Old Dominion's new album, 'Barbara,' won't lean on band's record-breaking laurels
'They're certainly wonderful honors that we get, but that's not in any way how we really measure our success or think. We can't let that kind of stuff creep in to the creative process because that's when we'll start to get off course,' said Matthew Ramsey, lead vocalist and guitarist. 'We try to protect each other from those outside influences a little bit and just make sure that we're … not chasing after some sort of reaction or award, or chasing after what we think the radio wants to play. We just have to make what we love.'
Old Dominion has been celebrated for intertwining different musical styles while within country music. Along with Ramsey, the band includes Brad Tursi , Trevor Rosen , Geoff Sprung and Whit Sellers . They have spent the last two years crafting 'Barbara,' out Aug. 22 via Columbia Nashville/Sony Music Nashville.
The project follows 2023's 'Memory Lane' album and last year's ' Odies But Goodies ' compilation, which Ramsey says is even more eclectic than past works.
'We just write constantly. And we've had albums where we've kind of gone deeper into the well and picked out older songs,' explained the 47-year-old. 'This one, not so much the case.'
The 13-track album is not named after a real woman but is an imagined composite of a person who embodies many of the group's various personality traits. It includes the released singles 'Me Most Nights' and 'Making Good Time,' along with the four-on-the-floor 'Talk Country' and the R&B-infused 'What Doesn't Kill a Memory.' Just as introspection is a fundamental element of country music, it's also the sweet spot on this album.
'Miss You Man' is dedicated to friend and writing collaborator Andrew Dorff, who died in 2016 during a vacation, while 'Goodnight Music City' reflects on the band's career.
'It has all the reverence about Nashville and a little bit of the jaded side to it, too. We've been through it in Nashville, as anyone goes through when they're trying to chase this crazy dream,' said Ramsey, who revealed the song is inspired by the children's book 'Goodnight Moon' by Margaret Wise Brown. 'It's such a meaningful song to us all … we've played it live one time at the Ryman Auditorium, and we were all crying by the end of it.'
The band also looks within on 'Man or the Song,' as Ramsey questions, 'If I put my guitar down, would I disappear? / Move back to my hometown, would you still be here?' Ramsey says it's his favorite song.
'That's kind of what it feels like once you get to this level and you're surrounded by all these people that are helping you make your dreams come true,' he said. 'Who's around for the right reasons can certainly creep into the conversation. It can be a lonely profession … I hope you love me for me, and not for this crazy job I have.'
Coinciding with the release of 'Barbara,' the band is prepping its 'How Good Is That' world tour which launches in September.
Throughout the past decade, Old Dominion has earned a loyal fan base in a genre often criticized as rigid, with frequent debates about equal radio play, what determines pure country music and who should be allowed to participate. But while there's no denying the group is authentically country, the irony is not lost on them that they've been able to cut through the Nashville noise by not sticking to only traditional country sounds.
'Whenever we wrote a song and recorded it, we just wanted to make sure that we were not chasing anything other than the truest form of that song and what was going to deliver that message as clearly as we wanted it to be,' said Ramsey. 'Our fans now, I think, are coming to expect that from us; they're looking for the surprise that we're gonna throw in there, rather than the same old thing. … We don't take that for granted. We know that's a rare thing in the genre.'
'Barbara' will be released Aug. 22.
1. 'Making Good Time'
2. 'Water My Flowers'
3. 'Me Most Nights'
4. 'Man or the Song'
5. 'Break Your Mama's Heart'
6. 'Miss You Man'
7. 'Talk Country'
8. 'Late Great Heartbreak'
9. 'Crying in a Beach Bar'
10. 'One of Us'
11. 'What Doesn't Kill a Memory'
12. 'Sip in the Right Direction'
13. 'Goodnight Music City'
Follow Associated Press entertainment journalist Gary Gerard Hamilton at @GaryGHamilton on all his social media platforms.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Scroll.in
17-07-2025
- Scroll.in
Our memories are biased, unreliable, extensively rewritten – and that's a good thing
Milan Kundera opens his novel The Book of Laughter and Forgetting with a scene from the winter of 1948. Klement Gottwald, leader of the Communist Party of Czechoslovakia, is giving a speech to the masses from a palace balcony, surrounded by fellow party members. Comrade Vladimir Clementis thoughtfully places his fur hat on Gottwald's bare head; the hat then features in an iconic photograph. Four years later, Clementis is found guilty of being a bourgeois nationalist and hanged. His ashes are strewn on a Prague street. The propaganda section of the party removes him from written history and erases him from the photograph. 'Nothing remains of Clementis,' writes Kundera, 'but the fur hat on Gottwald's head'. Efforts to enforce political forgetting are often associated with totalitarian regimes. The state endeavours to control not only its citizens, but also the past. To create a narrative that glorifies the present and idealises the future, history must be rewritten or even completely obliterated. In a famous article on 'the totalitarian ego', the social psychologist Anthony Greenwald argued that individual selves operate in the same way. We deploy an array of cognitive biases to maintain a sense of control, and to shape and reshape our personal history. We distort the present and fabricate the past to ensure we remain the heroes of our life narratives. Likening the individual to a destructive political system might sound extreme, but it has an element of truth. Memory Lane, a new book by Irish psychology researchers Ciara Greene and Gillian Murphy, shows how autobiographical memory has a capacity to rewrite history that is almost Stalinesque. There is no shortage of books on memory, from self-help guides for the anxiously ageing to scholarly works of history. Memory Lane is distinctive for taking the standpoint of applied cognitive psychology. Emphasising how memory functions in everyday life, Greene and Murphy explore the processes of memory and the influences that shape them. What memory is not The key message of the book is that the memory system is not a recording device. We may be tempted to see memory as a vault where past experience is faithfully preserved, but in fact it is fundamentally reconstructive. Memories are constantly revised in acts of recollection. They change in predictable ways over time, moulded by new information, our prior beliefs and current emotions, other people's versions of events, or an interviewer's leading questions. According to Greene and Murphy's preferred analogy, memory is like a Lego tower. A memory is initially constructed from a set of elements, but over time some will be lost as the structure simplifies to preserve the gist of the event. Elements may also be added as new information is incorporated and the memory is refashioned to align with the person's beliefs and expectations. The malleability of memory might look like a weakness, especially by comparison to digital records. Memory Lane presents it as a strength. Humans did not evolve to log objective truths for posterity, but to operate flexibly in a complex and changing world. From an adaptive standpoint, the past only matters insofar as it helps us function in the present. Our knowledge should be updated by new information. We should assimilate experiences to already learned patterns. And we should be tuned to our social environment, rather than insulated from it. 'If all our memories existed in some kind of mental quarantine, separate from the rest of our knowledge and experiences,' the authors write, 'it would be like using a slow, inefficient computer program that could only show you one file at a time, never drawing connections or updating incorrect impressions.' Simplifying and discarding memories is also beneficial because our cognitive capacity is limited. It is better to filter out what matters from the deluge of past experiences than to be overwhelmed with irrelevancies. Greene and Murphy present the case of a woman with exceptional autobiographical memory, who is plagued by the triggering of obsolete memories. Forgetting doesn't merely de-clutter memory; it also serves emotional ends. Selectively deleting unpleasant memories increases happiness. Sanding off out-of-character experiences fosters a clear and stable sense of self. 'Hindsight bias' boosts this feeling of personal continuity by bringing our recollections into line with our current beliefs. Revisionist history it may be, but it is carried out in the service of personal identity. Eyewitness memories and misinformation Memory Lane pays special attention to situations in which memory errors have serious consequences, such as eyewitness testimony. Innocent people can be convicted on the basis of inaccurate eyewitness identifications. An array of biases make these more likely and they are especially common in interracial contexts. Recollections can also be influenced by the testimony of other witnesses, and even by the language used during questioning. In a classic study, participants who viewed videos of car accidents estimated the car's speed as substantially faster when the cars were described as having 'smashed' rather than 'contacted'. These distortions are not temporary: new information overwrites and overrides the original memory. Misinformation works in a similar way and with equally dire consequences, such as vaccination avoidance. False information not only modifies existing memories but can even produce false memories, especially when it aligns with our preexisting beliefs and ideologies. Greene and Murphy present intriguing experimental evidence that false memories are prevalent and easy to implant. Children and older adults seem especially susceptible to misinformation, but no one is immune, regardless of education or intelligence. Reassuringly, perhaps, digital image manipulation and deepfake videos are no more likely to induce false memories than good old-fashioned verbiage. A doctored picture may not be worth a thousand words when it comes to warping memory. Memory Lane devotes some time to the ' memory wars ' of the 1980s and 1990s, when debate raged over the existence of repressed memories. Greene and Murphy argue the now mainstream view that many traumatic memories supposedly recovered in therapy were false memories induced by therapists. Memories for traumatic events are not repressed, they argue, and traumatic memories are neither qualitatively different from other memories, nor stored separately from them. Here the science of memory runs contrary to the wildly popular claims of writers such as psychiatrist Bessel van der Kolk, author of the bestseller The Body Keeps the Score. Misunderstanding memory The authors of Memory Lane contend that we hold memory to unrealistic standards of accuracy, completeness and stability. When people misremember the past or change their recollections, we query their honesty or mental health. When our own memories are hazy, we worry about cognitive decline. Greene and Murphy argue that it is in the very nature of memory to be fallible, malleable and limited. This message is heartening, but it does not clarify why we would expect memory to be more capacious, coherent and durable in the first place. Nor does it explain why we persist with this wrongheaded expectation, despite so much evidence to the contrary. The authors hint that our mistake might have its roots in dominant metaphors of memory. If we now understand the mind as computer-like, we will see memories as digital traces that sit, silent and unchanging, in a vast storage system. 'Many of the catastrophic consequences of memory distortion arise not because our individual memories are terrible,' they argue, 'but because we have unrealistic expectations about how memory works, treating it as a video camera rather than a reconstruction.' In earlier times, when memory was likened to a telephone switchboard or to books or, for the ancient Greeks, to wax tablets, memory errors and erasures may have seemed less surprising and more tolerable. These shifting technological analogies, explored historically in Douwe Draaisma's Metaphors of Memory, may partly account for our extravagant expectations for memory. Expecting silicon chip performance from carbon-based organisms, who evolved to care more about adaptation than truth, would be foolish. But there is surely more to this than metaphor. All aspects of our lives are increasingly recorded and datafied, a process that demands objectivity, accuracy and consistency. The recorded facts of the matter determine who should be rewarded, punished and regulated. The bounded and mutable nature of human memory presents a challenge to this digital regime. Human memory is also increasingly taxed by the overwhelming and accelerating volume of information that assails us. Our frustration with its limitations reflects the desperate mismatch we feel between human nature and the impersonal systems of data in which we live. Greene and Murphy urge us to relax. We should be humbler about our memory, and more realistic and forgiving about the memories of others. We should not be judgemental about the errors and inconsistencies of friends, or overconfident about our own recollections. And we should remember that, although memory is fallible, it is fallible in beneficial ways. A person whose memory system always kept an accurate record of our lives would be profoundly impaired, Greene and Murphy argue. Such a person 'would struggle to plan for the future, learn from the past, or respond flexibly to unexpected events'. Brimming with insights such as these, Memory Lane offers an informative and readable account of how the apparent weaknesses of human memory may be strengths in disguise.
Pink Villa
02-07-2025
- Pink Villa
What is Bella Ramsay Doing After The Last of Us? Actor Fixes Lead Role in Channel 4's New Thriller Maya
Fresh off the success of The Last of Us season two, Bella Ramsey is set to return to TV screens as the lead in Maya, a new Channel 4 psychological thriller created by Daisy Haggard. The BAFTA and International Emmy nominee is behind shows like Back To Life and Breeders, and will also star alongside Ramsey in this six-part series. Daisy Haggard steps into new roles Daisy Haggard's thriller will see her making her directorial debut. She'll co-direct the Channel 4 psychological thriller Maya with Jamie Donoughue, known for Doctor Who and The Last Kingdom. Haggard plays Anna, mother to Ramsey's Maya. The story follows Anna and her teenage daughter as they flee London under witness protection, trying to rebuild their lives in rural Scotland while dangerous enemies close in. Haggard shared her excitement: 'Ever since I first dreamt up this show, there has only ever been one Maya…I wrote the part with Bella so clearly in my head and I honestly still can't believe they want to be part of it. Bella is pure magic, just insanely talented, and I can't wait for us to work together.' Here's what Maya is about Bella R amsey's new series, Maya, is described as darkly comedic but rooted in warmth and wit. The show explores family ties, love, and the unbreakable bond between mother and daughter while tackling themes like predatory male behaviour. According to Variety, Ramsey praised the script: 'This story and these characters Daisy has created are so alive, nuanced, wickedly funny and scarily dark. Every character jumps off the page, the dialogue is incredibly witty and I'm so excited to get to play Maya opposite Daisy's Anna.' Produced by Two Brothers Pictures, known for hits like Fleabag, The Tourist and Boat Story, Maya will film entirely in Scotland later this year. Bella Ramsey's new series, Maya, is backed by Channel 4's Ollie Madden and Gemma Boswell. Haggard joins Harry and Jack Williams, Sarah Hammond, Alex Mercer, and Daisy Mount as executive producers for Two Brothers Pictures, with Kenny Tanner producing. Jamie Donoughue will co-direct and serve as co-executive producer. Shaheen Baig is the casting director. Alex Mercer and Daisy Mount called Ramsey 'one of the most incredible talents of their generation and the only Maya we had in mind.' They added, 'The two characters share such a unique and special relationship and are the heart and soul of the project.'
Hindustan Times
30-06-2025
- Hindustan Times
Who is Ocean Ramsey? All about Neflix's Shark Whisperer star
Ocean Ramsey, a free-diving conservationist and social media activist, is the subject of an all-new documentary by Netflix, titled Shark Whisperer, which came out on Monday, June 30. Helmed by JP Stiles, Harrison Macks, and James Reed, the Academy Award–winning director of My Octopus Teacher, the project follows Ramsey's journey towards changing the way people think about the misunderstood predator and captures her passion for sharks. Who is Ocean Ramsey? All about controversial 'shark influencer'(Instagram/ Ocean Ramsey) According to the streaming giant, more than 100 million sharks are killed every year, and Ramsey is advocating for their safety by urging people not to treat them as 'monsters.' Their survival is crucial for a balanced marine ecosystem, the 38-year-old conservationist says. Born in 1987 and raised in O'ahu, Hawaii, Ocean Ramsey is a marine conservationist, author, and free diver. For more than a decade, she has been spreading awareness regarding shark killings through various platforms. She has more than two million followers on Instagram, where she shares photographs and videos of herself swimming alongside various shark species, including great whites and tiger sharks. Popularly known as a 'shark influencer,' her dedication towards the cause has received support from many. However, there have been dozens of critics in the marine biologist community who have raised questions over her tactics and other things. In an interview with The Telegraph, Ramsey shared that she has been swimming with sharks since the age of 14, while her mission is to question and challenge the portrayal of sharks as the villains of nature. 'We gotta change the music, change the way we look at sharks. Flip the perception,' she said in the new documentary. According to her website, she studied biology at the University of Hawaii and earned her bachelor's degree in marine biology from San Diego State University. Also, she has a master's degree in ethology. For Ramsey, her role models are American marine biologist Sylvia Alice Earle and Bella, whom she called 'a female great white shark.' She is married to underwater photographer and videographer Juan Oliphant. The couple run a shark-diving business that organizes 'snorkel diving with shark expeditions' for just $150 per person. Besides this, she offers various online courses, such as 'Shark Behaviour and Safety for All'. FAQs: 1. When and where to watch Ocean Ramsey documentary? Shark Whisperer is available on Netflix now. 2. What's the story of Shark Whisperer? It narrates the journey of Ocean Ramsey as she looks forward to changing the way people think about sharks. 3. Is Ocean Ramsey married? Yes, she is married to Juan Oliphant, an underwater photographer and videographer.
