West London couple used Apple AirTag to retrieve stolen Jaguar
Ms Forbes Pirie said: "I went to use the car that morning, walking up and down the street and I was unable to find it, with my husband saying he hadn't moved it."I thought it was weird, we both thought it was unlikely it was stolen because it had two immobilisers and so I was quite shocked and my stomach dropped."
'Bit of an adventure'
As well as having an immobiliser fitted, which means the Jaguar E-Pace would not start without the correct PIN code, it also had an AirTag inside.The couple dialled 999 to report the theft. Ms Forbes Pirie said the police were "vague" and told them they might send a patrol car and would inform them if they found anything. Ms Forbes Pirie said they told the police they had the tracker and could could trace the car's location - explaining that it was only a nine minute drive away, in Chiswick."I wanted to act quite quickly as my fear was that we would find the AirTag and not the car when it was discarded on to the street without the car, so I told them that we were planning to head to the location," she said."It felt like a bit of an adventure, it was exciting, a little bit of a fun thing to do, to see if we could find our car."I didn't really think car thieves would hurt us, more that they would try to get away."
She said they were "relieved" to find the car where the AirTag had led them - in a parking space on a street in Chiswick.However, the immobiliser code did not work, so they had to contact the software company to retrieve the vehicle. After showing proof of ownership of the £46,000 car, the company came to the location and unlocked the vehicle for them.Speaking of the thieves, Ms Forbes Pirie said: "I think they wanted just to take the car somewhere quiet. The thieves appeared to be quite sophisticated. "They had managed to bypass the immobiliser that came with the car, but not the one that we had fitted. "We were told they did quite a good job and got quite close."I think I thought the police would act quicker considering they had a location for it, but I know they also very stretched."
Met figures show there were 33,530 offences of "theft or unauthorised taking" of a motor vehicle in the capital in 2024, a 1.6% increase on the year before. There were only 326 "positive outcomes", which can include a charge or caution, from those cases, representing a success rate of lower than 1%.
A Met Police spokesperson said the couple confirmed with police that they had found the vehicle and that it was being recovered by a truck back to the victim's home address."This investigation is ongoing and officers met the victim on Tuesday, 10 June as part of their inquiries," the spokesperson added.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
The Guardian
21 minutes ago
- The Guardian
The Guardian view on proscribing Palestine Action: blurring civil disobedience and terrorism is a dangerous step
When the Labour government introduced anti-terrorism legislation 25 years ago, it stressed that it was targeting extreme crimes. 'Terrorism involves the threat or use of serious violence for political, religious or ideological ends. It … aims to create a climate of extreme fear,' said Jack Straw, the then home secretary. Some MPs still feared that a group like Greenpeace, which had destroyed genetically modified crops and temporarily halted nuclear weapons production at Aldermaston, might be proscribed. Mr Straw reassured them that such bans would be used only when absolutely necessary; he knew of 'no evidence whatever' that the actions of the environmental group 'would fall remotely under [its] scope'. UN experts warned this week that 'acts of protest that damage property, but are not intended to kill or injure people, should not be treated as terrorism'. Yet on Wednesday, MPs voted – by 385 to 26 – to proscribe Palestine Action under the 2000 legislation. The Lords were expected to approve the order on Thursday. Unless a high court judge orders its suspension at a hearing on Friday, from Saturday, being a member of or simply expressing support for the group will carry a maximum penalty of 14 years. The ban was announced days after Palestine Action claimed responsibility for breaking into an RAF base and spraying paint on to planes that it claimed were supporting the Israeli military campaign. Four people have been charged. Hundreds of lawyers, cultural figures and groups such as Amnesty International have condemned the ban. It is lamentable that MPs backed it. But cynically listing two white-supremacist organisations on the same order – Maniacs Murder Cult, whose members have claimed violent attacks globally, and Russian Imperial Movement, which seeks to create a new Russian imperial state – made it harder for legislators to vote it down. The British state has plenty of legislation to deal with direct action. Palestine Action activists have been arrested and charged with criminal damage, violent disorder and burglary. The suspicion is that frequent acquittals have led to this order. Pouring paint over military aircraft and buildings, and tossing smoke bombs, does not sound like the kind of extreme act that the public rightly reviles as terrorism. Rather, the ban appears designed not only to silence supporters but to reduce public sympathy by placing the group on a par with Islamic State and the extreme-right group National Action. Yvette Cooper, the home secretary, alleges that Palestine Action's methods 'have become more aggressive, with its members demonstrating a willingness to use violence'. The public will need to see evidence of this – rather than take such claims on trust – if their faith in the state is not to be undermined. Palestine Action has targeted property to challenge a war in which tens of thousands of civilians have been killed. The group's protests embarrass the government: the UK continues to supply equipment to Israel's military as it slaughters Palestinians. Despite overwhelming evidence that war crime is piling on war crime in Gaza, and reportedly contrary to the advice of its own lawyers, the British government will not say that Israel has broken international law. The government should be doing all it can to end this conflict, not to criminalise protests against it. But you do not need to sympathise with Palestine Action's aims to believe that its proscription sets a chilling precedent and undermines democracy.
The Independent
24 minutes ago
- The Independent
Home Secretary: Government accepts court ruling on ‘serious failing' by MI5
The Home Secretary has said she is 'deeply concerned' that MI5 gave false evidence to the High Court and that the Government accepts a further investigation should take place. Yvette Cooper told MPs that 'internal processes at MI5 must improve' after three judges ruled on Wednesday that a further investigation should be carried out into how it came to give incorrect evidence to the High Court in a bid to secure an injunction against the BBC. Then-attorney general Suella Braverman asked the court for the injunction in 2022, which prevented the BBC from disclosing information likely to identify a man who allegedly abused two women and is a covert human intelligence source. But at a hearing earlier this year, the court was told that part of the written evidence provided by MI5 was false. The Lady Chief Justice Baroness Carr, Dame Victoria Sharp and Mr Justice Chamberlain ruled on Wednesday that, while it was 'premature' for contempt of court proceedings to be launched against the organisation, a further investigation should be carried out as probes conducted by MI5 into the matter 'suffer from serious procedural deficiencies'. In a statement on Thursday, Ms Cooper told MPs that MI5 must 'always maintain the highest of standards and rigour'. She said: 'I remain deeply concerned that inaccurate evidence was provided to the High Court and Investigatory Powers Tribunal. This was a serious failing by MI5. 'The Government accepts the High Court's conclusion that a 'further, robust and independent investigation' should take place. I will provide further details to the House in due course. 'I have also asked the attorney general to conduct an internal review of how evidence from MI5 should be prepared and presented in future, to respond to the court's specific findings on witness statements in this regard. 'Alongside this I have asked my officials to review the wider issues raised by this case. 'The vital work MI5 does every day keeps our country safe and saves lives in the face of myriad threats. 'We owe them a debt of gratitude for the work they do. 'But that is also why it is essential that they always maintain the highest of standards and rigour, including in responding to the courts.' Following the ruling, MI5 director-general Sir Ken McCallum offered a 'full and unreserved apology for the errors made in these proceedings'.
Daily Mail
26 minutes ago
- Daily Mail
Moment teenage 'neo-Nazi' is swarmed by counter-terror police after 'buying gun from undercover MI5 agent' in Morrisons car park
This is the terrifying moment a 'neo-Nazi' teenager was swarmed by armed counter-terror police after he allegedly bought a gun for a terrorist attack. Alfie Coleman, then 19, was detained outside a Morrisons supermarket in Stratford, east London, after he exchanged £3,500 for a Makarov gun and ammunition, the Old Bailey heard. The former Tesco worker was snared in a 'highly sophisticated operation' on September 29, 2023 after he allegedly made an arrangement with an undercover MI5 officer for the supply of a Makarov pistol, five magazines and 200 rounds of ammunition. In the shocking clip, Coleman collected the weapon dressed in a black tracksuit with his hood up. But before he could escape with the gun, a swarm of counter-terror police descended on him with stun guns and arrested him. Coleman, was allegedly told the undercover officer would be in a Land Rover Discovery parked in the Morrisons car park in Stratford, east London. Jurors were shown video footage of the defendant, dressed in all black and trying to obscure his face with his hood as he went to collect the weaponry. Coleman was seen leaving cash in the front passenger seat footwell and collecting a holdall from the boot. Coleman (pictured) has accepted having a significant quantity of extreme right-wing material and pleaded guilty to possessing 10 documents which contain information likely to be useful to terrorists But before he could walk away, he was confronted by counter-terrorism police officers pointing stun guns. In front of shocked shoppers, Coleman dropped to his knees and lay flat on the ground before being handcuffed. Coleman has accepted having a significant quantity of extreme right-wing material and pleaded guilty to possessing 10 documents which contain information likely to be useful to terrorists. The defendant, now aged 21, of Great Notley in Essex, has also pleaded guilty to attempting to possess both a firearm and ammunition but has denied he was preparing for a terrorist attack.
