Israel moves to tighten control of aid and rights groups
Advertisement
On Tuesday, more than 50 international aid organizations signed a letter protesting the new registration rules, calling them 'a grave threat to humanitarian operations and international law.' The groups, including Oxfam, Doctors Without Borders, and the Norwegian Refugee Council, have to reapply under the new system by September, or have their registration revoked.
Advertisement
'By framing humanitarian and human rights advocacy as a threat to the state, Israeli authorities can shut out organizations merely for speaking out about conditions they witness on the ground, forcing INGOs to choose between delivering aid and promoting respect for the protections owed to affected people,' the 55 nonprofit groups wrote in the letter Tuesday, adding that the regulations appeared to be 'based on vague, broad, politicised, and open-ended criteria.'
Aid groups have expressed particular concern over the requirement to share the names, contact details, and identification numbers for their Palestinian staff. Israel has argued this is necessary to vet employees for potential ties to militants, but aid groups fear this could endanger their teams, pointing to how hundreds of humanitarian personnel have been killed in the conflict.
'There's no reason to believe that that data would be held and treated in good faith, given the arbitrary nature of staff arrests and extrajudicial killings' of humanitarians, Joseph Belliveau, executive director of the US-based medical charity MedGlobal, said in an interview.
Meanwhile, draft legislation under debate in the constitution committee of the Israeli parliament, the Knesset, would tax foreign governmental contributions to Israeli nonprofits at 80 percent and prohibit those that receive foreign funding from appearing in court. Israeli rights organizations have conducted strategic litigation throughout the war to challenge the government's secret detentions of Palestinians from Gaza and their conditions of detention.
The bill's sponsor, Ariel Kallner from Netanyahu's Likud party, named as the bill's targets Israeli organizations such as Breaking the Silence, a group that supports whistle-blowers serving in the Israeli armed forces, saying it received disproportionate funding from abroad and was working to 'delegitimize' the state of Israel.
Advertisement
Kallner had introduced a similar bill in 2023 calling for a 65 percent tax but shelved it following sharp criticism from the Biden administration, France, and Germany.
At a committee hearing on Monday in the Israeli parliament, Kallner said the Biden administration's sanctions against armed West Bank settlers in 2024 'came as a result of vile blood libel by organizations [that delegitimize Israel], such as Breaking the Silence.' (The Trump administration reversed those sanctions in January.)
Kallner described the legislation as 'part of the struggle for the Zionist project and in support of the soldiers fighting on the front lines,' while citing other examples of foreign government-funded Israeli groups that recently pressured the Israeli government to allow more food into Gaza.
'I have no problem with NGOs. I have a problem with FGOs — Foreign Governmental Organizations,' Kallner said. 'These organizations do not represent Israeli society. They target our soldiers, discredit Israel around the world, and defend murderers.'
Avner Gvaryahu, a former director of Breaking the Silence, said the tax measure would cripple many of these organizations, and the proposed ban on appealing in Israeli courts was unprecedented.
Although the bill's sponsors have offered to exempt certain Israeli organizations from the 80 percent tax on a case-by-case basis, that would lead to a politicized atmosphere, he warned.
'This doesn't just pinpoint and destroy every organization that is vocally critical of the government,' Gvaryahu said. 'It also creates a dependency of every other organization on the government and eliminates their ability to critique the government.'
Advertisement
A position paper submitted to the Knesset in December by the Institute for Law and Philanthropy at Tel Aviv University estimated that 96 Israeli nonprofits that received roughly $32 million in foreign state donations in 2022 would be affected by the proposed bill. Many of those organizations, though not all, are 'human rights organizations advocating against the Israeli occupation of the West Bank and/or the rights of Palestinians and Palestinian citizens of Israel.'
Lior Soroka in Tel Aviv contributed to this report.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
a minute ago
- Yahoo
How Trump's love for TV is shaping US diplomacy
Donald Trump's sudden concern about starving Palestinians was a major shift for the US president, who had previously ignored the endless cries for help from aid groups. So what changed? In his words, it was images of emaciated children in Gaza that Trump saw on television -- his main window into the world that has long shaped his political and diplomatic decision-making. Trump made clear his affection for the small screen in late July when asked if he agreed with Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu, a major US ally, that there was no famine in Gaza. "Based on television, I would say not particularly, because those children look very hungry," said Trump, a former reality TV star. "That's real starvation stuff. I see it, and you can't fake that." Since then, the 79-year-old has repeated that aid must be brought to people living in the war-ravaged Palestinian territory, though he has stopped of any major diplomatic moves. "Trump has a reputation for not reading anything, including the briefing papers that his aides prepare for him, and for always believing that he knows better than his staff or anyone else does," said Dan Kennedy, a journalist professor at Northeastern University. "So it's not surprising that he would be affected by images on television, especially since he is known to spend a lot of time watching TV." - 'I watch the shows' - Trump has attended 22 intelligence briefings since taking office in January, according to an AFP tally, despite several reports having revealed that he lacks interest in written reports. However, his love for television is well-documented -- even when it comes to major decisions. In 2015, before he first entered the White House, the billionaire told a journalist asking how he educates himself on military strategy: "Well, I watch the shows." And a New York Times report recounted how Trump spent several hours a day in his first term glued to the television, mainly watching Fox News -- his favorite channel -- but also CNN, NBC and ABC news channels. His second term has been little changed, despite Trump leading an election campaign that deployed social media and podcasts. "Trump is a product of his generation," Kennedy said. "He's not sitting around looking at TikTok." - 'Great television' - The Republican, who hosted 14 seasons of "The Apprentice" television series, knows better than most how images can be weaponized for political point-scoring. He was gleeful after his shocking clash with Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelensky at the White House in February, which saw the pair rowing in front of the world's press. "This is going to be great television," Trump said. And in May he gave a similar public dressing down to South African leader Cyril Ramaphosa when he sat in the Oval Office for what turned into a diplomatic ambush. Trump hijacked the meeting by playing a video montage -- one littered with inaccuracies -- that purported to prove claims of a "genocide" against white farmers in South Africa. aue/bjt/sla
Bloomberg
2 hours ago
- Bloomberg
Trump Says US Close to Trade Deal With China
President Donald Trump's threatened tariffs, which has left officials in New Delhi feeling unsure of how to respond. Meanwhile, US President Donald Trump has said he is 'getting very close to a deal' with China to extend the trade truce between the two countries. Bloomberg's Swati Pandey and Romy Varghese break down what we know on The Asia Trade. (Source: Bloomberg)
Boston Globe
2 hours ago
- Boston Globe
What to know as Israel considers reoccupying Gaza in what would be a major escalation of the war
Advertisement The threat to reoccupy Gaza could be a negotiating tactic aimed at pressuring Hamas after talks mediated by the United States, Egypt and Qatar appeared to have broken down last month. Or it could be aimed at shoring up support from Netanyahu's far-right coalition partners. His governing allies have long called for escalating the war, taking over Gaza, relocating much of its population through what they refer to as voluntary emigration and reestablishing Jewish settlements that were dismantled when Israel withdrew in 2005. Whether they prevail will likely depend on the one person with leverage over Israel — President Trump. Asked Tuesday whether he thought Israel should reoccupy Gaza, he said he wasn't aware of the 'suggestion' but that 'it's going to be pretty much up to Israel.' Ground operations in the most densely populated areas To take full control of Gaza, Israel would need to launch ground operations in the last areas of the territory that haven't been flattened and where most of Gaza's 2 million Palestinians have sought refuge. Advertisement That would mean going into the central city of Deir al-Balah and Muwasi, a so-called humanitarian zone where hundreds of thousands of people live in squalid tent camps along the coast. Such operations would force another wave of mass displacement and further disrupt aid deliveries as the U.N. agencies and humanitarian organizations are already struggling to avert famine. Palestinians struggled to get donated food at a community kitchen in Gaza City, northern Gaza Strip, on Monday. Jehad Alshrafi/Associated Press Israel already controls around 75% of the territory, which has been declared a buffer zone or placed under evacuation orders. With Israel also largely sealing Gaza's borders, it's unclear where civilians would go. Related : It would also pose a major risk for the remaining 20 or so living hostages, likely held in tunnels or other secret locations. Hamas is believed to have ordered its guards to kill captives if Israeli forces approach. Hamas-led militants abducted 251 hostages in the Oct. 7, 2023, attack that ignited the war and killed around 1,200 people that day, mostly civilians. They are still holding 50 hostages, less than half of them believed to be alive, and recent videos have shown emaciated captives pleading for their lives. Israel's retaliatory offensive has killed over 61,000 Palestinians, according to Gaza's Health Ministry, which does not say how many were civilians or combatants. The ministry, which is part of the Hamas-run government and run by medical professionals, is seen by the United Nations and other experts as the most reliable source on casualties. Israel disputes its toll but has not provided its own. International outrage and further isolation Israel's wartime conduct has shocked much of the international community, and prompted even close Western allies to call for an end to the war and to take steps to recognize Palestinian statehood. Advertisement The International Court of Justice is considering allegations of genocide, and the International Criminal Court has issued arrest warrants for Netanyahu and his former defense minister, alleging war crimes and crimes against humanity, including the use of starvation as a method of war. Related : Israel has rejected the allegations and accused those making them of antisemitic 'blood libel.' It says it has taken every effort to avoid harming civilians and blames Hamas for their deaths because the militants are deeply entrenched in heavily populated areas. Israel has said it will keep fighting until all the hostages are returned, Hamas is defeated or disarmed, and Gaza's population is given the option of 'voluntary emigration,' which the Palestinians and much of the international community view as forcible expulsion. People take part in a protest outside the US Embassy in Tel Aviv demanding the end of the war, the release of hostages held by Hamas in the Gaza Strip, and against Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu's government, on July 26. Mahmoud Illean/Associated Press Hamas has said it will only release the remaining hostages in return for a lasting ceasefire and an Israeli withdrawal. It says it is willing to give up power but will not lay down its arms as long as Israel occupies territories the Palestinians want for a future state. Another open-ended occupation Israel captured Gaza, the West Bank and east Jerusalem in the 1967 Middle East war. The United Nations, the Palestinians and others continued to view Gaza as occupied territory after the 2005 withdrawal of Israeli troops and settlers, as Israel maintained control of its airspace, coastline, most of its land border and its population registry. The full reoccupation of Gaza would pose long-term challenges that Israel is well aware of given its long history of occupying Arab lands, including the likelihood of a prolonged insurgency. Israeli support for the war already appears to have declined since Netanyahu ended a ceasefire in March, as soldiers have been killed in hit-and-run attacks. Advertisement As an occupying power, Israel would be expected to maintain order and ensure the basic needs of the population are met. In the West Bank, it has largely outsourced that to the Palestinian Authority, which exercises limited autonomy in population centers. But in Gaza, Netanyahu has ruled out any future role for the PA, accusing it of not being fully committed to peace, and has not produced any plan for Gaza's postwar governance and reconstruction. Long-term repercussions Even if Israel succeeds in suppressing Hamas, the reoccupation of Gaza could pose an even more profound threat to the country. It would leave Israel in full control of the territory between the Mediterranean Sea and the Jordan River, which is home to around 7 million Jews and 7 million Palestinians — most of the latter denied basic rights, including the vote. Even before the war, major human rights groups said the situation amounted to apartheid, something Israel vehemently denies. A tent camp for displaced Palestinians stretches along Gaza City, on Sunday. Jehad Alshrafi/Associated Press Unless large numbers of Palestinians are expelled — no longer merely a fantasy of Israel's far-right — Israel would face an all-too-familiar existential dilemma: Create a Palestinian state in the 1967 territories and preserve Israel as a Jewish and democratic state, or rule over millions of Palestinians indefinitely and hope they never rally behind the idea of equal rights in a binational state. Israel would no longer be able to point to Hamas' rule in Gaza, or factional divisions among Palestinians, as reasons to avoid such a reckoning. And when Trump leaves office, it may find it has few friends to back it up. Advertisement
