Covid pandemic remembered: West Midlands medics reflect on experiences
She was among NHS staff reflecting as a new critical care unit opened at the Midland Metropolitan University Hospital in Smethwick, replacing those at Sandwell and City Hospitals.Looking back to 2020, senior sister Laura Harman described the pandemic as "the most challenging time in my career" and one in which staff were dealing with "fear of the unknown"."We were under immense pressure, working in fear, we were working harder and being stretched more than we ever had been previously," she said."I definitely experienced anxiety working through that period."
Ms Harman had to move out of her family home as one of her household was vulnerable and she said that left her without a place to relax and enjoy company away from work."Everything was turned upside down and everything was difficult and that was a really anxiety inducing time," she added."I definitely witnessed nurses having panic attacks when they were required to put their personal protective equipment (PPE) on."People were sick, people were having panic attacks, people would put their mask on and then just have to remove their PPE immediately because of the panic it was causing them to feel."
Dr Clare said it was especially tough given the area around the hospital which she described as "the biggest deprived ward in the country"."They couldn't isolate, they had to work, they were our shopkeepers, our bus drivers, they were the ones who were serving us but yet they were coming in their generations – mums, kids, grandkids and dying," she said."That was the most heartbreaking and gut-wrenching and we've all been scarred from that."
Critical care in the Sandwell and City hospitals was stretched to 350% of their usual capacity in 2020 during the pandemic and their area was one of the hardest hit in the country by Covid, according to the NHS trust running them.For matron Noku Sileya, it was the team around her in the hospital which helped her get through the dread and fear she felt during the pandemic."You always felt that you fell short because you weren't doing the standard of care that you were used to," she said."My fellow nurses and colleagues, we were all going through the same so we were all able to relate and able to share our experiences and keep each other going."Ms Harman agreed it was staff "pulling together" which helped her."The level of teamwork that was exhibited was the best I've ever seen and I felt so privileged to pull together and work with people who were all in the same boat," she added.
Despite the memories of five years ago still remaining vivid to many staff, they are positive about the future.Doctors say the new Midland Metropolitan hospital is much better equipped to cope in future.Prof Jonathan Hulme, joint clinical lead in critical care, said the new unit would make a big difference with any future pandemic."These are our new isolation rooms and if we had people with particularly infectious diseases, they'd now come into the isolation rooms," he explained."Within Covid times, we didn't end up using individual rooms because so many people had it that we just turned a whole unit into a Covid intensive care unit."It was traumatic for a lot of the time - being frustrated that we didn't know what Covid was, that we didn't know that we had any effective treatments for it."So many of the patients who ended up with us in intensive care on a ventilator would die."
A hospital gift
Dr Clare, the hospital's deputy chief medical officer, was awarded an MBE for her services to the NHS and leadership during the pandemic.She said other parts of the site would also be vital in the future."What's brilliant is that 50% of our rooms are single, side rooms and that is absolutely vital," she said."If we had this during Covid a lot more people would have survived. We were working in Victorian hospitals."We've already tested this out during the winter. Obviously we've had a flu outbreak and what we noticed is that we didn't have a spike, we didn't have to shut down wards."Our staff were kept safe, we didn't have any increase in staff sickness, so it's working."Our people of Sandwell and west Birmingham deserve the best health care and now they have got it. This [new hospital] is the gift to them."
Follow BBC Birmingham on BBC Sounds, Facebook, X and Instagram.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Daily Mail
an hour ago
- Daily Mail
Why thousands of people are missing out on NHS jabs for agonising shingles virus
Widespread confusion over who is eligible for the NHS shingles jab means thousands are going unprotected against the agonising infection, a survey has revealed. The poll found one in five over-65s either did not know what shingles was or were unaware the NHS offered a vaccine to prevent it. Fewer than half said they had been vaccinated, while nearly seven in ten admitted they did not understand who was eligible. More than 50,000 elderly Britons develop shingles every year, and nearly one in four of any age will have it at some point in their lives. The condition is linked to chickenpox – a highly contagious childhood illness that causes itchy, spotty rashes. While chickenpox is usually mild, the virus that causes it – varicella-zoster – lies dormant in the body and can reactivate later in life, especially as the immune system weakens with age. This can cause shingles – a painful, blistering rash that typically appears on one side of the chest or abdomen, but can strike anywhere on the body. Currently, anyone turning 65 is offered a shingles vaccine, and remain eligible until they are 80. But those who turned 65 before September 1, 2023, must wait until they are 70. 'I am not surprised by these findings at all,' said Professor Paul Hunter, an infectious disease expert at the University of East Anglia. 'A combination of confusing eligibility criteria – which even confused me, to be honest – and a lack of promotion of the vaccine campaign means that many people are going unprotected from what can be an extraordinarily painful and debilitating virus.' The jab is available privately at high street pharmacies such as Boots and Superdrug – but the two required doses cost £460 in total. 'I'm part of that group who has to wait until they turn 70 for the vaccine, and I did consider going private because of how painful shingles can be,' Professor Hunter added. 'It is a very effective and safe vaccine, and people should make sure they get it as soon as they're eligible on the NHS.' The study of more than 2,000 over-65s by GSK – the British pharmaceutical firm behind the jab – also found that most respondents wrongly believed they were still eligible for the NHS shingles vaccine after turning 80, when that is the cut-off age. A third of respondents also said they did not trust the Government for information on vaccines. Shingles is often accompanied by headaches, nausea and weeks of severe pain – and in some cases it can prove fatal. Around 50 Britons over 70 die from shingles each year. The vaccine reduces the risk of infection by 90 per cent, yet uptake has historically been low – less than half of all 71-year-olds are vaccinated. The latest figures show fewer than one in five of those who turned 65 this year have received the jab. The current two-dose vaccine, Shingrix, replaced a less effective version in September 2023. But due to high global demand, the Government opted to phase in eligibility. As reported by The Mail on Sunday, campaigners have urged ministers to end what they call 'discrimination' against the three million people aged 66 to 69 who are currently ineligible. Senior citizens group Silver Voices has called on the NHS to scrap the age restriction, warning it puts millions at unnecessary risk. One man who regrets missing out on the jab is 72-year-old Daniel Hill. While on holiday in Majorca he noticed a strange rash of blisters, about four inches wide, on his back. Concerned, but not alarmed, he visited a local clinic, where a doctor diagnosed shingles and prescribed antiviral medication. He was offered painkillers, but he declined them. But he said that moments after leaving, the pain struck 'like someone had taken an axe to my back'. The pensioner spent the rest of the trip in agony, confined to bed. 'You really don't want to get shingles,' he said. 'I wish I'd known the vaccine was available on the NHS – I was eligible but had no idea. 'It's so important to check if you qualify and, if you do, get vaccinated to avoid the terrible impact it can have.'
Sky News
2 hours ago
- Sky News
NHS figures reveal impact of five-day resident doctors' strike
The NHS has said 93% of planned operations, tests and procedures went ahead during a recent strike that saw fewer than a third of resident doctors walk out. Early data shows the NHS maintained care for an estimated 10,000 more patients than it did during last year's industrial action. Thousands of resident doctors - previously known as junior doctors - took part in the five-day strike, which ended on Wednesday morning. The overall number that walked out was down by 7.5% (1,243) on the previous strike in late June last year, according to early analysis of management information collected by NHS England. There are roughly 77,000 resident doctors working in hospital and community health services, meaning they make up about half of all doctors in the NHS. While most patients received treatments as planned, NHS chief executive Sir James Mackey said: "We should still acknowledge that there were thousands whose care was disrupted." NHS staff are working to ensure cancelled appointments can be rescheduled as soon as possible but "a repeat of this action will be unacceptable" for the patients affected, he added. "So, I would urge the Resident Doctor Committee to get back to the negotiating table and work with us and the government on the meaningful improvements we can make to resident doctors' working lives." 1:26 Health Secretary Wes Streeting said: "I want to again thank staff from across the NHS who have put in an incredible shift to make sure that the NHS was open to as many patients as possible over the five days of unnecessary strike action. "Despite the huge effort made to keep as much planned care as possible going, let's be clear - these damaging strikes still come at a cost to patients, other staff and the NHS." The dispute between the BMA and the government largely centres on pay - but Mr Streeting has repeatedly said there is no money for an increase, adding that it "should be clear to the BMA by now that it will lose a war with this government". He has said talks could lead to improvements in the working lives of resident doctors. 3:22 Earlier this week, the co-chairs of the BMA's Resident Doctor Committee, Dr Melissa Ryan and Dr Ross Nieuwoudt, said they "look forward" to returning to the negotiating table. A statement added: "The BMA has been willing to negotiate throughout this dispute, and we remain committed to finding a resolution. "We are very clear on what is needed to settle this pay dispute, and we hope the secretary of state is now equally clear that a credible offer must be brought to the table to achieve a settlement and prevent further strike action."
The Independent
3 hours ago
- The Independent
NHS cancelled thousands of appointments during resident doctor strikes
Thousands of patients had their NHS appointments cancelled during the five-day resident doctors' s trike last month. However early data also shows the NHS maintained care for an estimated 10,000 more patients during the latest doctors' strike compared with last year's industrial action, the Department for Health and Social Care (DHSC) said. The number of resident doctors who walked during the recent strike was also down by 1,243 - 7.5 per cent, the DHSC said. During the five-day strike in June and July 2024, 61,989 inpatient and outpatient appointments were rescheduled, and 23,001 staff were absent from work due to strikes at the peak of the action. However, the DHSC has claimed that during the most recent dispute, the NHS saw less disruption this time around. NHS chief executive Sir James Mackey noted that care was still disrupted for thousands of people. He said: 'While this is really good news for the vast majority of patients whose treatment went ahead, we should still acknowledge that there were thousands whose care was disrupted. 'NHS staff will continue to work hard to ensure patients can get their rescheduled care as soon as possible, but for those patients – and for all our staff who had to work extra shifts or with different responsibilities – a repeat of this action will be unacceptable. 'So, I would urge the Resident Doctors Committee to get back to the negotiating table and work with us and the Government on the meaningful improvements we can make to resident doctors' working lives.' The full data on cancellations is yet to be released; however, NHS England and the DHSC have released an 'early' analysis. The impact on A&E waiting times is not clear. Health and Social Care Secretary, Wes Streeting, said: 'Due to the dedication of NHS staff and a different operational approach from previous strikes, we have managed to significantly reduce disruption to patients, with early indications showing that 10,000 extra patients are receiving care compared to previous strike action. 'Despite the huge effort made to keep as much planned care as possible going, let's be clear – these damaging strikes still come at a cost to patients, other staff and the NHS.' He added: 'I want to end this unnecessary dispute and I will be urging the BMA to work with the government in good faith in our shared endeavour to improve the working lives of resident doctors, rather than pursuing more reckless strike action.' The DHSC claims the drop in cancellations was due to a change in the NHS's approach, which aimed to maintain planned care rather than cancel it as happened during previous rounds. The government has claimed it maintained 93 per cent of planned appointments, procedures and operations. The claims come as the DHSC faces winter disruption from nurses and other healthcare workers after their unions warned members had rejected the 3.6 per cent pay award given to them for 2025-26. Across the strikes in 2023 and 2024, which also included nurses and ambulance workers, around 1.5 million planned appointments were cancelled across England. Resident doctors, represented by the British Medical Association, staged strike action over a pay dispute in which the union is calling for a 29 per cent pay rise. It says this is to address a 22 per cent decrease in real terms pay since 2008. Following the strikes, the BMA opened a new dispute with the government over specialist training posts, claiming tens of thousands of resident doctors face not having specialist jobs at the end of the summer. The government has repeatedly said it will not move to increase pay. According to the DHSC and NHS England, some trusts managed to maintain more than 90 per cent of planned care, including West Hertfordshire Teaching Hospitals NHS Trust which maintained 98 per cent and University College London Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, which maintained 95 per cent. A BMA spokesperson said:'We recognise that for any patient to receive care – urgent or planned – during the period of strike action is of course beneficial for them and we recognise the efforts senior doctors, along with other healthcare workers, will have made to provide that care.' The BMA added: 'Even with NHS England's determination to carry on as if the strikes were not happening, we know that operations will have been postponed, and clinics rescheduled. But all of that could have been avoided if the Health Secretary had been serious in his intent to find a negotiated settlement with us. The strike could have been averted, as could any future ones, if Mr Streeting had come, and will come, to the table with a credible offer that resident doctors in England can accept.'
