
Pakistan sees minimal fiscal impact from India standoff as economists estimate billions in losses
Tensions between India and Pakistan escalated after a deadly April 22 attack on Hindu tourists in Indian-administered Kashmir, which killed 26 people. India blamed Pakistan for the assault, an allegation denied by officials in Islamabad, though it still led to one the worst military confronts between the two nuclear-armed neighbors in decades.
A ceasefire was announced on Saturday by US President Donald Trump, following four days of fighting and intense diplomatic efforts led by Washington. However, the military confrontation, by then, had disrupted stock markets, led to airspace closures, escalated defense spending and caused economic losses amounting to billions of dollars.
'The current standoff with India won't have a large fiscal impact on Pakistan,' Khurram Schehzad, adviser to the finance minister, told Arab News.
'It can be managed within the current fiscal space, with no need for a new economic assessment,' he added.
Schehzad said Pakistan's economic resilience was evident from a new record at the Pakistan Stock Exchange, which on Monday posted the highest single-day gain in over 26 years, surging by 10,123 points or 9.45 percent, significantly surpassing the losses recorded last week following the Indian strike.
'Pakistan's measured and responsible response, in both its narrative and actions on the ground, has caught investors' eye, alongside the potential positive spillover effect of a possible settlement in the US-China tariff issue,' he added.
Arab News reached out to the defense ministry and Pakistan's military media wing for official estimates of the conflict's cost, but did not receive a response by the time of filing this story.
Meanwhile, economists said the recent military standoff inflicted heavy financial losses on both countries, with combined costs approaching $1 billion per hour.
'The recent conflict, over an 87-hour period, I think cost about a billion dollars an hour for both countries,' economist Farrukh Saleem told Arab News.
He estimated total combined losses of between $80 and $90 billion over the four-day period.
'About 20 percent of that was incurred by Pakistan and a good 80 to 85 percent by India,' he added.
Saleem said daily economic losses from the conflict, including stock market declines and other impacts, amounted to around $20 billion per day, with Pakistan losing up to $4 billion and India as much as $16 billion per day.
'I have tried to put things together. If this conflict had continued for 30 days, my estimate is that both countries would have lost a good $500 billion, with over a $400 billion loss for the Indian economy,' he added.
Explaining India's higher losses, he noted that each Rafale fighter jet costs around $240 million, while Pakistan's JF-17 Thunder or J-10C jets are priced between $20 and $25 million per unit.
'BrahMos, for instance, the Indian ballistic missile, costs $3 million apiece. If, for example, 10 units are used in a day, that amounts to $30 million in a single day,' he said.
Dr. Ali Salman, Executive Director of the Policy Research Institute of Market Economy (PRIME), an Islamabad-based independent economic policy think tank, said the conflict had disrupted economic sentiment and affected investor confidence.
'Certainly, investors would not like to come into countries, whether India or Pakistan, if they are in a constant war-like situation,' he told Arab News.
He emphasized that prolonged conflict would push people in both countries deeper into poverty, noting that one in four poor people in the world lives in India or Pakistan.
'We have 27 percent of the world's poor in just these two countries, and I believe that we need to come out of the military context and go into an economic context,' he added.
Another economist, Shakeel Ramay, said every war has an economic dimension and that the conflict had imposed a heavy financial burden on both economies.
'Pakistan's military expenditure over the four-day conflict, including jets, artillery and missiles, amounted to around $1.5 billion from the national budget, by my estimate,' he said, adding that this was significant, especially as the country continues to face economic challenges.
'The good thing is our economic activities continued without interruption, retail markets operated smoothly with no shortages and trade routes remained open, all indicating that the direct economic cost was minimal,' he added.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Arab News
an hour ago
- Arab News
Minister orders probe into killing of barking deer on Islamabad's Margalla Hills
ISLAMABAD: Pakistan's Minister for Climate Change and Environmental Coordination Dr. Musadik Malik has taken notice of the killing of an endangered barking deer on Islamabad's Margalla Hills and ordered a probe into the incident, the Press Information Department (PID) said on Saturday. Barking deer, also known as Indian muntjac, are found in isolated populations within Margalla Hills National Park, Khanpur Range and Lathrar near the Pakistani capital of Islamabad. They are considered endangered in Pakistan due to their restricted range and declining population. A disturbing video circulating on social media this week showed three men slaughtering the rare animal on the roadside and has sparked public anger and calls to investigate the incident. Climate Change and Environmental Coordination Minister Malik condemned the hunting and killing of wildlife in protected areas, according to a PID statement. 'Such acts of cruelty and disregard for conservation laws are unacceptable and will not be tolerated,' the minister, who has sought a report from authorities on the incident, was quoted as saying. Separately, the Islamabad Wildlife Management Board (IWMB) said it had filed a complaint with police, seeking action against the ones involved in the incident for violating the Islamabad Nature Conservation and Wildlife Management Act. 'Barking deer is a protected animal under Schedule 1 of the act,' the IWMB said on X. 'A request has been made for action under sections 12.4(a) and 16.1(a) of the Nature Act 2024.' The board said a violation of the relevant section of the law is punishable by a fine of Rs1 million ($3,523) and imprisonment for a term of up to one year. Pakistan has witnessed frequent incidents of violation of wildlife laws. An escaped pet lion chased a woman and two children down a busy street in Pakistan's Lahore, police said Friday, with dramatic footage showing the big cat leaping a wall before pouncing on them. All three were taken to hospital but were not in a critical condition. Keeping exotic animals, especially big cats, as pets has long been seen as a sign of privilege and power in Punjab, the most populous province of the country. Police said they had arrested three men. 'The suspects fled from the spot, taking the lion with them. They were arrested within 12 hours of the incident,' the office of the Deputy Inspector General Operations in Lahore said. The lion, an 11-month-old male, has been confiscated by police and sent to a wildlife park.

Al Arabiya
an hour ago
- Al Arabiya
Elon Musk announces forming of ‘America Party' in further break from Trump
The tattered bromance between Republican President Donald Trump and his main campaign financier Elon Musk took another fractious turn on Saturday when the space and automotive billionaire announced the formation of a new political party, saying Trump's 'big, beautiful' tax bill would bankrupt America. A day after asking his followers on his X platform whether a new US political party should be created, Musk declared in a post on Saturday that 'Today, the America Party is formed to give you back your freedom.' 'By a factor of 2 to 1, you want a new political party and you shall have it!' he wrote. By a factor of 2 to 1, you want a new political party and you shall have it! When it comes to bankrupting our country with waste & graft, we live in a one-party system, not a democracy. Today, the America Party is formed to give you back your freedom. — Elon Musk (@elonmusk) July 5, 2025 The announcement from Musk comes after Trump signed his self-styled 'big, beautiful' tax-cut and spending bill into law on Friday, which Musk fiercely opposed. Musk, who became the word's richest man thanks to his Tesla car company and his SpaceX satellite firm, spent hundreds of millions on Trump's re-election and led the Department of Government Efficiency from the start of the president's second term aimed at slashing government spending. The two have since fallen out spectacularly over disagreements about the bill. Musk said previously that he would start a new political party and spend money to unseat lawmakers who supported the bill. Trump earlier this week threatened to cut off the billions of dollars in subsidies that Musk's companies receive from the federal government. Republicans have expressed concern that Musk's on-again, off-again feud with Trump could hurt their chances to protect their majority in the 2026 midterm congressional elections. Asked on X what was the one thing that made him go from loving Trump to attacking him, Musk said: 'Increasing the deficit from an already insane $2T under Biden to $2.5T. This will bankrupt the country.' He referenced the growth of Greece from subjugation to preeminence in the ancient world in another tweet, saying: 'The way we're going to crack the uniparty system is by using a variant of how Epaminondas shattered the myth of Spartan invincibility at Leuctra: Extremely concentrated force at a precise location on the battlefield.' There was no immediate comment from Trump or the White House on Musk's announcement. The feud with Trump, often described as one between the world's richest man and the world's most powerful, has led to several precipitous falls in Tesla's share price. The stock soared after Trump's November reelection and hit a high of more than $488 in December, before losing more than half of its value in April and closing last week out at $315.35. Despite Musk's deep pockets, breaking the Republican-Democratic duopoly will be a tall order, given that it has dominated American political life for more than 160 years, while Trump's approval ratings in polls in his second term have generally held firm above 40 percent, despite often divisive policies.


Arab News
4 hours ago
- Arab News
Trump says he didn't know an offensive term he used in a speech is considered antisemitic
WASHINGTON: President Donald Trump says he didn't know the term 'shylock' is considered antisemitic when he used it in a speech to describe unscrupulous moneylenders. Trump told reporters early Friday after returning from an event in Iowa that he had 'never heard it that way' and 'never heard that' the term was considered an offensive stereotype about Jews. Shylock refers to the villainous Jewish moneylender in Shakespeare's 'The Merchant of Venice' who demands a pound of flesh from a debtor. The Anti-Defamation League, which works to combat antisemitism, said in a statement that the term 'evokes a centuries-old antisemitic trope about Jews and greed that is extremely offensive and dangerous. President Trump's use of the term is very troubling and irresponsible.' Democrat Joe Biden, while vice president, said in 2014 that he had made a 'poor choice' of words a day after he used the term in remarks to a legal aid group. Trump's administration has made cracking down on antisemitism a priority. His administration said it is screening for antisemitic activity when granting immigration benefits and its fight with Harvard University has centered on allegations from the White House that the school has tolerated antisemitism. But the Republican president has also had a history of playing on stereotypes about Jewish people. He told the Republican Jewish Coalition in 2015 that 'you want to control your politicians' and suggested the audience used money to exert control. Before he kicked off his 2024 presidential campaign, Trump drew widespread criticism for dining at his Florida club with a Holocaust-denying white nationalist. Last year, Trump made repeated comments accusing Jewish Americans who identify as Democrats of disloyalty because of the Democratic leaders' criticisms of Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu. Critics said it perpetuated an antisemitic trope about Jews having divided loyalties and there being only one right way to be Jewish. On Thursday night in his speech in Iowa, Trump used the term while talking about his signature legislation that was passed by Congress earlier in the day. 'No death tax, no estate tax, no going to the banks and borrowing some from, in some cases, a fine banker and in some cases shylocks and bad people,' he said. When a reporter later asked about the word's antisemitic association and his intent, Trump said; 'No, I've never heard it that way. To me, a shylock is somebody that's a money lender at high rates. I've never heard it that way. You view it differently than me. I've never heard that.' The Anti-Defamation League said Trump's use of the word 'underscores how lies and conspiracies about Jews remain deeply entrenched in our country. Words from our leaders matter and we expect more from the President of the United States.'