Paedophile father fails to overturn conviction for abusing second daughter
Oliver Berry abused his daughter Sharon up to three times a week and also subjected the child to physical violence. She ran away from home when she was 12 years old.
Advertisement
Berry, of Newtown Lawns, Mullingar, had pleaded not guilty to 25 counts of indecent assault relating to Sharon Berry between 1980 and 1986, but was convicted following a trial in June 2023.
He was handed a seven-year sentence by Ms Justice Patricia Ryan on July 25th, 2023, to run consecutive to a prison term he was already serving for the sexual abuse of another of his daughters, Jennifer Berry.
The 68-year-old was previously jailed for 10 years in 2018, after a Central Criminal Court jury convicted him of 104 counts of both raping and sexually assaulting Jennifer between December 1982 and December 1994. She was aged between seven and 19 at the time.
This sentence was subsequently increased by three years following a successful appeal by the State.
Advertisement
That trial heard he raped Jennifer throughout her pregnancy and while her two-week-old baby was in the same room.
Berry maintained his innocence after the trial, and Ms Berry's mother, who has since separated from Berry, supported him and gave evidence in his defence during the trial.
Berry had appealed his conviction, arguing that the trial judge had made an error in ruling that the complainant was competent to give evidence.
It was further argued that the judge had erred in not permitting a competency hearing in respect of Ms Berry and in setting limits on the extent to which she could be cross-examined.
Advertisement
Dismissing his appeal on Tuesday, against his conviction for abusing Sharon, Ms Justice Tara Burns said none of the appellant's grounds of appeal had been upheld.
Ms Justice Burns noted that the proceedings had a 'protracted history'. She said several trials ended with a discharge of the jury or an adjournment after queries were raised about the victim's capacity to give evidence.
Further arguments arose over whether her initial complaints were reliable, having regard to a mental health issue which the victim disclosed during her evidence in the first trial.
During her evidence in that trial, Ms Berry said she was under 'psychiatric care' and was on medication. Following further investigation, the victim's medical records were disclosed.
Advertisement
In dismissing Berry's appeal, Ms Justice Burns said the appellant received the victim's medical records relating to her mental health.
She said it then became a matter for him whether to instruct an expert to determine the effect on the victim, if any, of the mental health conditions referred to in her medical records.
She said this could have been used to attempt to lay a foundation in respect of the competency hearing or to challenge the reliability of the victim's original complaint, but this was not done.
Ireland
Will with handwritten changes did not amount to re...
Read More
The judge said the height of the challenge was an assertion that the complainant was not competent to give evidence based on a diagnosis of schizophrenia that the victim indicated she had been informed of some time prior to August 2008.
Advertisement
'No evidence was led as to what the effect, if any, such a diagnosis could have on her ability to tell the truth,' she said. 'In those circumstances, the trial judge did not err in declining to hold a competency hearing.'
Ms Justice Burns also dismissed the grounds of appeal related to the limitations put on the cross-examination, noting that the relevance of her mental health could only be from the perspective of her reliability as a witness.
If you have been affected by any of the issues raised in this article, you can call the national 24-hour Rape Crisis Helpline at 1800-77 8888, access text service and webchat options at drcc.ie/services/helpline/ or visit Rape Crisis Help.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
The Independent
5 minutes ago
- The Independent
Watch: Ella Henderson opens up about endometriosis diagnosis
Pop star Ella Henderson has opened up about her struggles with endometriosis and is partnering with Endometriosis UK to support others affected. The condition occurs when cells similar to those in the lining of the womb grow elsewhere in the body, often causing pain, inflammation, and scar tissue. 'I've really, really been struggling not only with stomach bloating and physical pain, but also with my mental health … I wasn't really believed,' she shared on Instagram. 'I know my situation isn't unique,' she added. 'Too many women unnecessarily suffer with undiagnosed endometriosis.' She's promoting the charity 's tool that checks symptoms in one minute and creates a personalised letter for people to take to their GP.
Daily Mail
5 minutes ago
- Daily Mail
The teenage sex offenders getting away with raping and assaulting children... because police take too long to investigate the crimes
A teenager accused of sexually assaulting a 14-year-old schoolgirl has escaped prosecution because he is now over 18 and would have to be tried as an adult. The boy was 16 when he allegedly attacked the girl but the police investigation took so long that he was 19 by the time a file was sent to prosecutors. Despite the boy admitting the sexual contact took place, it was decided that it was 'not in the public interest' to prosecute him. The victim, from Surrey and named only as Rachel, said: 'I wish I had never bothered to report what happened to me. 'The message here is that if you are a few years from turning 18, you can rape and assault whoever you like without being punished for it.' The Mail has identified another shocking case which suggests teenage sex offenders are escaping justice because investigations take years and prosecutors drop cases when the suspects can no longer be tried as youths. In the second case, the police have failed to even interview a teenage rape suspect two years after the incident was reported – during which time he has turned 18. The proportion of rape cases being dropped by the Crown Prosecution Service has risen from nine per cent in 2022 to 13 per cent in 2024/25, official statistics show. The average wait for a bailed rape trial to conclude is five and a half years after the offence took place, including an average 18-month wait from a charge date to the end of the trial. This is due to investigative delays, a shortage in specialist barristers and a record court backlog of more than 77,000 cases. In Rachel's case, she was allegedly sexually assaulted in September 2021 by a college student who contacted her on Snapchat and arranged to meet near her home. The 16-year-old then groped her, told her to get on all fours before trying to have sex with her and then made her perform a sex act on him – which she said she did because she was frightened. She reported the boy to the police the following day, gave a statement and the suspect was arrested. When he was interviewed, he accepted the sexual activity had taken place but insisted it was consensual. Police also found a number of intimate photos of young girls on the boy's phone, Rachel said. Surrey Police did not send a file of evidence to the CPS until January 2024 – by which time the suspect had turned 19. The day before Rachel's 18th birthday she was told her interview had been 'credible and compelling' and there was enough evidence to charge the suspect with sexual offences. Despite this, a district prosecutor said it was not in the public interest to do so because he would now have to be tried as an adult. In a letter containing the news, the prosecutor wrote: 'The importance of this is that, if he were to be charged with the offences, he is no longer deemed a youth and therefore has lost the right to have his case heard in a Youth Court which means he no longer has the right to have the proceedings held in private, he has lost the right to anonymity and the Youth Court special measures and possible sentences, if convicted, that would have been available to him if he were charged as a youth. 'Although this has been a difficult decision to make, I have concluded that it would not be in the public interest to prosecute the suspect for the sexual activity which took place between you.' Rachel said: 'What happened to me that day was the single most horrific thing in my life, and this experience has just made it so much worse. 'I just cannot understand it. 'The message to young girls who are sexually assaulted by teenagers is 'don't bother reporting what happened to you – it will take so long for something to happen that they will turn 18 and the authorities won't care'. 'It feels like his interests are being prioritised over mine. It is not my fault that so much time has passed. 'And I won't be the only case. If this has happened here then it must be happening all over the country – it's almost like there's a loophole in the law.' Human rights lawyer Harriet Wistrich, who founded the Centre for Women's Justice, said Rachel had been 'failed by the state because of its own delays.' 'She has potentially been denied justice so may have a case under the Human Rights Act,' she added. 'This is not the only case involving an allegation of rape committed by a suspect who has then become an adult while the investigation is dragging on, something which can obviously change things. ' A colleague is working on a case currently where the investigating police force hasn't even interviewed the suspect two years on. 'He has now turned 18, and it seems that part of the reason they haven't bothered is they feel that his behaviour was just a young man being a young man and perhaps they didn't want to ruin his career. 'But this is another victim potentially being denied justice.' A CPS spokesman said: 'We take allegations of sexual offences extremely seriously regardless of the age of the people involved. 'Prosecutors examined the evidence in this case carefully and on review, concluded that there was no realistic prospect of conviction for any rape charge. When considering other potential sexual offences, it was not in the public interest to pursue prosecution. 'We have written to and offered to meet with the complainant and her family to explain our decision-making.' A Surrey Police spokesman said: 'Officers put in significant amounts of work into securing evidence in rape and sexual assault cases which are often complex and can involve multiple agencies. 'Whilst it is not uncommon for suspects under 18 to reach adulthood during an investigation, we understand each case must be individually assessed. 'In [Rachel's] case, charges were secured for underage sexual activity and an appeal was made against the decision not to charge for rape or attempted rape. 'Surrey Police continue to work with the family and liaise with CPS about this case.'
BreakingNews.ie
5 minutes ago
- BreakingNews.ie
Former TD Colm Keaveney banned from driving for four years
Former Labour and Fianna Fáil TD Colm Keaveney has been banned from driving for four years after refusing to provide a blood or urine sample to gardaí following a late-night incident in Boyle, Co Roscommon. Keaveney (54), of Milltown Road, Tuam, Co Galway pleaded guilty to failing to provide a specimen under Section 12 of the Road Traffic Act and failing to stop after a collision. Advertisement Appearing before Carrick-on-Shannon District Court on Tuesday, Judge Sandra Murphy imposed a €250 fine and a four-year disqualification from driving. Other charges, including no insurance and no licence, were struck out after he produced valid documents. The incident occurred on October 11th, 2024, when gardaí observed a Ford Focus being driven without lights through Boyle. The vehicle veered across the road and collided with a car waiting at a junction, but did not stop. When approached, Keaveney appeared intoxicated, was unsteady on his feet, had glassy eyes, and smelled of alcohol. Advertisement He was arrested and brought to Carrick-on-Shannon Garda Station, where he refused to provide a blood or urine sample to a designated doctor despite a formal demand. His solicitor said Keaveney had been under significant personal strain, including the recent deaths of both parents and ongoing chronic pain from spinal surgery. She said he had no previous criminal convictions and had asked to see his own doctor at the station, which was not possible. A long-time figure in politics, Keaveney was elected to the Dáil in 2011 as a Labour TD for Galway East. He lost the party whip in 2012 over a vote of conscience on a Government plan to cut an annual care grant as part of the 2013 budget and later joined Fianna Fáil, becoming the first sitting TD to cross directly between the two parties. He lost his Dáil seat in 2016 and later served one term on Galway County Council.
