I am a Palestinian. Keir Starmer's recognition plan is an insult
But Glasgow-based Wael Shawish, who is originally from Jerusalem and has family in Gaza, has said the conditional plan set out by Starmer is an 'insult' to Palestinians and is meaningless unless it is accompanied by tangible sanctions, such as an end to arms sales to Israel.
'It doesn't seem to be a genuine statement. They need to satisfy Palestinians – not just Starmer but other world leaders in the West – on why they are doing it now,' Shawish, who is part of the Scottish Palestinian Society, told the Sunday National.
READ MORE: The National hosts Q&A with Peter Oborne on UK Gaza complicity
'I think there are a number of reasons [it is being done now] – one is that there is so much unhappiness in the West among the populations of these countries that makes the government divorced from the opinion of their people.
'So they want to do something to say 'okay, we are with you, you are angry, we are angry, we are taking steps and the step is to recognise the state of Palestine' not because the Palestinians deserve a state, but because Israel is misbehaving and we are punishing it by recognising Palestine.
'That is not the right way to go about it. We shouldn't be used as a stick to hit Israel with. We should get recognition because we deserve it. To use it as a bargaining chip to hit Israel with is an insult to us.
"The only way this announcement could be meaningful is if it is coupled with sanctions or stopping exporting arms to Israel."
On Starmer, Shawish (below) added: 'With all due respect to the guy, who was supposed to be a high-flying international lawyer, his knowledge of international law to start with seems to be doubtful."
(Image: NQ) Daily images of starving children coming out of Gaza has led to a change in tone from several world leaders in recent weeks, with the UK's hand seemingly being forced by France which also plans to recognise the state of Palestine next month.
Canada has since indicated that it will recognise a Palestinian state, but there are again conditions, such as the Palestinian Authority committing to elections and other democratic reforms with no involvement from Hamas.
Shawish claimed Starmer and other world leaders may be starting to worry about their complicity in war crimes being carried out in Gaza and so have felt compelled to make an 'empty gesture'.
'Some of them [Western world leaders], having seen the images of the starving children, now can recognise that they cannot argue about the death toll as being part of the battle, as collateral damage,' he said.
'It is now clear that there is a starvation plan in place to starve the Palestinian people and when these leaders actually provide weapons to Israel, to kill whoever they can kill, with British weapons […] these leaders are now worried that if somebody goes to the international courts, they could actually stand before the courts for being complicit, if not partners, in that genocide that is taking place.'
A group of legal figures in the House of Lords claimed last week that the UK recognising Palestine would not be compatible with international law, citing a Pan-American treaty from 1933 – to which the UK was not a signatory.
There are several signatories of the Montevideo Convention who recognised Palestine as a state.
An expert explained to The National that it was a 'cynical ploy' by peers and a 'ludicrous' interpretation of the treaty.
The SNP have said they will press ahead with a vote on recognising [[Palestine]], saying that it must be based on 'principle, not preconditions'.
But, like Starmer, the party has still been speaking of a 'two-state solution that we all wish to see'.
Dr Richard McNeil-Willson, a Middle East expert at Edinburgh University, said he did not believe a two-state solution was viable, adding that if state recognition is to happen, there needs to be 'serious discussions' on what that state looks like.
In a piece for The Conversation, law lecturer Malak Benslama-Dabdoub – based at Royal Holloway University of London – also outlined how analysts have warned that recognition of this kind risks formalising a state in name only and Palestine would end up a 'fragmented, non-sovereign entity without control over its borders, resources or defence'.
Shawish – who recently said his family member came back from an aid point with a gunshot wound – is in agreement and said he does not believe in the viability of a Palestinian state.
He said: 'Even if recognition says the West Bank and Gaza Strip and East Jerusalem, subject to the borders of 1967, is that feasible? You've got one million Israeli settlers in the West Bank. Can you get them out?
'If you can't, is there any point in having a state that is a Swiss cheese shape where there are pockets of Israel's settlements in the middle of the state all over the place?
'How viable is that state going to be? How independent or sovereign? I don't believe in the feasibility of a Palestinian state.
'I don't see the two states that Starmer is talking about as a viable option. It is too late. Maybe 25 years ago it was possible, not today.'
A UK Government spokesperson said: "We have announced our intention to recognise [[Palestine]] in September to protect the viability of the two-state solution. The first step in that process must be a ceasefire and there is no question about that.
'Our demands on Hamas have not changed. For there to be any chance of peace, the hostages must be released. Hamas must lay down its weapons and commit to having no future role in the governance of Gaza.
'We must also see significant progress on the ground including the supply of humanitarian support and for Israel to rule out annexations in the West Bank, and a commitment to a long-term sustainable peace. We will make an assessment ahead of UNGA [The UN General Assembly] on how far both Israel and Hamas have met the steps we set out. No one side will have a veto on recognition through their actions or inactions."
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Telegraph
an hour ago
- Telegraph
Can Netanyahu fully occupy Gaza without destroying Israel?
Freed hostages have recounted the terror of languishing in a Hamas tunnel while the blasts from Israeli air strikes move ever closer. Now, under a plan being considered by Benjamin Netanyahu, those same tunnels may well shudder from the sound of IDF tanks and automatic gunfire directly overhead. In what appears to be a major gamble, Israel's government seems poised to announce the 'full occupation' of Gaza in what it says is a final attempt to rescue the hostages and wipe out Hamas. The plan would mean smashing arguably the only consistent taboo in the IDF's nearly 23-month-long campaign: namely, conducting major ground operations in areas where hostages are believed to be held. The main areas affected are Gaza City in the north of the Strip and Deir al-Balah in the centre. Largely because Israeli intelligence thinks the hostages are being held there, these are the last major conurbations in Gaza not to have been substantially flattened, and they are currently home to around 1.4 million Palestinians. The strategy is not without significant risk. Critics believe the remaining hostages would probably die in the operation. Meanwhile, Mr Netanyahu's generals are said to be deeply opposed. The Israeli prime minister hinted at his plan in an oblique video address on Monday, in which he said: 'We are committed to free Gaza from the tyranny of these terrorists.' It coincided with a series of unattributed leaks from his office suggesting that 'occupation' of Gaza was now the preferred option, following the collapse of formal negotiations with Hamas last month. This appears at variance with a plan of 'encirclement' reportedly being worked up by military chiefs, under which the IDF would establish semi-permanent zones around population centres from which to launch raids against Hamas. On Tuesday, Sharren Haskel, Israel's deputy foreign minister, confirmed to The Telegraph that the occupation plan was 'something that is still being discussed'. Families of the hostages are, by and large, appalled. 'That means one thing,' said Viki Cohen, mother of captured soldier Nimrod. 'It means they will only bring our brothers back in coffins. Maybe there will be a miracle and our heroic soldiers will be able to save one or two people.' The thinking at the top levels of government, however, is that the plight of the hostages – 20 are believed to be alive – is now so dire that Israel cannot afford to wait for a ceasefire deal that is acceptable to both sides. It means, they say, that applying overwhelming military pressure is the best chance. This follows the release of harrowing videos in recent days of Evyatar David and Rom Braslavsky in an emaciated state, with Mr David being forced to dig what he said was his own grave. 'Unfortunately, with the images of Rom and Evyatar that were published this weekend, it is proof that the longer this goes, the more in danger they are,' Ms Haskel said on Tuesday. 'Hamas right now is killing them slowly, starving them, torturing them, mentally, physically. 'They cannot survive much longer in the hands of that death cult. So the only way to bring them back is through military operations.' Sources close to Mr Netanyahu insist that he has Donald Trump's backing for the new plan. However, reports suggest it is being opposed by the military. The Israel Defense Forces' chief of staff, Lt Gen Eyal Zamir, is widely thought to believe that the IDF has gone as far as it can in safely pressuring Hamas to return the hostages. This week's political leaks have not been kind to him. Several Israeli outlets reported a senior official as saying: 'If that [the plan] doesn't work for the chief of staff, he should resign.' Many in Israel's commentariat are now expecting – and those in the community of former military and security chiefs actively hoping – that he will do just that. Mr Netanyahu's son, Yair, no stranger to controversy, also appeared to join in the attack, claiming on social media that Lt Gen Zamir's appointment had not been his father's idea. Retired military chiefs' plea to Trump The general's decision to cancel a trip to CentCom in the US has been taken by some as a sign of crisis at the top of the command structure. It comes at an exceptionally fragile time for relations between Israel's political and security establishments, following an open letter by no fewer than 550 retired senior military and spy chiefs to Donald Trump, begging the US president to pressure Mr Netanyahu to end the 'unjust ' war in Gaza. The image of IDF commanders as politically neutral professional servants is central to Israel's conception of itself as the only democracy in the Middle East. This may have been on the mind of Yair Lapid, the opposition leader, when he urged Mr Netanyahu and his chief of staff this week to keep their disagreements 'behind closed doors'. Even if they do, some fear that by asking an exhausted and depleted army to expand its operations yet further, Mr Netanyahu and his allies put that ideal at risk. Fighting into areas where hostages are held in order to release them safely also risks stretching the credulity of centre-ground opinion in a country already gripped by protests. Poll after poll indicate that while the majority of people are emotionally in favour of pummelling Hamas, their priority is returning the hostages immediately, if necessary by striking a deal to end the war. For the civilians of Gaza – serially displaced, intensely bombed and plagued by hunger – it could pile on further disaster. A feature of the campaign of the last three months – Operation Gideon's Chariot, which was also supposed to pressure Hamas into releasing the hostages – has been to demolish large areas of residential neighbourhoods using air power, army ordnance engineers or civilian contractors. In practical terms, it means the southern city of Rafah no longer exists, along with tracts of Khan Younis. Hundreds of thousands of civilians are now in makeshift refugee camps and tented cities in the coastal enclave of Al Mawasi and numerous other locations. If the same approach was taken to Gaza City, another million people – roughly half the Strip's population – risk becoming internally displaced. There has been talk for a month now of Israel constructing a 'humanitarian city' on the rubble of Rafah, into which all civilians would be ordered while the army attempts to finish off Hamas. However, this too has reportedly prompted opposition from Lt Gen Zamir. Ms Haskel said on Tuesday that the scheme – bitterly criticised by much of the international community – remained government policy. However, she said that ministers had 'requested the plans' from the military, suggesting that a workable blueprint has yet to be signed off. Some in Israel's media fear that without a robust refugee plan in place, assaulting Gaza City and Deir al-Balah, where another 400,000 people reside, could escalate the humanitarian crisis past the point where the country's international reputation can recover. Ironically, talk of occupation came just as Israel agreed to let private goods into the Strip, in parallel to UN and NGO supplies, for the first time in months in an effort to ease the suffering. Despite the concerns, there are prominent voices in Israel who argue that expanding the fighting could successfully return the hostages. Lt Col Yaron Buskila, a former special forces officer and director general of the hawkish Habithonistim Movement, said this week that fighting towards terrorists known to be holding hostages could work. 'You can carry out a raid on a structure and create the element of surprise or, alternatively, you can reach the site, apply pressure and, in the course of that pressure, hold negotiations,' he said. 'After all, negotiations themselves are a weapon since they create communication that forces the captors to choose between different alternatives.' Critics say continuing war is Netanyahu's only plan For Mr Netanyahu's critics, the touted full occupation has fuelled speculation that his only plan is to continue the war, because his ultra-nationalist coalition partners will collapse his government if he does not. For those on the Left, both inside Israel and abroad, new large-scale assaults on populated areas will be taken as further evidence of ethnic cleansing of Gazans, a charge Israel utterly rejects and says is based on anti-Semitism and Hamas propaganda. Nevertheless, opponents will point to Mr Trump's February vision of a Middle East Riviera for Gaza, a rich man's paradise from which Gazans have been removed. Israel currently says it would facilitate the voluntary departure of Palestinian civilians from the Strip. However, it has so far not succeeded in finding a third country willing to accept refugees. Any final decision on the full occupation of Gaza would need to be formally signed off by Israel's security cabinet, which is expected to meet in the coming days, once Gideon Sa'ar, the foreign minister, returns from New York, where he is taking part in a special session of the UN on the plight of the hostages. In the meantime, all eyes will be on Lt Gen Zamir for any hint of public dissent. Some interpreted an order he gave to cancel the emergency extension of reserve call-up duration, meaning the army will be reduced in numbers later this year, as just such a hint. However, he is reported to be phlegmatic in private, repeatedly inviting critical ministers to replace him, if they can think of someone better to do the job. In public, he continues to toe the line, telling soldiers on a recent visit to Gaza that they will fight on for as long as necessary in the absence of a ceasefire deal. On Tuesday, on a visit to Gaza, Israel Katz, the defence minister, appeared to fire a shot across Lt Gen Zamir's bow when he said the IDF will 'professionally implement ministers' decisions'. If history is anything to go by, that is exactly what it will do. US president could be key More level-headed Israeli commentators argue that Lt Gen Zamir knew what he was getting into when he accepted Mr Netanyahu's offer of promotion to chief of staff, and that those hoping for a dramatic resignation will wait in vain. Which leaves Mr Trump. While he has repeatedly voiced concern about the humanitarian crisis and is known to want a ceasefire, he has conspicuously taken Israel's side in blaming Hamas for the recent collapse in talks, as well as echoing Israeli rhetoric about using 'alternative' methods to return the hostages. His thinking on the way ahead may be influenced by the visit to Gaza last week of Steve Witkoff, his Middle East Envoy, whose counsel he appears to value. After all, the last time Mr Witkoff set foot in the benighted enclave was just before Mr Trump's 'Riviera' speech in February.
The National
an hour ago
- The National
John Swinney dismisses SNP members' rival independence plan
The First Minister was speaking at an Unspun event held by The Herald at the Edinburgh Fringe when he was asked about the rival, grassroots proposals to his own independence strategy. Writing in The National in July, Swinney had laid out his three-point plan to secure a Yes vote: building support for independence among the voting public, upping the pressure on Westminster to allow Scotland to assert its right to choose in a referendum, and urging the public to vote [[SNP]] to do so. However, 43 SNP branches responded by backing a rival proposal, which called for the list votes at the 2026 Holyrood election to be treated as a de facto independence referendum, with ballots for pro-independence parties and Unionist parties representing Yes and No votes respectively. Speaking to columnist Brian Taylor on stage at Summerhall, Swinney was asked if he had 'any truck' with the rival proposal. 'No, I don't,' he said. 'Because I don't think that is an argument that would have any legal force at the end of it, because it's not an agreed process. 'It might be what we would like to do – I would love Scotland to be independent today, but it's not going to deliver that process of Scotland becoming an independent country.' READ MORE: John Curtice gives verdict on John Swinney's indyref2 plan Asked if the [[SNP]] branches should then drop their proposals, the First Minister said: 'Well, I don't think it's an idea worth pursuing because I think it's going to lead to the type of situation that has emerged in Catalonia. 'Without an agreed process, Catalonia tried to secure its independence and it did not succeed.' He added: 'Totally I understand the frustration of people inside my own party – and outside my party and across the community. I totally understand that frustration and I feel it – but I don't think I am serving people well if I put in front of them a proposition that I know in my heart is not going to work.' Brian Taylor speaking to John Swinney at the Edinburgh Fringe (Image: Gordon Terris) The SNP leader said he was 'only interested' in a process which could see Scotland become genuinely independent on the international stage. He said a legally agreed referendum, like the one held in 2014, would be 'crucial to get domestic and international legitimacy for the independent Scotland'. Swinney said that ahead of the 2026 elections, the SNP would be urging voters to 'look at the precedent' in place. 'We did have a majority of MSPs committed after 2021 to the principle of a referendum on independence, but we were not able to secure that referendum,' he said. 'So I'm simply saying to people, look at the precedent for all of this. When we got a majority in 2011, it led to the legislation which gave us a referendum.' READ MORE: SNP members set for second meeting to challenge Scottish independence plan Since the 2014 vote, Unionist politicians have often looked to dismiss calls for a second referendum by pointing to the rhetoric that the initial ballot was a 'once in a generation' opportunity. Addressing that, the First Minister told the audience in Edinburgh: 'We are a sovereign country. 'Go back to the roots of Scotland and representative democracy. The identity and the foundations of our ethos as a country is based on the sovereignty of the people … it's deeply founded in how Scotland has influenced the world.' He added: 'By 2030, a million people will be in Scotland who were not eligible to vote in 2014. So let's start talking about what a generation is.' The SNP leader further said there would be 'no mucking about' and that voters would be in no doubt that a vote for his party in 2026 would be a vote for Scotland to be an independent country.
Metro
an hour ago
- Metro
Corbyn vs Starmer, modern manners, and a crumbling NHS
Do you agree with our readers? Have your say on these MetroTalk topics and more in the comments. Robert Hughes (MetroTalk, Mon) says that 'Labour has little to fear by losing the niche hard left and should let Corbyn and his disciples get on with it'. It is worth remembering that in 2017, the Labour Party under Corbyn received 3 million more votes than it did in 2024 under Starmer. Even in 2019, a catastrophic election insofar as the number of parliamentary seats was concerned, it received half a million more actual votes than in 2024. This represents quite a large niche. Political parties striving to attract more supporters should understand that it is even more important to keep those they already have. I am not sure that Starmer and his colleagues have really grasped this point. Rory O'Kelly, Beckenham So Robert Johnson takes issue with Chris Sheperd (MetroTalk, Tue) over the government's record. Under Labour: Unemployment is up; small businesses are closing at their biggest rate in more than ten years; government borrowing is going through the roof; crime in general is up; inflation is up. Also, waiting lists are not down –appointments have been met due to lack of strikes, so that's a sleight of hand with the figures. Labour gave in to the doctors once on pay and look what has happened – more strikes. As for Labour councils going bankrupt all over the country, is that the Conservatives' fault? I would argue there's more illegal immigration than ever before, too. So yes, let's judge the country in five years. I can wait. Gary, Essex I know this has been mentioned by other readers before but why are people so self-centred and lacking in simple manners or consideration for others? Behaviour that we thought was just kids being obnoxious is now being exhibited by grown men and women, adults who should know better. My rant is about the very disgusting trend of listening or playing videos etc without a headset on public transport. It's annoying that one is constantly put in a position of having to say something, and risk abuse or worse. With the demise of any kind of onboard supervision empowered to tackle this anti-social behaviour, ordinary citizens are taking the risk of challenging it themselves. It angers me that I am forced to say something and it's just awful by those who do it, daring anyone to comment or say anything. Shame on you all. I know your mothers taught you better than that! Agatha, Surrey One thing I would like to bring back from yonder years is queuing at bus stops. However, this would only work if the buses stopped right at the bus stop. If it stops 20 yards after or 20 yards before, as seems the case often nowadays, it wouldn't work. Richard Farrar, London Whilst I don't wish to make light of this lady's horrible experience of having 'rodent droppings found in her drawers' (Metro, Mon), I do think you would have been wise to substitute 'drawers' for 'bedside cabinet' to avoid any ambiguity. William Buckley, Reading The front page headline of Monday's Metro ('Rat horror for hospital gran') will come as little surprise to people who've worked in our hospitals for any length of time. A theatre nurse friend of mine told me stories of a large hospital in London which had all manner of pests – rats, mice, cockroaches – cropping up throughout the building, including in operating theatres and kitchens. This was 20 years ago, mind, but I'm sure there are still many hospitals around the country with similar infestations. Nowadays, my friend works in a smaller hospital, which was built from RAAC concrete, so they have to watch out for bits of the roof falling on them during surgery. I'm not even joking. I'm afraid this is what happens when we don't fund our health service properly. These are the things I think of whenever anyone claims that taxes are too high. And you can't pin this on immigration either, because our hospitals rely on immigrants – they are a large and established part of the workforce. Sharon, Manchester Why are hundreds of Gaza children being brought into destitute Britain for treatment – this will only lead to the underfunded NHS's waiting lists becoming even longer. The children should be sent to oil-rich countries such as Saudi Appley, Kent The cost of items in my local charity shops has rocketed. I was shocked to see a T-shirt priced at £5.99, while it is currently on sale in Primark for £6. Mrs AH East, Leeds Mark Hardinge (MetroTalk, Mon) is mistaken when talking about the 'futile net zero programme'. Net zero is the only way we will have good quality jobs and sustainable industries for future generations. It is the most patriotic action we can take. Nigel Farage is backed by oil and gas companies – surely the only reason he champions backward-looking and catastrophic policies. Christina, Sheffield Thank you Michael D Baker (MetroTalk, July 29) for your anecdote about Ozzy Osbourne meeting Leicester band Spring at Rockfield studios in Monmouth. More Trending Spring were a little-known band, who made an almost forgotten, long-lost great British album in my view – although drummer Pick Withers did subsequently find some fame with Dire Straits. Coincidentally, another band, Indian Summer from Coventry, shared both management and a residency at Henry's Blueshouse in Birmingham with Black Sabbath and also made a great, long-lost British album on the same label, Neon. Collectors have always recognised the quality in these albums and both originals are now fetching large sums of money. But for me the enormity of Sabbath and the anonymity of Spring and Indian Summer is impossible to comprehend. It never ceases to amaze me. Lots of things fascinate me about music, this surely one I am destined personally never to understand. Lionel Hutt, Keynsham MORE: The Metro daily cartoon by Guy Venables MORE: I'm a fashion expert – here's what I'm buying in Aligne's unmissable sale MORE: Titan sub pilot Stockton Rush could have faced criminal charges if he survived, report finds
