&w=3840&q=100)
State-run Mahavitaran seeks licence to supply electricity across Mumbai
In a release, Maharashtra State Electricity Distribution Company Ltd (MSEDCL or Mahavitaran) said the petition has been submitted under sections 14 and 15 of the Electricity Act, 2003, along with provisions of the MERC Rules, 2006, and the Electricity Distribution Licence Rules, 2005. The company has urged the commission to grant it permission to supply electricity to key regions in Mumbai -- ranging from Colaba to Mahim, Bandra to Dahisar, Vikhroli to Chunabhatti and Mankhurd, as well as Chena, Kajupada, and Mira Bhayandar Municipal Corporation limits. Currently, power in Mumbai is distributed by three players -- civic utility Brihanmumbai Electricity Supply and Transport Undertaking (BEST), private companies Adani Electricity Mumbai Ltd and Tata Power Mumbai. Mahavitaran already supplies power to Mumbai suburbs of Mulund and Bhandup, but its entry into the rest of the city would mark a significant expansion. Mahavitaran is among the largest electricity distribution companies in the country, serving over 31.7 million customers across Maharashtra. It operates a vast network that includes 4,230 substations, nearly 25,000 high-voltage feeders, 960,000 distribution transformers, and more than 3.64 lakh kilometres of 11 kV lines, said the release. The company supplies electricity to 457 cities and over 41,928 villages in the state, with a current daily supply capacity of 26,000 MW. Mahavitaran said Mumbai's electricity demand has reached approximately 4,000 MW, and is set to grow rapidly due to the ongoing metro and coastal road infrastructure projects, expansion in the service sector, and a boom in data centre developments across eastern and western suburbs. "To meet this growing demand, Mahavitaran has entered into power purchase agreements under the Resource Adequacy Plan, aimed at boosting the state's generation capacity from 42,000 MW to 81,000 MW over the next five years," the release said. A significant share of this will be green energy, enabling supply of clean and affordable electricity, said the state-run company. Mahavitaran has also proposed a reduction in tariffs before the commission, signalling its intent to make electricity more affordable for consumers. "Mahavitaran has over seven decades of experience in electricity distribution in Maharashtra. With sufficient power capacity and an extensive network, the company is well-positioned to serve Mumbai's residential, commercial, and industrial consumers with reliable, green, and affordable power," the release concluded.
(Only the headline and picture of this report may have been reworked by the Business Standard staff; the rest of the content is auto-generated from a syndicated feed.)
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Mint
2 days ago
- Mint
Maha power regulator puts controversial order on hold after solar cos move court
Mumbai: The Maharashtra Electricity Regulatory Commission (MERC) has assured the Bombay High Court that it will not implement till 14 July its order that green power producers complain makes it difficult to supply excess electricity to the grid for later retrieval. The move comes after a consortium of renewable energy developers challenged the decision, saying it would cripple their ability to provide round-the-clock low-cost power, rendering them uncompetitive. The court was hearing a plea filed by the National Solar Energy Federation of India (NSEFI), JSW Neo Energy Ltd, and nine other solar developers including Sunsure Solar Park MH One Pvt. Ltd and Solenco Solar Park MH-V Pvt. Ltd. The developers have called MERC's decision arbitrary, unlawful, and detrimental to the commercial viability of clean energy projects in the state. MERC, along with the Maharashtra State Electricity Distribution Company Ltd (MSEDCL), submitted that it would not enforce the contested provisions until mid-July. 'The aforesaid statement is accepted as an undertaking given to this court. In light of the aforesaid statement, we find that at this stage, the petitioners are adequately protected and hence, no further ad-interim relief is passed in the above petitions,' the court said on 1 July. In addition to MERC's 25 June order, the developers have challenged Regulation 115 of the Multi-Year Tariff (MYT) Regulations, 2024, which empowers distribution companies to propose new Time-of-Day (ToD) slots and tariffs. The core issue before the court stems from MERC's reversal of its March 2024 decision that allowed consumers to draw banked solar power across different ToD slots—enabling both operational flexibility and financial efficiency. Under the revised rules, solar energy banked during, say, 9 am to 5 pm, must be consumed strictly within that window, significantly diminishing the value of banking. This makes the supply of renewable power to commercial and industrial (C&I) customers more expensive for solar companies. This is because solar power is generated in excess during the morning and afternoon hours when the sun shines the brightest. The excess power during this period is supplied to the grid and drawn by MSEDCL. Later, when the C&I customer needs power when the sun sets, it tends to draw it back from the grid at a nominal fee, usually about 8-10% of the power banked. Solar producers fear that a change to the banking structure would jeopardize their long-term power supply agreements with C&I consumers as the cost increases. MSEDCL proposed to change the banking structure as it was getting more expensive for it to supply the power back during non-solar hours from other sources. India suffers from insufficient capacity to store its solar power. In the court, developers argued that MERC enacted the change without public consultation, a legal requirement in tariff matters, thereby breaching principles of natural justice. 'The review petition (filed before MERC) was neither made available to the stakeholders nor were the stakeholders permitted to address any arguments,' the petition reads, calling the process a 'complete go-by to the established principles of law.' They also contend that their intervention applications, which sought a hearing in the review proceedings, were dismissed without explanation. The petition states that nearly 600 MW of solar capacity in Maharashtra is affected by the order. The developers are seeking to quash both the 25 June directive and Regulation 115, arguing that the latter unlawfully delegates tariff-setting authority to distribution companies. Legal experts say the case raises broader questions around regulatory accountability and administrative fairness. 'The failure of MERC to provide due process, such as adequate hearing or consultation, before issuing a significantly impactful review order constitutes a direct infringement of the petitioners' fundamental legal right to fair administrative action,' said Kunal Sharma, founder and managing partner at Taraksh Lawyers & Consultants. He noted that while the petition does not directly challenge Regulation 115, the court could still strike down the order on procedural or jurisdictional grounds. 'The petition derives substantial force from the argument that the revised banking provisions are inconsistent with the existing DOA Regulations and that MERC acted beyond the scope of its limited review jurisdiction,' Sharma said. Sachit Mathur, managing partner at Emerald Law, offered a different view, suggesting the review order could hold if MERC's rationale is sound. 'With respect to the ToD tariff and banking provisions, the Commission's reliance on review jurisdiction may withstand scrutiny. In particular, the omission of Regulation 20.3 could plausibly qualify as an error apparent on the face of the record,' Mathur said. MERC maintains that the review order is a clarification, aligning the tariff framework with earlier regulatory processes. It insists that stakeholder input had been taken during the original MYT proceedings and that repeat consultation during the review is not mandatory. It also warned that granting relief solely on procedural grounds could set a sweeping precedent.
Time of India
3 days ago
- Time of India
Consumers protest in front of MSEDCL office in Sambhajinagar against installation of smart meters
Chhatrapati Sambhajinagar: A group of consumers, led by the local unit of the Communist Party of India (CPI-M), staged a protest on Wednesday against the ongoing installation of 'smart meters' by the MSEDCL . Protesters said these new Time of Day (TOD) meters will inflict an additional financial burden on consumers. "Maharashtra State Electricity Distribution Co Ltd (MSEDCL) has appointed people to install these so-called 'smart' meters without our consent. The meters do not show real-time consumption data to date as promised by the state power utility. We fear that it will inflate our monthly power bills in days to come," Prashant Beedkar, a consumer, told TOI. Gathered in front of the office of the joint managing director of MSEDCL on Wednesday, protesters raised slogans against state govt and demanded a stay on the installation of smart meters. Local CPI (M) leader Abhay Taksal, who led the protest, claimed a few large corporate houses in India have bagged the contract for smart meters. He said, "There are several hidden terms and conditions associated with the installation of smart meters. by Taboola by Taboola Sponsored Links Sponsored Links Promoted Links Promoted Links You May Like 3BHK Transformation Possible for ₹4.5 Lakh? HomeLane Get Quote Undo MSEDCL is deliberately keeping consumers in the dark about these. The installation of smart meters is a larger conspiracy to privatise the power supply." Taksal added that there is a strong possibility that the existing postpaid smart meters will become prepaid ones in days to come. "The private telecom service providers offered free internet initially and later gradually made data packages highly exorbitant in prices. Such a tactic is bound to be repeated in the matter of power supply in Maharashtra," he alleged. When contacted, MSEDCL authorities said false propaganda involving smart meters is being spread by certain elements. "We have not received complaints of hefty power bills from consumers who have received the smart meters. The existing postpaid nature of power bills will continue in the future too. The power tariffs are decided by the power regulator MERC, and therefore there is no scope for any arbitrary hike," the MSEDCL spokesperson for the Chhatrapati Sambhajinagar zone said.
Time of India
3 days ago
- Time of India
Consumer body requests users to install Time of Day meters to gain from reduced tariff
Nashik: Akhil Bharatiya Grahak Panchayat, Nashik Zilla, which previously opposed the installation of Time of Day (TOD) smart electricity meters, has reversed its position and urged consumers to adopt the new meters. H R Jadhav, a retired engineer from MSEDCL and current president of the district unit of Akhil Bharatiya Grahak Panchayat (ABGP), held a meeting with Sunder Latpate, the chief engineer of the Nashik Zone of MSEDCL, on Monday. Following the discussion, Jadhav called on residents to install TOD, or smart meters, to take advantage of tariff benefits now available to consumers. "We met Sunder Latpate, the chief engineer of Nashik Zone (Nashik and Ahilyanagar), who explained to us the finer points of the TOD meters that are in the interest of the consumers. So, till date, there has been opposition by the organisation for the installation of the meters, but we now appeal to the people to install these devices," said Jadhav. Jadhav explained that MSEDCL is installing TOD meters to analyse power consumption patterns. This data will enable the company to plan infrastructure investments effectively and reward consumers for using power during peak or off-peak hours. "Solar power generation is rising enormously. Since this power is cheap, the power distribution company intends to pass on the benefits directly to the consumers using the power during the daytime and, hence, will charge lower rates. However, current electricity meters do not have the facility to measure power consumption during specific timings. The TOD meters can provide details of power consumption, and hence they should be installed by consumers who will receive power supply at reduced prices," Jadhav added. He also said MSEDCL will cover the cost of installation and repairs if the TOD meter is damaged within five years from the installation date, except in cases where the malfunction results from consumer misuse. Get the latest lifestyle updates on Times of India, along with Doctor's Day 2025 , messages and quotes!
