Sebi slaps ₹10 lakh fine on entity for insider trading during HDFC merger
Sebi found that Rupesh Satish Dalal HUF had traded in derivatives of both HDFC entities on April 1, 2022 -- just days before the official announcement of the merger between HDFC Ltd and HDFC Bank on April 4, 2022.
Rupesh Satish Dalal is the karta of Rupesh Satish Dalal HUF.
The regulator's probe revealed that Dalal had received UPSI through his son, who was in close and regular contact with a person (individual) who was an insider associated with Deloitte.
Deloitte Touche Tohmatsu India LLP was engaged as the valuer for the merger exercise and the individual was part of the valuation team from March 29, 2022.
The individual and Dalal's son were long-time friends and exchanged several calls in the run-up to the trades. Sebi also noted that a meeting between the two took place on March 31, a day before Dalal placed the trades.
Sebi said the noticee (Rupesh Satish Dalal HUF) bought multiple call option contracts of HDFC Ltd and HDFC Bank Ltd on April 1, 2022, while being in possession of the UPSI.
The regulator noted that once the information regarding the impending merger was disclosed, Rupesh Satish Dalal HUF immediately exited his positions on the same very date, i.e., on April 4, 2022.
Thus, it is established that Rupesh Satish Dalal HUF has violated PIT (Prohibition of Insider Trading) regulations.
The order came after NSE analysed the trading activity of various entities in the scrip of HDFC Ltd and HDFC Bank Ltd. Further, the bourse observed that the trading of certain clients including Rupesh Satish Dalal HUF pointed to the possibility of trading on the basis of UPSI.
Consequently, the matter was forwarded to the Securities and Exchange Board of India (Sebi) for investigation. The period was from November 01, 2021 to April 30, 2022.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Mint
5 hours ago
- Mint
Who keeps the interest? Delhi HC to hear case on margin money in F&O trades
The Delhi High Court will on Wednesday hear a public interest litigation (PIL) that puts the spotlight on a contentious yet under-examined issue in India's ₹160-trillion futures and options (F&O) market: the fate of interest earned on margin money that traders deposit with brokers. Investor funds in focus Every day, millions of Indian traders participating in the fast-paced F&O market have to deposit 'margin money" as security against market risk. This capital—locked up for the entire period their position is open, ranging from a day to as long as two months—gets parked by stock brokers, often into fixed deposits or overnight mutual funds. According to FY24 data from the National Stock Exchange annual report, traders collectively deposited over ₹160 trillion as margin, calculated as an average 20% margin on an F&O turnover of about ₹800 trillion. While this capital remains blocked and generates substantial interest income, traders do not receive any compensation, the petition says. Brokers have traditionally pocketed this interest, despite the money not belonging to them. Regulatory action by Sebi In June 2023, the Securities and Exchange Board of India (Sebi) introduced rules to prevent misuse of client funds after a series of high-profile broker defaults. The so-called 'upstreaming framework" now requires brokers to transfer all client monies to designated clearing corporations (CC) at the end of each trading day. Funds can only be held as cash, in specified fixed deposits, or in risk-free overnight mutual funds, and must be subject to tight liens and disclosures. However, Sebi's circulars remain silent on who is entitled to the interest income from margin funds kept in FDs or mutual funds. This regulatory ambiguity forms the crux of the PIL filed by a Delhi-based lawyer, Virat Agarwal, who argues that while brokers act merely as intermediaries, it is the clients who deserve the return on their own capital. The PIL seeks a clear directive from Sebi and the Central government to ensure that interest earned on traders' margin fixed deposits is passed back to the clients. 'After paying all taxes, duties, brokerage and fees, it is the legal right of the trader to get the interest on the margin money deposited," Agarwal argues. The issue, he points out, impacts millions of retail and institutional investors who see no return on capital locked up as margins. Legal lacunae and regulatory confusion Legal experts universally agree that there is no statute or regulation in India that clearly prescribes who should rightfully receive the interest accrued on client margin fixed deposits. 'The upstreaming framework lays out stringent operational and safety norms to prevent the misuse of client money, but is silent on who benefits from the interest on these fixed deposits," said Alay Razvi, managing partner at Accord Juris. The result, he emphasized, is that brokers retain this income by default, exposing a glaring regulatory gap that the PIL seeks to close. On its part, on 5 July 2024, market regulator Sebi issued a draft circular and consultation paper proposing that clearing corporations should segregate their own funds from client money at all times and distribute interest income earned on invested collaterals to clearing members, who in turn should pass it on to their clients. But these rules are still under consideration, and there is no formal adoption yet. Brokerage business models on the line Not surprisingly, the issue is contentious. Some brokers contend that interest on client float has become their sole major revenue stream, especially for low-cost or zero-fee platforms. 'Take away the interest, and brokers will be forced to increase trading fees or shut shop," warns one broker. Financial advisors echo this view, noting that discount brokers—who have driven down commissions industry-wide—depend on this interest to subsidize their razor-thin margins. Narinder Wadhwa, chief executive of SKI Capital Services, notes, 'For discount and zero-commission brokers, retaining interest on client margin is critical. Any regulatory shift could lead to fee hikes, business model overhauls, or even consolidation." Globally, approaches to interest distribution vary. In the US, SEC and Finra demand strict segregation of client funds but do not require that brokers pass on interest. Some brokers voluntarily do so for high net worth clients as a competitive perk. In the UK, the FCA's rules on client money require segregation, but interest-sharing is a matter of contract, not regulation. Experts warn that blanket Sebi orders would face formidable hurdles. One being the operational challenges of accurately allocating interest (after deducting costs and taxes) to each client in pooled accounts over shifting intraday balance, especially for high-volume brokers. Wadhwa elaborates on a key regulatory obstacle of the broker not being a non-banking financial company. 'Under current financial regulation, brokers are not permitted to accept deposits or offer interest-bearing products in the manner that RBI-regulated financial institutions do." He warns that Sebi requiring interest distribution could result in a jurisdictional conflict, blurring the lines between brokerages and regulated deposit-taking institutions. 'Any such step would likely require a coordinated policy effort between SEBI, RBI, clearing corporations, and exchanges, to ensure consistent treatment across the financial system." He also mentions the tax and compliance implications, including questions around TDS, GST, and client-level tax reporting if interest is passed on. 'Most broker-client agreements today do not account for this scenario, and any retrospective application could trigger legal and contractual disputes", Wadhwa says, adding that a more pragmatic approach could involve phased reform, including policy-level clarification on the role of clearing corporations in interest income distribution. Looking ahead Parth Contractor, founder of the Chamber of Parth Contractors, suggests a bigger story behind the PIL. 'The difference between Sebi's 2023 circulars and ground reality lies at the core of current litigation. Any change will surely disrupt brokers' economics and force compliance and technology upgrades." As the High Court gears up for the hearing, Sebi has already replied to the court, arguing that the matter needs legislative and not judicial attention. The outcome could reshape investor compensation as well as business models across India's capital markets.
Hindustan Times
9 hours ago
- Hindustan Times
Delayed project possession and missed EMIs: Here's how it can impact your CIBIL score
Rohit Singh, a 36-year-old mid-level IT professional in Pune, booked a 2-BHK flat in 2021 for ₹78 lakh, expecting possession by August 2023. To fund the purchase, he took a home loan of ₹65 lakh, with an EMI of ₹52,000 per month. However, due to regulatory delays and cash flow issues faced by the developer, the project stalled, and handover was pushed indefinitely. Delayed real estate projects: Any default, regardless of the reason, is recorded in the borrower's credit history and can lead to a significant drop in the credit score. (Photo for representational purposes only)(Pixabay) Singh was forced to continue living in a rented apartment, paying ₹27,000 in monthly rent in addition to the EMI. With no tax benefits from possession and no rental income, the ₹79,000 monthly outgo severely strained his finances. His savings quickly depleted, and he began defaulting on utility bills and pausing SIPs and insurance premiums. Within five months, he delayed two EMI payments, which impacted his credit score and triggered penalty interest from the bank. 'Borrowers facing delayed flat possession are caught between a rock and a hard place as they need to pay EMI as well as in many cases rent for the existing accommodation,' says Abhishek Kumar, a Securities and Exchange Board of India (Sebi)-registered investment advisor (RIA), and founder and chief investment advisor of SahajMoney, a financial planning firm. Impact on borrowers Even if there is a delay in possession, it is recommended that borrowers keep on making the EMI payments on time. Starting from affecting your credit score, not paying your EMIs will land you in all sorts of trouble. Banks will simply check which customer's EMI has bounced. They are not obligated nor do they have the systems in place to check why it bounced. 'So, yes, if you miss an EMI because your house hasn't been delivered yet and you're stuck paying both rent and loan, your CIBIL score will still take a hit,' says Siddarth Jain, CFO at MinEmi, a web application that utilizes AI to help users optimize their loan and credit card choices. Also Read: Has your real estate developer delayed possession of your flat? Here's how homebuyers can manage the EMI and rent burden At present, there is limited formal relief available for borrowers in such situations. Lenders generally assess defaults on a case-by-case basis, and any relaxation or restructuring is at their discretion. 'Credit bureaus rely solely on the data provided by lenders; they do not investigate the reasons behind defaults. As a result, even if the default is due to a delay in possession, it is recorded as a missed payment unless the lender intervenes,' says Raoul Kapoor, Co-CEO, Andromeda Sales and Distribution, a loan distribution company. Any default, regardless of the reason, is recorded in the borrower's credit history and can lead to a significant drop in the credit score. This, in turn, reduces the borrower's chances of getting future loans or may result in higher interest rates. Also Read: Section 54: Can a wife claim tax exemption by selling flats gifted by her husband and reinvesting in a new property? 'Rebuilding a damaged credit score is a slow process and may take years of consistent repayment and financial discipline to recover,' says Kapoor. What can you do to minimise the impact If you're stuck with delayed possession, ask your bank if they offer a pre-EMI option. Under this structure, you only pay the interest portion of your loan until you actually get possession. 'This significantly lowers your monthly outgo for a while. It's similar to how an education loan works, interest accumulates while you study, and full repayment begins once you graduate. For homebuyers, this can ease the pressure during the construction phase,' says Adhil Shetty, CEO, a fintech portal. Lenders are often open to negotiations. If you explain your situation, say, construction is delayed and you're struggling to manage rent and EMI, they might offer a moratorium. 'For example, they could allow you to defer payments for six months, with the accumulated interest added later. It's not free money, but it gives you breathing space. Many borrowers are unaware that such arrangements are possible if they simply ask,' says Shetty. Anagh Pal is a personal finance expert who writes on real estate, tax, insurance, mutual funds and other topics If you're stuck with delayed possession, ask your bank if they offer a pre-EMI option. Under this structure, you only pay the interest portion of your loan until you actually get possession(HT Graphics) Early and transparent communication with the lender is thus crucial to negotiate suitable terms. Of course, one needs to remember that under these options you may get a temporary relief but the total cost of the loan increases.
News18
a day ago
- News18
Man held from Punjabs Amritsar for threatening Congress MP Randhawas son
Chandigarh, Aug 2 (PTI) A man was arrested from Punjab's Amritsar for allegedly threatening Congress MP Sukhjinder Singh Randhawa's son, police on Saturday said. The preliminary probe, however, revealed no link with any gangster in the matter, they said. The accused, identified as Gagandeep Singh, made the threatening comments, police said. The senior Congress leader had on Friday alleged that jailed gangster Jaggu Bhagwanpuria has threatened to kill his son. Batala Senior Superintendent of Police (SSP) Suhail Qasim Mir said Gagandeep Singh hails from this city but was currently staying in Amritsar. The accused had made some objectionable and threatening comment on an Instagram post of Randhawa's son Udhayveer Singh. After taking up the matter with the Instagram authorities, it was found that the objectionable comments were made from Gagandeep's account, the SSP told reporters reporters in Batala. The accused was arrested from Amritsar, he said. The preliminary probe revealed that there was no link with any gangster in this case, said police, adding that 'it was an act of mischief". The SSP, however, said that this matter would be thoroughly investigated. A case has been registered against the accused under relevant sections of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita and the IT Act, police said. Randhawa had said on Friday that Bhagwanpuria has threatened to kill his son. 'One of my associates met my son and within one hour of leaving, he was fired upon," he said in a post on X. The Congress leader had alleged that Bhagwanpuria was threatening people even from inside prison. The MP's associate had also stated that he too received one such call. Batala Police wrote to the jail authorities in Silchar, Assam, to have effective surveillance on Bhagwanpuria, the SSP said. Earlier in March, Bhagwanpuria was detained by the Narcotics Control Bureau (NCB) under the PIT-NDPS Act and shifted from the Central Jail in Bathinda to Assam's Silchar jail. The gangster, who faces several other cases, was already in the custody of Punjab Police in the 2022 singer Sidhu Moosewala murder case. PTI CHS AS AS view comments First Published: August 02, 2025, 19:30 IST Disclaimer: Comments reflect users' views, not News18's. Please keep discussions respectful and constructive. Abusive, defamatory, or illegal comments will be removed. News18 may disable any comment at its discretion. By posting, you agree to our Terms of Use and Privacy Policy.
