Why Elon Musk hates researchers and loves engineers — after he corrected xAI employee Aditya Gupta's hiring post
recently made waves by publicly correcting a hiring post from an xAI employee, Aditya Gupta, who initially sought to recruit both "researchers" and "engineers" for the artificial intelligence startup.
Musk emphatically declared that the term "researcher" is outdated, pretentious, and fosters a problematic two-tier system within the engineering workforce.
He insisted that at xAI—and also at SpaceX—everyone should simply be called "engineers." This shift reflects Musk's vision for a unified, accountable, and highly practical technical team, breaking away from traditional academic distinctions he views as unnecessary and even harmful to innovation and team cohesion.
Elon Musk's perspective: Engineers over researchers
Elon Musk has been vocal about his dislike for the title "researcher," which he frequently describes as a "relic of academia." In Musk's view, the label 'researcher' creates an artificial hierarchy within technical teams, suggesting that researchers are somehow distinct, or even less accountable, compared to engineers.
He argues that this division weakens ownership, blurs responsibility, and fosters a separation that slows practical progress. Elon Musk reasons that in fast-paced technology companies like xAI and
SpaceX
, what matters most is the ability to build, iterate, and solve real-world problems—responsibilities encompassed by the role of an "engineer."
by Taboola
by Taboola
Sponsored Links
Sponsored Links
Promoted Links
Promoted Links
You May Like
Learn More - How Donating Sperm May Boost Your Income
SpellRock
Undo
By rejecting the researcher title, Musk aims to eliminate what he perceives as academic pretentiousness that can sometimes encourage theoretical work disconnected from product outcomes. He emphasizes that this distinction is not only outdated but counterproductive, introducing inefficiencies and hindering collaboration.
As Musk noted, his insistence on the universal "engineer" title promotes a culture where every team member is equally accountable for delivering tangible, impactful results, fostering a meritocratic and results-driven environment.
Practical engineering over theoretical research
At xAI, Musk champions a workforce composed of builders and implementers rather than theorists. The company's mission to rapidly advance AI technologies, relying on cutting-edge methods like reinforcement learning and massive computing infrastructure, requires a practical, hands-on approach.
Musk specifically points out that although SpaceX conducts groundbreaking technological research, it never labels any employees as 'researchers.'
This reflects his belief that true innovation depends on rigorous engineering discipline, rapid prototyping, and direct problem-solving.
This approach denotes a preference for those who can translate ideas into working systems efficiently, rather than spending extended time in exploratory research without definite product outcomes. In Musk's philosophy, eliminating the 'researcher' distinction accelerates the engineering feedback loop, promoting speed and accountability critical for breakthrough innovation.
Impact on company culture and the AI industry
Musk's correction of the xAI hiring post is more than a cosmetic change—it embodies his no-nonsense, high-accountability management style. By publicly enforcing uniform job titles, Musk sends a clear message that academic or theoretical fragmentation has no place in his companies. Experts interpret this move as symbolic of a broader Silicon Valley trend favoring flatter, integrated teams with streamlined roles to enhance agility and rapid product delivery.
However, this shift has its critics. Some industry analysts warn that entirely removing the "researcher" role risks sidelining deep exploratory inquiry and ethical considerations essential in AI development—areas traditionally safeguarded by academic research freedoms. The balance between practical engineering and theoretical investigation remains a subject of debate.
The ripple effects and future outlook
Elon Musk's terminological shift is already influencing company cultures beyond xAI.
SpaceX has long embraced this engineering-only framework, and other prominent AI companies like OpenAI and Anthropic are experimenting with novel job title structures to blur conventional boundaries between research and engineering roles. Musk's approach underscores his desire to build startups that push technological frontiers aggressively while maintaining crystal-clear lines of accountability and measurable output.
Whether this 'engineer-only' model will foster faster innovation or create challenges in navigating the complex landscape of AI research remains to be seen. For now, Elon Musk has unequivocally communicated his stance: at xAI, there are no researchers—only engineers—united in building the future of artificial intelligence.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
India Today
10 minutes ago
- India Today
Apple to boost AI spending, Tim Cook says difficult to see a world where iPhone is not living in it
There is no doubt that Apple is officially late to the AI party. However, the company still has high hopes for its devices. This is not just a trend we observed, but CEO Tim Cook has recently told investors that Apple is throwing its full weight behind artificial intelligence as it seeks to catch up with rivals in the race to develop nextgeneration AI technologies. Speaking on the company's thirdquarter earnings call, he described AI as transformative and confirmed that Apple was reallocating resources and staff to strengthen its see AI as one of the most profound technologies of our lifetime. We are embedding it across our devices and platforms and across the company. We are also significantly growing our investments,' Cook said. 'Apple has always been about taking the most advanced technologies and making them easy to use and accessible for everyone, and that's at the heart of our AI strategy,' he explained that Apple has been moving more people onto AI projects. 'We have a great, great team and we're putting all of our energy behind it,' he said. The company said its growing AI ambitions are also visible in its capital expenditure. Spending is trending higher yeartodate, although Apple still leans on thirdparty partners for some infrastructure, limiting the overall rise in its CapEx an interview with CNBC ahead of the earnings release, Apple disclosed that mergers and acquisitions form part of this accelerated push. Cook said the company had already completed seven acquisitions in 2025, describing them as modest in size but significant strategically. 'None was huge,' he said, adding during the call that Apple was 'making acquisitions at the rate of one every several weeks.'The company has faced criticism for being slow to respond to the current AI wave. Some of its flagship announcements, such as a revamped AIpowered Siri, have failed to ship on time. Reports have even suggested that a demo of the new Siri was far from Cook defended the company's approach, insisting that Apple is not interested in speed for its own sake. 'Rushing out the wrong features or the wrong products just to be first would be a mistake,' the company has repeatedly said. 'That's especially true if those products don't work as promised.'Apple says it has already launched more than 20 new AIpowered capabilities under its 'Apple Intelligence' branding. These include Visual Intelligence features, a Writing assistant, and a Cleanup tool. Later this year, the company expects to roll out live translation and an AI workout companion. However, the muchanticipated update to Siri has been pushed back to 2026. Cook said Apple was 'making good progress' on the the call, Cook was asked about the possibility that future hardware, such as the AI glasses recently touted by Meta CEO Mark Zuckerberg, could threaten the dominance of the iPhone.'It's difficult to see a world where iPhones aren't living in it,' Cook replied. 'That doesn't mean that we are not thinking about other things, as well, but I think that the [AI] devices are likely to be complementary devices, not substitutions.'Pressed on which areas of AI technology Apple sees as commoditised, Cook declined to give specifics, saying: 'That would give away part of our strategy.'While the AI future for Apple devices is still under wraps, this year we are excited to see how the rumoured iPhone 17 Air will turn out. It is speculated to be the thinnest iPhone ever in the Apple-verse. The iPhone 17 series is expected to debut next month.- Ends
Time of India
22 minutes ago
- Time of India
‘To be seen in office is to survive': Layoff-weary Bengaluru techies ditch WFH, brave traffic
Representative Image BENGALURU: As fears of AI-driven layoffs grip the tech industry, a new pattern has emerged on the city's already clogged Outer Ring Road (ORR): Wednesday is now the worst day to commute. In what officials call a clear shift in behaviour, the Bengaluru Traffic Police (BTP) say vehicle entries into 26 tech parks on ORR spiked by 20-45% this June compared to the same period last year. And Wednesday stands out — with 1.2 lakh vehicles logged, up from 82,168 in June 2024. The rising midweek rush, say police, appears to stem from a growing belief among tech workers that being visible in office improves job security amid a wave of AI-triggered downsizing. You Can Also Check: Bengaluru AQI | Weather in Bengaluru | Bank Holidays in Bengaluru | Public Holidays in Bengaluru 'I can't afford to be invisible,' said Rahul Shetty (name changed), a senior developer who now shows up at his Doddanekundi office at least four days a week. 'These days, optics matter. Being seen at your desk might ensure job security.' The trend is fuelling severe congestion along tech corridors like ORR (Silk Board to KR Pura), Sarjapur Road, and roads leading to Electronics City. Sensing a growing crisis, newly-appointed joint commissioner (traffic) Karthik Reddy has suggested a midweek work-from-home policy for tech companies to curb the surge. 'Peak traffic is observed between 9am and 10am on all weekdays, but Wednesday stands out because of increased office attendance by IT employees. We've recommended that tech firms either allow work-from-home every Wednesday or shift office timings to start by 7.30am and end earlier in the day,' Reddy told TOI . But the traffic chaos has reignited frustration about the city's inadequate infrastructure — something commuters say needs urgent fixing, beyond temporary work-from-home measures. 'Work-from-home for a single day is only a temporary band-aid,' said Suma Santosh, a data analyst who works in Bellandur. 'The deeper problem lies in poor pedestrian infrastructure. I live barely 2.5km from my office, but I'm forced to take my two-wheeler because walking is unsafe and inconvenient. If proper footpaths and crossings existed, at least 25% of two-wheeler traffic could be cut down.' Others point to the lack of coordination among civic agencies. 'From Metro construction to BWSSB's pipeline works to road widening, everything is happening at the same time,' said Vikram Naik, a project lead in Marathahalli. 'There's no synchronisation between agencies. This chaos is what's fuelling peak-hour gridlocks.' A BBMP official who was part of the recent coordination meeting acknowledged that concurrent infrastructure works have worsened the situation. 'We're working with BMRCL and BWSSB to ensure better coordination in project planning. We're also exploring the feasibility of creating parallel service roads or alternative routes to divert traffic.' Some companies are willing to explore flexible options, but stress the need for careful rollout. 'Work-from-home arrangement on Wednesdays is doable but optional,' said Sridhar M, an HR executive at a major tech firm. 'Some roles demand physical presence. We're open to encouraging early shift starts, and promoting carpooling and BMTC usage among our employees.' As bottlenecks intensify across Bellandur, Marathahalli, Kadubeesanahalli and Devarabisanahalli, the coming weeks could prove crucial in determining whether better coordination and corporate cooperation can untangle the city's tech traffic mess.
Time of India
38 minutes ago
- Time of India
Click & Bait: AI-led fake ads skim Billions from Brands
New Delhi: Want to boost your Instagram reel views? You can now buy 1,000 views for a dollar. From China to Egypt the booming black market of fake clicks or 'click farms' are gaming the system to artificially inflate website traffic metrics and mislead advertisers. Similar ad fraud tactics like traffic exchange credits and proxy traffic services are burning advertising dollars. For instance, in a traffic exchange networks, users agree to view each other's websites in order to increase page views or ad impressions, but they do not lead to any real engagement or conversions. And AI is only making such scams more sophisticated with tricks like ad hijacking, cloaked sites and smart redirects. "We're seeing an avalanche of AI-led fake traffic," said Dhiraj Gupta, founder of digital fraud detection firm mFilterIt. "Tools like ChatGPT can now generate thousands of sites in hours, and platforms like offer millions of bot hits for a few thousand dollars." Nearly 22 per cent ($84 billion) of online ad spend is lost to ad fraud in 2023 and is expected to reach over $170 billion by 2028, according to Juniper Research. According to research by cybersecurity firm Imperva, bots now account for over 51 per cent of all internet traffic, surpassing human activity for the first time. Nearly 37 per cent of all internet traffic was characterised by bad bots for activities like account hijacking, data scraping and mimicking human behaviour to avoid detection. Ad measurement company DoubleVerify (DV) found an 86 per cent year-over-year increase in invalid bot traffic in late 2024, which they attribute to the rise in AI-powered crawlers and scrapers such as GPTBot, ClaudeBot. While these bots lack malicious intent, they can distort campaign metrics, inflate impression counts, and undermine trust in the digital advertising ecosystem, the report said. Advertisers are largely unaware of the scale of the problem, Gupta emphasised. Even top-tier brands have been caught off-guard by such bot attacks. For instance, a major OTT platform crashed due to 100 per cent bot traffic and 52 per cent click-through-rate, a clear sign of made-up engagement, he recalled. During the India-Pakistan tensions, several YouTube videos were injected with hate speech ads maligning the platform's and brand's reputation, he said. At a base level, the ad-fraud economy is booming because many brands still track success by the number of clicks and impressions registered, which are easy to manipulate. "Fraudsters optimise for surface metrics," said Shailesh Dhuri, CEO, Decimal Point Analytics. "True effectiveness only shows when you remove the inflated numbers from bots."
