Seat 11A Miracle: British Passenger Vishwash Kumar Ramesh Escapes Air India Disaster That Killed 241
The survivor, identified as 48-year-old Vishwash Kumar Ramesh, a British citizen of Indian origin known locally as Ramesh Vishwashkumar, was rescued from the charred fuselage and is currently in stable condition, according to Blic. Authorities say he "miraculously survived the crash and was taken to the hospital, where he is not in life-threatening danger."
Ramesh recounted the harrowing moment from his hospital bed: "Thirty seconds after takeoff, a loud noise was heard and the plane crashed. Everything happened very quickly," he told BBC News. He had been seated in 11A—a window seat beside an emergency exit in the front of the Economy Class cabin—allowing him to escape the burning aircraft, noted Kompas.
According to BBC News, Flight AI171 was carrying 242 people—230 passengers and 12 crew members—including 169 Indian citizens, 53 Britons, seven Portuguese nationals, and one Canadian. The flight had just departed from Sardar Vallabhbhai Patel International Airport at 1:38 p.m. local time when it crashed into the B.J. Medical College complex, tearing through a dormitory and dining hall, as reported by Mirror.
Ynet News confirmed the death toll at at least 204, including passengers, crew, and local residents. More than fifty medical students were hospitalized; five later died, and dozens more suffered severe burns.
Ramesh was traveling with his older brother, Ajay Kumar Ramesh, who sat in a different row and remains missing. "He was traveling with me, and I couldn't find him. Please help me find him," Ramesh pleaded through tears, as quoted by BBC News. Proceso reported that the brothers were visiting Gujarat on a family trip, and also published video footage of Ramesh, bloodied and dazed, walking toward an ambulance just moments after escaping the wreck.
As rescue operations continued, Police Commissioner Gyanendra Singh Malik warned the toll could rise due to the aircraft's impact on the crowded residential zone, Kompas reported. Army units have been assisting local emergency responders in sifting through debris, recovering bodies, and supporting survivors.
International aviation safety teams have joined the Directorate General of Civil Aviation in investigating the crash. According to The Economist, the probe is focusing on cockpit voice and flight data recordings, while engineers examine potential mechanical failures or procedural missteps. The Indian Express cited sources from the Justice Mathur Commission who are reviewing whether flap misconfiguration compromised lift, alongside possibilities of engine thrust loss or a bird strike.
This marks the first fatal crash involving a Boeing 787 since the aircraft entered service in 2009, The Economist noted. Following the incident, Boeing shares plunged more than eight percent, "re-igniting concerns about Boeing's ongoing safety issues."
Air India's parent company, Tata Group, announced compensation of ₹1 crore for each bereaved family, and is providing travel, accommodation, and counseling support for relatives arriving in Ahmedabad, according to Ynet News.
Prime Minister Narendra Modi called the disaster "an indescribably heartbreaking tragedy," reported Kompas, and the crash has renewed scrutiny over the safety of urban airports located in densely populated areas.
Doctors have confirmed that Ramesh sustained trauma to his chest, eyes, and legs, but his condition is stable. Investigators hope his firsthand account will provide critical insight into the final moments of Flight AI171.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
DW
25-07-2025
- DW
India: Collapsed roof in Rajasthan school kills children – DW – 07/25/2025
Some 40 children, apart from teachers and staff members, were in the school building in India's Rajasthan, when the roof collapsed, killing at least four children. At least four children have been killed and dozens others feared trapped as the roof of a school building collapsed in India's western state of Rajasthan on Friday. The news was reported by local Indian media newspaper Indian Express and television channel NDTV. The incident occured at the Piplodi Government School around 8:30 am, as per NDTV's report. It cited officials saying around 40 children, in addition to teachers and staff members, were inside when the roof of the one-storied building collapsed.
Int'l Business Times
18-07-2025
- Int'l Business Times
UK 'Princes In The Tower' Murder Probe Clears Richard III
It is one of history's most intriguing "murders" -- the mysterious disappearance over five centuries ago of two young princes from the Tower of London. Nearly 200 years after they disappeared, two small skeletons were found in a wooden box at the historic tower and reburied at Westminster Abbey. The remains were believed, but never proved, to be those of the two brothers -- heir to the throne Edward, 12, and Richard, nine, the sons of King Edward IV of England, who were reputedly murdered at the behest of their uncle, Richard Duke of Gloucester. William Shakespeare later immortalised him in Richard III as a scheming hunchback who did away with his royal nephews so he could take the crown himself, sealing his reputation as a child killer. Now British author Philippa Langley, who helped unearth Richard's body from a central England carpark in 2012, has claimed that the princes -- far from being killed -- actually survived. The elder prince, Edward, was heir to the throne at the time of his disappearance and would have ruled as King Edward V of England. Langley decided to delve into the mystery after coming to believe that the conventional narrative in which Richard had the young princes killed smacked of "history being written by the victors". She was finally spurred into action after reading an article about Richard's reburial at Leicester Cathedral in 2015 which questioned whether the nation should honour a "child killer". "I think I'd always realised that the story sort of developed during the reign of the Tudors," she said, adding that it was then "repeated and repeated over time" until it became "truth and fact". The last English king to die in battle, Richard ruled from 1483 until his brutal death at the Battle of Bosworth near Leicester in 1485, aged 32. Bosworth was the last major conflict in the Wars of the Roses and changed the course of English history because the Tudor dynasty of Henry VII captured the crown from Richard's Plantagenets. Langley attributes the accepted story that Richard had the boys murdered to King Henry VII, a "very, very intelligent individual, but suspicious and highly paranoid". "He had a massive spy network working for him. And he was able to completely control the narrative," she said, adding that Richard ended up "covered in Tudor mud". Taking a cold case review approach to the historical "whodunnit", Langley says she assembled a group of investigative specialists, including police and lawyers, to advise her. "They said: 'Look, if you haven't got any confirmed, identified bodies, then it has to be a missing persons investigation and you have to follow that methodology'. "They said: 'You have to actively look for evidence'. That's when it really started to get interesting." Langley put out an appeal for volunteers to scour archives, only to be inundated with offers of help from people ranging from ordinary citizens to medieval historians. The result was the decade-long Missing Princes Project which she says unearthed a significant amount of information pointing to the survival of both young princes. Langley now believes that it is up to Richard's detractors to disprove the survival thesis, which she outlines in the new book "The Princes in the Tower: Solving History's Greatest Cold Case". "The onus is now on them to find the evidence that the boys died. "They cannot say Richard III murdered the princes in the tower any more because we found numerous proofs of life everywhere," she said. Key to Langley's conviction that both boys survived are documents discovered supporting a rebellion by "Edward IV's son". During the rebellion in 1487, Lambert Simnel, a pretender to the throne who came forward after Richard's death, was crowned in Dublin. According to fresh references found by the project, the boy was "called" or said to be "a son of King Edward", which she believes points to Simnel being the elder prince, son of Edward IV. The reaction to Langley's research has been mixed. Michael Dobson, director and a professor of Shakespeare studies at the University of Birmingham's Shakespeare Institute, expressed scepticism. "Given the ways of dynastic monarchy, I think Richard would have been taking a very big risk in leaving those princes alive," he said. "The chances of their having accidentally gone missing while incarcerated on his orders in the Tower of London seem pretty remote." Yeoman Warder Ravenmaster Chris Skaife at the Tower of London, where the young princes were imprisoned AFP Langley says there is evidence the princes were not murdered by their uncle, Richard III AFP
DW
15-07-2025
- DW
Air India crash: Boeing aircraft in the spotlight – DW – 07/15/2025
India and South Korea have ordered comprehensive checks of Boeing aircraft following the Ahmedabad crash which killed 260 people. A preliminary report indicates fuel switches moving to cutoff position just before impact. The US aircraft manufacturer Boeing finds itself in focus of an international controversy once again, with India and South Korea ordering fuel switch inspections for Boeing jets after a 787-8 Dreamliner crashed in Ahmedabad last month. Individual airlines in Japan and Singapore started their own checks as a precaution, according to the Reuters news agency. To view this video please enable JavaScript, and consider upgrading to a web browser that supports HTML5 video The London-bound Boeing jet collided with a structure just minutes after takeoff. The crash killed 19 people on the ground and all but one of the 242 people onboard the aircraft. Indian officials are still trying to determine the cause of the tragedy. However, the nation's Aircraft Accident Investigation Bureau (AAIB) published a preliminary report this week claiming that the fuel switches for both of the plane's engines moved to the "CUTOFF" position almost immediately after takeoff, starving the engines of fuel. It is not yet known if this was done by one of the pilots or happened due to any mechanical faults. While the 15-page report does not provide a full transcript of the pilots' conversation, the authorities shared a snippet indicating confusion in the cockpit. "In the cockpit voice recording, one of the pilots is heard asking the other why did he cutoff. The other pilot responded that he did not do so," AIIB officials said. The report also notes that fuel switches moved to "RUN" seconds later. One of the engines apparently started cycling toward recovery, while the other continued to struggle. This was not enough to maintain flight and the plane crashed after spending less than a minute in the air. Commenting on the preliminary report, aviation expert Sanjay Lazar who has worked with Air India for 37 years, said that the document "raises more questions" than it provides answers. To view this video please enable JavaScript, and consider upgrading to a web browser that supports HTML5 video He also said it was "regrettable" that the full transcript from the cockpit has not been shared with the public. The AAIB-provided note on the pilots' conversation indicates that "either none of them cut it off and it got cut off some other way, or you know, there was some element of subterfuge. So it adds a cloud of mystery over that," he told DW. With the focus of the probe moving onto Boeing's fuel intake controls, Lazar pointed to two directives issued by the US Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) possibly relating to the issue. The first, non-mandatory directive in 2018 had FAA warning that these fuel switches could have a fault and advising supervisory bodies to check them. The second one in 2022, however, was mandatory — and it focused on engine fire control panel and engine fire control switches. According to Lazar, the FAA said checks were necessary due to reports that foreign object debris "may have been introduced during maintenance or rework" of certain units, with one of the risks associated with it being an "uncommanded activation of the engine fuel shutoff." Air India admitted not following up on the first, non-mandatory directive. It was not immediately clear if the airline took action on the 2022 order. Air India also said its maintenance records for the crashed jet showed that the throttle control module, which includes the fuel switches, was replaced in 2023. However, "the reason for the replacement was not linked to the fuel control switch," the AAIB said in their preliminary report. In recent days, news agencies reported that Boeing was assuring airlines its fuel switch locks were safe. According to a media reports, Air India CEO Campbell Wilson issued an internal memo on Monday acknowledging that the preliminary AAIB report "provided both greater clarity and opened additional questions." "I urge everyone to avoid drawing premature conclusions as the investigation is far from over," he said. To view this video please enable JavaScript, and consider upgrading to a web browser that supports HTML5 video Wilson also said all mandatory maintenance and checks were completed on the Boeing aircraft. "There was no issue with the quality of fuel and no abnormality with the take-off roll. The pilots had passed their mandatory pre-flight breathalyser and there were no observations pertaining to their medical status," he said in the note. On Tuesday, Singapore Airlines said it had completed the inspection of its 787 fleet, including planes used by its low-cost subsidiary Scoot, and confirmed all were functioning properly. Germany's Lufthansa group also said it rechecked fuel switches on its own 787s in the wake of the Air India crash, and found no faults. Indian officials are due to submit their findings regarding fuel switches by next Monday. The final report on the crash, however, is likely to take a full year or longer. To view this video please enable JavaScript, and consider upgrading to a web browser that supports HTML5 video Meanwhile, the Airline Pilots' Association of India (ALPA India) requested to be included as observers to provide "the requisite transparency" in the official probe. "We feel that the investigation is being driven in a direction presuming the guilt of pilots and we strongly object to this line of thought," ALPA India president Sam Thomas said in a statement issued over the weekend. Whatever the outcome of India's and other probes, the latest Boeing crash is likely to further degrade the already shaky reputation of the US airspace giant. Boeing has been struggling to recover from two fatal crashes in 2018 and 2019, both of them involving 737 Max jets. While multiple factors contributed to both tragedies, both of them were linked to the plane's Manoeuvring Characteristics Augmentation System (MCAS), which is designed to automatically push the plane's nose down if it detects a danger of stalling. Between the 2019 crash and the latest incident in India, Boeing aircraft were involved in a series of smaller midair emergencies, such as a door ripping off of an Alaska Airlines 737 Max-9 in January 2024, or a 787 suddenly dropping during flight and leaving some 50 people injured in March 2024. Some two months later, one person died when a Boeing 777 hit turbulence while flying from London to Singapore. To view this video please enable JavaScript, and consider upgrading to a web browser that supports HTML5 video Multiple whilstleblowers have also publicly raised concerns about production issues and alleged safety gaps in Boeing's production process, though achieving clarity on the complaints has proven to be difficult. In March 2024, a Boeing former employee who had recently been giving evidence against the company in a whistleblower suit died of what police later said was a self-inflicted gunshot wound. Weeks later, another whistleblower passed away after a short illness, after coming down with a fast-spreading infection and developing pneumonia.
