Tensions flare at Loudoun County School Board meeting amid Title IX investigation
Hundreds make comment
More than 130 people signed up to speak during public comment, with 117 appearing in person. Due to the volume of speakers, each was limited to just one minute.
Loudoun County School Board Chair Melinda Mansfield issued a stern warning ahead of the meeting, reminding attendees not to name students or staff or make personal attacks — rules that were challenged repeatedly throughout the evening.
At the center of the controversy is Policy 8040, a guideline adopted in 2021 that permits students to use restrooms and locker rooms that align with their gender identity rather than their biological sex. Some parents are now calling for the policy to be repealed.
The backstory
Their concerns stem from an incident currently under Title IX investigation, in which three male students are accused of sexually harassing a transgender student—who is biologically female but identifies as male—in the boys' locker room after gym class.
The transgender student recorded video as they entered the locker room, it shows a black screen at first while capturing audio of classmates questioning why "a girl" was present and one student expressing that he felt "uncomfortable." The student filming then positioned the phone where the camera could see some of the students in the locker room.
While it is illegal to record inside locker rooms, a Loudoun County Public Schools (LCPS) official confirmed that no individuals appeared in compromising positions in the video. As a result, it was determined that no privacy laws were violated.
What they're saying
Parents of the accused students spoke to FOX5, voicing frustration over the policy and how the investigation is being handled.
"The school system has failed everybody," said Renae Smith, mother of one of the accused students. "Who felt safe in this situation? The answer is no one. No one felt safe, no one felt respected, and no one left that locker room with their dignity intact."
"We're trying to define where the line is drawn between student rights and policy enforcement," added Seth J. Wolfe, another parent. "We feel our children's rights are being taken away because of these policies."
Big picture view
Virginia Gov. Glenn Youngkin has since requested that the Attorney General launch an independent investigation into how LCPS has managed the situation.
Meanwhile, the families of the accused students have retained legal counsel and are awaiting further updates as the school system continues its inquiry.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
CBS News
3 hours ago
- CBS News
Trump signs executive order laying out new rules for NIL deals and money in college sports
President Trump on Thursday introduced new rules for the name, image and likeness and revenue-sharing deals that have shaken up college sports in recent years, seeking to rein in what the White House called an "out-of-control, rudderless system." The executive order seeks to ban "third-party, pay-for-play payments to collegiate athletes," while still allowing athletes to strike brand endorsement deals. It also says any revenue-sharing arrangements between universities and athletes should expand or preserve "scholarships and collegiate athletic opportunities in women's and non-revenue sports." Mr. Trump's order also said schools with more than $50 million in athletic revenue cannot reduce the number of scholarship opportunities for "non-revenue sports" — typically sports other than football and basketball. Schools that draw more than $125 million are directed to increase their non-revenue scholarships in the coming academic year. The president also directed the National Labor Relations Board to work on "clarifying the status of collegiate athletes" — likely referring to moves by some college athletes to be deemed university employees and form labor unions. It's not clear how the order will be enforced. Mr. Trump tells top administration officials to "develop a plan" within 30 days to advance the order using "all available and appropriate regulatory, enforcement, and litigation mechanisms." It floated decisions about federal funding, Title IX enforcement and work with Congress. CBS News was first to report on Mr. Trump's plan to sign a college sports-focused executive order last week. In recent years, collegiate sports have been reshaped by drastic policy changes that allow student-athletes to make millions of dollars while still in school. The NCAA in 2021 permitted athletes to earn money for the use of their name, image and likeness, or NIL. Since then, some big-name student-athletes have scored the types of lucrative brand endorsement deals that were once more closely associated with professional athletes. Rules restricting schools from directly paying athletes have also been loosened. A legal settlement involving the NCAA earlier this year allowed schools to start sharing revenue with athletes for the first time, and the Supreme Court ruled in 2021 that the NCAA's attempts to limit some benefits to athletes violated antitrust law. The changes mark a stark departure from college sports' previous operating model, in which athletes were thought of as amateurs and were paid in college scholarships. That system faced stiff criticism from many student-athletes, who viewed it as unfair to block them from being compensated even as their work, in some cases, brought in millions of dollars for their schools. But the new landscape has also drawn fears about whether smaller colleges will struggle to compete with their larger peers' checkbooks, and whether sports that don't generate much revenue for colleges will face more pressure. And fans of certain schools have formed so-called NIL collectives that draw in donations and offer endorsement deals to players, an arrangement some critics have called a "pay-to-play scheme." "Absent guardrails to stop the madness and ensure a reasonable, balanced use of resources across collegiate athletic programs that preserves their educational and developmental benefits, many college sports will soon cease to exist," Mr. Trump's executive order signed Thursday states. Meanwhile, most states have passed their own laws regulating NIL, but the federal government doesn't have a uniform standard. This week, a House committee advanced the SCORE Act, which would set national NIL rules. But there's concern that the bill doesn't do enough to protect athletes' interests. The NCAA said in a statement after Thursday's executive order that it "appreciates the Trump Administration's focus on the life-changing opportunities college sports provides millions of young people." "The NCAA is making positive changes for student-athletes and confronting many challenges facing college sports by mandating health and wellness benefits and guaranteeing scholarships, but there are some threats to college sports that federal legislation can effectively address and the Association is advocating with student-athletes and their schools for a bipartisan solution with Congress and the Administration," NCAA President Charlie Baker said in a statement.
Vox
4 hours ago
- Vox
Columbia pays Trump's ransom
Columbia University has agreed to pay $200 million to the Trump administration over three years. Charly Triballeau/AFP via Getty Images This story appeared in The Logoff, a daily newsletter that helps you stay informed about the Trump administration without letting political news take over your life. Subscribe here. Welcome to The Logoff: Columbia University has struck a deal with the Trump administration to restore federal research funding in exchange for a $200 million settlement and other concessions. What's the context? Columbia has been attempting to come to terms with the Trump administration since it canceled $400 million in research funding for the university in March, accusing Columbia of permitting antisemitism on campus. Columbia subsequently caved to a number of demands, but only now succeeded in regaining its federal funding. Why did Trump go after Columbia? The administration has targeted at least 60 universities for alleged antisemitism, but Columbia received particular focus. It was the site of high-profile pro-Palestinian protests in April 2024, which spurred similar demonstrations at universities across the country. And just one day after the administration froze Columbia's funding, student activist Mahmoud Khalil was arrested by US Immigration and Customs Enforcement and detained for 104 days. What did Columbia agree to? The deal requires Columbia to pay $200 million to the Trump administration over three years to settle discrimination allegations, as well as $21 million over a separate investigation. It also includes provisions about diversity, equity, and inclusion programs at Columbia, international student admissions, and Title IX. The Logoff The email you need to stay informed about Trump — without letting the news take over your life. Email (required) Sign Up By submitting your email, you agree to our Terms and Privacy Notice . This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply. What are the implications of the deal? Columbia's settlement might spell the end of the university's months-long clash with the Trump administration — but it almost certainly won't mark the end of President Donald Trump's efforts to attack American higher education. The administration's war with Harvard is ongoing, and a number of other research universities, including Princeton, Brown, Cornell, and Northwestern, have had research funding frozen. What's the big picture? Since returning to office, Trump has set out to break American institutions that don't cater to his demands — corporations like Disney and Paramount, universities like Columbia and UPenn, and white-shoe law firms like Paul Weiss. Frequently, he has succeeded, despite offering only thin pretenses of wrongdoing. It's a concerning pattern, one commonly found in authoritarian regimes. And with that, it's time to log off…
New York Times
5 hours ago
- New York Times
Trump signs executive order aimed at addressing issues in college sports
President Donald Trump signed an executive order directed at trying to bring order and stability to college sports, the White House announced Thursday, a day after it became apparent that Congress was still a long way from addressing the issue through federal legislation. The order highlights many of the same goals that were in a draft version of the executive order obtained by The Athletic last week: Protecting women's and Olympic sports; addressing the employment status of college athletes and antitrust issues that have pulled the NCAA and conferences into constant litigation. Advertisement One notable addition: 'The Order prohibits third-party, pay-for-play payments to collegiate athletes. This does not apply to legitimate, fair-market-value compensation that a third party provides to an athlete, such as for a brand endorsement.' The EO will direct the Secretary of Labor and the National Labor Relations Board to weigh in on the debate over the employment status of college athletes. It also calls on members of Trump's cabinet and other political officials to pursue policy and protections in a number of other areas related to college sports, including rules that could be challenged by antitrust complaints and continued opportunity for scholarships and roster spots. 'A national solution is urgently needed to prevent this situation from deteriorating beyond repair and to protect non-revenue sports, including many women's sports, that comprise the backbone of intercollegiate athletics, drive American superiority at the Olympics and other international competitions, and catalyze hundreds of thousands of student-athletes to fuel American success in myriad ways,' the order said. An executive order is not law, and any agency policy decisions could face legal challenges, but the White House makes clear in the order that it hopes to enforce any policies through 'federal funding decisions, enforcement of Title IX of the Education Amendments Act of 1972, prohibiting unconstitutional actions by States to regulate interstate commerce' and other protections, while working with Congress and state governments. The threat of federal funding decisions is notable. Higher education as a whole has been reeling from federal funding stoppages by the Trump administration this year. Northwestern earlier this month announced budget cuts and a hiring freeze after the federal government froze $790 million in research funding. Columbia on Thursday said it would agree to a $200 million fine, which comes months after the federal government canceled $400 million in grants and contracts. Those decisions by the federal government surrounded allegations of antisemitism and discrimination through the promotion of diversity at universities. Advertisement Trump has mulled getting involved in the continued legal and legislative friction that has surrounded college sports for months and his interest seemed to gain momentum after a meeting with former Alabama coach Nick Saban in May. The possibility of creating a presidential commission to study issues facing college sports and recommend possible solutions was floated and is still a possibility. While President Trump's involvement is seen as significant by increasing the spotlight on the issues facing college sports, an executive order doesn't provide the long-term solutions that have dogged college sports for years. 'The Association appreciates the Trump Administration's focus on the life-changing opportunities college sports provides millions of young people and we look forward to working with student-athletes, a bipartisan coalition in Congress and the Trump Administration to enhance college sports for years to come,' NCAA President Charlie Baker said. The antitrust protections and pre-emption of state laws that college sports leaders have been lobbying for need to come from federal law. There has been some movement on that front. On Wednesday, a bill that would help regulate college sports and how athletes are compensated by schools made it through two House committees, clearing the way for a possible vote when Congress returns from summer recess. The SCORE Act is the first bill to move through a committee in either chamber, but it has little bipartisan support. Even if it does pass a Republican majority House, it would need 60 votes in the Senate, meaning at least seven Democrats would have to jump on board. There is no indication yet that it is likely.
