Bill Gates' daughter Phoebe, 22, lands a new side hustle... after her billionaire dad said he would not give her money
The fashion show regular is working with Sophia Kianni and Tay Nakamoto for a new podcast episode, Sticking With Style.
They are offering tips on upgrading dorm room space for the fall 2025 semester.
The project is part of an endorsement deal with the brand Command, which proves Phoebe is moving more into the world of an influencer.
The 22-year-old studied Human Biology at California 's Stanford University.
She is the daughter to the Microsoft co-founder, 69, and his philanthropist ex wife Melinda Gates, 60.
Phoebe and her siblings, Jennifer, 28, and Rory, 25, will famously receive a minute percentage of their father's fortune because Bill will instead divert his mammoth fortune to charitable organizations.
In April she discussed her father's extraordinary success and the pressure that brings on her new podcast, The Burnouts, alongside her business partner and close friend, Sophia.
She said: 'I had so much insecurity and such a desire to prove myself at Stanford.
'I came in, I was like, ''I'm so privileged, I'm a nepo baby'', like I had so much insecurity around that. I feel it's so hard when you're a freshman in college because you have no experience. You have nothing.'
Despite her billionaire father's gravitas, the graduate, who is dating Sir Paul McCartney 's grandson, Arthur Donald, said she was 'flat-out rejected' from a business class after devising her first pitch, Bluetooth tampons, giving women health status updates throughout their periods.
'This was our first big failure of many, many, many,' Phoebe admitted. 'I don't think it's really a shocker that we got flat-out rejected from this class - they asked us, ''What problem does this solve? How would it make money?'' We couldn't answer those questions.'
It wasn't just her Stanford professors who doubted Phoebe's entrepreneurial skills, but Bill also blocked his daughter's request to drop out of school to pursue her debut company despite him doing something similar 49 years earlier.
Phoebe, who will soon launch her company, digital fashion platform Phia, which she describes as a 'new way to shop' online, with Kianni, said: 'I remember even when we wanted to start the company, him being like, ''Are you sure you want to do this?''
'Because both of my siblings were incredibly intelligent and took very typical career paths - my brother's a genius, my sister has two kids and a horse-back riding career and is in residency [as a Junior Pediatrician] - but there wasn't this adverse risk of failure.'
Phoebe and her siblings won't get a big inheritance.
The star continued: 'So my parents were really cautious when I was like, ''I want to do Stanford abroad and do this remotely and finish up my degree and do the start-up''.
'They were very much like, ''You need to finish your degree. You don't just get to drop out and [start] a company.'' Which is so funny because my dad literally did that - that's like the reason I'm able to go to Stanford, have my tuition paid.'
Bill dropped out of Harvard in 1975 after three semesters to start Microsoft, a decision which helped earn him his estimated $107 billion (£83 billion), according to Forbes.
Phoebe added that, despite having a close relationship with her father, she has few recollections of him discussing Microsoft with her.
'I literally never remember my dad talking to me about the start of Microsoft. I literally mostly just remember him talking about the Foundation,' she said.
Instead of depending entirely on knowledge passed down from her father, Phoebe claimed that she is securing her future through a solid work ethic.
She said: 'I really like the results we're seeing - and this is not just true for business, but any career you're in: it is just the result of habits.
'The tracking we're seeing with our product is really just the result of our habits; it's the result of loving your work, waking up early, working 'til damn late on this company because you love it.
'It's not work-life balance: this is your life, and you really enjoy it. It has to be fun, and you have to have the habits built around that.
'And controlling - being able to control that part of your brain that wants to stay in bed and being like, I don't want to eat but I need to go eat lunch because I need to be productive this afternoon.'
Gates offered the example of embracing rejection as a habit she and Kianni adopted to enable success.
She said: 'A habit that we had that I thought was so good at the beginning was just constant outreach and constant acceptance of rejection.
'When we were trying to get our first partnerships for Phia, we would outreach like... we maxed out the LinkedIn credits. And they wouldn't grant us more because we hit the limit.
'We'd get people respond like, ''Please leave me alone and never email me''. We'd still respond again.
'I really feel the greatest lesson from this is vulnerability is not embarrassing. Yes, our cold email outreach template was awful at first, and it was a complete flop, but I've connected with some of those people now, and they were like, ''Good for you for reaching out in college.''
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Geeky Gadgets
27 minutes ago
- Geeky Gadgets
Gemini Deep Think AI Might Be at Critical Capability Levels Researchers Warn
Could a machine ever think so deeply that it rivals, or even surpasses, human ingenuity? With Google's Gemini Deep Think model, this question is no longer theoretical—it's a pressing reality. Touted as a new leap in artificial intelligence, Gemini's capabilities extend far beyond solving complex equations or generating 3D models. It has cracked mathematical puzzles that stumped experts for decades and analyzed molecular structures with precision that could transform drug discovery. Yet, as researchers celebrate these achievements, they're also sounding the alarm: Gemini may have reached critical capability thresholds, where its potential for misuse is as staggering as its promise. The stakes have never been higher in the race to balance innovation with responsibility. This overview by Wes Roth provide more insights into the dual-edged nature of Gemini Deep Think, exploring its fantastic applications alongside the growing concerns it raises. How does a model capable of parallel thinking and reinforcement learning reshape fields like biology, cybersecurity, and engineering? And more importantly, what safeguards are needed to prevent it from becoming a tool for harm? By examining the intricate balance between progress and precaution, we uncover the profound implications of AI systems approaching the limits of their potential. As the lines between human and machine intelligence blur, the question isn't just what AI can do—but whether we're ready for what comes next. What Sets Gemini Deep Think Apart? The Gemini 2.5 model distinguishes itself through its ability to address problems previously deemed too intricate for AI systems. Its integration of parallel thinking and reinforcement learning allows it to process vast amounts of data and solve multifaceted challenges with exceptional efficiency. Some of its most new accomplishments include: Securing gold at the International Mathematical Olympiad by solving advanced mathematical problems. Resolving longstanding mathematical conjectures that have puzzled researchers for decades. Analyzing complex molecular structures in biology and chemistry, aiding in drug discovery and material science. Generating detailed 3D models and precise scientific diagrams for research and engineering applications. These capabilities make Gemini Deep Think a fantastic tool for scientists, engineers, and researchers, allowing them to synthesize insights from extensive datasets and accelerate innovation across various disciplines. Why is Access to Gemini Deep Think Restricted? Despite its potential to transform research and development, access to Gemini Deep Think is tightly controlled. Users are limited to five interactions per day, a restriction aimed at managing the model's substantial computational demands and mitigating risks associated with its advanced functionalities. Furthermore, the model is exclusively available to premium subscribers, making sure that only a select group of users can use its capabilities. These limitations are not solely about resource allocation. They reflect broader concerns about the potential misuse of such a powerful tool. In fields like chemical and biological research, where technical expertise can be weaponized, restricting access is seen as a necessary safeguard to prevent unintended consequences. Gemini Deep Think Model Might Be at Critical Capability Levels Watch this video on YouTube. Take a look at other insightful guides from our broad collection that might capture your interest in Deep Thinking AI models. Addressing Safety Concerns: A Delicate Balance One of the most pressing concerns surrounding Gemini Deep Think is its ability to generate detailed technical knowledge in chemical, biological, radiological, and nuclear (CBRN) domains. This capability, while valuable for legitimate research, could be exploited by malicious actors to develop harmful technologies, such as bioweapons. The model's proficiency in synthesizing information from multiple research papers amplifies this risk, as it may inadvertently provide insights that could be misused. To mitigate these risks, experts are advocating for the implementation of: Stringent safety protocols to restrict access to sensitive functionalities. Comprehensive risk assessments before deploying the model in high-stakes environments. Ethical guidelines to ensure responsible development and use of AI technologies. These measures are critical as AI systems like Gemini Deep Think approach what researchers describe as 'critical capability thresholds,' where their potential benefits are matched by equally significant risks. Emerging Risks in AI Development The rapid advancement of AI technologies has sparked widespread concern about their potential misuse. Beyond the risks in CBRN domains, there are growing fears about AI's applications in cybersecurity. Advanced models like Gemini Deep Think could be used to: Identify and exploit vulnerabilities in digital systems, compromising sensitive data and infrastructure. Create highly convincing disinformation campaigns that could undermine public trust and democratic processes. Automate sophisticated cyberattacks, increasing their scale and complexity. These risks underscore the need for a balanced approach to AI development—one that fosters innovation while prioritizing safety, ethical responsibility, and robust oversight. Practical Applications and User Insights Despite the concerns, Gemini Deep Think has garnered praise for its practical applications across various fields. Early adopters have highlighted its ability to: Generate detailed 3D models and interactive interfaces for engineering and design projects. Create precise scientific diagrams that enhance research presentations and publications. Synthesize ideas across disciplines, fostering interdisciplinary innovation and collaboration. These features make Gemini Deep Think an invaluable tool for professionals in fields ranging from engineering to scientific research. However, its benefits must be carefully weighed against the potential for misuse, emphasizing the importance of responsible development and deployment. Fostering Innovation While Making sure Responsibility As AI systems like Gemini Deep Think continue to evolve, the need for a cautious and deliberate approach becomes increasingly evident. While the model represents a significant milestone in artificial intelligence, it also highlights the ethical and safety challenges that accompany such advancements. By implementing proactive safeguards, conducting thorough risk assessments, and fostering a culture of responsibility, the AI community can ensure that these technologies are used to benefit society. Striking this balance is essential to harnessing the full potential of AI while minimizing its risks, paving the way for a future where innovation and responsibility coexist harmoniously. Media Credit: Wes Roth Filed Under: AI, Top News Latest Geeky Gadgets Deals Disclosure: Some of our articles include affiliate links. If you buy something through one of these links, Geeky Gadgets may earn an affiliate commission. Learn about our Disclosure Policy.
Geeky Gadgets
27 minutes ago
- Geeky Gadgets
The Thinnest Phones Ever: Galaxy S25 Edge vs. iPhone 17 Air
The Samsung Galaxy S25 Edge and the rumored iPhone 17 Air are redefining the boundaries of smartphone design with their ultra-thin profiles and lightweight builds. These devices aim to combine portability with innovative aesthetics, offering a sleek and modern appeal. However, their designs come with compromises that may impact functionality and usability. For potential buyers, the key question is whether these trade-offs align with their priorities. The video below from Matt Talks Tech gives us more details. Watch this video on YouTube. Design: Striking Looks, Practical Concerns The Galaxy S25 Edge stands out with its 5.8 mm thickness and a weight of just 163 grams. Its titanium frame and Gorilla Glass ceramic construction ensure durability, while the matte finish and flat-edge design add a touch of modern sophistication. On the other hand, the iPhone 17 Air, rumored to be even thinner at 5.5 mm, draws inspiration from the iconic flat-edge design of the iPhone 5, blending nostalgia with contemporary aesthetics. While both devices excel in portability and visual appeal, their ultra-thin profiles may introduce practical challenges. The reduced thickness can make them less comfortable to hold during extended use, and the diminished grip increases the likelihood of accidental drops. These factors raise questions about their suitability for users who prioritize ergonomic handling and durability in their daily lives. Battery Life: The Cost of Thinness The Galaxy S25 Edge is equipped with a 3,900 mAh battery, offering approximately 4 to 4.5 hours of screen-on time. It supports 25W wired and 15W wireless charging, allowing relatively quick recharges. In contrast, the iPhone 17 Air is rumored to house a smaller 2,800 mAh battery. While Apple's renowned software optimization may help extend battery performance, it is unlikely to satisfy the demands of power users who rely on their devices for intensive tasks. The challenge of balancing thin designs with adequate battery capacity is evident in both models. Users may find themselves needing to recharge more frequently, which could detract from the convenience these devices aim to provide. For individuals who prioritize long-lasting performance, this trade-off may be a significant drawback. Camera Performance: Style Over Versatility The Galaxy S25 Edge features a 200 MP main sensor paired with a 12 MP ultra-wide lens, capable of recording 8K video at 30 fps and 4K at 120 fps. However, it lacks a dedicated telephoto lens, limiting its zoom capabilities. Meanwhile, the iPhone 17 Air is rumored to include a single 48 MP camera, relying heavily on advanced AI-driven image processing to enhance photo quality. While both devices deliver impressive results for casual photography, they fall short of the versatility offered by multi-lens setups in thicker flagship models. Photography enthusiasts may find these limitations restrictive, particularly when capturing diverse scenes that require optical zoom or specialized lenses. For users who prioritize comprehensive camera functionality, these devices may not fully meet expectations. User Experience: Balancing Form and Function The ultra-thin designs of the Galaxy S25 Edge and iPhone 17 Air prioritize portability and aesthetics, making them visually appealing and easy to carry. However, these benefits come with notable trade-offs. Reduced battery life, limited camera versatility, and potential fragility may impact the overall user experience. Additionally, the flat-edge designs, while stylish, can feel less ergonomic during prolonged use, potentially leading to discomfort. These factors suggest that these smartphones are better suited for casual users who value sleek design and portability over high performance or durability. For individuals who rely on their devices for intensive tasks or extended use, the compromises in functionality may outweigh the benefits of their ultra-thin profiles. Target Audience: Who Will Appreciate These Devices? The Galaxy S25 Edge and iPhone 17 Air cater to a specific audience that prioritizes style and convenience. Their lightweight builds and minimalist aesthetics appeal to users who value portability and visual appeal over extended battery life or advanced features. These devices are ideal for individuals who primarily use their smartphones for basic tasks, such as browsing, messaging, and casual photography. However, for power users or those who require versatile photography options and long-lasting performance, these smartphones may fall short. Professionals, gamers, and photography enthusiasts may find the compromises in battery capacity, camera functionality, and durability limiting for their needs. Final Thoughts: A Niche Appeal for Style Enthusiasts The Galaxy S25 Edge and iPhone 17 Air represent a bold move toward ultra-thin smartphone designs, offering a unique blend of portability and aesthetics. While their sleek profiles and lightweight builds are undeniably attractive, the trade-offs in battery life, camera versatility, and ergonomic comfort make them less suitable for mainstream users. These devices are best suited for a niche audience that values style and portability above all else, providing a specialized smartphone experience for those willing to prioritize form over function. Stay informed about the latest in Ultra-thin smartphones by exploring our other resources and articles. Source & Image Credit: Matt Talks Tech Filed Under: Android News, Apple iPhone, Guides Latest Geeky Gadgets Deals Disclosure: Some of our articles include affiliate links. If you buy something through one of these links, Geeky Gadgets may earn an affiliate commission. Learn about our Disclosure Policy.
The Independent
27 minutes ago
- The Independent
Oprah Winfrey picks Richard Russo's 'Bridge of Sighs' for her book club
Pulitzer Prize-winning novelist Richard Russo i s the latest author to be welcomed into the inner circle of Oprah Winfrey book club picks. Winfrey announced Tuesday that she had selected Russo's 'Bridge of Sighs,' a 2007 novel centered in a rural New York community. Russo has set much of his work in small, Northeastern towns, including 'Nobody's Fool,' later adapted into a movie of the same name that starred Paul Newman; and 'Empire Falls,' winner of the Pulitzer in 2002 and the basis for an Emmy-winning HBO series that featured Newman and his wife, Joanne Woodward. Winfrey often chooses new books for her club, but has at times looked to older releases, from Toni Morrison's 'The Bluest Eye' to John Steinbeck's 'East of Eden.' 'It is, of course, a profound honor to be chosen for Oprah's Book Club,' Russo said in a statement. 'But to be chosen for a novel written two decades earlier? A book that will introduce a whole new generation of readers to my work? How special is that?' A conversation between Winfrey and Russo, held recently at a Starbucks in Seattle, can be seen on Winfrey's YouTube channel and on other outlets where podcasts are aired. Starbucks is the current partner for Winfrey's book club, which she founded in 1996. On Tuesday, Winfrey issued a statement praising 'Bridge of Sighs' as a 'classic summer read,' with "romance, unrequited love, life-long friendships, and of course — epic family drama.' 'If you're a fan of Richard Russo or discovering him for the first time, here's your opportunity to read one of America's most beloved writers,' she added.
