What is President Trump's approval rating a year after assassination attempt in PA
The president's second term has been mired in controversial politics and policies, taking Americans on a roller coaster of economic and social ups and downs that include his ongoing tariff and trade negotiations, mass government firings and DOGE cuts, nationwide ICE raids, the bombing of Iran, and most recent passage of the One, Big Beautiful Bill.
Trump's job approval rating in his first term averaged a 41.1% approval rating with a 56.1% disapproval rate, however he has come into his second term with stronger favorable numbers, according to the polls.
Here's how Americans are feeling about Trump's presidential job performance now.
According to today's Rasmussen Reports polling, Trump's approval has slipped to 48% approval rating versus 50% that disapprove. This is down from his highest rating this term in January, when it was at 56% approval and 40% disapproval.
In this week's Economist/YouGov poll, Trump's job approval dropped to 42% with a 53% disapproval. Within the same poll, 67% of respondents described the state of the economy as fair or better with 28% describing it as poor.
The weekend's Morning Consult poll saw Trump's favorability dipping to 45% and a rising disapproval rating of 52%.
In a Quantus Insights poll ending July 2, 47% approved of Trump's job as president, while 49% disapproved and 4% reported not sure. Ahead of Fourth of July, the pollsters asked about American pride, with 77% responding they are proud to be American and 23% said not proud. Along the same vein, Americans were asked which American values they hold most dear, the response was freedom of speech, equality under the law, democracy/voting rights, the right to bear arms, and religious liberty, in that order.
RealClear Polling which encompasses the average of different 15 different pollsters, including all those mentioned above, shows Trump's overall favorability declining this week to 46.3% that approve and 50.3% that disapprove. These numbers are still on improvement since his lows at the end of April, when it reached a 52.4% disapproval rating and 45.1% favorable approval rating.
Note: Polls are constantly changing and different pollsters ask different varieties of the population. These numbers were reflected as of Friday, July 11, 2025 at 11 a.m.
According to Civiqs polls, last updated July 9, Trump sits at a -9% net approval rating in Pennsylvania.
About 52% of Pennsylvanians polled currently disapprove of the president's performance. About 44% of respondents approve of Trump's job performance and another 4% didn't feel one way or the other.
These polling numbers were also broken down by age, education, gender, race and party.
Age: Those between 18-34 were most unfavorable of Trump (62%), while those 50 to 64 were the most favorable (53%).
Education: Respondents across all education levels disapprove of Trump' s job performance, with postgraduates at 63% disapproval, college graduates at 53% and 49% of non-college graduates.
Gender: Men and women are split on Trump, more than half of females (58%) holding an unfavorable view and about half of males (50%) having a favorable view of the president.
Party: Members of the Republican party were 88% favorable of Trump, compared to the Democratic party, who felt just 2% favorable of the president's performance. Half of Independent voters were unfavorable (50%).
Race: Black voters had the highest unfavorable opinion of Trump (90%), followed by other races at 62%, Hispanic/Latino at 61% and white at 49%.
This article originally appeared on NorthJersey.com: Trump polls today: What is President Trump's current approval rating
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Forbes
5 minutes ago
- Forbes
Monday, July 14. Russia's War On Ukraine: News And Information From Ukraine
TOPSHOT - US President Donald Trump meets with NATO Secretary General Mark Rutte (L) in the Oval ... More Office of the White House in Washington, DC on July 14, 2025. Photo by ANDREW CABALLERO-REYNOLDS/AFP via Getty Images Dispatches from Ukraine. Day 1,237. Trump Unveils New Aid for Ukraine and Issues Ultimatum to Moscow On July 14 U.S. President Donald Trump announced a significant shift in U.S. policy toward ending the war in Ukraine, unveiling a new plan to boost military support for Kyiv while increasing pressure on Moscow. Speaking in the Oval Office alongside NATO Secretary General Mark Rutte, Trump said the U.S. will provide Ukraine with as many as 17 Patriot missile defense systems. 'We're going to have some come very soon, within days,' Trump told reporters. Some of the systems will be transferred from European NATO allies' stockpiles, with the allies ordering replacements from the U.S. The new aid is valued at billions of dollars. The more aggressive posture comes with a clear warning to Moscow. Trump gave the Kremlin a 50-day deadline to reach a peace agreement with Kyiv. Otherwise, the U.S. will impose what President Trump called 'very severe' tariffs. 'If we don't have a deal in 50 days, it's very simple, and they'll be at 100%.' A White House official later clarified that these tariffs would target Russian goods, as well as extend to countries that continue purchasing Russian exports, including oil. Donald Trump's decision appears to be driven by growing frustration with Russian President Vladimir Putin. 'My conversations with him are very pleasant, and then the missiles go off at night,' Trump said, even as he denied being taken in by Putin and attempted to cast his predecessors as having done so: 'He fooled Clinton, Bush, Obama, Biden — he didn't fool me.' President Trump's decision, nonetheless, may not represent as abrupt a shift against the Kremlin as it might initially appear, thanks to the grace period Russia received to devise a resolution to the conflict before the measures take effect. The 50-day grace period was met with cautious relief by investors in Russia, where the ruble rebounded from earlier losses against the dollar and the stock market posted modest gains of 2.7%. Reacting to Trump's new pledges of military aid for Ukraine, European Union foreign policy chief Kaja Kallas, welcomed his firmer tone toward Russia, but not the 50-day grace period. 'It is very positive that President Trump is taking on a strong stance on Russia,' she said. 'On the other hand, 50 days is a very long time if we see that they [Russia]Meanwhile, Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskyy met in his country's capital, Kyiv, with Keith Kellogg, President Trump's special envoy to Ukraine and Russia. Zelenskyy said they had 'a productive conversation' about strengthening Ukrainian air defenses, joint arms production, purchasing U.S. weapons in conjunction with European allies, and the possibility of tightening international sanctions on Russia. 'We hope for the leadership of the United States, because it is clear that Moscow will not stop unless its unwarranted ambitions are stopped by force,' Zelenskyy wrote in his post on Telegram following the meeting. Russian Attacks on Ukraine Russian forces rained 597 drones down on Ukraine, along with 26 cruise missiles, overnight into July 12, marking the second largest aerial attack of the war. Ukraine's Air Force reported intercepting 319 drones and 25 missiles, as well as electronically jamming 258 drones. The barrage was directed at western Ukraine, with impacts recorded at five locations. Officials in Chernivtsi, previously considered one of Ukraine's safest cities, reported two residents killed, its first wartime casualties. In Lviv, a city widely regarded as the nation's cultural capital, at least 12 people were injured amid damage to the city's historic center. In total, the Kremlin fired more than 1,800 drones, 1,200 glide bombs, and 83 missiles at its neighbor last week. In addition to the massive overnight assault on July 12, Russian daytime attacks between July 10-13 killed at least 29 civilians across Ukraine. In the blood soaked eastern province of Donetsk, sustained Russian shelling killed at least 14 non-combatants and injured 26 others. In northeastern Kharkiv oblast, or province, four residents were killed, with 21 others wounded; in southern Kherson region, Russian drone strikes left four civilians dead and 32 others injured, while in southeastern Zaporizhzhia oblast, Russian attacks killed at least two residents and injured three others. In northern Sumy oblast, where Russia has renewed its on-the-ground offensive, five residents were reported dead and 19 others suffered injuries. June marked the deadliest month for Ukrainian civilians in the war's more than three-year history. According to a recent report from the UN Human Rights Monitoring Mission in Ukraine, 232 were civilians killed and 1,343 injured in June, nearly three times the losses a year earlier. The UN attributed the spike to a tenfold increase in Russian long-range missile and loitering munition attacks, which use drones that can hover over an area to allow precision targeting. These weapons were in use across at least 16 regions, including Kyiv. Civilian casualties across Ukraine in the first half of 2025 surged to 6,754, a 54% year-over-year increase, where civilian deaths and injuries from Russian strikes rose by 17% and 64%, respectively. President Volodymyr Zelensky announced a government reshuffle and proposed First Deputy Prime Minister Yulia Svyrydenko as the next Prime Minister of Ukraine on July 14. After the resignation of the current Prime Minister, Denys Shmyhal, Ukrainian lawmakers have 30 days to vote on the next Prime Minister. By Danylo Nosov, Karina L. Tahiliani
Yahoo
41 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Redistricting, flood warning systems on Texas special session agenda
AUSTIN (Nexstar) — Texas Gov. Greg Abbott announced a full special session agenda Wednesday, including a rumored mid-decade redistricting of congressional maps and the creation of flood warning systems in response to the deadly and destructive floods that hit Central Texas. The special session begins July 21. Flash flooding claimed more than 100 lives in Central Texas. Here's what we know about the victims Redistricting made headlines in recent weeks as the New York Times reported President Donald Trump was urging Texas Republican congressmen to redraw the state's maps ahead of the 2026 midterms. With a slim majority in the U.S. House, it would only take three flips for Democrats to retake control of the chamber. Redrawing maps to benefit the GOP could offset any losses in other parts of the country, and potentially keep the House for the GOP if the election is close. Republicans already hold 25 out of 38 congressional seats in Texas — a higher percentage of seats than Trump's 2024 vote share. Some Republicans reportedly have worries that redrawing the maps could make their seats more vulnerable if the midterm environment is favorable to Democrats. Any attempt to redraw the maps could provoke a response from Democratic governors, as California is reportedly considering a redraw of its maps should Texas move forward. Congressional maps in the country's two largest Democratic states — California and New York — are drawn by independent commissions, while the two largest Republican states — Texas and Florida — are drawn by legislators. To address flooding, legislation to improve warning systems and emergency communications in flood-prone areas of Texas is one of the first items in Abbott's release announcing the agenda. Flooding over the July 4 weekend killed over 100 people in the Texas Hill Country and surrounding counties. As of Wednesday afternoon, more than 160 people remain missing in Kerr County. The release from the governor's office did not go into further detail on the system, and lawmakers such as House Speaker Dustin Burrows have said it is too early to determine any specific legislation. In addition to new warning systems, the special session agenda includes additional funding for flood relief efforts and additional regulation for natural disaster recovery and preparedness. Abbott's agenda includes eliminating the STAAR test and replacing it with alternative assessment tools, along with legislation to reduce property taxes and impose spending limits on entities authorized to levy property taxes. Several agenda items reflect conservative priorities, including legislation to make it a crime to provide hemp-derived products to children under 21 and comprehensive regulation of hemp-derived products. Abbott also seeks legislation 'further protecting unborn children and their mothers from the harm of abortion' and measures 'protecting women's privacy in sex-segregated spaces.' The session will consider proposals to ban taxpayer-funded lobbying, including prohibiting the use of tax dollars to hire lobbyists and payments to associations that lobby the Legislature. Abbott also wants to grant the Attorney General constitutional authority to prosecute state election crimes and protect law enforcement officers from public disclosure of unsubstantiated complaints in personnel files. The agenda includes legislation protecting human trafficking victims from criminal liability for non-violent acts tied to their victimization, strengthening protections against title theft and deed fraud, providing water project incentives for conservation measures and addressing judicial department operations. The special session begins at noon on July 21. Unlike regular sessions, special sessions are limited to 30 days and can only consider items specifically placed on the agenda by the governor. The flood response measures represent the most immediate priority, as federal and state officials continue search and recovery operations in the Hill Country and communities work to rebuild infrastructure damaged by the historic flooding. Copyright 2025 Nexstar Media, Inc. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten, or redistributed.
Yahoo
43 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Federal job cuts set off retirement surge, planning challenges
A sharp rise in federal retirements, coupled with an expected wave of more government layoffs, is prompting high-stakes career decisions for many federal employees. Through June, more than 72,000 federal employees have filed retirement claims with the Office of Personnel Management, data shows. That represents a 38% increase in claims compared to the same period last year, driven by a wave of cuts across federal agencies by the Trump administration. Starting in late January, Elon Musk and his Department of Government Efficiency (DOGE) worked to cut tens of thousands of federal workers. But even after Musk's departure, the Trump administration has made clear that it intends to continue downsizing the federal workforce. Last week, the Supreme Court ruled that the Trump administration could move forward with extensive government job cuts. Thousands of federal employees across more than a dozen agencies, including the Departments of Agriculture, Commerce, Health and Human Services, State, Treasury, and Veterans Affairs, are slated for dismissal. READ MORE: Trump's megabill passed — here's what advisors should know Financial advisors who specialize in working with federal employees say the options available to their clients have become clearer compared to the start of the year. "Earlier this year, there was so much more uncertainty around what the options were, and so in some ways … some discussions were driven by a lot of fear, because of the uncertainty of just not understanding what the deferred resignation program really looked like and whether it was legal and things like that," said Amy King, founder of Instar Financial Planning in Fallston, Maryland. "Now there's not so much uncertainty anymore. It's really just that they've made their decision. Now how do we effectively plan, given the decision they've made and the timeline that we know about." Still, continued cuts across the government, as well as uncertainty around future regulations, make navigating retirement decisions for current federal employees difficult. "In some cases, whole offices have basically stopped having any work come down to them, like they're just being totally hobbled and cut out at the knees," said Andrew Katz-Moses, founder of Katz-Moses Financial in Washington, D.C., "So they're very interested in exploring if it's possible for them to actually retire." Making that determination looks different for every worker, but advisors point to a couple of common considerations. Federal workers considering retirement can have a variety of potential offers available to them, each with its own set of rules and financial implications. For many, the choice revolves around a handful of options, including the voluntary early retirement authority (VERA), the voluntary separation incentive payment (VSIP) — commonly known as a buyout — and, in some cases, agency-specific initiatives such as a deferred resignation program (DRP). "I would say 75% of the new clients that I've received, federal employee clients that have come in, are looking at whether or not they can accept the deferred retirement offer that came out earlier, and several of them are taking it," King said. "Several have taken the voluntary early retirement authority, the VERA, in conjunction with DRP." READ MORE: Coping with brutal Efficiency: How advisors are helping federal workers For eligible workers, deferred retirement could also be an appealing option, but it comes with implications of its own, King said. "If they're leaving and they're going to end up with a deferred retirement, which means that it's not going to kick in until probably 62 maybe as early as 57, what are they doing in between when they retire, until they're eligible to collect their annuity?" King said. "What are they doing for health care? What are they doing for income? What are their options for whether or not the Federal Employee Health Benefit kicks back in or not? So it's not just the standard stuff that normally comes with financial planning around literally, like, 'Can I retire?' It's also the benefits part of it." Beyond the finances, advisors say that many federal employees are also having to factor in assumptions about the future of the government into their decision. Earlier this year, some 40,000 federal employees resigned through the Trump administration's fork-in-the-road offer, according to the Federal News Network. Now, many of the workers who declined to take that offer find themselves in limbo. "Sometimes it makes a lot of sense, like they should take it, and sometimes they also have to think about, okay, if they don't take it, what's the risk that they come back and get fired anyway, and now they've not taken this buyout that was on offer," Katz-Moses said. As a new wave of federal layoffs ramps up, advisors say that it's easy for workers to feel overwhelmed by all of the variables at play. That's why it is crucial to talk about emotions first before jumping into logistics, according to Katz-Moses. READ MORE: A checklist for advisors assisting federal employees "I always like to check in on the emotions first and [say] like, 'Let's step back. Let's get out of the numbers and the logistics for a second. What do you really want right now? What's most important?'" he said. "'Even given all the turmoil and tumultuousness of what's happening right now, if this goes really well, what will happen for you?' Start to, you know, vision out what that ideally looks like, and then we have to look at the numbers."
