
Everyone's Using AI In Security—Now What?
The question is no longer whether AI is part of the deal when selecting a security provider. The answer is going to be a resounding "yes." However, determining whether the AI in the equation is enabling that service—and, as a result, your organization—or is simply tacked on for marketing purposes is more nuanced.
The uncomfortable truth is that security budgets are plateauing (if not shrinking), while security incidents (and the average cost of a data breach) are increasing. As a result, business leaders must ask themselves:
• If attacks are growing in frequency and sophistication every day, are we making the right investments to stay ahead of those threats?
• Is it an efficient use of capital?
• Are we getting the results/outcomes we should?
• Are we continuously improving?
For some, AI-enabled security services might be the key to meeting those needs. If that's the case for your organization, it's time to pivot to the next critical step: selecting vendors that move beyond adoption to show how AI adds real, demonstrable value to your security stack.
Moving Past The Feature List To Achieving Business Objectives
To make that shift from what it does to what they can accomplish with it, leaders have to recognize that AI isn't a magic bullet; it's an enabler for achieving specific business objectives. However, when rapidly emerging tech crashes onto the scene, it can be difficult to differentiate between a marketing play and a real value add. Doing so requires security leaders to ask the right questions—of themselves and their would-be providers. Questions like:
• What are the objectives of our cyber program? Taking an outcome-first approach can help determine what specific, measurable results you're after—whether that's reducing mean time to remediate, improving threat detection speed or other important SOC metrics.
• Can this tool seamlessly integrate with our security stack? Compatible integrations and interoperability not only speed up onboarding but also help avoid tool sprawl.
• Does the tool provide actionable insights that align with the business risks we care about? Focus on vendors that understand your specific environment and deliver recommendations for tools that help you continuously improve, not just a steady stream of alerts.
• Can it grow with our business and adapt to evolving threats? The best offerings will use AI to accelerate efficiency, allowing your organization to grow and scale without sacrificing protection.
• Is there a human in the loop? Understand where the checks and balances exist in the system and ensure AI-driven decisions are easily auditable. This builds trust internally and externally, and it helps avoid fallout from hallucinations (AI-generated incorrect or nonsensical information).
• What's the implication for team headcount? If your CFO approves a new solution, don't expect a simultaneous increase to your hiring budget. Knowing whether the solution keeps your headcount neutral or—better yet—helps net some efficiency only strengthens your argument.
Of course, feeling confident in these answers and knowing you're ready to onboard an AI-enabled vendor is only part of the puzzle. You also have to prove that value with a compelling ROI.
Proving The "Now What" To The Business And Board
If you've based your argument for a new tool on efficiency gains, consider how the security team having "more time" will be beneficial to the CFO, CEO and/or board. While it can be difficult to prove a negative (i.e., cost saved on breaches that didn't happen), it's usually a matter of translating security efficiency into business value.
In other words, AI-enabled investments reduce the likelihood of cyber incidents—and when they do occur, they reduce their impact. This directly translates to:
• Minimal Business Disruption: Faster detection and remediation lead to less downtime and fewer breaches, creating a more resilient organization.
• Less Reputational Risk: Avoiding negative PR, loss of brand trust or anything that reduces competitiveness in a market.
• Fewer Unplanned Direct And Indirect Costs: Mitigating incident response, technology rebuilds, recovery and time lost when the business has to shift attention and resources to a security incident.
• Meeting Regulatory And Legal Requirements: Avoiding GDPR fines, FTC and SEC consent decrees and expensive, distracting lawsuits.
It also frees up resources for better optimization. AI-enabled services should give time back to the human analyst in the loop, taking over the repetitive, manual tasks and allowing them to focus on strategic initiatives like threat hunting, proactive defense and security architecture improvements.
When it comes time to communicate this ROI to stakeholders, focus on business outcomes. Use clear units (dollars and percentages, preferably), show trends and employ comparables against industry frameworks (e.g., NIST CSF) to establish context. Over time, this also measures for continuous improvement and efficiency, making it that much easier to "prove the negative" (prevented breaches) to the skeptics in the room.
These elements together elevate the security function and allow for the business to innovate faster—making security an enabler, not a roadblock.
From Adoption To Strategic Advantage
The "now what" of AI-enabled security is about moving past the flashy new tech and thinking critically about the strategic outcomes it drives for the business. Security leaders tasked with proving the ROI on these services are best served when they can solve for business-critical risks and communicate how efficiency in the security program helps drive these goals.
Communicating that ROI is also about understanding who is at the table and speaking their language, whether they come from a tech background or the business and/or finance side of the house. Frame things in terms of enterprise risk and positive business outcomes that the organization really cares about, keeping in mind that finance is the common language of leadership and boards. Regardless, establish metrics that help security teams find creative and useful ways to demonstrate effectiveness and build a cycle of continuous improvement.
AI alone is not a differentiator; rather, it's how it enables teams to help achieve your business goals. The next time you see a provider touting AI, ask hard questions—of potential vendors and your own program—and know the difference between better security outcomes or just marketing fluff.
Forbes Technology Council is an invitation-only community for world-class CIOs, CTOs and technology executives. Do I qualify?

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Motor Trend
24 minutes ago
- Motor Trend
GM's Tennessee Plant to Start Churning Out Cheaper EV Batteries Soon
For current electric vehicle buyers, the news of the federal EV tax credits disappearing before the end of the year is probably spurring a second look at their budgets. Can they still swing that entry-level EV without a $7,500 tax break? For those looking at GM products, at least, there might be some good news on the horizon. Thanks to an investment into its Spring Hill, Tennessee battery plant, GM's Ultium battery packs might get a cheaper cell design soon—and since the battery is one of the most expensive components in an EV, any cost reduction there directly translates to savings on the car's MSRP. Same goes for the location of that battery plant. Cells built in the U.S. can mitigate today's tariff costs. GM's Tennessee plant will produce cheaper LFP battery cells by 2027, reducing EV costs as federal tax credits phase out. LFP cells are less costly due to abundant materials but have lower energy density. The move aims to offset tariffs and make entry-level EVs more affordable. This summary was generated by AI using content from this MotorTrend article Read Next Utilizing its joint venture with LG Energy Solution and its $2.3 billion investment, GM will expand the Ultium Spring Hill, Tennessee battery production plant in order to produce new lithium iron phosphate (LFP) battery cells. Commercial production volumes are expected to start in late 2027. Currently—no pun intended—Ultium cells built at the Warren, Ohio, and Spring Hill, Tennessee, plants utilize nickel manganese cobalt (NMC) aluminum chemistry. While powerful and well developed, NMC batteries come with inherent problems stemming from sourcing cobalt and the cost of nickel raw materials. Both issues create a battery cell that is quite expensive, even as overall production scale continues to drive costs down. Those who know battery chemistries know that there is a better alternative already in reality (unlike some solid-state battery chemistries that border on fantasy): LFP. While not a solid-state battery, LFP has many advantages, namely its lower material costs. Both iron and phosphate raw materials can dip into cents per pound while something like nickel is dollars per pound and cobalt can reach the tens of dollars per pound. The drawback of LFP is mainly its energy density and its performance. LFP batteries don't hold quite as much energy as an NMC battery and can be slower to both charge and discharge on demand. Density is easy to improve by just making a bigger battery cell, but that does mean it will weigh more. Despite those issues, the carrot of lower materials cost is just too good to pass up, especially for lower-priced EVs that tend to skip out on ultra-fast charging and mega range anyhow. But just how much cheaper could a GM vehicle using LFP batteries be? We asked GM for those details but it wasn't able to respond to our questions in time for publication. Once it gives us those details, we'll update this story with some ideas.
Yahoo
25 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Google Brain founder has an unexpected one-word message on AI
Google Brain founder has an unexpected one-word message on AI originally appeared on TheStreet. Big Tech just can't stop chasing it. The dream of controlling an all-knowing, human-like AI, artificial general intelligence (AGI), has become Silicon Valley's obsession. 💵💰💰💵 From cloud giants to chipmakers, they're shelling out billions in building the elusive AGI, opening up never-before-seen avenues. But just as the race heats up, one seasoned AI veteran dropped a single word that has quickly turned the narrative on its head. AGI has arguably been the holy grail of Big Tech. Unlike the current narrow AI systems, AGI looks to replicate human-level thinking, problem-solving, and adaptability. It's arguably the tech industry's most expensive gamble in its rich history, and the biggest names in Big Tech have gone all-in. At Google I/O, co-founder Sergey Brin argued that the company's powerful Gemini model is built to be the first true CEO Demis Hassabis argued that AGI needs to be capable of advanced reasoning while building mental models of the world. Meta Platforms, in particular, isn't holding back. In June, it launched its Superintelligence Lab, effectively reshaping its internal AI strategy around AGI milestones. Meanwhile, Microsoft has dished out billions to OpenAI, with clauses governing AGI rights baked into their contract. More Tech Stock News: TikTok's next move has Google and Meta sweating bullets Cathie Wood shells out $13.9 million for one high-stakes biotech stock Apple's quiet shake-up could redefine its future Amazon's no different, betting huge on AGI startup Anthropic, while Nvidia, whose GPUs drive over 80% of generative AI compute loads, recently jumped to a $4 trillion market cap. Analysts forecast that the AGI market could surge from just under $4 billion last year to more than $100 billion by the mid-2030s. Though those numbers are far from guaranteed, rest assured, the money will keep pouring from Big Tech. AGI isn't taking over the world anytime soon, at least not if you ask Andrew Ng. The AI pioneer and founder of Google Brain dismissed the buzz around the phenomenon, bluntly referring to it with one word — 'overhyped' — during a talk at Y Combinator. 'For a long time, there'll be a lot of things that humans can do that AI cannot.' AGI obviously refers to a future version of AI that could beat humans in thinking and reasoning across a wide range of tasks. However, Ng says we're nowhere close at this point, and he's not chief AI scientist, Yann LeCun, said last year that AGI fears are misplaced. He explained that even though large language models might seem impressive, they're not the road to AGI. Ng agrees and feels the real punch from AI lies in the ability to use it, not in building the most human-like system. 'People that know how to use AI to get computers to do what you want it to do will be much more powerful,' he said. That doesn't let developers off the hook, though. Some folks will be there to create the tools, but plenty more will simply learn how to use them well, which represents the real edge. The bigger message is obviously a more hopeful one that suggests humans aren't becoming obsolete anytime soon. There's still plenty of work to do, and AI is just a different way to accomplish it. However, as the tech world pursues the AI objective like crazy, Ng's take offers a reality check. Though a ton of companies are marching toward AGI, he's reminding everyone that smart, strategic usage still matters more than sci-fi dreams. That stance puts Big Tech in a remarkably tricky spot. Companies such as Google, Microsoft, and Meta have sunk billions into the AGI dream. However, if AGI is overblown, as Ng and others suggest, it raises serious questions about whether tech giants are overpromising — and setting themselves up to Brain founder has an unexpected one-word message on AI first appeared on TheStreet on Jul 14, 2025 This story was originally reported by TheStreet on Jul 14, 2025, where it first appeared.


Motor 1
25 minutes ago
- Motor 1
Porsche Hikes Prices Again Due to 'Market Conditions'
A Porsche being expensive is not news. These cars always have been, and always will be. But, recently, the automaker implemented price increases across its entire lineup, citing "market conditions." Initially brought to our attention by Road & Track , Porsche has since confirmed these price increases. "With our customers front of mind, we keep a regular watch on market conditions, absorbing costs where we can and making adjustments only when it's absolutely necessary to do so," a spokesperson said in a statement. "Where possible, we have taken steps to support our customers, but market conditions necessitate incremental adjustments to MSRP. The price adjustment encompasses all models and varies from model to model, from between 2.3 and 3.6 percent." Here are the previous and current prices for each Porsche base model. Model New Price Previous Price Increase 2025 718 Cayman $77,395 $74,795 3.5% 2026 911 Carrera $134,650 $129,950 3.6% 2026 Cayenne $91,950 $88,795 3.6% 2026 Macan $66,950 $65,350 2.4% 2026 Panamera $112,450 $108,550 3.6% 2026 Taycan $106,250 $102,550 3.6% Porsche also tells us, "market conditions necessitate incremental adjustments to individual option pricing and delivery fees from time to time." So, depending on what options your car has, the new price may be more than 3.6 percent higher than it was a few months ago. Porsche didn't blame tariffs specifically here, but it's one of a handful of volume automakers that doesn't make cars in the US. The company builds all its cars in Germany, except for the Cayenne, which is made in Slovakia, and in very small numbers in Malaysia for that market only. The Trump administration put a 25-percent tariff on imported automobiles and automobile parts in place back in April, on top of a preexisiting 2.5% import duty. Trump on Saturday threatened a 30-percent tariff on all goods from the EU . This, of course, would apply to all Porsche cars. Earlier this year, we reported that Porsche is considering starting US production . Obviously, its customers have long been used to paying premium prices for their cars, and while a 3.6 percent increase might not be a huge deal for 911, Taycan, and Panamera buyers, it could be an impediment to customers of less expensive, larger-volume models like the Cayenne and Macan. Porsche is in a precarious situation right now. Its sales are down globally—especially in China, where buyers are rejecting non-domestic automakers—and customer response to EVs like the Taycan and Macan Electric is less enthusiastic than the automaker hoped. US sales have remained strong, but buyers here aren't adopting EVs as quickly as everyone (including Porsche) thought they would, and tariffs are complicating everything. It just illustrates the rewriting of the automotive order. Up until recently, Porsche was the envy of the auto industry, wildly profitable and beloved by so many. That's still true today, but the picture is not as rosy in Stuttgart as it once was. More on Porsche Porsche: New Cayenne 'Will Shape the Future of Electric Driving' The Electric Porsche Macan Is Outselling the Gas Model. But There's More to the Story Get the best news, reviews, columns, and more delivered straight to your inbox, daily. back Sign up For more information, read our Privacy Policy and Terms of Use . Share this Story Facebook X LinkedIn Flipboard Reddit WhatsApp E-Mail Got a tip for us? Email: tips@ Join the conversation ( )