Trump orders US nuclear subs repositioned over statements from ex-Russian leader Medvedev
Trump posted on his social media site that, based on the 'highly provocative statements' from Medvedev, he had 'ordered two Nuclear Submarines to be positioned in the appropriate regions, just in case these foolish and inflammatory statements are more than just that.'
The president added, 'Words are very important, and can often lead to unintended consequences, I hope this will not be one of those instances.'
It wasn't clear what impact Trump's order would have on U.S. nuclear subs, which are routinely on patrol in the world's hotspots, but it comes at a delicate moment in the Trump administration's relations with Moscow.
Trump has said that special envoy Steve Witkoff is heading to Russia to push Moscow to agree to a ceasefire in its war with Ukraine and has threatened new economic sanctions if progress is not made. He cut his 50-day deadline for action to 10 days, with that window set to expire next week.
The post about the sub repositioning came after Trump, in the wee hours of Thursday morning, had posted that Medvedev was a 'failed former President of Russia' and warned him to 'watch his words.' Medvedev responded hours later by writing, 'Russia is right on everything and will continue to go its own way.'
And that back-and-forth followed earlier this week, when Medvedev wrote, 'Trump's playing the ultimatum game with Russia: 50 days or 10' and added, 'He should remember 2 things: 1. Russia isn't Israel or even Iran. 2. Each new ultimatum is a threat and a step towards war. Not between Russia and Ukraine, but with his own country.'
Asked as he was leaving the White House on Friday evening for a weekend at his estate in New Jersey, about where he was repositioning the subs, Trump didn't offer any specifics.
'We had to do that. We just have to be careful,' the president said. 'A threat was made, and we didn't think it was appropriate, so I have to be very careful.'
Trump also said, 'I do that on the basis of safety for our people' and 'we're gonna protect our people' and later added of Medvedev, 'He was talking about nuclear.'
'When you talk about nuclear, we have to be prepared,' Trump said. 'And we're totally prepared.'
Medvedev was Russia's president from 2008 to 2012, while Putin was barred from seeking a second consecutive term, but stepped aside to let him run again.
Now deputy chairman of Russia's National Security Council, which Putin chairs, Medvedev has been known for his provocative and inflammatory statements since the start of the war in 2022. That's a U-turn from his presidency, when he was seen as liberal and progressive.
Medvedev has frequently wielded nuclear threats and lobbed insults at Western leaders on social media. Some observers have argued that with his extravagant rhetoric, Medvedev is seeking to score political points with Putin and Russian military hawks.
One such example before the latest spat with Trump came on July 15, after Trump announced plans to supply Ukraine with more weapons via its NATO allies and threatened additional tariffs against Moscow. Medvedev posted then, 'Trump issued a theatrical ultimatum to the Kremlin. The world shuddered, expecting the consequences. Belligerent Europe was disappointed. Russia didn't care.'
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
6 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Inheritance impatience threatens generation of Aussies as $5.4 trillion wealth transfer looms
Older Australians are suffering financial abuse inflicted by their own children and grandchildren, who are hungry to get their hands on an early inheritance. Giving money away to family members before death has gaines traction as younger generations struggle with the cost-of-living and housing crisis. Those unable to make ends meet or get onto the property ladder have been gifted tens or even hundreds of thousands of dollars. But Advocare, a not-for-profit organisation based in Western Australia, has seen a shift from gifting, into expectation, and sadly to a demand. Advocare regional team leader David Thompson told Yahoo Finance that inheritance impatience has become a growing issue for Baby Boomers and the Silent Generation. RELATED Bank of Mum and Dad warned early inheritance could impact their pension Centrelink update on little-known support for Aussies in crisis New alcohol tax to hit Aussies again from today There is an impending $5.4 trillion wealth transfer due to begin over the coming years as these two generations offload their assets and savings to their younger counterparts either before they die or after they pass. There are significant considerations to weigh up in giving an early inheritance, and Thompson said older relatives are being pressured into giving away their fortunes without much care for how that could impact them. He has been shocked by cases of financial elder abuse emerging from this grim new trend, with one Australian pressured to hand over $200,000 to a younger relative. "You'd be surprised how many cases where the main factor for the abuse continuing is because of family obligations," he told Yahoo Finance. "The older person is not going to put their foot down because they know that it's going to have a negative impact on the abuser."Financial elder abuse can come in many shapes and sizes Advocare has seen a 20 per cent increase in elder abuse this year alone and just in WA. The elder abuse helpline received 1,649 calls in the last 12 months, which is one every operating hour, and 80 per cent of those related to a family member being the abuser. The organisation said this type of financial abuse can be as small as taking your parent's card under the guise of doing grocery shopping for them, but buying some items for yourself. It can also start when younger people help out their older relatives set up their online banking or certain online accounts. "All of a sudden, they've got the bank details or they can see how much money they have and they're not doing anything with it," Thompson said. "Younger people might think that this money is far better to be repurposed for them." This is how Gen Z, Millennials, and Gen X assert their power and knowledge of certain technologies or systems over their older counterparts, he added. "The abuser gets a taste for the money initially, for something that is really required in their eyes, and then it just becomes a habit, and they lean on the fact that mum and dad still want to support them and don't have any other use for the money," Thompson said. But he revealed that financial elder abuse can get far more extreme. He said an older Aussie sold her unit to afford to move into an aged care home, which came with "significant" costs. She suffered from cognitive impairment and Thompson alleged her daughter used that to their advantage. The child said they were really struggling with their finances and desperately needed help. The older woman eventually gifted a large sum of money to help her daughter out. But this got flagged with Centrelink because it went over the gifting limit, and the older Aussie was kicked off the payments that helped her afford her aged care home. You can find out about these limits here. "She's now in this situation where she's got no money, and she has a debt, and no one's going to support her," Thompson said. "When you pull back the layers, she was financially abused by the daughter because she wanted to support her family, even when she was in this situation where she needed to think about herself. "But the daughter either didn't care or didn't take that into consideration." Inheritance is a gift, not a right Thompson said he understood younger Aussies were under significant financial pressures. Whether it's saving enough money for a deposit for a home, trying to afford to start a family, or even just keeping up with rising rent and grocery prices — it's tough going for many. But he has been concerned some young people look at inheritance as their right. This was echoed by National Seniors Australia, with CEO Chris Grice warning all Aussies to treat their older counterparts' money with respect. "It is a gross sense of entitlement based on the assumption that the relative is owed money or assets, which are not theirs," he told Yahoo Finance. "They haven't earned it. They haven't made sacrifices to build it. And while a lot of individuals pass on income to younger generations through inheritances – there is no obligation to do this." Signs of financial elder abuse to watch out for Advocare has highlighted several warning signs that financial elder abuse is either about to start or is already underway: Younger people giving their grandparents or parents ultimatums to pressure money to be handed over Convincing their older relatives that gifting property, other assets, or money to them is in their best interests Taking advantage of their parents' dependence on them to manage technology, like internet banking, online shopping, or subscriptions Gaslighting parents to convince them they're confused and require assistance to manage their money Council on the Ageing (COTA) Australia acting CEO Corey Irlam said no one deserves to live in fear that their finances could be taken or misued by someone they trust. 'Financial elder abuse is far more common than people realise, and sadly, it can sometimes start with a trusted family member, carer or friend,' he said. 'It's time we stop treating elder abuse, including financial crimes against older people, as a private matter – it's a serious issue that deserves urgent national action.' How much are older Aussies helping the younger generations? Financial site Mozo discovered 75 per cent of parents are giving their kids money for a home deposit without expecting it to be repaid down the line. That's a big jump from the 33 per cent who said the same back in 2021. Mums and dads are now giving, on average, $74,040 to their child to help them get on the property ladder. One in three parents felt some sort of emotional pressure to become the Bank of Mum and Dad when their kids are buying property. Mozo's report found 3 per cent of parents are taking out a loan themselves or using a credit card to give their kids the cash boost. This had caused some parents to delay their retirements in order to give their kids a leg up. Finder research revealed one in four Aussies, equivalent to 5.8 million people, had their bank balances bolstered by an inheritance payout recently. This money has given some people "real financial momentum", whereas others it's been just enough to "plug the gaps". Additional data from the consumer group showed two in five respondents, equivalent to 8.3 million people, admitting they would rather receive their inheritance while the family member was still alive instead of waiting until they died. Roughly 28 per cent of Aussies are expecting an inheritance of more than $100,000, while 20 per cent think they will receive between $50,000 to $100, while retrieving data Sign in to access your portfolio Error while retrieving data
Boston Globe
7 minutes ago
- Boston Globe
Trump fired America's economic data collector. History shows the perils.
There is the case of China, where earlier this century local authorities manipulated data to hit growth targets mandated by Beijing, forcing analysts and policymakers to turn to alternative measures to gauge the state of the country's economy. Advertisement Perhaps most famously, there is the case of Argentina, which in the 2000s and 2010s systematically understated inflation figures to such a degree that the international community eventually stopped relying on the government's data. That loss of faith drove up the country's borrowing costs, worsening a debt crisis that ultimately led to it defaulting on its international obligations. Get Starting Point A guide through the most important stories of the morning, delivered Monday through Friday. Enter Email Sign Up It is too soon to know whether the United States is on a similar path. But economists and other experts said that Trump's decision Friday to fire Erika McEntarfer, the Senate-confirmed head of the Bureau of Labor Statistics, was a troubling step in that direction. Janet Yellen, the former Treasury secretary and chair of the Federal Reserve, said the firing was not what is expected from the most advanced economy in the world. Advertisement 'This is the kind of thing you would only expect to see in a banana republic,' Yellen said. Essential data The Bureau of Labor Statistics is officially part of the Labor Department, whose secretary is a member of the president's Cabinet. But the agency operates independently, producing detailed, nonpartisan data on employment, prices, wages and other topics. Economists say that reliable, independently produced statistics are critical to good decision making in both the public and private sector. Officials at the Federal Reserve rely on government-collected data on inflation and unemployment to decide how to set interest rates, which affect how much Americans must pay to get a mortgage or a car loan. 'Good data helps not just the Fed, it helps the government, but it also helps the private sector,' Jerome Powell, the Fed chair, said at a recent news conference. 'The United States has been a leader in that for 100 years,' he added, 'and we really need to continue that in my view.' Experts on government statistics say data from the Bureau of Labor Statistics and other agencies is unlikely to deteriorate dramatically overnight. The acting commissioner named to replace McEntarfer on a temporary basis, William J. Wiatrowski, is a longtime employee of the agency who is widely respected by experts inside and outside government. The career employees who collect and analyze the data remain in place, using the same methods and procedures they used before McEntarfer was pushed out. But experts who just days ago were defending the integrity of the statistical agencies now find themselves asking uncomfortable questions about the trajectory of economic data in the United States. Advertisement 'If the poverty numbers come in and look great, is the director of the Census going to get a raise?' said Amy O'Hara, a former Census Bureau official who is now a professor at Georgetown University. 'If the household income numbers don't look great what happens then? What about GDP? What about CPI?' Andreas Georgiou knows the challenges of standing up to such political pressure. After he took over Greece's statistical agency in 2010, he found that the country has been severely understating its budget deficits. Those findings ran afoul of Greek authorities, who spent years trying to prosecute him on a variety of charges related to his work, despite independent reviews that supported his conclusions. (He fared better, though, than Olimpiy Kvitkin, a Soviet census official who was arrested and executed when his population count came in lower than Josef Stalin had announced.) Georgiou refused to bend. Reliable statistics are important for policymaking, he said. But they are also essential to democracy. 'Official statistics, government statistics are a mirror that society holds up to itself,' he said. If that mirror is distorted, or broken entirely, then the accountability that is central to a democratic system cannot work. 'If society cannot see itself clearly, then it cannot identify its problems,' he said. 'If it cannot identify its problems, then it cannot find the right solutions. It cannot find the right persons to solve these problems.' Data integrity at risk Trump said he fired McEntarfer because the numbers produced by her agency were 'rigged' to hurt him politically. Experts on the government statistics, including former commissioners in both Democratic and Republican administrations, have called foul on that accusation. The commissioner, who is the bureau's sole political appointee, does not control the numbers that the agency publishes, or even see them until they have been finalized by a staff of career technocrats whose careers typically span multiple presidential administrations. Advertisement Erica Groshen, who led the bureau under President Barack Obama, recalled getting resistance from the agency's staff when she tried to liven up the language of the monthly jobs reports. The bureau's staff insisted that the agency's job wasn't to say whether the glass was half-full or half-empty, only to report that, 'It is an eight-ounce container with four ounces of liquid.' Groshen relented. That is not to say political interference would be impossible. Government statistics rely on hundreds of methodological decisions, many of them judgment calls with no obviously correct answer. A sufficiently sophisticated agency head might, over time, be able to nudge the data in a politically advantageous direction, without any single decision being so egregious that it led to a mass resignation of career employees. 'I could imagine a new commissioner coming in and trying to make changes to those methods and procedures that try to move those numbers one way or the other,' said Katharine G. Abraham, who led the bureau during the Clinton and George W. Bush administrations. 'They would have to know a lot in terms of where to put the finger on the scale.' Private alternatives There are also blunter approaches. In Argentina in 2007, the government of then-President Néstor Kirchner pushed out the mathematician in charge of the country's consumer price data, then released an inflation figure that was dramatically lower than the one the mathematician had calculated. The public wasn't fooled. Nor were international bond investors, who ultimately turned to alternative sources of inflation data, calculated by researchers outside the government. Advertisement But such alternative sources are inherently limited, said Alberto Cavallo, a Harvard University economist who developed one of the most widely used private inflation indexes in Argentina. 'Private alternatives can complement official statistics, but they are not a substitute,' Cavallo wrote in an email. 'Government agencies have the resources and scale to conduct nationwide surveys -- something no private initiative can fully replicate.' Recently, Cavallo has been publishing data on consumer prices in the United States, which has shown the impact of Trump's tariffs more quickly than the government's data. But while such real-time sources are valuable, they don't carry the 'institutional credibility' of government data. The trouble is that once that credibility is eroded, it is hard to repair -- particularly at a time when partisans on both sides of the political aisle are skeptical of numbers put out by members of the opposing party. Nancy Potok, a former Census official who served as chief statistician of the United States during the first Trump administration, said that in the past there had been strong bipartisan support for the statistical system in Congress and the business community. But partisanship seems to have eroded that support at a moment when a combination of political pressures and long-standing budget challenges are making it most necessary. 'There were some people who really understood the value of the economic data, and now that's not the conversation and those champions aren't there that were there in the past,' she said. 'There's no one leading the charge to make these kind of investments.' This article originally appeared in Advertisement
Boston Globe
7 minutes ago
- Boston Globe
Breaking from his father, Josh Kraft criticizes Trump as having ‘stoked hatred and division'
Kraft, son of New England Patriots Owner Robert Kraft, has been tied to his father's connections to Trump during his campaign. Robert Kraft and Trump have a long history. In 2017, Kraft told the Globe that the two have 'been friends for years' and that during 'the worst time in my dad's life, [Trump] was there for him.' Advertisement Scrutiny over Robert Kraft's friendship with Trump increased after the Globe reported the After the meeting, Josh Kraft received campaign donations from four of the top attorneys at the firm, including its chairman, Brad Karp. At the time, a spokesperson for The Kraft Group denied any coordination between parties for the donation to the campaign. Advertisement Kraft said he is ready to deal with the consequences of the Trump presidency if he is elected mayor, amid 'a mountain of federal budget cuts along with a billion dollar tax credit shortfall.' He also spoke about Mayor Michelle Wu's criticism of his family's relationship with Trump. 'Michelle Wu wants to talk about me, I want to talk about all of you,' Kraft said. Wu could not be immediately reached for comment. Kraft also spoke out against Wu's handling of the Boston housing crisis, the White Stadium renovation, and the city's homelessness problem, saying, 'addiction does not discriminate.' Regarding housing, Kraft said his campaign promises to jump-start construction, implement ' 'Boston is going to be a place where families and young people have to leave the city, and only the wealthy can afford to live here,' Kraft said. Kraft also criticized Wu's comments about 'She's desperate to distract the voters from a record of broken and failed campaign promises and the failures of her policy plans, especially making it easier for the middle class to afford to live in the city of Boston,' Kraft said. Kraft said he proposes a plan to place White Stadium, located in Franklin Park, back in the hands of Boston Public Schools students and athletes. He previously criticized Mayor Wu for not disclosing the Advertisement The renovations, which were subject to lawsuits over alleged During the press conference, Kraft dismissed comments about Super PAC tax exemptions. Super PACs are not limited in their campaign contributions, and can donate more than the $1,000 limit. The Your City Your Future Super PAC that supports Kraft has donated more than $3 million to his campaign. He also did not discuss his tax returns, which his campaign promised to release before the preliminary vote on Sept. 9. His campaign revealed last week he earned $6.3 million in 2024 but declined to break down the sources of Kraft's income. Wu and others have criticized Kraft for his lack of income transparency and the possibility of conflicts of interest in his mayoral campaign. Kraft has already personally contributed $2 million to his campaign. Mayoral candidates are not required to release their tax returns, but it has become common practice to do so. Wu said she has disclosed her finances for the last 12 years. If elected, Kraft said he would not be involved with his family business to avoid conflicts of interest. Critics, including Wu, flagged The Kraft Group's proposed soccer stadium in Everett, to which The Kraft Group proposed mitigation payments of $750,000. Kraft served as the head of the family charity, the New England Patriot Charitable Foundation. The nonprofit reported that Kraft was not paid a salary for his role, but a spokesperson from the campaign said Advertisement Kraft was also the head of the Boston Boys and Girls Club for more than a decade, where he earned $350,000 in 2020, the year he stepped down from his leadership role. Maria Probert can be reached at
