting migrants to countries other than their own. The court gave no explanation for the decision, which lifted a judge's order that gave people 10 days notice and a chance to argue they would be at risk of torture. The birthright citizenship case didn't directly concern the legality of the restrictions, which would upend a longstanding constitutional right. Trump seeks to jettison what has been the widespread understanding that the Constitution's 14th Amendment confers citizenship on virtually everyone born on US soil. The executive order would restrict that to babies with at least one parent who is a citizen or legal permanent resident. The practical effect of the ruling remains to be seen. The 22 states challenging the citizenship plan can still argue at the lower court level that they need a nationwide halt to avoid the financial costs and administrative headaches that would result if the restrictions applied in neighboring jurisdictions. And Barrett explicitly left open the prospect that people challenging policies can press class action lawsuits. A prominent critic of nationwide injunctions, Notre Dame law professor Samuel Bray, hailed the decision — but also predicted a surge of class action suits and new court orders blocking the citizenship policy. 'I do not expect the president's executive order on birthright citizenship will ever go into effect,' Bray said in a statement. Barrett cast the ruling as a nonpartisan one, noting that the Biden administration also sought to rein in the use of nationwide injunctions. 'It's easy to see why. By the end of the Biden administration, we had reached 'a state of affairs where almost every major presidential act was immediately frozen by a federal district court,' Barrett wrote, quoting from a law review article co-written by Bray and University of Chicago Law School professor William Baude. Critics of the court said that characterization missed a key point. 'It is true, of course, that universal injunctions have bedeviled both prior Democratic and Republican administrations,' Michael Dorf, a professor who teaches constitutional law and federal courts at Cornell Law School, said in an email. 'But the court fails to recognize the fact that eliminating a tool for courts to rein in the executive branch is especially perilous at this particular moment, when we have an administration that is already inclined to take a casual attitude towards judicial orders.' This article was generated from an automated news agency feed without modifications to text.
Time of India
32 minutes ago
- Time of India
Unfair trade practices by Bangla suppliers forced India to restrict import of jute: Officials
Live Events (You can now subscribe to our (You can now subscribe to our Economic Times WhatsApp channel India imposed restrictions on the import of jute and allied fibre products from Bangladesh in view of its "unfair trade" practices including circumvention of anti-dumping duty that harmed Indian farmers, people familiar with the matter said on new restrictions will apply to imports into India of Bangladesh's jute and allied fibre products across all land and seaports, with the exception of the Nhava Sheva seaport in punitive measures were announced on Friday and they came into effect has been a sharp downturn in India-Bangladesh relations after deposed prime minister Sheikh Hasina fled Dhaka and took shelter in India in August last year in the face of a massive anti-government must not be allowed to persist with "unfair trade" practices that harm the livelihood of Indian farmers and mill workers in a sector that forms the economic backbone of rural regions, said an official on condition of market access extended by India in good faith cannot be undermined to the detriment of India's economic interests, said another decision on Bangladeshi jute and fibre products came weeks after it put restrictions on ready-made garments and several other consumer goods through land the provisions of SAFTA (South Asian Free Trade Area), jute from Bangladesh enjoys a duty free access to the Indian jute industry has, for long, suffered due to the adverse impact of dumped and subsidised imports of jute products, particularly yarn, fibre and bags' from the neighbouring country, the people cited above is credible evidence that Bangladeshi jute exports continue to benefit from state subsidies extended by the government of Bangladesh, they response to these concerns, the Directorate General of Anti-Dumping and Allied Duties (DGAD) conducted detailed investigations and imposed anti-dumping duty (ADD) on jute and goods originating from Bangladesh, the people the imposition of ADD has not yielded a substantial reduction in imports, they from various subsidies, common malpractices by Bangladeshi exporters include circumvention of anti-dumping duty through technical exemptions, mislabelling, exports through ADD exempted firms and "misdeclaration" to secure higher subsidies, the people restrictions are aimed to counter unfair trade practices , promote ' Atmanirbhar Bharat ' (self-reliance), and protect rural livelihoods tied to India's domestic jute economy, the people cited above said."To safeguard the interests of the domestic jute industry and to counter the unfair trade practices employed by the Bangladesh exporters acting in collusion with Bangladeshi establishment, it has been decided to restrict Bangladesh imports of jute and jute products to India through only from Nhava Sheva port," said one of the people."The imposition is expected to streamline the quality checking, prevent misdeclaration and fraudulent labelling, thereby neutralising the malpractices that have plagued the industry for long," the person said."The government is also taking steps to ensure that exporters in Bangladesh do not circumvent the aforesaid restrictions by routing their jute exports through third countries," he added.
