
Foraco International reports Q2 2025
Q2 2025 Highlights:
Revenue: US$69.1 million, compared to US$77.9 million in Q2 2024. At constant exchange rates, revenue decreased by US$5.8 million (-7.4%).
Revenue breakdown:
Asia Pacific: Achieved another record quarter with revenue of US$24.7 million, up 11% YoY, driven by the ongoing commissioning of proprietary rigs and strong operational performance.
EMEA: Revenue rose to US$7.8 million, a 47% increase, supported by the start of significant new contracts for the region.
North America: Despite noticeable early wins in the US, revenue decreased by 21% to US$25.3 million, due to program discontinuations and delays in starting new contracts.
South America: Revenue fell to US$11.3 million (from US$18.2 million in Q2 2024), as Chile and Argentina entered the mobilization and learning curve phases of new long-term contracts, and Brazil faced client-driven mobilization delays.
Profitability metrics:
Gross Margin: US$14.1 million (20.5% of revenue), compared to US$17.9 million (23.0%) in Q2 2024. Excluding one-off costs of US$1.0 million related to specific reorganization measures, gross margin stood at US$15.1 million (21.9%).
EBITDA: US$14.0 million (20.3% of revenue) or US$15.0 million (21.7% of revenue) excluding one-off costs, compared to US$16.4 million (21.0%) in Q2 2024.
Net Profit: US$6.0 million (9% of revenue), compared to US$7.8 million (10%).
Free Cash Flow: Negative US$7.1 million, mainly due to working capital requirements and Capex to support new contracts.
Net Debt: US$76.5 million, including IFRS 16 but US$69.5 million at constant FX, compared to US$78.7 million as of June 30, 2024.
Tim Bremner, CEO of Foraco, reflected on the quarter, stating, "In Q2 2025, we continued to focus on aligning our portfolio with high-potential regions and segments, driven by our investment in proprietary rigs and high-value contracts. While some regions face program discontinuations and delays in starting new contracts, we are seeing positive developments, with Asia Pacific achieving another robust quarter, the award of a significant long-term contract in Chile, and early wins, including four new contracts in the US to be executed in the second half of the year. We relocated more than 10 rigs across distant continents - including Europe, Chile, Canada, and the US - and continued to implement our tailored Capex program to support the execution of newly secured contracts."
Fabien Sevestre, CFO of Foraco, shared insights into the financial performance, stating, "During this quarter, despite lower activity in America, we managed to maintain solid profitability supported by cost discipline and the resilient performance of our operations. Excluding the one-off costs of US$1.0 million related to a reorganization in South America, our EBITDA margin would have reached 21.7% compared to 21% in Q2 2024. The exit from Kazakhstan generated an accounting net gain of US$0.3 million. Working capital requirements, although still negative, improved significantly during the quarter, partially offsetting the impact of capital expenditures needed for new deployments. Net debt stands at US$76.5 million, as we remain committed to a disciplined capital allocation strategy, focusing on proprietary rigs and fleet modernization to sustain future growth."
Income Statement
(1) This line item includes amortization and depreciation expenses related to operations
Highlights – Q2 2025
Revenue
Total revenue in Q2 2025 was US$69.1 million, compared to US$77.9 million in Q2 2024. At constant exchange rates, revenue decreased by US$5.8 million. Asia Pacific and EMEA delivered growth, with revenue increasing by US$5.7 million at constant exchange rates, while North and South America declined by US$11.0 million mainly due to the discontinuation of certain client programs and delays in starting new contracts.
Mining activity was the most impacted by the factors mentioned above, partially offset by a US$3.0 million increase in Water activity.
Profitability
Gross margin for Q2 2025, including depreciation within cost of sales, was US$14.1 million (20.5% of revenue), compared to US$17.9 million (23.0% of revenue) in Q2 2024. The decrease was mainly driven by the phasing and ramp-up of new contracts which are typically associated with lower margins, and by one-off costs (US$1.0 million) related to a reorganization in South America.
During the quarter, EBITDA amounted to US$14.0 million (or 20.3% of revenue) compared to US$16.4 million (or 21.0% of revenue) in the previous year.
Net profit for the quarter amounted to US$6.0 million (9% of the revenue) compared to US$7.8 million (10% of revenue) in Q2 2024.
Highlights – H1 2025
Revenue
For the six-month period ending June 30, 2025 (H1 2025), the revenue amounted to US$124 million compared to US$155 million in H1 2024.
Profitability
In H1 2025, the gross margin, inclusive of depreciation within cost of sales, was US$21.9 million (or 18% of revenue), compared to US$34.7 million (or 22% of revenue) in H1 2024.
During H1, EBITDA amounted to US$21.0 million (or 17.0% of revenue), compared to US$34 million (or 21.9% of revenue) for the same period last year.
Free Cash Flow for the period was negative at US$7.1 million, primarily due to working capital needs and capital expenditures required to support the mobilization of new contracts.
Net debt
As of June 30, 2025, net debt, including the impact of IFRS 16, was US$76.5 million, US$69.5 million at constant exchange rates compared to US$78.7 million as of June 30, 2024.
Financial results
Revenue
(In thousands of US$) - (unaudited)
Q2 2025
% change
Q2 2024
H1 2025
% change
H1 2024
Reporting segment
Mining
57,479
-17 %
69,316
101,217
-27 %
138,363
Water
11,584
35 %
8,568
22,856
38 %
16,610
Total revenue
69,063
-11 %
77,884
124,073
-20 %
154,973
Geographic region
Asia-Pacific
24,637
11 %
22,190
45,030
22 %
36,861
North America
25,273
-21 %
32,129
43,372
-27 %
59,151
South America
11,325
-38 %
18,255
21,443
-51 %
43,830
Europe, Middle East and Africa
7,828
47 %
5,310
14,228
-6 %
15,130
Total revenue
69,063
-11 %
77,884
124,073
-20 %
154,973
Q2 2025
Revenue in Q2 2025 was US$69.1 million, compared to US$77.9 million in Q2 2024. At constant exchange rates, revenue decreased by US$5.8 million.
Activity in North America declined by 21% to US$25.3 million in Q2 2025, compared to US$32.1 million in Q2 2024. This decrease was primarily driven by the discontinuation of certain client programs and delays in starting new contracts.
Asia Pacific delivered growth with revenue reaching US$24.7 million, up 11% compared to Q2 2024. This strong performance reflects the ongoing success of operations and the continued commissioning of new proprietary rigs.
Revenue in South America was US$11.3 million, compared to US$18.2 million in Q2 2024. In Chile and Argentina, the Company started new long-term contracts during the quarter, which are currently in the mobilization and learning curve phases, impacting both revenue and margins. In Brazil, operations were affected by disruptions in the mobilization process caused by client-driven delays.
In the EMEA region, revenue was US$7.8 million in Q2 2025, compared to US$5.3 million in Q2 2024. Revenue in Africa and Europe grew by 47%, supported by the start of contracts that are significant for the region.
Overall, rig utilization rate in Q2 2025 was 35% compared to 40% in Q2 2024.
H1 2025
H1 2025 revenue totaled US$124.1 million, down from US$155 million in H1 2024.
In Asia Pacific, the Company's first-largest revenue contributor, H1 2025 revenue amounted to US$45.0 million, marking the best first half ever with a 22% increase compared to H1 2024. This growth is primarily attributable to successful operations and the commissioning of new proprietary rigs.
North America, the Company's second revenue contributor region, declined by 27%, The decrease was primarily due to the discontinuation of certain client programs and delays in starting new contracts.
Revenue in South America totaled US$21.4 million in H1 2025, down 51% from US$43.8 million in H1 2024. In Chile and Argentina, the Company started new long-term contracts during the period, which are currently in the mobilization and learning curve phases, impacting both revenue and margins. In Brazil, the Company was impacted by disruption in the mobilization process due to client-driven delays.
In the EMEA region, revenue slightly decreased by US$0.9 million compared to H1 2024. Excluding the exit from CIS and certain West African countries, the revenue increased by US$4.1 million (41%).
Gross profit
Q2 2025
The Q2 2025 gross margin, including depreciation within cost of sales, was US$14.1 million (20.5% of revenue), or US$15.1 million (21.9% of revenue) when excluding one-off costs, compared to US$17.9 million (23.0% of revenue) in Q2 2024. The decline in the mining segment's gross margin was primarily due to the phasing and ramp-up of new contracts, which are typically associated with lower initial margins. In contrast, gross profit in the water segment was supported by the deployment of new proprietary rigs on long-term contracts.
H1 2025
The H1 2025 gross margin including depreciation within cost of sales was US$21.9 million (or 17.6% of revenue) compared to US$34.7million (or 22.4% of revenue) in H1 2024.
Q2 2025
SG&A expenses were reduced by 19% versus the prior-year quarter. As a percentage of revenue, SG&A improved to 6.8% from 7.4% in Q2 2024.
H1 2025
SG&A decreased 21% compared to last year. As a percentage of revenue, SG&A remained stable at approximately 7.8% of revenue.
Operating result
Q2 2025
The operating profit was US$9.7 million compared to US$12.1 million in the same quarter last year.
Foraco sold its 50% stake in its Kazakh subsidiary, Eastern Drilling Company LLP, generating a net gain of US$289 thousand, which was recorded under "Other Operating Income" in the Company's consolidated financial statements for Q2 2025.
H1 2025
The H1 2025 operating profit was US$12.6 million compared to US$24.7 million in H1 2024.
Financial position
The following table provides a summary of the Company's cash flows for H1 2025 and H1 2024:
In H1 2025, the cash generated from operations before working capital requirements amounted to US$21.0 million compared to US$33.9 million in H1 2024.
During the same period, working capital requirements were US$7.9 million, a decrease compared to the same period last year, primarily driven by tightened control on working capital management and the reduction in activity.
During the period, Capex totaled US$9.8 million in cash compared to US$10.0 million in H1 2024. Capex primarily relates to new rigs, and the acquisition of ancillary equipment and rods to support new contracts.
Strategy
The Company's strategy is to assist its customers in exploring or managing their deposits throughout the entire cycle, with a special focus on the life of mine activity. The Company intends to continue developing and growing its services across the world with a focus on stable jurisdictions, high tech drilling services, optimal commodities mix including battery metals and gold - with a significant presence in water related drilling services - and a gradual implementation of remote-controlled rigs and other advanced digital applications. The Company expects to execute its strategy primarily through organic growth and targeted acquisitions.
The Company addressed the environmental, social and governance (ESG) requirements, and implemented a pragmatic and measurable approach to ESG with quantitative KPIs to maximize improvement and efficiencies.
Currency exchange rates.
The exchange rates for the periods under review are provided in the Management's Discussion and Analysis of Q2 2025.
Non-IFRS measures
EBITDA represents Net income before interest expense, income taxes, depreciation, amortization and non-cash share based compensation expenses. EBITDA is a non-IFRS quantitative measure used to assist in the assessment of the Company's ability to generate cash from its operations. The Company believes that the presentation of EBITDA is useful to investors because it is frequently used by securities analysts, investors and other interested parties in the evaluation of companies in the drilling industry. EBITDA is not defined in IFRS and should not be considered to be an alternative to Profit for the period or Operating profit or any other financial metric required by such accounting principles.
Net debt corresponds to the current and non-current portions of borrowings and the consideration of payables related to acquisitions, net of cash and cash equivalents. The Company's lease obligations are included in the net debt calculation.
Reconciliation of the EBITDA is as follows:
Conference call and webcast
On July 31, 2025, Company Management will conduct a conference call at 10:00 am Eastern Time to review the financial results. The call will be hosted by Tim Bremner, CEO, and Fabien Sevestre, CFO.
You can join the call by dialing 1-888-836-8184 or 1-289-819-1350. You will be put on hold until the conference call begins. A live audio webcast of the Conference Call will also be available
https://app.webinar.net/AZGYQ4dQbXj
An archived replay of the webcast will be available for 90 days.
About Foraco International SA
Foraco International SA (TSX: FAR) is a leading global mineral drilling services company that provides a comprehensive and reliable service offering in mining and water projects. Supported by its founding values of integrity, innovation and involvement, Foraco has grown into the third largest global drilling enterprise with a presence in 16 countries across five continents. For more information about Foraco, visit www.foraco.com.
"Neither TSX Exchange nor its Regulation Services Provider (as that term is defined in the policies of the TSX Exchange) accepts responsibility for the adequacy or accuracy of this release."
Caution concerning forward-looking statements
This document may contain "forward-looking statements" and "forward-looking information" within the meaning of applicable securities laws. These statements and information include estimates, forecasts, information and statements as to Management's expectations with respect to, among other things, the future financial or operating performance of the Company and capital and operating expenditures. Often, but not always, forward-looking statements and information can be identified by the use of words such as "may", "will", "should", "plans", "expects", "intends", "anticipates", "believes", "budget", and "scheduled" or the negative thereof or variations thereon or similar terminology. Forward-looking statements and information are necessarily based upon a number of estimates and assumptions that, while considered reasonable by Management, are inherently subject to significant business, economic and competitive uncertainties and contingencies. Readers are cautioned that any such forward-looking statements and information are not guarantees and there can be no assurance that such statements and information will prove to be accurate and actual results and future events could differ materially from those anticipated in such statements. Important factors that could cause actual results to differ materially from the Company's expectations are disclosed under the heading "Risk Factors" in the Company's Annual Information Form dated March 2, 2025, which is filed with Canadian regulators on SEDAR (www.sedar.com). The Company expressly disclaims any intention or obligation to update or revise any forward-looking statements and information whether as a result of new information, future events or otherwise. All written and oral forward-looking statements and information attributable to Foraco or persons acting on our behalf are expressly qualified in their entirety by the foregoing cautionary statements.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


CBC
a few seconds ago
- CBC
U.S.-Canada trade solution 'easier said than done,' says Toronto steel manufacturer
Rahim Moloo, owner of Conquest Steel, says his company didn't expect that a trade deal between the U.S. and Canada would be reached by the Aug. 1 deadline. He anticipates Canada will 'do the right thing' by finding a way to further develop the Canadian manufacturing sector.


CBC
a few seconds ago
- CBC
Trump didn't chicken out. So what's Canada's next move?
Social Sharing Canada has now learned that the derisive acronym TACO — often slapped on U.S. President Donald Trump — is inaccurate and needs to be tweaked to something more like "Trump (Almost) Always Chickens Out." Despite putting decidedly lower tariffs than he'd threatened on dozens of countries around the globe and giving Mexico a 90-day reprieve from his threat to raise its tariff rate, Trump singled out Canada for an increase. While there's no way that Canada can characterize what happened as a win, there's plenty of evidence that it's not a reason for Prime Minister Mark Carney's government to panic and do something that jeopardizes what really matters for the Canadian economy: tariff-free access to the U.S. for the vast majority of exports. The key evidence backing this perspective comes in the economic number-crunching showing the actual impact of Trump's tariffs on the whole of Canada's exports to the U.S, what's called the effective tariff rate. Think of it as an average, weighted by the value of Canadian goods going across the border. Different economists have slightly different estimates, but even with the increase Trump announced Thursday night, there's consensus the effective tariff rate for Canada is down in the single digits, noticeably lower than the rate for any other major trading partner. That's because despite Trump's bluster, he's allowing the vast majority of Canada's exports into the country with zero tariff under the terms of the Canada-U.S.-Mexico Agreement (CUSMA). WATCH | Canada's talks with Trump administration will continue, says minister of US trade: 'The doors aren't closed' LeBlanc says on Canada-U.S. trade deal 3 hours ago Dominic LeBlanc, the minister responsible for Canada-U.S. trade, tells CBC News that despite an overnight hike in tariffs on some Canadian goods by U.S. President Donald Trump, Ottawa is still negotiating with Washington and that LeBlanc expects talks to continue next week. LeBlanc was speaking outside the Canadian embassy in Washington, D.C. Experts and business leaders say Canada's trade negotiators and federal government need to be laser focused on maintaining that tariff-free access through CUSMA, especially since the deal is soon up for review. Goldy Hyder, president and CEO of the Business Council of Canada, says a bigger issue than Trump's incremental increase of the tariffs is the way Canada is struggling to "find a way forward" in its negotiations with the U.S. 'The conversation that we should be having' "I am hoping this is an opportunity to reassess and to some extent reset where we are and where we need to get to for the longer haul," Hyder told CBC's Katie Simpson in an interview Friday. While Hyder says he has empathy for Carney's government as it tries to navigate the uncharted waters of dealing with Trump 2.0 on trade, he's questioning whether its negotiating strategy has been aimed at the correct target. Canada must assess what it needs to do "to get into the conversation that we should be having, which is first and foremost: how are we going to review and renew the USMCA?" Hyder said, using the U.S. government's preferred acronym for the trade deal. The text of CUSMA calls for a formal review starting in July 2026, but consultations between the three countries are expected to begin this fall. As Trump levies blanket tariffs on nearly every other major trading partner, observers are increasingly pointing to the big tariff exemptions Canada is getting from CUSMA as a major competitive advantage. That creates a rather hefty source of motivation for the Carney government to make solidifying CUSMA the long-term goal of its talks with the Trump administration. The eternal question: Trump's real motivation for the tariffs On the other side of the border, there's a view that a significant driving force behind Trump's tariff tactics with Canada is gaining leverage in those CUSMA renewal talks. Although Department of Justice lawyers have been arguing in court that stopping the flow of fentanyl from Canada — as minimal as it is — justifies the tariffs, trade policy expert Inu Manak of the Council for Foreign Relations in Washington, D.C., says she believes there's no way that's really what's motivating Trump. "I do think a lot of this has to do with some sort of renegotiation of parts of the CUSMA deal that the Trump administration is not happy with," Manak told CBC News Network on Friday. Although Trump hit Canada with a tariff increase, Manak isn't criticizing Canada's negotiating tactics. "There's no really good way to go about doing this," she said. "We've seen variation in approaches and no matter what, everyone seems to be getting hit with tariffs." WATCH | Breaking down the winners and loser in Trump's tariff gambit: Win, lose or tariff? Playing Trump's trade deal game 20 hours ago CUSMA and its tariff-free access must remain the focus for Canada, says John Manley, a former Liberal deputy prime minister, now chair of chair of Jefferies Securities, a global investment banking firm. "The big game is the 93 per cent of Canadian goods that cross the border currently tariff-free under USMCA," Manley told CBC News. "That is what we need to protect." To retaliate or not? Even if the CUSMA renegotiation is what matters most in the long term for Canada, the Carney government also has to think about what its immediate next steps should be. Perhaps the most immediate question along those lines for Ottawa is whether to retaliate or not. Brian Clow, who served as former prime minister Justin Trudeau's deputy chief of staff and led his "war room" on Canada-U.S. trade relations, describes himself as a fan of retaliation, but is not advocating for Carney to fire back at Trump in this instance. "I do think [Carney and his team] need to stop and consider whether to further retaliate right now, given Canada is standing on its own, and the rest of the world is not standing with us," Clow said Friday in an interview with CBC News. WATCH | Should Carney hit back? Here's what a former PMO insider thinks: Canada is the only country in the world to be hit immediately by U.S. President Donald Trump's tariffs. Brian Clow, former deputy chief of staff for Justin Trudeau, says part of the reason Canada is being singled out is because it was one of only two countries to stand up to Trump — and 'the world made a mistake' by not retaliating. Carney's government also needs to think about what it can do about the tariffs that are actually having the biggest impact on Canada right now: the sectoral tariffs of 50 per cent on steel and aluminum and 25 per cent on the non-U.S. content of assembled automobiles. "Maybe there's one more step towards the American ask that we can take — that we can live with — that can close this deal," Clow said. The signals from Carney's team suggest the plan is to keep on keeping on. Dominic LeBlanc, the minister responsible for Canada-U.S. trade, said Friday that he and Commerce Secretary Howard Lutnick, Trump's point man on tariffs, agreed to speak by phone next week and arrange for a meeting later in August. "We'll continue to talk to the Americans," LeBlanc told reporters in Washington. "The United States will continue to be our neighbour, continue to be our most important economic and security partner." Both LeBlanc in his scrum and Carney in his statement acknowledged the need for the government to help the steel, aluminum and auto sectors. Getting carve-outs or reductions of those tariffs will no doubt be an objective as the talks with Team Trump progress.


CBC
28 minutes ago
- CBC
How should Canada respond to U.S. tariff increase?
As U.S. President Donald Trump bumps up import tariffs on non-CUSMA-compliant Canadian goods to 35 per cent, the Power & Politics panel of party insiders discusses how Canada should respond and whether there should be an expiration date on negotiations.