logo
Are Big Airlines' CEOs Overpaid Or Underpaid?

Are Big Airlines' CEOs Overpaid Or Underpaid?

Forbes6 days ago
Scott Kirby, United Airlines' CEO (Photo by Hyoung Chang/The Denver Post)
High and wildly fluctuating fuel prices. Enormously expensive assets that must be bought and maintained in near-perfect condition. Tens of thousands of (mostly) well-paid employees and their powerful, sometimes contentious unions. Extraordinarily powerful, often opinionated and sometimes down-right pushy shareholders and other financial backers. Uptight domestic and foreign regulators and a constantly changing cast of politicians whose motivations rarely support the idea of making big profits.
Given all that, one must ask whether it's worth it to even want to be the chief executive of a U.S. airline?
Well, at least it is for the CEOs of the nation's four largest carriers who, according to reports filed by the carriers with the Securities & Exchange Commission, earned more than $87.5 million, combined, for their troubles in 2024. That number includes the actual value and/or estimated current value of shares and options to buy shares, plus other forms of non-salary compensation, that they received last year.
So, are they paid too much?The answer to that question depends on one's ethical, moral, philosophical, political or maybe even theological views regarding the value of an individual's work - or on one's view of the relative fairness of a CEO's compensation vis-à-vis what their average employee earns. But in any practical evaluation there's no disputing that running a big airline, however tough a job that might be, is a sweet gig financially.
TOP PAID AIRLINE BOSSES
And the sweetest gig, at least in 2024, was Scott Kirby's at United Airlines. His total pay (including bonuses, the actual and/or estimated value of shares and options granted to him last year, and all other non-salary compensation) was just over $33.9 million. That was a big jump from 2023, when Kirby's total take was a mere $18.6 million.
As calculated by AirlineGeeks.com, an airlines-focused news website, that produced a CEO-to-worker ratio of 380-to-1. That means Kirby earned $380 for every $1 earned by the average United employee in 2024. Their average pay was $89,197.
Ed Bastian, Delta Airlines COE (Photo by: Nathan Congleton/NBC via Getty Images)
Ed Bastian at Delta last year took home just over $27.1 million, down from $34. 2 million in 2023. AirlineGeeks.com calculated the Delta's CEO-to-worker pay ratio to be 258-to-1 in 2024, based on Delta's average employee pay of $105,269.
American Airlines boss Robert Isom's pay in 2024 was considerably lower at $15.6 million. But in 2023 he took home more than $31.4 million. His 2024 pay ratio vs. the average American employee's pay ($81,744) was 191-to-1.
Bob Jordan, who became Southwest's CEO early 2022, received total compensation of $10.6 million in 2024, which resulted in a ratio of $115.5-to-1 vs. the average Southwest worker pay of $91,442. That, too, is per AirlineGeeks.com. In 2023, Jordan's first full year as CEO, his total compensation was $9.3 million.
However one looks at it, all four of those airline chiefs are well-compensated, as are pretty much all airline CEOs around the world.
DO SHAKY FINANCIAL TRACK RECORDS JUSTIFY BIG CEO PAY?
But according to FORBES and FORTUNE rankings of corporate leaders' compensation a strong argument can be made that the top bosses at the three biggest U.S. airlines – Delta, United and American – are being paid more than their companies' annual revenues warrant.
Of the 100 biggest publicly owned companies in America based on revenues, Delta's $54 billion in 2024 revenues ranks 70th, while United ($53.7 billion) ranks 83rd and American ($52.8 billion) comes in No. 86. Southwest's $27.5 billion does place it among the top 100 U.S. companies by revenue.
Yet the CEOs of the nation's three largest airlines all rank among the top 50 U.S. CEOs in compensation. Delta's Bastian's $34.2 million was the 31st highest CEO pay in America in 2023. That's according to Equilar, a corporate data tracking and analysis firm. Not all U.S. companies have filed their 2024 CEO compensation data yet, so 2023 is the latest year for which such data is complete.
Robert Isom, American Airlines CEO. (Photo by Nathan Posner/Anadolu via Getty Images)
Meanwhile, Isom's $31.4 million in compensation from American in 2023 was good enough to land him at No. 40 on that list. And though Kirby's 2023 compensation of $18.6 million from United wasn't enough to place his name on that same list, his $33.9 million earned in 2024 would have been enough to rank 32nd on the 2023 list. It also likely will put him at or near No. 32 on the 2024 list from Equilar once all companies have reported their 2024 CEO compensation data.
Furthermore, airlines today – as they have historically – generally represent a poor investment for those who invest in their stock because of their weak-to-non-existent returns on investment over time. Thus, the case can be aruged that these airline bosses shouldn't be quite so handsomely rewarded, especially considering their companies have failed over the last 65 years to fix their financially ramshackle houses.
Conversely, given the many complex financial, legal, regulatory, technical, labor, economic, macro-economic and political challenges they face just as compelling an argument can be made in the opposite direction: that the CEOs of America's biggest airlines are compensated appropriately - or maybe even that they're not paid enough. The gist of that argument is that without the great work of those CEOs and their management teams their respective airlines' would be in much worse shape, financially.
MIND THE PAY GAP
Regardless of what side one takes in that debate, analysis of the gap between what the big carriers' CEOs earn annually and what the average employees at their respective companies earn can be used to support both sides of the overpaid/underpaid argument.
Compared with the CEO-to-average employee ratios of the 100 highest-paid CEOs in the nation, Bastian's 258-to-1 ratio at Delta, and Isom's 191-to-1 ratio at American in 2024 are middle-of-the-pack numbers. Kirby's 380-to-1 ratio is slightly elevated over the Delta and American pay gaps, but certainly not extreme vis-à-vis most other large companies' pay gaps. (Jordan's 115.5-to-1 ratio at Southwest is way below the average among the top 100 paid CEOs in the U.S.)
The highest CEO-to-average worker compensation ratio in 2023, according to Equilar, involved Brian Niccol, CEO at Starbucks. That ratio (impacted heavily by the presence of a huge percentage of lower-paid part time baristas in the employee population) was an eye-popping 6,666-to-1. More than a dozen other CEOS on the Top 100 Pay Gap list had ratios above 500-to-1. Meanwhile, the lowest such ratio was just 74-to-1 at data storage giant Snowflake Inc., where the CEO, Frank Slootman, earned $21.2 million in total compensation. But the large majority of companies and CEOs on the list had boss-to-worker pay gap ratios in the 200- to 500-to-1 range.
On that basis, the case that airline CEOs are paid about right, or maybe not even enough is strengthened.
Still, just as lots of part time baristas on the payroll inflates Starbucks' CEO-to-worker pay ratio, airlines' CEO-to-average worker pay ratios are skewed in the opposite direction by the thousands of highly-paid pilots on their payrolls. U.S. News and World Report currently ranks piloting as the highest-paying non-medical profession in terms of total annual compensation.
Bob Jordan, Southwest Airlines CEO (Photo by Sam Hodde for The Washington Post via Getty Images)
Kit Darby, an airline labor analyst and consultant to piloting job-seekers at Kit Darby Aviation Consulting says that senior captains of the largest planes in each of the Big Four carriers' fleets 2024 earned on average about $364,500 at Delta, $372,850 at American, $384,000 at United and $386,700 at Southwest.
And Darby, himself a retired airline captain, notes that even the lowest-paid, newly hired aviators working as co-pilots on their major carriers' smallest planes earn way more than the average U.S. worker's pay (which is just over $62,000 a year). The most junior pilot at American earns about $115,600 a year; $117,800 at Delta; $123,800 at United; and $141,900 at Southwest.
Even at such relatively low, entry-level payrates, new pilots still help to narrow the CEO-to-average worker pay gap at the big airlines. And the much higher pay of senior captains – plus the handsome compensation earned by mid-career pilots – greatly narrows that pay gap. Indeed, pilot pay at the big airlines effectively smothers the impact that the carriers' tens of thousands of lower-paid workers like flight attendants, airport ground workers and office employees have on the CEO-to-worker pay gaps at their respective carriers.
In other words, if pilots weren't so numerous, and if they didn't earn such high wages, airline CEO-to-average worker pay gaps would be significantly larger. And that suggests, again, that maybe airlines' top executives are overpaid after all.
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Columbia Will Pay $9 Million to Settle Lawsuit Over U.S. News Ranking
Columbia Will Pay $9 Million to Settle Lawsuit Over U.S. News Ranking

New York Times

time25 minutes ago

  • New York Times

Columbia Will Pay $9 Million to Settle Lawsuit Over U.S. News Ranking

Columbia University has agreed to pay $9 million to settle a class-action lawsuit brought by students who claimed they had been overcharged for their educations as a result of incorrect data that they said the school had provided to U.S. News & World Report to artificially inflate its national ranking. The lawsuit stemmed from a 2022 scandal over how Columbia earned a No. 2 spot in the magazine's annual 'Best Colleges' rankings that year, acing a process that is a powerful driver of prestige and applications for American universities. Believing there were flaws in the data underpinning the university's score, a Columbia mathematician investigated and published a blog post asserting that several key figures were 'inaccurate, dubious or highly misleading.' The discrepancies caused Columbia to drop to No. 18 in the rankings. The next year, Columbia opted out of the rankings all together. The proposed settlement, which was filed in Federal District Court in Manhattan on Monday, did not require Columbia to formally admit wrongdoing. But the university said in a statement on Tuesday that it 'deeply regrets deficiencies in prior reporting.' The settlement agreement covers some 22,000 former undergraduate students who attended Columbia College, Columbia Engineering, or Columbia's School of General Studies between 2016 and 2022 and will be eligible to apply for a slice of the award. If all the students applied, taking into account likely lawyers' fees, they would each receive about $273. The lawsuit claimed that Columbia had artificially inflated its ranking by consistently reporting false data, including that 83 percent of its classes had fewer than 20 students. Want all of The Times? Subscribe.

Ultra Mobile raised its data caps without a price increase
Ultra Mobile raised its data caps without a price increase

The Verge

time43 minutes ago

  • The Verge

Ultra Mobile raised its data caps without a price increase

T-Mobile is bringing some of its Uncarrier energy to Ultra Mobile, the carrier's international-focused MVNO that operates on its network. It announced that its plans now have slightly higher data caps and more international perks, but with the same prices as before for new and existing subscribers — a rare thing to see these days. The plan with the most notable increase in data cap is its $39 per month tier, which jumps from 15GB to 24GB per month. It also includes 5GB of data you can use in Mexico before international data roaming charges kick in. If you're accustomed to churning through a ton of data every month, its $59 per month unlimited (talk, text, and data) plan is stuffed with more goodies. It includes a combined $20 in international calling and data roaming credits, plus 25GB to use as a mobile hotspot (it previously included 20GB). You'll also get 100 minutes to call 'nearly anywhere,' and either 500 texts or 500MB of roaming data to use while traveling abroad before you have to pay extra. Whichever plan is best for your budget, Ultra Mobile stands out from Mint Mobile and Metro (other T-Mobile-owned MVNOs), as well as other major carriers, by offering more perks for people who call and text folks in countries outside the US. In addition to unlimited talk and text to Mexico, Canada, and the UK, Ultra allows free calls to landlines and mobile phones in China, India, Australia, and many other countries. Plus, all of its plans support Wi-Fi calling, which makes it easy to take calls even if local coverage is spotty.

Why Dupe Lawsuits Like LuluLemon's Are Rare—And Hard To Win
Why Dupe Lawsuits Like LuluLemon's Are Rare—And Hard To Win

Forbes

time44 minutes ago

  • Forbes

Why Dupe Lawsuits Like LuluLemon's Are Rare—And Hard To Win

Topline Luxury athletic wear brand Lululemon has sued Costco in federal court and accused the big box store of selling products that purposefully rip off some its most popular items for a fraction of the price—the latest lawsuit to come out of an increasingly prevalent 'dupe culture' that has left big-name companies with little recourse against brands that produce copycat products for less. A customer enters a Lululemon store in Corte Madera, California. Getty Images Key Facts In a lawsuit filed in California, Lululemon accused Costco of selling and, in one case, manufacturing knockoffs of its Scuba sweatshirts, Define jackets and ABC pants. The complaint alleged trade dress infringement, unfair competition under the Lanham Act, patent infringement and violation of the California Unfair Business Practices Act, and asks that Lululemon be compensated for the lost profits and "significant harm" done to its brands and reputation. Costco, which did not respond to request for comment from Forbes on Tuesday, could be forced to pay up if Lululemon prevails, but winning a trademark infringement lawsuit over dupe products is a tall order. Dozens of successful brands have sued over the increasing production of dupes in the last several years, but proving a product was copied isn't enough to win—the original producer must also show that the copycat product could actually 'dupe' customers into believing the knockoffs are the real thing. The onus of proving the copycat product actually confused customers and impacted the original manufacturer's business falls on the originating company, New York trademark lawyer Karl Zielaznick told Forbes, and it's very hard to prove: 'Customers often know that they aren't buying a $5,000 watch for $100… They know it's a different, dupe product,' he said. Get Forbes Breaking News Text Alerts: We're launching text message alerts so you'll always know the biggest stories shaping the day's headlines. Text 'Alerts' to (201) 335-0739 or sign up here. Key Background The prevalence of 'dupe culture' has skyrocketed in the last decade, largely thanks to TikTok, as customers search for and buy products that are cheaper, almost identical versions of high-end items. As opposed to generations before who "may have shopped for knockoffs on the sly," Jennifer Baker of creator management platform Grin told The Guardian, young people are now happy to buy knockoff products and share their finds with the world. TikTok videos with #dupe hashtag have racked up more than 6 billion views, and shoppers can easily find counterfeits for everything from a $600 hair tool to a $40 face wash. Because shoppers are happily and knowingly buying the fake products, nobody is actually being duped into thinking knock-offs are the real thing, Zielaznick explained, which makes it much harder to prove brand confusion. Surprising Fact In December, the e.l.f. Cosmetics company admitted in federal court that it created a mascara product called the Lash 'N Roll specifically meant to mimic the Hook N' Roll brush of Benefit Cosmetics' Roller Lash mascara, which has produced $278 million in revenue from U.S. sales since 2015. E.l.f released its product in 2022, and the two mascaras are packaged and marked similarly. Despite the admission and similarities, a judge ruled that the e.l.f. product did not infringe on the trademark or trade dress of Benefit Cosmetics because it was very unlikely customers would ever actually confuse the two products. To win, Benefit would have had to prove e.l.f. had managed to actually dupe buyers, which the company failed to do. Crucial Quote 'It's not enough to have someone admit they looked at or were inspired by your product,' Zielaznick said. 'You have to be able to prove in some other way that this is harming you. There has to be a true attempt by the dupe manufacturer to deceive, and it's very hard to prove that that intent exists.' What To Watch For The verdict in pending trademark lawsuits. Snack giant Mondelez International has sued grocery chain Aldi over claims the store is mimicking the packaging of cookies like Oreo, Chips Ahoy! and Nutter Butter with the intention of confusing customers. Williams-Sonoma is suing a website called which allows shoppers to search for products that look eerily similar to something they liked online, and American Eagle is suing Amazon over claims it ripped off branding from the Aerie clothing line to confuse online shoppers. Deckers, the parent company of Ugg, is suing Quince for alleged trademark infringement related to a copycat version of its UGG Classic Ultra Mini boots. Further Reading Forbes Do Trademarks Still Matter In 2025? Forbes Earth, Wind & Firing Off: A Cautionary Tale Of Trademark Infringement In The Music Industry Forbes Nike Stole Company's Trademark, Then Tried To Bury It In Legal Bills, Court-Ordered Report Says

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store